Advertisement

Bulletin of Volcanology

, 81:12 | Cite as

A laboratory-scale study on the role of mechanical vibrations in pore pressure generation in pyroclastic materials: implications for pyroclastic flows

  • Carlos Soria-HoyoEmail author
  • José Manuel Valverde
  • Olivier Roche
Research Article
  • 60 Downloads

Abstract

The results of laboratory-scale experiments with ignimbrite material are reported and discussed. The ignimbrite material contained in a rotating drum is subjected to mechanical vibrations, simulating particle agitation at the base of a pyroclastic flow propagating on an irregular substrate. It is observed that vibrations lead to a severe decrease of internal friction, evidenced by a drastic drop of the avalanche angle of the material in the rotating drum. We propose that acoustic streaming, a well-known phenomenon in engineering applications, operates in the ignimbrite material. Vibrations cause the development of rotational air flow around the particles, and in consequence, the enhancement of hydrodynamic viscous stresses promotes pore fluid pressure, which leads to dynamical weakening through fluidization. A fluid mechanical theoretical model accounts for the decrease of the friction coefficient of the ignimbrite material under a wide range of experimental conditions. It can be reasonably inferred that sustained high gas pore pressure resulting from mechanical agitation could be present in pyroclastic flows and might contribute to their high mobility.

Keywords

Pyroclastic flow Fluidization Acoustic streaming Pore pressure 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Spanish Government Agency Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, FEDER Funds (Contracts CTQ2014-52763-C2-2-R and CTQ2017-83602-C2-2-R), and French Research Institute for Sustainable Development (IRD). The Microscopy Service of Innovation and Research Center (CITIUS) and the Mechanical Workshop of the University of Seville are gratefully acknowledged. This is Laboratory of Excellence ClerVolc contribution no. 330.

References

  1. Atkinson J (2007) The mechanics of soils and foundations. McGraw Hill International, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Breard ECP, Lube G, Jones JR, Dufek J, Cronin SJ, Valentine GA, Moebis A (2016) Coupling of turbulent and non-turbulent flow regimes within pyroclastic density currents. Nat Geosci 9:767–771.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2794 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Capra L, Sulpizio R, Márquez-Ramirez VH, Coviello V, Doronzo DM, Arambula-Mendoza R, Cruz S (2018) The anatomy of a pyroclastic density current: the 10 July 2015 event at Volcán de Colima (Mexico). Bull Volcanol 80:34.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-018-1206-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carman PC (1997) Fluid flow through granular beds. Chem Eng Res Des 75:S32–S48.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8762(97)80003-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cas RAF, Wright HMN, Folkes CB, Lesti C, Porreca M, Giordano G, Viramonte JG (2011) The flow dynamics of an extremely large volume pyroclastic flow, the 2.08-Ma Cerro Galán Ignimbrite, NW Argentina, and comparison with other flow types. Bull Volcanol 73:1583–1609.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-011-0564-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Castellanos A, Valverde JM, Pérez AT, Ramos A, Watson PK (1999) Flow regimes in fine cohesive powders. Phys Rev Lett 82:1156–1159.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.1156 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Castellanos A, Valverde JM, Quintanilla MAS (2005) Physics of compaction of fine cohesive particles. Phys Rev Lett 94:075501(1)–075501(4).  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.075501 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chedeville C, Roche O (2014) Autofluidization of pyroclastic flows propagating on rough substrates as shown by laboratory experiments. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 119:1764–1776.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JB010554 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Angelis S, Bass V, Hards V, Ryan G (2007) Seismic characterization of pyroclastic flow activity at Soufrière Hills Volcano, Montserrat, 8 January 2007. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 7:467–472.  https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-7-467-2007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dellino P, Mele D, Bonasia R, Braia G, la Volpe L, Sulpizio R (2005) The analysis of the influence of pumice shape on its terminal velocity. Geophys Res Lett 32:1–4.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023954 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Denlinger RP, Iverson RM (2001) Flow of variably fluidized granular masses across three-dimensional terrain: 2. Numerical predictions and experimental tests. J Geophys Res 106:553–566.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JB900330 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dufek J (2016) The fluid mechanics of pyroclastic density currents. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 48:459–485.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-122414-034252 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dufek J, Manga M (2008) In situ production of ash in pyroclastic flows. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 113:B09207.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JB005555 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Holtsmark J, Johnsen I, Sikkeland T, Skavlem S (1954) Boundary layer flow near a cylindrical obstacle in an oscillating, incompressible fluid. J Acoust Soc Am 26:26–39.  https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1907285 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Iverson RM, Denlinger RP (2001) Flow of variably fluidized granular masses across three-dimensional terrain: 1. Coulomb mixture theory. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 106:537–552.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JB900329 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Iverson RM, LaHusen RG (1989) Dynamic pore-pressure fluctuations in rapidly shearing granular materials. Science 246:796 LP–796799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Iverson RM, Logan M, LaHusen RG, Berti M (2010) The perfect debris flow? Aggregated results from 28 large-scale experiments. J Geophys Res 115:F03005.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JF001514 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnson BC, Campbell CS, Melosh HJ (2016) Reply to comment by Iverson on “The reduction of friction in long runout landslides as an emergent phenomenon”. J Geophys Res Earth Surf 121:2243–2246.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JF004093 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Landau LD, Lifshitz EM (1958) Course of theoretical physics. In: Journal of nuclear energy (1954). Pergamon Press, New York, pp 326–327Google Scholar
  20. Mele D, Dellino P, Sulpizio R, Braia G (2011) A systematic investigation on the aerodynamics of ash particles. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 203:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVOLGEORES.2011.04.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mellmann J (2001) The transverse motion of solids in rotating cylinders—forms of motion and transition behavior. Powder Technol 118:251–270.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-5910(00)00402-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Melosh HJ (1979) Acoustic fluidization: a new geologic process? J Geophys Res Solid Earth 84:7513–7520.  https://doi.org/10.1029/JB084iB13p07513 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Montserrat S, Tamburrino A, Roche O, Niño Y (2012) Pore fluid pressure diffusion in defluidizing granular columns. J Geophys Res Earth Surf 117.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JF002164
  24. Quintanilla MAS, Castellanos A, Valverde JM (2001a) Correlation between bulk stresses and interparticle contact forces in fine powders. Phys Rev E 64:031301.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.64.031301 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Quintanilla MAS, Valverde JM, Castellanos A, Viturro RE (2001b) Looking for self-organized critical behavior in avalanches of slightly cohesive powders. Phys Rev Lett 87:194301.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.194301 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Quintanilla MAS, Valverde JM, Castellanos A (2006) The transitional behaviour of avalanches in cohesive granular materials. J Stat Mech Theory Exp 2006:P07015–P07015.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2006/07/P07015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rietema K (1991) The dynamics of fine powder. Elsevier, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Riley CM, Rose WI, Bluth GJS (2003) Quantitative shape measurements of distal volcanic ash. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 108.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB000818
  29. Roche O (2012) Depositional processes and gas pore pressure in pyroclastic flows: an experimental perspective. Bull Volcanol 74:1807–1820.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-012-0639-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Roche O, Buesch DC, Valentine GA (2016) Slow-moving and far-travelled dense pyroclastic flows during the Peach Spring super-eruption. Nat Commun 7:10890.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10890 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schubert H (1984) Capillary forces—modeling and application in particulate technology. Powder Technol 37:105–116.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-5910(84)80010-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Self S (2006) The effects and consequences of very large explosive volcanic eruptions. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 364:2073–2097.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2006.1814 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Soria-Hoyo C, Valverde JM, Castellanos A (2008) Effect of vibration on flow properties of fine glass beads. AICHE J 54:886–896.  https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.11423 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Soukhovitskaya V, Manga M (2006) Martian landslides in Valles Marineris: wet or dry? Icarus 180:348–352.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2005.09.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sparks RSJ (1978) Gas release rates from pyroclastic flows: a assessment of the role of fluidisation in their emplacement. Bull Volcanol 41:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02597679 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Streck MJ, Grunder AL (1995) Crystallization and welding variations in a widespread ignimbrite sheet; the Rattlesnake Tuff, eastern Oregon, USA. Bull Volcanol 57:151–169.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00265035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sulpizio R, Dellino P, Doronzo DM, Sarocchi D (2014) Pyroclastic density currents: state of the art and perspectives. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 283:36–65.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2014.06.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sundaresan S (2003) Instabilities in fluidized beds. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 35:63–88.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.35.101101.161151 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Uhira K, Yamasato H, Takeo M (1994) Source mechanism of seismic waves excited by pyroclastic flows observed at Unzen volcano, Japan. J Geophys Res 99:17757–17773.  https://doi.org/10.1029/94JB00110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Valverde JM (2013) Acoustic streaming in gas-fluidized beds of small particles. Soft Matter 9:8792.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c3sm50780g CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Valverde JM (2015a) Convection and fluidization in oscillatory granular flows: the role of acoustic streaming. Eur Phys J E 38.  https://doi.org/10.1140/epje/i2015-15066-7
  42. Valverde JM (2015b) Pattern-formation under acoustic driving forces. Contemp Phys 56:338–358.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00107514.2015.1008742 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Valverde JM (2015c) Dynamical weakening by fluidization under oscillatory viscous flows. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth 120(11):7641–7654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Valverde JM, Durán-Olivencia FJ (2014) Acoustic streaming in pulsating flows through porous media. Riv Nuovo Cim 37:591–619.  https://doi.org/10.1393/ncr/i2014-10106-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Valverde JM, Soria-Hoyo C (2015) Vibration-induced dynamical weakening of pyroclastic flows: insights from rotating drum experiments. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 120:6182–6190.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JB012317 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Valverde J, Castellanos A, Ramos A, Watson P (2000) Avalanches in fine, cohesive powders. Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Topics 62:6851–6860.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.62.6851 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Valverde JM, Ebri JMP, Quintanilla MAS (2013) Acoustic streaming enhances the multicyclic CO 2 capture of natural limestone at Ca-looping conditions. Environ Sci Technol 47:9538–9544.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es4019173 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Van Der Elst NJ, Brodsky EE, Le Bas PY, Johnson PA (2012) Auto-acoustic compaction in steady shear flows: experimental evidence for suppression of shear dilatancy by internal acoustic vibration. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 117.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008897
  49. Wilson CJN (1980) The role of fluidisation in the emplacement of pyroclastic flows: an experimental approach. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 8:231–249.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0273(80)90106-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yu a B, Liu LF, Zhang ZP et al (2003) Computer simulation of the packing of particles. Int J Mater Prod Technol 19:324.  https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMPT.2003.002516 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association of Volcanology & Chemistry of the Earth's Interior 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Facultad de FísicaSevillaSpain
  2. 2.Laboratoire Magmas et Volcans, CNRS, IRD, OPGCUniversité Clermont AuvergneClermont-FerrandFrance

Personalised recommendations