Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 271–282 | Cite as

Addressing a whole bioprocess in real-time using an optical biosensor-formation, recovery and purification of antibody fragments from a recombinant E. coli host

Original Paper

Abstract

The use of biosensor technology is described to address in real-time the production and subsequent purification of a bioactive recombinant protein product. The product, D1.3 Fv antibody fragment, was expressed in Escherichia coli and purified via two process routes, one for extracellular and one for intracellular product material. The cells were harvested by centrifugation in a solid bowl CARR Powerfuge and stored at −70°C. Clarification of the supernatant was performed by depth filtration, followed by affinity chromatography for final purification of the extracellular product. To purify the intracellular product the harvested cells were resuspended and homogenised. Removal of debris in the CARR Powerfuge was followed by depth filtration and affinity chromatography. In this work we have shown the rapid determination of bioactive product levels, and the impact this has on improved accountability and confidence is demonstrated in process mass balances on the product using the data acquired during process operation.

Keywords

Bioprocess monitoring Biosensor Antibody fragments Rapid monitoring 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The support by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) for the Innovative Manufacturing Research Centre (IMRC) for Bioprocessing is gratefully acknowledged. The IMRC is part of the Advanced Centre for Biochemical Engineering at UCL, and the support of the collaborating companies is also gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    Von Stockar U, Van der Wielen LAM (1997) Thermodynamics in biochemical engineering. J Biotechnol 59:25–37Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bracewell DG, Gill A, Hoare M, Lowe PA, Maule CH (1998) An optical biosensor for real-time chromatography monitoring: Breakthrough determination. Biosens Bioelectron 13:847–853Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Varga E, Titchener-Hooker NJ, Dunnill P (2001) Prediction of the pilot scale recovery of recombinant yeast enzyme using integrated models. Biotechnol Bioeng 74:96–107Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boychyn M, Doyle W, Bulmer M, More J, Hoare M (2000) Laboratory scale-down of protein purification processes involving fractional precipitation and centrifugal recovery. Biotechnol Bioeng 69:1–10Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pate ME, Thornhill NF, Turner MK, Titchener-Hooker NJ (1999) The use of principal component analysis for the modelling of high performance liquid chromatography. Bioprocess Engineering 21:261–272Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Glassey J, Iganova M, Ward AC, Montague GA, Morris AJ (1997) Bioprocess supervision: Neural networks and knowledge based systems. J Biotechnol 52:201–205Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schugerl K (2001) Progress in monitoring, modelling and control of bioprocesses during the last 20 years. J Biotechnol 85:149–173Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Richardson P, Molloy J, Ravenhall R, Holwill I, Hoare M, Dunnill P (1996) High speed centrifugal separator for rapid on-line sample clarification in biotechnology. J Biotechnol 49:111–118Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Habib GB, Holwill I, Hoare M (1997) Rapid piloting of a selective flocculation process for product purification. J Biotechnol 59:91–101Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Willoughby NA, Habib G, Hjorth R, Hoare M, Titchener-Hooker NJ (2000) The use of rapid on-line monitoring of products and contaminants from within an expanded bed to control separations exhibiting fast breakthrough characteristics and to maximise productivity. Biotechnol Bioeng 70:254–261Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Middendorf C, Schulze B, Freitag R, Scheper T, Howaldt M, Hoffmann H (1993) On-line immunoanalysis for bioprocess control. J Biotechnol 31:395–403Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ozturk SS, Thrift JC, Blackie JD, Naveh D (1995) Real-time monitoring of protein secretion in mammalian cell fermentation: Measurement of monoclonal antibodies using a computer-controlled HPLC system (BioCAD/RPM). Biotechnol Bioeng 48:201–206Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Polzius R, Bier FF, Bilitewski U, Jager V, Schmid RD (1993) On-line monitoring of monoclonal antibodies in animal cell culture using a grating coupler. Biotechnol Bioeng 42:1287–1292Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Osborne M, Bracewell D, Dempsey J, Field R, Fish B, Rithie C (2001) Rapid estimation of human monoclonal antibody (IgG4) concentration in cell culture supernatants. In: Lindner-Olsson E, Chatzissavidou N, Lullau E (eds) Animal cell technology: From target to market. Kluwer pp 463–465Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gill A, Bracewell DG, Maule CH, Lowe PA, Hoare M (1998) Bioprocess monitoring: An optical biosensor for rapid bioproduct analysis. J Biotechnol 65:69–80Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bowering LC, Bracewell DG, Keshavarz-Moore E, Hoare M, Weir ANC (2002) Comparison of techniques for monitoring antibody fragment production in E.coli fermentation cultures. Biotechnol Prog 18:1431–1438Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bracewell DG, Gill A, Hoare M (2002) An in-line flow injection optical biosensor for real-time bioprocess monitoring. Trans Inst Chem Eng 80(C):71–77Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bracewell DG, Brown RA, Gill A, Hoare M (2001) Monitoring and control of bioproducts from conception to production in real-time using an optical biosensor. Eng Life Sci 1:25–31Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ryan W, Parulekar SJ, Stark BC (1989) Expression of β-lactamase by recombinant Escherichia coli strains containing plasmids of different sizes-effects of pH, phosphate and dissolved oxygen. Biotechnol Bioeng 34:309–319Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gregory ME, Turner C (1993) Open-loop control of specific growth rate in fed-batch cultures of recombinant E. coli. Biotechnol Tech 7:889–894Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ward ES, Gussow D, Griffiths AD, Jones PT, Winter G (1989) Binding activities of a repertoire of single immunoglobulin variable domains secreted from Escherichia coli. Nature 341:544–546Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Holwill I, Gill A, Harrison J, Hoare M, Lowe PA (1996) Rapid analysis of biosensor data using initial rate determination and its application to bioprocess monitoring. Process Control Qual 8:133–145Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Harrison JS, Keshavarz-Moore E, Dunnill P, Berry MJ, Fellinger A, Frenken L (1997) Factors affecting the fermentative production of a lysozyme-binding antibody fragment to Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Bioeng 53:612–622Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Souzu H (1980) Studies on the damage to Escherichia coli cell membrane caused by different rates of freeze-thawing. Biochim Biophys Acta: Biomembranes 603:13–26Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Clarkson AI, Lefevre P, Titchener-Hooker NJ (1993) A study of process interactions between cell disruption and debris clarification stages in the recovery of yeast intracellular products. Biotechnol Prog 9:462–467Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wong HH, O’Neill BK, Middelberg AJP (1997) A mathematical model for Escherichia coli debris size reduction during high pressure homogenisation based on grinding theory. Chem Eng Sci 52:2883–2890Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bracewell DG, Gill A, Hoare M (2002) An in-line flow injection optical biosensor for real-time bioprocess monitoring. Trans Inst Chem Eng 80(C):71–77Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bailey JE, Ollis D (1986) Biochemical engineering fundamentals, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IMRC for Bioprocessing, The Advanced Centre for Biochemical EngineeringDepartment of Biochemical Engineering, University College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations