Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 93–101 | Cite as

Conversion of paper sludge to ethanol in a semicontinuous solids-fed reactor

  • Zhiliang Fan
  • Colin South
  • Kimberly Lyford
  • Jeffery Munsie
  • Peter van Walsum
  • Lee R. Lynd
Original Paper


Conversion of paper sludge to ethanol was investigated with the objective of operating under conditions approaching those expected of an industrial process. Major components of the bleached Kraft sludge studied were glucan (62 wt.%, dry basis), xylan (11.5%), and minerals (17%). Complete recovery of glucose during compositional analysis required two acid hydrolysis treatments rather than one. To avoid the difficulty of mixing unreacted paper sludge, a semicontinuous solids-fed laboratory bioreactor system was developed. The system featured feeding at 12-h intervals, a residence time of 4 days, and cellulase loading of 15 to 20 FPU/g cellulose. Sludge was converted to ethanol using simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) featuring a β-glucosidase-supplemented commercial cellulase preparation and glucose fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiea. SSF was carried out for a period of 4 months in a first-generation system, resulting in an average ethanol concentration of 35 g/L. However, steady state was not achieved and operational difficulties were encountered. These difficulties were avoided in a retrofitted design that was operated for two 1-month runs, achieving steady state with good material balance closure. Run 1 with the retrofitted reactor produced 50 g/L ethanol at a cellulose conversion of 74%. Run 2 produced 42 g/L ethanol at a conversion of 92%. For run 2, the ethanol yield was 0.466 g ethanol/g glucose equivalent fermented and >94% of the xylan fed to the reactor was solubilized to a mixture of xylan oligomers and xylose.


Paper sludge Ethanol Semicontinuous bioreactor 



This study was partially supported by the Consortium for Plant Biotechnology Research (grant no. OR22072-111) and the State of New Hampshire Governor’s Office of Energy and Community Services (grant no. 622188).


  1. 1.
    (1994) Agenda 2020: A technology vision and research agenda for America’s forest, wood, and paper industry. American Forest and Paper Association, Washington, DC, USAGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    (1999) Technical bulletin no 793, Solid waste management and disposal practices in the US paper industry. NCASI, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Duff SJB, Moritz JW, Anderson KL (1994) Simultaneous hydrolysis and fermentation of pulp mill primary clarifier sludge. Can J Chem Eng 72:1013–1020Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Duff SJB, Moritz JW, Casavant TE (1995) Effect of surfactant and particle size reduction on hydrolysis of deinking sludge and nonrecyclable new print. Biotechnol Bioeng 45:239–244Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jeffries TW, Schartman R (1999) Bioconversion of secondary fiber fines to ethanol using counter-current enzymatic saccharification and co-fermentation. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 77–79:435–444Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Katzen R, Fowler DE (1994) Ethanol from lignocellulosic wastes with utilization of recombinant bacteria. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 45/46:697–707Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lark N, Xia Y, Qin CG, Gong CS, Tsao GT (1997) Production of ethanol from recycled paper sludge using cellulase and yeast, Kluveromyces Marxianus. Biomass Bioenergy 12:135–143Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lynd LR, Lyford K, South CR, van Walsum P, Levenson K (2001) Evaluation of paper sludge for amenability to enzymatic hydrolysis and conversion to ethanol. TAPPI J 84:50–55Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, van Zyl WH, Pretorius IS (2002) Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 66:506–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lynd LR (1996) Overview and evaluation of fuel ethanol from cellulosic biomass: technology, economics, the environment and policy. Annu Rev Energy Environ 21:403–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kadam KL, Newman MM (1997) Development of a low-cost fermentation medium for ethanol production from biomass. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 47:625–629PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    (1995) Chemical analysis and testing laboratory analytical procedures. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, USAGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lynd LR, Grethlein HG, Wolkin RH (1989) Fermentation of cellulosic substrate in batch and continuous culture by Clostridium thermocellum. Appl Environ Microbiol 55:3131–3139Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    South CR, Hogsett DAL, Lynd LR (1995) Modeling simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of lignocellulose to ethanol in batch and continuous reactors. Enzyme Microb Technol 17:797–803Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    (1993) Assessment of costs and benefits of flexible and alternative fuel use in the US. Transportation sector, technology report. 2. Evaluation of a wood to ethanol process. US Department of Energy DOE/EP-000Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lynd LR, Elander RT, Wyman CE (1996) Likely features and cost of mature biomass ethanol technology. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 57/58:741–761Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wooley R, Ruth M, Glassner D, Sheehan J (1999) Process design and costing of bioethanol technology: a tool for determining the status and direction of future research and development. Biotechnol Prog 15:794–803Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ho NWY, Chen Z, Brainard AP (1998) Genetically engineered Saccharomyces yeast capable of effective cofermentation of glucose and xylose. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:1852–1859PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ingram LO, Gomez PF, Lai X, Moniruzzaman M, Wood BE, Yomano LP, York SW (1998) Metabolic engineering of bacteria for ethanol production. Biotechnol Bioeng 58:204–214Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang M, Eddy C, Deanda K, Finkestein M, Picataggio S (1995) Metabolic engineering of a pentose metabolism pathway in ethanologenic Zymomonous mobilis. Science 267:240–243Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhiliang Fan
    • 1
  • Colin South
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kimberly Lyford
    • 1
  • Jeffery Munsie
    • 1
  • Peter van Walsum
    • 1
    • 3
  • Lee R. Lynd
    • 1
  1. 1.Chemical and Biochemical Engineering Program, Thayer School of EngineeringDartmouth CollegeHanoverUSA
  2. 2.ViaLactia BiosciencesAucklandNew Zealand
  3. 3.Department of Environmental StudiesBaylor UniversityWacoUSA

Personalised recommendations