Advertisement

Bulletin of Volcanology

, 81:22 | Cite as

Experimental constraints on the textures and origin of obsidian pyroclasts

  • James E. GardnerEmail author
  • Fabian B. Wadsworth
  • Edward W. Llewellin
  • James M. Watkins
  • Jason P. Coumans
Research Article

Abstract

Obsidian pyroclasts are commonly preserved in the fall deposits of explosive silicic eruptions. Recent work has suggested that they form by sintering of ash particles on the conduit walls above the fragmentation depth and are subsequently torn out and transported in the gas-particle dispersion. Although the sintering hypothesis is consistent with the general vesicle textures and dissolved volatiles in obsidian pyroclasts, previous sintering experiments do not capture all of the textural complexities observed in the natural pyroclasts. Here, we design experiments in which unimodal and bimodal distributions of rhyolitic ash are sintered at temperatures and H2O pressures relevant to shallow volcanic conduits and under variable cooling rates. The experiments produce dense, welded obsidian that have a range of textures similar to those observed in natural pyroclasts. We find that using a unimodal distribution of particles produces obsidian with evenly distributed trapped vesicles, while a bimodal initial particle distribution produces obsidian with domains of poorly vesicular glass among domains of more vesicle-rich glass. We also find that slow cooling leads to resorption of trapped vesicles, producing fully dense obsidian. These broad features match those found in obsidian pyroclasts from the North Mono (California, USA) rhyolite eruption, providing strong support to the hypothesis that obsidian can be produced by ash sintering above the fragmentation depth during explosive eruptions.

Keywords

Obsidian Ash Sinter Volatile Explosive eruption 

Notes

Acknowledgements

JEG and JMW were partially supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (EAR–1725186 and EAR–1725207). EWL and JPC acknowledge support from the UK Natural Environment Research Council via grant NE/N002954/1. FBW acknowledges a fellowship from the Centre for Advanced Study at the Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich. All data from the study can be obtained from JEG. The authors thank two anonymous reviewers and the Associate Editor for their insights, which have improved the manuscript.

References

  1. Alfano F, Bonadonna C, Watt S, Connor C, Volentik A, Pyle DM (2016) Reconstruction of total grain size distribution of the climactic phase of a long-lasting eruption: the example of the 2008–2013 Chaitén eruption. Bull Volcanol 78:46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bonadonna C, Houghton BF (2005) Total grain-size distribution and volume of tephra-fall deposits. Bull Volcanol 67(5):441–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cabrera A, Weinberg RF, Wright HMN, Zlotnik S, Cas RAF (2011) Melt fracturing and healing: a mechanism for degassing and origin of silicic obsidian. Geology 39:67–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Castro JM, Cordonnier B, Tuffen H, Tobin MJ, Puskar L, Martin MC (2012) The role of melt-fracture degassing in defusing explosive rhyolite eruptions at Volcán Chaitén. Earth Planet Sci Lett 333-334:63–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Castro JM, Bindeman IN, Tuffen H, Schipper CI (2014) Explosive origin of silicic lava: textural and δD–H2O evidence for pyroclastic degassing during rhyolite effusion. Earth Planet Sci Lett 405:52–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dunbar NW, Kyle PR (1992) Volatile contents of obsidian clasts in tephra from the Taupo Volcanic Zone, New Zealand: implications to eruptive processes. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 49:127–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eichelberger JC, Carrigan CR, Westrich HR, Price RH (1986) Non-explosive silicic volcanism. Nature 323:598–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elam WT, Kerstein AR, Rehr JJ (1984) Critical properties of the void percolation problem for spheres. Phys Rev Lett 52(17):1516–1519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gardner JE (2007) Bubble coalescence in rhyolitic melts during decompression from high pressure. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 166:161–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gardner JE, Ketcham RA (2011) Bubble nucleation in rhyolite and dacite melts: temperature dependence of surface tension. Contrib Mineral Petrol 162:929–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gardner JE, Llewellin EW, Watkins JM, Befus KS (2017) Formation of obsidian pyroclasts by sintering of ash particles in the volcanic conduit. Earth Planet Sci Lett 459:252–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gardner JE, Wadsworth FB, Llewellin EW, Watkins JM, Coumans JP (2018) Experimental sintering of ash at conduit conditions and implications for the longevity of tuffisites. Bull Volcanol 80:23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gonnermann HM, Manga M (2005a) Nonequilibrium magma degassing: results from modeling of the ca. 1340 AD eruption of Mono Craters, California. Earth Planet Sci Lett 238(1):1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gonnermann HM, Manga M (2005b) Flow banding in obsidian: a record of evolving textural heterogeneity during magma deformation. Earth Planet Sci Lett 236(1):135–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gottsmann J, Giordano D, Dingwell DB (2002) Predicting shear viscosity during volcanic processes at the glass transition: a calorimetric calibration. Earth Planet Sci Lett 198(3–4):417–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hess K–U, Dingwell DB (1996) Viscosities of hydrous leucogranitic melts: a non–Arrhenian model. Am Mineral 81:1297–1300Google Scholar
  17. Jaupart C, Allegre CJ (1991) Gas content, eruption rate and instabilities of eruption regime in silicic volcanoes. Earth Planet Sci Lett 102:413–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kaminski E, Jaupart C (1998) The size distribution of pyroclasts and the fragmentation sequence in explosive volcanic eruptions. J Geophys Res 103(B12):29759–29779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kertész J (1981) Percolation of holes between overlapping spheres: Monte Carlo calculation of the critical volume fraction. J Physique Lett 42(17):393–395.  https://doi.org/10.1051/jphyslet:019810042017039300 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu Y, Zhang Y, Behrens H (2005) Solubility of H2O in rhyolitic melts at low pressure and a new empirical model for mixed H2O-CO2 solubility in rhyolitic melts. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 143:219–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McIntosh IM, Llewellin EW, Humphreys MCS, Nichols ARL, Burgisser A, Schipper CI, Larsen JF (2014) Distribution of dissolved water in magmatic glass records growth and resorption of bubbles. Earth Planet Sci Lett 401:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Newman S, Epstein S, Stolper E (1988) Water, carbon dioxide and hydrogen isotopes in glasses from the ca. 1340 A.D. eruption of the Mono Craters, California: constraints on degassing phenomena and initial volatile content. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 35:75–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Okumura S, Nakamura M, Nakashima S (2003) Determination of molar absorptivity of IR fundamental OH stretching vibration in rhyolitic glasses. Am Mineral 88:1657–1662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Okumura S, Nakamura M, Takeuchi S, Tsuchiyama A, Nakano T, Uesugi K (2009) Magma deformation may induce non-explosive volcanism via degassing through bubble networks. Earth Planet Sci Lett 281(3–4):267–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pitzer KS, Sterner SM (1994) Equations of state valid continuously from zero to extreme pressures for H2O and CO2. J Chem Phys 101:311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rust AC, Cashman KV (2007) Multiple origins of obsidian pyroclasts and implications for changes in the dynamics of the 1300 B.P. eruption of Newberry Volcano, USA. Bull Volcanol 69:825–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rust AC, Cashman KV, Wallace PJ (2004) Magma degassing buffered by vapor flow through brecciated conduit margins. Geology 32:349–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Taylor BE (1991) Degassing of Obsidian Dome rhyolite, Inyo volcanic chain, California. Geochem Soc Spec Publ 3:339–353Google Scholar
  29. Taylor BE, Eichelberger JC, Westrich HR (1983) Hydrogen isotopic evidence of rhyolitic magma degassing during shallow intrusion and eruption. Nature 306:541–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tuffen H, Dingwell DB (2005) Fault textures in volcanic conduits: evidence for seismic trigger mechanisms during silicic eruptions. Bull Volcanol 67(4):370–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tuffen H, Dingwell DR, Pinkerton H (2003) Repeated fracture and healing of silicic magma generate flow banding and earthquakes? Geology 31:1089–1092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vasseur J, Wadsworth FB (2017) Sphere models for pore geometry and fluid permeability in heterogeneous magmas. Bull Volcanol 79(11):77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wadsworth FB, Vasseur J, von Aulock FW, Hess KU, Scheu B, Lavallée Y, Dingwell DB (2014) Nonisothermal viscous sintering of volcanic ash. J Geophys Res 119:8792–8804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wadsworth FB, Vasseur J, Llewellin EW, Schauroth J, Dobson KJ, Scheu B, Dingwell DB (2016) Sintering of viscous droplets under surface tension. Proc R Soc A 472(2188):20150780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wadsworth FB, Vasseur J, Llewellin EW, Dobson KJ, Colombier M, von Aulock FW, Fife JL, Wiesmaier S, Hess KU, Scheu B, Lavallée Y (2017) Topological inversions in coalescing granular media control fluid-flow regimes. Phys Rev E 96(3):033113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Walker GPL (1981) Plinian eruptions and their products. Bull Volcanol 44:223–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Watkins JM, Gardner JE, Befus KS (2017) Non-equilibrium degassing, regassing, and vapor fluxing in magmatic feeder systems. Geology 45:183–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang Y, Ni H (2010) Diffusion of H, C, and O components in silicate melts. Rev Mineral Geochem 72:171–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang Y, Belcher R, Ihinger PD, Wang L, Xu Z, Newman S (1997) New calibration of infrared measurement of dissolved water in rhyolitic glasses. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 61:3089–3100CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association of Volcanology & Chemistry of the Earth's Interior 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geological Sciences, Jackson School of GeosciencesThe University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA
  2. 2.Department of Earth Sciences, Science LabsDurham UniversityDurhamUK
  3. 3.Department of Earth SciencesUniversity of OregonEugeneUSA

Personalised recommendations