Monte Carlo simulation of the α-amylolysis of amylopectin potato starch. 2. α-amylolysis of amylopectin
A model is presented that describes all the saccharides that are produced during the hydrolysis of starch by an α-amylase. Potato amylopectin, the substrate of the hydrolysis reaction, was modeled in a computer matrix. The four different subsite maps presented in literature for α-amylase originating from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens were used to describe the hydrolysis reaction in a Monte Carlo simulation. The saccharide composition predicted by the model was evaluated with experimental values. Overall, the model predictions were acceptable, but no single subsite map gave the best predictions for all saccharides produced. The influence of an α(1→6) linkage on the rate of hydrolysis of nearby α(1→4) linkages by the α-amylase was evaluated using various inhibition constants. For all the subsites considered the use of inhibition constants led to an improvement in the predictions (a decrease of residual sum of squares), indicating the validity of inhibition constants as such. As without inhibition constants, no single subsite map gave the best fit for all saccharides. The possibility of generating a hypothetical subsite map by fitting was therefore investigated. With a genetic algorithm it was possible to construct hypothetical subsite maps (with inhibition constants) that gave further improvements in the average prediction for all saccharides. The advantage of this type of modeling over a regular fit is the additional information about all the saccharides produced during hydrolysis, including the ones that are difficult to measure experimentally.
KeywordsMonte Carlo Starch Hydrolysis Alpha-amylase Saccharides
The authors thank Stoffer Rustebiel (Avebe) for performing the HPLC analysis. Avebe and the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs (PBTS-Biotechnology Project No. BIO94043) funded this research.
- 1.Marchal LM, Zondervan J, Bergsma J, Beeftink HH, Tramper J (2001) Monte Carlo simulation of the α-amylolysis of amylopectin potato starch. 1. Modeling of the structure of amylopectin. Bioproc Biosys Eng 24:163–170Google Scholar
- 3.Torgerson EM, Brewer LC, Thoma JA (1979) Subsite mapping of enzymes. Use of subsite map to simulate complete time course of hydrolysis of a polymer substrate. Archs Biochem Biophys 196:13–22Google Scholar
- 6.Thoma JA, Rao CV, Brothers CE, Spradlin JE (1971) Subsite mapping of enzymes. Biochem J 246:5621–5635Google Scholar
- 11.Chipman DM, Sharon N (1970) Mechanism of lysozyme action. Science. 165:454–465Google Scholar
- 12.Gurney RW (1953) Ionic processes in solution. McGraw-Hill, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 14.Marchal LM, Tramper J (1999) Hydrolytic gain during hydrolysis reactions: implications and correction procedures. Biotechnol Tech 13:325–328Google Scholar
- 15.Hizukuri S (1996) Starch: analytical aspects. In: Eliasson AC (ed) Carbohydrates in food. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 347–429Google Scholar
- 17.Banzhaf W, Nordin P, Keller RE, Francone FD (1998) Genetic programming, an introduction. Morgan Kaufmann, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
- 18.Gidley MJ (1985) Quantification of the structural features of starch polysaccharides by NMR spectroscopy. Carbohydr Res 139:85–93Google Scholar