Advertisement

Bulletin of Volcanology

, 80:77 | Cite as

Tephra transformations: variable preservation of tephra layers from two well-studied eruptions

  • Nick A. Cutler
  • R. T. Streeter
  • J. Marple
  • L. R. Shotter
  • J. S. Yeoh
  • A. J. Dugmore
Research Article

Abstract

Volcanologists often use terrestrial tephra layers to reconstruct volcanic eruptions. However, the conversion of fresh tephra deposits into tephra layers is poorly understood. To address this knowledge gap, we surveyed tephra layers emplaced by the 1980 eruption of Mount St Helens, USA (MSH1980) and the 1947 eruption of Hekla, Iceland (H1947). We compared our measurements with observations made shortly after the 1947 and 1980 eruptions, to calibrate the subsequent transformation of the tephra deposit. We expected the tephra layers to retain the broad characteristics of the original deposits, but hypothesized (a) changes in thickness and mass loading due to re-working, and (b) positive correlations between thickness and vegetation density. We observed some systematic changes in tephra layer properties with distance from the vent and the main plume axis. However, the preservation of the layers varied both between and within our survey locations. Closed coniferous forest appeared to provide good conditions for the preservation of the MSH1980 tephra, as expected; preservation of the H1947 deposit in sparsely vegetated parts of Iceland was much more variable. However, preservation of the MSH1980 deposit in sparsely vegetated areas of eastern Washington State was also excellent, possibly due to biocrust formation. We concluded that the preservation of tephra layers is sensitive to surface conditions at the time of the eruption. These findings have implications for the reconstruction of past eruptions where eruption plumes span regions of variable surface cover.

Keywords

Hekla Mount St Helens Mass loading Biocrusts Kriging Volcanological reconstruction Biophysical feedbacks 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Kathy Cashman and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. We are also grateful to Icelandic landowners for access, Ben Fitzhugh and Tim Kohler for fieldwork support, and Richard Waitt (USGS) for his advice, particularly regarding the selection of field sites and the interpretation of the MSH1980 tephra layer.

Funding information

Financial support was provided by the National Science Foundation of America through grant 1202692 ‘Comparative Island Ecodynamics in the North Atlantic,’ and grant 1249313 ‘Tephra layers and early warning signals for critical transitions’ (both to AJD).

Supplementary material

445_2018_1251_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (81 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 80 kb)
445_2018_1251_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (113 kb)
ESM 2 (PDF 113 kb)
445_2018_1251_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (134 kb)
ESM 3 (PDF 134 kb)
445_2018_1251_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (79 kb)
ESM 4 (PDF 79 kb)
445_2018_1251_MOESM5_ESM.pdf (187 kb)
ESM 5 (PDF 186 kb)
445_2018_1251_MOESM6_ESM.pdf (98 kb)
ESM 6 (PDF 98 kb)
445_2018_1251_MOESM7_ESM.pdf (67 kb)
ESM 7 (PDF 66 kb)

References

  1. Arnalds O, Thorarinsdottir EF, Thorsson J, Dagsson Waldhauserova P, Agustsdottir AM (2013) An extreme wind erosion event of the fresh Eyjafjallajokull 2010 volcanic ash. Sci Rep-UK 3Google Scholar
  2. Bivand RS, Prebesma E, Gómez-Rubio V (2013) Applied spatial data analysis with R. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blong R, Enright N, Grasso P (2017) Preservation of thin tephra. J Appl Volcanol 6.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13617-017-0059-4
  4. Bonadonna C, Houghton BF (2005) Total grain-size distribution and volume of tephra-fall deposits. B Volcanol 67:441–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonadonna C, Biass S, Costa A (2015) Physical characterization of explosive volcanic eruptions based on tephra deposits: propagation of uncertainties and sensitivity analysis. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 296:80–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burden RE, Chen L, Phillips JC (2013) A statistical method for determining the volume of volcanic fall deposits. B Volcanol 75Google Scholar
  7. Cutler NA, Bailey RM, Hickson KT, Streeter RT, Dugmore AJ (2016a) Vegetation structure influences the retention of airfall tephra in a sub-Arctic landscape. Prog Phys Geogr 40:661–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cutler NA, Shears OM, Streeter RT, Dugmore AJ (2016b) Impact of small-scale vegetation structure on tephra layer preservation. Sci Rep-UK 6.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep37260
  9. Dugmore A, Streeter R, Cutler N (2018) The role of vegetation cover and slope angle in tephra layer preservation and implications for quaternary tephrostratigraphy. Palaeogeogr Palaeocl 489:105–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Engwell SL, Sparks RSJ, Aspinall WP (2013) Quantifying uncertainties in the measurement of tephra fall thickness. J Appl Volcanol 2:5.  https://doi.org/10.1186/2191-5040-2-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Engwell SL, Aspinall WP, Sparks RSJ (2015) An objective method for the production of isopach maps and implications for the estimation of tephra deposit volumes and their uncertainties. B Volcanol 77:61.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-015-0942-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferrenberg S, Reed SC, Belnap J (2015) Climate change and physical disturbance cause similar community shifts in biological soil crusts. PNAS 112:12116–12121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Houghton B, Carey RJ (2015) Pyroclastic fall deposits. In: Siggurdsson H, Houghton B, McNutt SR, Rymer H, Stix J (eds) Encyclopedia of volcanoes. Academic Press, London, pp 599–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. IAVCEI (2010) Data sets. IAVCEI Commission on Tephra Hazard Modelling. http://www.ct.ingv.it/iavcei/data/MSH/MSH80_location-thickness.txt. Accessed 25 April 2018
  15. Isaaks EH, Srivastava RM (1989) An introduction to applied geostatistics. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Johansen JR (1993) Cryptogamic crusts of semiarid and arid lands of North America. J Phycol 29:140–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu EJ, Cashman KV, Beckett FM, Witham CS, Leadbetter SJ, Hort MC, Guomundsson S (2014) Ash mists and brown snow: remobilization of volcanic ash from recent Icelandic eruptions. J Geophys Res-Atmos 119:9463–9480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lowe DJ (2011) Tephrochronology and its application: a review. Quat Geochronol 6:107–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Panebianco JE, Mendez MJ, Buschiazzo DE, Bran D, Gaitan JJ (2017) Dynamics of volcanic ash remobilisation by wind through the Patagonian steppe after the eruption of Cordon Caulle, 2011. Sci Rep-UK 7Google Scholar
  20. Pebesma EJ (2004) Multivariable geostatistics in S: the gstat package. Comput Geosci 30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pyle DM (1989) The thickness, volume and grainsize of tephra fall deposits. B Volcanol 51:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pyle DM (2016) Field observations of tephra fallout. In: Mackie S, Cashman K, Ricketts H, Rust A, Watson M (eds) Volcanic ash. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 25–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rozenstein O, Zaady E, Katra I, Karnieli A, Adamowski J, Yizhaq H (2014) The effect of sand grain size on the development of cyanobacterial biocrusts. Aeolian Res 15:217–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sarna-Wojcicki AM, Shipley S, Waitt RB, Dzurisin D, Wood SH (1981) Areal distribution, thickness, mass, volume, and grain size of air-fall ash from the six major eruptions in 1980. In: Lipman PW, Mullineaux DR (eds) The 1980 eruption of Mount St Helens, Washington, U.S. U.S. Department of the Interior, USGS, Washington D.C., pp 577-600Google Scholar
  25. Thorarinsson S (1954) The tephra fall from Hekla on March 29th 1947. Societas Scientarium Islandica, ReykjavikGoogle Scholar
  26. Waitt RB, Dzurisin D (1981) Proximal air-fall deposits from the May 18 eruption—stratigraphy and field sedimentology. In: Lipman PW, Mullineaux DR (eds) The 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens, Washington. US Department of the Interior, USGS, Washington D.C., pp 601-616Google Scholar
  27. Waitt RB, Hansen VL, Sarna-Wojcicki AM, Wood SH (1981) Proximal air-fall deposits of eruptions between May 24 and August 7, 1980—stratigraphy and field sedimentology. In: Lipman PW, Mullineaux DR (eds) The 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens, Washington. U.S. Department of the Interior, USGS, Washington D.C., pp 617-628Google Scholar
  28. Wilson TM, Cole JW, Stewart C, Cronin SJ, Johnston DM (2011) Ash storms: impacts of wind-remobilised volcanic ash on rural communities and agriculture following the 1991 Hudson eruption, southern Patagonia, Chile. B Volcanol 73:223–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yang QY, Bursik M (2016) A new interpolation method to model thickness, isopachs, extent, and volume of tephra fall deposits. B Volcanol 78.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-016-1061-0
  30. Zobel DB, Antos JA (1991) 1980 tephra from Mount St Helens—spatial and temporal variation beneath forest canopies. Biol Fertil Soils 12:60–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nick A. Cutler
    • 1
  • R. T. Streeter
    • 2
  • J. Marple
    • 2
  • L. R. Shotter
    • 3
  • J. S. Yeoh
    • 3
  • A. J. Dugmore
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.School of Geography, Politics & SociologyNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK
  2. 2.School of Geography & Sustainable DevelopmentUniversity of St AndrewsSt AndrewsUK
  3. 3.School of GeosciencesUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
  4. 4.Department of AnthropologyWashington State UniversityPullmanUSA
  5. 5.Graduate CenterCity University of New YorkNew York CityUSA

Personalised recommendations