Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering

, Volume 31, Issue 4, pp 323–327 | Cite as

Comparing the effect of immobilization methods on the activity of lipase biocatalysts in ester hydrolysis

  • L. Costa
  • V. Brissos
  • F. Lemos
  • F. Ramôa Ribeiro
  • J. M. S. Cabral
Original Paper

Abstract

The activity of various lipases was compared, in both free and immobilized forms, using the kinetics of the hydrolysis reaction of p-nitrophenyl butyrate, which was followed with in situ UV/Vis diode array spectrophotometry. Several enzymes were used to catalyze the reaction, namely Candida antarctica lipase B and Fusarium solani pisi cutinase wildtype and three single-mutation variants. The enzymes were tested in three different forms: free, immobilized as cross-linked aggregates and supported on zeolite NaY. A simple kinetic model was used to allow a quantitative comparison of the behavior of the different catalysts. It was concluded that although immobilization reduces the activity of the enzyme, the zeolite offers a much higher specific activity when compared to the cross-linked aggregates, thus supplying a heterogeneous catalyst with promising catalytic properties.

Keywords

Lipases Zeolite NaY Kinetic modeling Diode array spectrophotometry Spectral deconvolution 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully thank Novozymes A/S (Denmark) for the kind gifts of Novozym® 435 and Lipozyme® CALB L. L. Costa and V. Brissos acknowledge Ph.D. grants (SFRH/BD/19108/2004 and SFRH/BD/9019/2002) from Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia.

References

  1. 1.
    Hasan F, Shah AA, Hameed A (2006) Industrial applications of microbial lipases. Enzyme Microb Technol 39:235–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sharma R, Chisti Y, Banerjee UC (2001) Production, purification, characterization and applications of lipases. Biotechnol Adv 19:627–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Klibanov AM (2001) Improving enzymes by using them in organic solvents. Nature 409:241–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jaeger K-E, Eggert T (2002) Lipases for biotechnology. Curr Opin Biotechnol 13:390–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gupta MN, Roy I (2004) Enzymes in organic media. Eur J Biochem 271:2575–2583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gotor-Fernández V, Brieva R, Gotor V (2006) Lipases: useful biocatalysts for the preparation of pharmaceuticals. J Mol Catal B: Enzym 40:111–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ghanem A (2007) Trends in lipase-catalyzed asymmetric access to enantiomerically pure/enriched compounds. Tetrahedron 63:1721–1754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang N, Suen W-C, Windsor W, Xiao L, Madison V, Zaks A (2003) Improving tolerance of Candida antarctica lipase B towards irreversible thermal inactivation through directed evolution. Protein Eng 16:599–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Svendsen A (2000) Lipase protein engineering. Biochim Biophys Acta Prot Struct Mol Enzym 1543:223–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ema T, Fujii T, Ozaki M, Korenaga T, Sakai T (2005) Rational control of enantioselectivity of lipase by site-directed mutagenesis based on the mechanism. Chem Commun 37:4650–4651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bornscheuer UT (2003) Immobilizing enzymes: how to create more suitable biocatalysts. Angew Chem Int Ed 42:3336–3337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gonçalves APV, Lopes JM, Lemos F, Ramôa Ribeiro F, Prazeres DMF, Cabral JMS, Aires-Barros MR (1996) Zeolites as supports for enzymatic hydrolysis reactions. Comparative study of several zeolites. J Mol Catal B: Enzym 1:53–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gonçalves APV, Lopes JM, Lemos F, Ramôa Ribeiro F, Prazeres DMF, Cabral JMS, Aires-Barros MR (1997) Effect of the immobilization support on the hydrolytic activity of a cutinase from Fusarium solani pisi. Enzyme Microb Technol 20:93–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Serralha FN, Lopes JM, Aires-Barros MR, Prazeres DMF, Cabral JMS, Lemos F, Ramôa Ribeiro F (2002) Stability of a recombinant cutinase immobilized on zeolites. Enzyme Microb Technol 31:29–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mateo C, Palomo JM, Fernandez-Lorente G, Guisan JM, Fernandez-Lafuente R (2007) Improvement of enzyme activity, stability and selectivity via immobilization techniques. Enzyme Microb Technol 40:1451–1463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Serralha FN, Lopes JM, Lemos F, Ramôa Ribeiro F, Prazeres DMF, Aires-Barros MR, Cabral JMS (2004) Application of factorial design to the study of an alcoholysis transformation promoted by cutinase immobilized on NaY zeolite and Accurel PA6. J Mol Catal B: Enzym 27:19–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Illanes A, Wilson L, Altamirano C, Cabrera Z, Alvarez L, Aguirre C (2007) Production of cephalexin in organic medium at high substrate concentrations with CLEA of penicillin acylase and PGA-450. Enzyme Microb Technol 40:195–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mateo C, Chmura A, Rustler S, van Rantwijk F, Stolz A, Sheldon RA (2006) Synthesis of enantiomerically pure (S)-mandelic acid using an oxynitrilase-nitrilase bienzymatic cascade: a nitrilase surprisingly shows nitrile hydratase activity. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 17:320–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sheldon RA, Schoevaart R, van Langen LM (2005) Cross-linked enzyme aggregates (CLEAs): a novel and versatile method for enzyme immobilization (a review). Biocatal Biotransform 23:141–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brissos V (2006) In vitro evolution of lipolytic enzymes—stabilization of cutinase against surfactants. Ph.D. thesis, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa, Lisbon, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lauwereys M, De Geus P, De Meutter J, Stanssens P, Mathyssens G (1990) Cloning, expression and characterization of cutinase, a fungal lipolytic enzyme. In: Alberghirna L, Schmidt RD, Verger R (eds) Lipases structure, mechanism and genetic engineering, vol. 16. GBF Monographs, BraunschwergGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Carvalho CML, Aires-Barros MR, Cabral JMS (1999) Cutinase: from molecular level to bioprocess development. Biotechnol Bioeng 66:17–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    López-Serrano P, Cao L, van Rantwijk F, Sheldon RA (2002) Cross-linked enzyme aggregates with enhanced activity: application to lipases. Biotechnol Lett 24:1379–1383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265–275Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Costa L, Brissos V, Lemos F, Ramôa Ribeiro F, Cabral JMS (2007) Following multi-component reactions in liquid medium using spectral deconvolution techniques. Book of Abstracts 8th European Congress on Catalysis, Europacat VIII, Turku, Finland, 2007Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mei Y, Miller L, Gao W, Gross RA (2003) Imaging the distribution and secondary structure of immobilized enzymes using infrared microspectroscopy. Biomacromolecules 4:70–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gonçalves AM, Serro AP, Aires-Barros MR, Cabral JMS (2000) Effects of ionic surfactants used in reversed micelles on cutinase activity and stability. Biochim Biophys Acta 1480:92–106Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gonçalves AM, Aires-Barros MR, Cabral JMS (2003) Interaction of an anionic surfactant with a recombinant cutinase from Fusarium solani pisi: a spectroscopic study. Enzyme Microb Technol 32:868–879Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Costa
    • 1
  • V. Brissos
    • 1
  • F. Lemos
    • 1
  • F. Ramôa Ribeiro
    • 1
  • J. M. S. Cabral
    • 1
  1. 1.IBB—Institute for Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Centre for Biological and Chemical EngineeringInstituto Superior TécnicoLisboaPortugal

Personalised recommendations