Advertisement

Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering

, Volume 26, Issue 6, pp 361–375 | Cite as

Solvent toxicity in organic-aqueous systems analysed by multivariate analysis

  • Carla C. C. R. de Carvalho
  • M. Manuela R. da Fonseca
Original paper

Abstract

The effect of several solvents present in a biphasic reaction system on cells of Rhodococcus erythropolis DCL14, Xanthobacter Py2, Arthrobacter simplex and Mycobacterium sp. NRRL B-3805 was evaluated. These four strains have been widely exploited, from bioremediation to the production of fine chemicals, in two-phase reaction media. The solvents tested were ethyl butyrate, n-hexane, cyclohexane, iso-octane, n-dodecane, DMSO, bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate and fluorinert FC-70. The cell population was monitored by fluorescence microscopy and analysis of the images captured provided single-cell-level information on cell viability, morphological factors of both viable and non-viable cells, and on the number of viable cells in clusters. These data, and those concerning the initial carveol concentration, the carbon source used during growth, the adaptation time to the solvent prior to substrate addition, and the properties of the organic solvent, were interpreted using principal components analysis (PCA). For R. erythropolis, X. Py2, and A. simplex, between 70.1 and 80.4% of the variability of the data could be explained by six principal components, while 86.7% of the variance in the results obtained with Mycobacterium sp. could be represented by seven principal components. In all cases, solvent toxicity could explain over a third of the variability in the data. R. erythropolis cells were able to maintain their viability under harsh conditions. A period of contact between cells and solvent, prior to the addition of substrate, was prejudicial for R. erythropolis and A. simplex cells, at least for the most toxic solvents, but was beneficial for X. Py2 cells. The number of Mycobacterium sp. cells in clusters was lower after an adaptation period compared to the number of cells in aggregates when the substrate was added at time zero. The substrates transformed by R. erythropolis and A. simplex cells increased the toxicity of the system by decreasing the log P of the reaction mixture. Hydrocortisone was responsible for a reduction in the ability of A. simplex to respond to stress conditions. Mycobacterium sp. cells were apparently unaffected by β-sitosterol. The results obtained are useful for the design of more efficient two-phase reaction systems where solvent toxicity may be overcome in order to increase cell productivity.

Keywords

PCA Cell behaviour Bacteria Organic solvent Cell morphology Viability 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank: Prof. Marie-Nöelle Pons from the CNRS, Nancy, France, for the development of the image analysis programs to be used with Visilog 5; the French Embassy in Lisbon for financing C. Carvalho during a 1-month project in the Laboratoire des Sciences du Génie Chimique, Nancy, France, for the development of the image analysis programs; A. Cruz, P. Fernandes and F. van Keulen for providing resting cells of Mycobacterium sp., A. simplex and Xanthobacter PY2, respectively.This study was partially supported by a PhD. grant (PRAXIS XXI/BD/21574/99) awarded to Carla da C. C. R. de Carvalho by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Portugal.

References

  1. 1.
    Heipieper HJ, de Bont JAM (1994) Adaptation of Pseudomonas putida S12 to ethanol and toluene at the level of fatty acid composition of membranes. Appl Environ Microbiol 60(2):4440–4444PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Morbach S, Kramer R (2002) Body shaping under water stress: osmosensing and osmoregulation of solute transport in bacteria. Chembiochem 3(5):384–397CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    de Carvalho CCCR, da Fonseca MMR (2002) Maintenance of cell viability in the biotransformation of (-)-carveol with whole cells of Rhodococcus erythropolis. J Mol Catal B–Enzym 19(20C):389–398Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    de Carvalho CCCR, van Keulen F, da Fonseca MMR (2000) Production and recovery of limonene-1,2-diol and simultaneous resolution of a diastereomeric mixture of limonene-1,2-epoxide with whole cells of Rhodococcus erythropolis DCL14. Biocatal Biotransfor 18:223–235Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    van Keulen F, da Fonseca MMR (1994) Batch cultivation of Xanthobacter Py2 on 1-pentene: growth yield and cell activity for the degradation of 1,2-epoxyhexane. Biotechnol Lett 16:989–994Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fernandes P, Cabral JMS, Pinheiro HM (1995) Bioconversion of hydrocortisone derivative in an organic-aqueous two-liquid-phase system. Enzyme Microb Tech 17:163–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cruz A, Fernandes P, Cabral JMS, Pinheiro HM (2001) Whole cell bioconversion of β-sitosterol in aqueous:organic two phase system. J Mol Catal B–Enzym 11:579–585Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Laane C, Boeren S, Vos K, Veeger C (1987) Rules for optimization of biocatalysis in organic solvents. Biotechnol Bioeng 30:81–87Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    van der Werf MJ, van der Ven C, Barbirato F, Eppink MHM, de Bont JAM, van Berkel JH (1999) Stereoselective carveol dehydrogenase from Rhodococcus erythropolis DCL14. J Biol Chem 274(37):26296–26304CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    de Carvalho CCCR, da Fonseca MMR (2002) Influence of reactor configuration on the production of carvone from carveol by whole cells of Rhodococcus erythropolis DCL14. J Mol Catal B–Enzym 19(20C):377–387Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Davey HM, Kell DB (1996) Flow cytometry and cell sorting of heterogeneous microbial populations: the importance of single-cell analyses. Microbiol Rev 60(4):641–696Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wiegant WM, de Bont JAM (1980) A new route for ethylene glycol metabolism in Mycobacterium E44. J Gen Microbiol 120:325–331Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Everitt BS, Dunn G (1992) Applied multivariate data analysis. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kaiser HF (1960) The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ Psychol Meas 20:141–151Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carla C. C. R. de Carvalho
    • 1
  • M. Manuela R. da Fonseca
    • 1
  1. 1.Centro de Engenharia Biológica e QuímicaInstituto Superior TécnicoLisboaPortugal

Personalised recommendations