Bulletin of Volcanology

, 79:80 | Cite as

Validating the accuracy of SO2 gas retrievals in the thermal infrared (8–14 μm)

  • Andrea Gabrieli
  • John N. Porter
  • Robert Wright
  • Paul G. Lucey
Research Article

Abstract

Quantifying sulfur dioxide (SO2) in volcanic plumes is important for eruption predictions and public health. Ground-based remote sensing of spectral radiance of plumes contains information on the path-concentration of SO2. However, reliable inversion algorithms are needed to convert plume spectral radiance measurements into SO2 path-concentrations. Various techniques have been used for this purpose. Recent approaches have employed thermal infrared (TIR) imaging between 8 μm and 14 μm to provide two-dimensional mapping of plume SO2 path-concentration, using what might be described as “dual-view” techniques. In this case, the radiance (or its surrogate brightness temperature) is computed for portions of the image that correspond to the plume and compared with spectral radiance obtained for adjacent regions of the image that do not (i.e., “clear sky”). In this way, the contribution that the plume makes to the measured radiance can be isolated from the background atmospheric contribution, this residual signal being converted to an estimate of gas path-concentration via radiative transfer modeling. These dual-view approaches suffer from several issues, mainly the assumption of clear sky background conditions. At this time, the various inversion algorithms remain poorly validated. This paper makes two contributions. Firstly, it validates the aforementioned dual-view approaches, using hyperspectral TIR imaging data. Secondly, it introduces a new method to derive SO2 path-concentrations, which allows for single point SO2 path-concentration retrievals, suitable for hyperspectral imaging with clear or cloudy background conditions. The SO2 amenable lookup table algorithm (SO2–ALTA) uses the MODTRAN5 radiative transfer model to compute radiance for a variety (millions) of plume and atmospheric conditions. Rather than searching this lookup table to find the best fit for each measured spectrum, the lookup table was used to train a partial least square regression (PLSR) model. The coefficients of this model are used to invert measured radiance spectra to path-concentration on a pixel-by-pixel basis. In order to validate the algorithms, TIR hyperspectral measurements were carried out by measuring sky radiance when looking through gas cells filled with known amounts of SO2. SO2–ALTA was also tested on retrieving SO2 path-concentrations from the Kīlauea volcano, Hawai’i. For cloud-free conditions, all three techniques worked well. In cases where background clouds were present, then only SO2–ALTA was found to provide good results, but only under low atmospheric water vapor column amounts.

Keywords

Inversion algorithm Ground-based retrieval Path-concentration SO2 PLSR Hyperspectral imaging 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the United States Department of Interior National Parks Service for authorizing the collection of the field data reported in this paper (Permit number HAVO-2015-SCI-0050). We thank Dr. Jacopo Taddeucci (Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Italy), Dr. Andrew Harris (Université Clermont Auvergne, Laboratoire Magmas et Volcans, France), and two anonymous reviewers for their most valuable comments on the manuscript, as their feedback led us to an improvement of the work. We also thank Dr. Matthew Blackett (Coventry University, UK), for his help with the field data collection, and Dr. Alexander Berk (Spectral Sciences Inc.) for his insightful suggestions regarding the use of MODTRAN5. This is HIGP publication number 2269 and SOEST publication number 1025.

Funding statement

'Funding for this work was provided by NASA’s Earth Science Technology Office (Instrument Incubator Program, NNX14AE61G).

Supplementary material

445_2017_1163_MOESM1_ESM.docx (9.6 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 9809 kb)

References

  1. Abdi H (2010) Partial least squares regression and projection on latent structure regression (PLS-regression). Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics 2:97–106.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.51 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aiuppa A, Moretti R, Federico C, Giudice G, Gurrieri S, Liuzzo M, Papale P, Shinohara H, Valenza M (2007) Forecasting Etna eruptions by real-time observation of volcanic gas composition. Geology 35(12):1115.  https://doi.org/10.1130/G24149A. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allard P, Carbonnelle J, Me’trich N, Loyer H, Zettwoog P (1994) Sulphur output and magma degassing budget of Stromboli volcano. Nature 368:326–330.  https://doi.org/10.1038/368326a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allard P, Aiuppa A, Beatuducel F, Gaudin D, Di Napoli R, Calabrese S, Parello F, Crispi O, Hammouya G, Tamburello G (2014) Steam and gas emission rate from La Soufriere volcano, Guadeloupe (Lesser Antilles): implications for the magmatic supply during degassing unrest. Chem Geol 384:76–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson GP, Berk A, Acharya PK, Bernstein LS, Adler-Golden SM, Lee J, Muratov L (2009) “Reformulated atmospheric band model method for modeling atmospheric propagation at arbitrarily fine spectral resolution and expanded capabilities,” U.S. Patent #7593835, issued September 22, 2009.Google Scholar
  6. Anderson K, Segall P (2013) Bayesian inversion of data from effusive volcanic eruptions using physics-based models: application to Mount St. Helens 2004–2008. J Geophys Res 118(5):20.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrb.50169 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baxter PJ (1999) “Impacts of eruptions on human health”. Published in: Sigurdsson, H., et al (eds.) Encyclopedia of Volcanoes. San Diego: Academic Press. 1035–1043.Google Scholar
  8. Berk A, Acharya PK, Bernstein LS, Anderson GP, Lewis P, Chetwynd JH, Hoke HL (2008) Band model method for modeling atmospheric propagation at arbitrarily fine spectral resolution. U.S. Patent #7433806, issued October 7, 2008.Google Scholar
  9. Bluth GJS, Shannon JM, Watson IM, Prata AJ, Realmuto VJ (2007) Development of an ultra-violet digital camera for volcanic SO2 imaging. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 161:47–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Collins WD, Hackney JK, Edwards DP (2002) “An updated parameterization for infrared emission and absorption by water vapor in the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Atmosphere Model”. J Geophys Res.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001365, 2002
  11. Cramer CE, Woodward IV JT, Lykke KR, Stubbs CW, Vaz A, Fraser GT (2015) “A comparison of MODTRAN5 atmospheric extinction predictions with narrowband astronomical flux observations”. Proc. SPIE 9608, Infrared Remote Sensing and Instrumentation XXIII, 96080R;  https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2188453
  12. Elias T, Sutton AJ (2012) Sulfur dioxide emission rates from Kīlauea Volcano, Hawai‘i, 2007–2010: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2012–1107, 25 p. (Available at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2012/1107/.)
  13. EPA, National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), 2011 [Online], Available at https://www.epa.gov/ttn/naaqs/criteria.html
  14. Foster J, Bevis M, Raymond W (2006) Precipitable water and the lognormal distribution. J Geophys Res 111:D15102.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006731 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Francis P, Burton M, Oppenheimer C (1998) Remote measurements of volcanic gas compositions by solar occultation spectroscopy. Nature 396:567–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gabrieli A, Wright R, Lucey PG, Porter JN, Garbeil H, Pilger E, Wood M (2016) Characterization and initial field test of a long wave thermal infrared hyperspectral imager for measuring SO2 in volcanic plumes. Bull Volcanol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-016-1068-6
  17. Gabrieli A, Wilson L, Lane S (2015) Volcano-tectonic interactions as triggers of volcanic eruptions. J Geol Assoc, UK.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pgeola.2015.10.002
  18. Goff F, Love SP, Warren RG, Counce D, Obenholzner J, Siebe C, Schmidt SC (2001). Passive infrared remote sensing evidence forlarge, intermittent CO2 emissions at Popocatépetl volcano, Mexico. Chem Geol 177:133–156Google Scholar
  19. Hoskuldsson P (1988) PLS regression methods. J Chemom 2:211–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kern P, Werner C, Sutton J, Elias T, Thelen W, Kelly P, Mastin L (2012) Ultraviolet SO2 imaging systems allow insights into degassing processing occurring on short timescales at Kilauea’s summit. [Online]. Available at: http://hilo.hawaii.edu/~kenhon/HawaiiChapman/documents/PKern2012HawaiiChapmanPoster.pdf
  21. Kern C, Werner C, Elias T, Sutton AJ, Luebcke P (2013) Applying UV cameras for SO2 detection to distal or optically thick volcanic plumes. J Geophys Res 262:80–89Google Scholar
  22. La Spina A, Burton M, Allard P, Alparone S, Mure F (2015) Open-path FTIR spectroscopy of magma degassing processes during eight lava fountains on Mount Etna. Earth Planet Sci Lett 2015 413:123–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lopez F, Nicolau V, Maldague X, Ibarra-Castanedo C, (2013) Advances in Signal Processing for Non Destructive Evaluation of Materials. Proceedings of the VIIth International Works. 16th International Symposium on Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics (ISEM 2013)Google Scholar
  24. Love SP, Goff F, Counce D, Siebe C, Delgado H (1998) Passive infrared spectroscopy of the eruption plume at Popocatépetl volcano, Mexico. Nature 396:563–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lucey PG, Horton KA, Williams T (2008) Performance of a long-wave infrared hyperspectral imager using a Sagnac interferometer and an uncooled microbolometer array. Appl Opt 47(28):F107–F113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Martens H, Naes T (1989). Multivariate Calibration. Wiley, New York. Z. Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR91e:62050Google Scholar
  27. Mattu MJ, Small GW, Combs RJ, Knapp RB, Kroutil RT (2000) Quantitative analysis of sulfur dioxide with passive fourier tranform infrared remote sensing interferogram data applied spectroscopy 54: 341–348Google Scholar
  28. Moffat AJ, Millan MM (1971) The applications of optical correlation techniques to the remote sensing of SO2 plumes using sky light. Atmos Environ 5:677–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mori T, Burton M (2009) Quantification of the gas mass emitted during single explosions on Stromboli with the SO2 imaging camera. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 188:395–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Oppenheimer C, Francis P, Burton M, Maciejewski AJH, Boardman L (1998) Remote measurement of volcanic gases by Fourier Tranform infrared spectroscopy. Appl Phys B Laser Optics 67:505–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Oppenheimer C, Bani P, Calkins JA, Burton MR, Sawyer GM (2006) Rapid FTIR sensing of volcanic gases released by Strombolian explosions at Yasur volcano. Vanuatu Appl Phys B Laser Optics 85:453–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Prata J, Bernardo C (2014) Retrieval of sulfur dioxide from a ground-based thermal infrared imaging camera. Atmos Meas Tech 7:2807–2828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Realmuto VJ, Worden HM (2000) Impact of atmospheric water vapor on the thermal infrared remote sensing of volcanic sulfur dioxide emissions: a case study from the Pu’u ’O’o vent of Kilauea Volcano, Hawaii. J Geophys Res 105(B9):21,497–21,508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rosipal R, and Kramer N (2006) Overview and recent advances in partial least squares. Subspace, Latent Structure and Feature Selection: Statistical and Optimization Perspectives Workshop (SLSFS 2005), Revised Selected Papers (Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3940), pp. 34–51, springer-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  35. Schmidt A (2014) “Volcanic gas and aerosol hazards from a future Laki-type eruption in Iceland”. Published in: Papale, P. and Shroder, J.F. (eds.) Volcanic hazards, risks and disasters. Elsevier, pp 377–397Google Scholar
  36. Stoiber RE, Jepsen A (1973) Sulfur dioxide contributions to the atmosphere by volcanoes. Science 182:577–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stoiber RE, Malinconico JLL, Williams SN (1983) Use of the correlation spectrometer at volcanoes. Published in: Tazieff, H., Sabroux, J.C. (eds) Forecasting volcanic events. Elsevier, New York, pp 424–444Google Scholar
  38. Sun W, Videen G, Kato S, Lin B, Lukashin C, Hu Y (2011) A study of subvisual clouds and their radiation effect with a synergy of CERES, MODIS, CALIPSO, and AIRS data. J Geophys Res.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016422
  39. Upper Air Sounding Website (2017) University of Wyoming, College of Engineering [Online]. Available at: https://weather.uwyo.edu/upperair/sounding.html. Accessed 04 Oct 2016
  40. Yang H, Griffiths PR, Tate JD (2003) Comparison of partial least squares regression and multi-layer neural networks for quantification of nonlinear systems and application to gas phase fourier transform infrared spectra. Anal Chim Acta 489:125–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wright R, Lucey P, Crites S, Horton K, Wood M, Garbeil H (2013) BBM/EM design of the thermal hyperspectral imager: an instrument for remote sensing of earth’s surface, atmosphere and ocean, from a microsatellite platform. Acta Astronautica 87:182–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zuccaro G, De Gregorio D, Baxter P (2014) “Human and Structural Vulnerability to Volcanic Processes”. Published in: Papale, P. and Shroder, J.F. (eds.) Volcanic hazards, risks and disasters. Elsevier, pp 261–288Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hawai’i Institute of Geophysics and PlanetologyUniversity of Hawai’i at MānoaHonoluluUSA
  2. 2.Department of Geology and Geophysics, School of Ocean and Earth Science and TechnologyUniversity of Hawai’i at MānoaHonoluluUSA

Personalised recommendations