Advertisement

Bulletin of Volcanology

, 76:858 | Cite as

Pyroclastic flow erosion and bulking processes: comparing field-based vs. modeling results at Tungurahua volcano, Ecuador

  • Julien BernardEmail author
  • Karim Kelfoun
  • Jean-Luc Le Pennec
  • Silvia Vallejo Vargas
Research Article

Abstract

Pyroclastic density currents (PDCs) are high-temperature and high-velocity mixtures that threaten populations in the vicinity of many active volcanoes. Deciphering the cause of their remarkable mobility is essential for volcanic hazard analysis, but remains difficult because of the complex processes occurring within the flows. Here, we investigate the effect of bulking on dense PDC mobility by means of a double approach. First, we estimate the amount of material incorporated into scoria flows emplaced during the August 2006 eruption of Tungurahua volcano, Ecuador. For this, we carry out a detailed analysis of 3D-corrected digital images of well-exposed scoria flow deposits. Componentry analysis indicates that PDC bulking occurs principally on the steep (>25°) upper slope of the volcano, and the deposits typically comprise 40–50 wt% of non-juvenile (i.e., accessory and accidental) material. Secondly, we develop a simple stress-related grain-by-grain equation of erosion combined with two simple depth-averaged geophysical mass-flow models that compare the bulking mechanism to a non-fluidized and a fluidized flow. Two behaviors based on Coulomb and plastic rheologies are used to reproduce, on a first order basis, the 2006 Tungurahua PDCs. Cross-check comparisons between these modeled cases and the erosion pattern inferred from field-based data allow us to evaluate the accuracy of our modeling assumptions. Regardless of the rheological regime, the PDC-induced erosion pattern of the 2006 Tungurahua eruption can only be reproduced by fluctuations of the flow’s basal shear stress during emplacement. Such variations are controlled by flow thinning-thickening processes, notably through the formation of a thick non-erosive flow body that pushes a thin frictional erosive front during PDC emplacement. The input volume of juvenile material, as well as the thickness of the erodible layer available prior to the eruption, are additional key parameters. Our work highlights complexities in PDC erosion and bulking processes that deserve further study. In terms of hazard assessment, our findings reveal that incorporation and bulking translate into increased flow mobility, i.e., the augmented flow mass enhances both flow velocity and runout distance (up to 20 %). These outcomes should be considered closely for hazard analysis at many other andesitic volcanoes worldwide where similar PDC events are common.

Keywords

Pyroclastic density currents Erosion Componentry Numerical simulation Tungurahua 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is part of a PhD project by JB and has been completed in the context of a French-Ecuadorian cooperation program. We thank the Laboratoire Mixte International of IRD “Séismes et Volcans dans les Andes du Nord” for financial support. We thank V. Manville for editorial handling as well as S. Charbonnier, R Sulpizio, and an anonymous reviewer for constructive criticism on the manuscript. This is Laboratory of Excellence ClerVolc contribution number 134.

Supplementary material

445_2014_858_MOESM1_ESM.docx (23 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 22.9 kb)

References

  1. Arellano SR, Hall M, Samaniego P, Le Pennec JL, Ruiz A, Molina I, Yepes H (2008) Degassing patterns of Tungurahua volcano (Ecuador) during the 1999–2006 eruptive period, inferred from remote spectroscopic measurements of SO2 emissions. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 176(1):151–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Auker MR, Sparks RSJ, Siebert L, Crosweller HS, Ewert J (2013) A statistical analysis of the global historical volcanic fatalities record. J Appl Volcanol 2(1):2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bouchut F, Fernández-Nieto ED, Mangeney A, Lagrée PY (2008) On new erosion models of Savage–Hutter type for avalanches. Acta Mech 199(1–4):181–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boudon G, Camus G, Gourgaud A, Lajoie J (1993) The 1984 nuée-ardente deposits of Merapi volcano, Central Java, Indonesia: stratigraphy, textural characteristics, and transport mechanisms. Bull Volcanol 55(5):327–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brand BD, Mackaman-Lofland C, Pollock NM, Bendaña S, Dawson B, Wichgers P (2014) Dynamics of pyroclastic density currents: conditions that promote substrate erosion and self-channelization - Mount St Helens, Washington (USA). J Volcanol Geotherm Res 276:189–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Branney MJ, Kokelaar BP (2002) Pyroclastic density currents and the sedimentation of ignimbrites. Geol Soc Mem No 27:143Google Scholar
  7. Buesch DC (1992) Incorporation and redistribution of locally derived lithic fragments within a pyroclastic flow. Geol Soc Am Bull 104(9):1193–1207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Calder ES, Sparks RSJ, Gardeweg MC (2000) Erosion, transport and segregation of pumice and lithic clasts in pyroclastic flows inferred from ignimbrite at Lascar Volcano, Chile. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 104(1–4):201–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cao Z, Pender G, Wallis S, Carling P (2004) Computational dam-break hydraulics over erodible sediment bed. J Hydraul Eng 130(7):689–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carn SA, Krueger AJ, Arellano S, Krotkov NA, Yang K (2008) Daily monitoring of Ecuadorian volcanic degassing from space. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 176(1):141–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cas RA, Wright JV (1987) Volcanic successions, modern and ancient: a geological approach to processes, products, and successions. Allen & Unwin, London, p 528Google Scholar
  12. Charbonnier SJ, Gertisser R (2011) Deposit architecture and dynamics of the 2006 block-and-ash flows of Merapi Volcano, Java, Indonesia. Sedimentology 58(6):1573–1612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Charbonnier SJ, Gertisser R (2012) Evaluation of geophysical mass flow models using the 2006 block-and-ash flows of Merapi Volcano, Java, Indonesia: towards a short-term hazard assessment tool. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 231–232:87–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Charbonnier SJ, Germa A, Connor CB, Gertisser R, Preece K, Komorowski JC, Lavigne F, Dixon T, Connor L (2013) Evaluation of the impact of the 2010 pyroclastic density currents at Merapi volcano from high-resolution satellite imagery, field investigations and numerical simulations. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 261:295–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cole PD, Fernandez E, Duarte E, Duncan AM (2005) Explosive activity and generation mechanisms of pyroclastic flows at Arenal volcano, Costa Rica between 1987 and 2001. Bull Volcanol 67(8):695–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cronin SJ, Lube G, Dayudi DS, Sumarti S, Subrandiyo S, Surono (2013) Insights into the October–November 2010 Gunung Merapi eruption (Central Java, Indonesia) from the stratigraphy, volume and characteristics of its pyroclastic deposits. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 261:244–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Crosta GB, Imposimato S, Roddeman D (2009) Numerical modelling of entrainment/deposition in rock and debris-avalanches. Eng Geol 109(1–2):135–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dellino P, Büttner R, Dioguardi F, Doronzo DM, La Volpe L, Mele D, Sonder I, Sulpizio R, Zimanowski B (2010) Experimental evidence links volcanic particle characteristics to pyroclastic flow hazard. Earth Planet Sci Lett 295(1–2):314–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Douillet G, Tsang-Hin-Sun È, Kueppers U, Letort J, Pacheco D, Goldstein F, Aulock F, Lavallée Y, Hanson J, Bustillos J, Robin C, Ramón P, Hall M, Dingwell D (2013) Sedimentology and geomorphology of the deposits from the August 2006 pyroclastic density currents at Tungurahua volcano, Ecuador. Bull Volcanol 75(11):1–21Google Scholar
  20. Druitt TH (1998) Pyroclastic density currents. Geol Soc Lond, Spec Publ 145(1):145–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Egashira S, Honda N, Itoh T (2001) Experimental study on the entrainment of bed material into debris flow. Phys Chem Earth C Solar Terr Planet Sci 26(9):645–650Google Scholar
  22. Eychenne J, Le Pennec J-L (2012) Sigmoidal particle density distribution in a subplinian scoria fall deposit. Bull Volcanol 74(10):2243–2249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Eychenne J, Le Pennec J-L, Troncoso L, Gouhier M, Nedelec J-M (2012) Causes and consequences of bimodal grain-size distribution of tephra fall deposited during the August 2006 Tungurahua eruption (Ecuador). Bull Volcanol 74(1):187–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Eychenne J, Le Pennec J-L, Ramón P, Yepes H (2013) Dynamics of explosive paroxysms at open-vent andesitic systems: high-resolution mass distribution analyses of the 2006 Tungurahua fall deposit (Ecuador). Earth Planet Sci Lett 361:343–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Farin M, Mangeney A, Roche O (2013) Fundamental changes of granular flow dynamics, deposition and erosion processes at high slope angles: insights from laboratory experiments. J Geophys Res Earth Surf 2013JF002750Google Scholar
  26. Fee D, Garces M, Steffke A (2010) Infrasound from Tungurahua Volcano 2006–2008: Strombolian to Plinian eruptive activity. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 193(1–2):67–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fraccarollo L, Capart H (2002) Riemann wave description of erosional dam-break flows. J Fluid Mech 461:183–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Grunewald U, Sparks RSJ, Kearns S, Komorowski JC (2000) Friction marks on blocks from pyroclastic flows at the Soufriere Hills volcano, Montserrat: implications for flow mechanisms. Geology 28(9):827–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gurioli L, Cioni R, Sbrana A, Zanella E (2002) Transport and deposition of pyroclastic density currents over an inhabited area: the deposits of the AD 79 eruption of Vesuvius at Herculaneum, Italy. Sedimentology 49(5):929–953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hall ML, Robin C, Bernardo B, Mothes P, Monzier M (1999) Tungurahua Volcano, Ecuador: structure, eruptive history and hazards. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 91:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hall ML, Steele AL, Mothes PA, Ruiz MC (2013) Pyroclastic density currents (PDC) of the 16–17 August 2006 eruptions of Tungurahua volcano, Ecuador: geophysical registry and characteristics. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 265:78–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hungr O, Evans SG (2004) Entrainment of debris in rock avalanches: an analysis of a long run-out mechanism. Geol Soc Am Bull 116(9–10):1240–1252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hungr O, McDougall S, Bovis M (2005) Entrainment of material by debris flows. In: Jakob M, Hungr O, Jakob DM (eds) Debris-flow hazards and related phenomena. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 135–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Iverson RM (2012) Elementary theory of bed-sediment entrainment by debris flows and avalanches. J Geophys Res 117(F3)Google Scholar
  35. Iverson RM, Denlinger RP (2001) Flow of variably fluidized granular masses across three-dimensional terrain: 1. Coulomb mixture theory. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 106(B1):537–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Iverson RM, Reid ME, Logan M, LaHusen RG, Godt JW, Griswold JP (2011) Positive feedback and momentum growth during debris-flow entrainment of wet bed sediment. Nat Geosci 4(2):116–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jessop DE, Kelfoun K, Labazuy P, Mangeney A, Roche O, Tillier JL, Trouillet M, Thibault G (2012) LiDAR derived morphology of the 1993 Lascar pyroclastic flow deposits, and implication for flow dynamics and rheology. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 245–246:81–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kelfoun K (2011) Suitability of simple rheological laws for the numerical simulation of dense pyroclastic flows and long-runout volcanic avalanches. J Geophys Res 116(B8)Google Scholar
  39. Kelfoun K, Druitt TH (2005) Numerical modeling of the emplacement of Socompa rock avalanche, Chile. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 110(B12), B12202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kelfoun K, Samaniego P, Palacios P, Barba D (2009) Testing the suitability of frictional behaviour for pyroclastic flow simulation by comparison with a well-constrained eruption at Tungurahua volcano (Ecuador). Bull Volcanol 71(9):1057–1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Launeau P, Robin P-YF (1996) Fabric analysis using the intercept method. Tectonophysics 267(1):91–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Le Pennec J-L, Jaya D, Samaniego P, Ramón P, Moreno Yánez S, Egred J, van der Plicht J (2008) The AD 1300–1700 eruptive periods at Tungurahua volcano, Ecuador, revealed by historical narratives, stratigraphy and radiocarbon dating. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 176(1):70–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Le Pennec J-L, Ruiz GA, Ramón P, Palacios E, Mothes P, Yepes H (2012) Impact of tephra falls on Andean communities: the influences of eruption size and weather conditions during the 1999–2001 activity of Tungurahua volcano, Ecuador. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 217–218:91–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Le Pennec J-L, de Saulieu G, Samaniego P, Jaya D, Gailler L (2013) A devastating Plinian eruption at Tungurahua Volcano reveals formative occupation at ~1100 cal BC in Central Ecuador. Radiocarbon 55(3–4)Google Scholar
  45. Lê L, Pitman EB (2009) A model for granular flows over an erodible surface. Siam J Appl Math 70(5):1407–1427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lube G, Cronin SJ, Platz T, Freundt A, Procter JN, Henderson C, Sheridan MF (2007) Flow and deposition of pyroclastic granular flows: a type example from the 1975 Ngauruhoe eruption, New Zealand. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 161(3):165–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mangeney A, Tsimring LS, Volfson D, Aranson IS, Bouchut F (2007) Avalanche mobility induced by the presence of an erodible bed and associated entrainment. Geophys Res Lett 34(22), L22401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mangeney A, Roche O, Hungr O, Mangold N, Faccanoni G, Lucas A (2010) Erosion and mobility in granular collapse over sloping beds. J Geophys Res 115(F3), F03040Google Scholar
  49. Mc Coy SW, Kean JW, Coe JA, Tucker GE, Staley DM, Wasklewicz TA (2012) Sediment entrainment by debris flows: in situ measurements from the headwaters of a steep catchment. J Geophy Res 117(No. F3)Google Scholar
  50. Mc Dougall S, Hungr O (2005) Dynamic modelling of entrainment in rapid landslides. Can Geotech J 42(5):1437–1448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Medina V, Hürlimann M, Bateman A (2008) Application of FLATModel, a 2D finite volume code, to debris flows in the northeastern part of the Iberian Peninsula. Landslides 5(1):127–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Naaim M, Faug T, Naaim-Bouvet F (2003) Dry granular flow modelling including erosion and deposition. Surv Geophys 24:569–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Patra AK, Bauer AC, Nichita CC, Pitman EB, Sheridan MF, Bursik M, Rupp B, Webber A, Stinton AJ, Namikawa LM, Renschler CS (2005) Parallel adaptive numerical simulation of dry avalanches over natural terrain. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 139(1–2):1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pirulli M, Pastor M (2012) Numerical study on the entrainment of bed material into rapid landslides. Geotechnique 62(11):959–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pitman E, Nichita C, Patra A, Bauer A, Bursik M, Weber A (2003) A model of granular flows over an erodible surface. Discret Contin Dyn Syst B 3(4):589–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Procter JN, Cronin SJ, Platz T, Patra A, Dalbey K, Sheridan M, Neall V (2010) Mapping block-and-ash flow hazards based on Titan 2D simulations: a case study from Mt. Taranaki, NZ. Nat Hazards 53(3):483–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Quan Luna B, Remaître A, van Asch TWJ, Malet JP, van Westen CJ (2012) Analysis of debris flow behavior with a one dimensional run-out model incorporating entrainment. Eng Geol 128:63–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Roche O, Montserrat S, Niño Y, Tamburrino A (2010) Pore fluid pressure and internal kinematics of gravitational laboratory air-particle flows: insights into the emplacement dynamics of pyroclastic flows. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 115(B9), B09206Google Scholar
  59. Roche O, Niño Y, Mangeney A, Brand B, Pollock N, Valentine GA (2013) Dynamic pore-pressure variations induce substrate erosion by pyroclastic flows. Geology 41(10):1107–1110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sahagian DL, Proussevitch AA (1998) 3D particle size distributions from 2D observations: stereology for natural applications. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 84:173–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Samaniego P, Le Pennec J-L, Robin C, Hidalgo S (2011) Petrological analysis of the pre-eruptive magmatic process prior to the 2006 explosive eruptions at Tungurahua volcano (Ecuador). J Volcanol Geotherm Res 199(1–2):69–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sarocchi D, Sulpizio R, Macías JL, Saucedo R (2011) The 17 July 1999 block-and-ash flow (BAF) at Colima Volcano: new insights on volcanic granular flows from textural analysis. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 204(1–4):40–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Saucedo R, Macías JL, Bursik MI, Mora JC, Gavilanes JC, Cortes A (2002) Emplacement of pyroclastic flows during the 1998–1999 eruption of Volcán de Colima, México. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 117(1–2):129–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Saucedo R, Macías J, Bursik M (2004) Pyroclastic flow deposits of the 1991 eruption of Volcán de Colima, Mexico. Bull Volcanol 66(4):291–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schwarzkopf LM, Schmincke H-U, Cronin SJ (2005) A conceptual model for block-and-ash flow basal avalanche transport and deposition, based on deposit architecture of 1998 and 1994 Merapi flows. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 139(1–2):117–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Shea T, Houghton BF, Gurioli L, Cashman KV, Hammer JE, Hobden BJ (2010) Textural studies of vesicles in volcanic rocks: an integrated methodology. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 190:271–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sovilla B, Burlando P, Bartelt P (2006) Field experiments and numerical modeling of mass entrainment in snow avalanches. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface 111(F3)Google Scholar
  68. Sparks RSJ (1976) Grain size variations in ignimbrites and implications for the transport of pyroclastic flows. Sedimentology 23(2):147–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sparks RSJ, Wilson L, Hulme G (1978) Theoretical modeling of the generation, movement, and emplacement of pyroclastic flows by column collapse. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 83(B4):1727–1739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sparks RSJ, Gardeweg MC, Calder ES, Matthews SJ (1997) Erosion by pyroclastic flows on Lascar Volcano, Chile. Bull Volcanol 58:557–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Steffke AM, Fee D, Garces M, Harris A (2010) Eruption chronologies, plume heights and eruption styles at Tungurahua Volcano: integrating remote sensing techniques and infrasound. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 193(3–4):143–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sulpizio R, Dellino P (2008) Chapter 2: Sedimentology, depositional mechanisms and pulsating behaviour of pyroclastic density currents. In: Gottsmann J, Marti J (eds) Developments in volcanology. Elsevier, pp 57–96Google Scholar
  73. Sulpizio R, Capra L, Sarocchi D, Saucedo R, Gavilanes-Ruiz JC, Varley NR (2010) Predicting the block-and-ash flow inundation areas at Volcán de Colima (Colima, Mexico) based on the present day (February 2010) status. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 193(1–2):49–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Tanguy JC, Ribière C, Scarth A, Tjetjep WS (1998) Victims from volcanic eruptions: a revised database. Bull Volcanol 60(2):137–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Yamashita S, Miyamoto K (1993) Model of pyroclastic flow and its numerical solution. IAHS Publication:67–67Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julien Bernard
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Karim Kelfoun
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Jean-Luc Le Pennec
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Silvia Vallejo Vargas
    • 4
  1. 1.Clermont Université, Université Blaise PascalLaboratoire Magmas et VolcansClermont-FerrandFrance
  2. 2.CNRS, UMR 6524, LMVClermont-FerrandFrance
  3. 3.IRD, R 163, LMVClermont-FerrandFrance
  4. 4.Instituto GeofísicoEscuela Politéchnica NacionalQuitoEcuador

Personalised recommendations