Modeling thickness variability in tephra deposition
- 526 Downloads
The attenuation of tephra fall thickness is most commonly estimated after contouring isolated and often irregular field measurements into smooth isopachs, with varying degrees of subjectivity introduced in the process. Here, we present an explicit description of the variability introduced into a semiempirical tephra attenuation relation. This opens the way to fitting models to actual tephra observations through maximum likelihood estimation, rather than using weighted least-squares estimation on the isopachs. The method is illustrated for small-scale basaltic explosive eruptions using a simple, but typical, data set of the actual tephra thickness data published from the 1973 Heimaey eruption. Of the distributions considered to describe variability in these measurements, the lognormal performed poorly, due to its tendency to predict a small number of greatly over-thickened deposits. The Weibull and gamma distributions fitted the data to a very similar degree and produced very similar estimates for the “effective volume,” mean wind direction, and mass/thickness attenuation rate. The latter can be inverted to obtain an estimate of the mean column height. The estimated wind direction, and the column height derived from the estimated thickness attenuation parameter, agreed very well with the direct observations made during the eruption. Augmented by a mixture framework allowing for the incorporation of multiple lobes and/or vents, the model was able to identify the source and direction of tephra deposition for the 1977 Ukinrek Maars eruptions from only the tephra thickness data.
KeywordsTephra Ukinrek Maars Aleatory uncertainty Statistical method
The first author (E.K.) is supported by the New Zealand Earthquake Commission and GNS Science. M.B. and S.C. are supported by the New Zealand Natural Hazards Research Platform, project “Living with Volcanic Risk.” We thank Christina Magill and an anonymous reviewer for improvements suggested to the original manuscript.
- Akaike H (1977) On entropy maximization principle. In: Krishnaiah PR (ed) Applications of statistics. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 27–41Google Scholar
- Connor LJ, Connor CB (2006) Inversion is the key to dispersion: understanding eruption dynamics buy inverting tephra fallout. In: Mader H et al. (ed) Statistics in volcanology, vol 1: special publications of IAVCEI. Geological Society, London, pp 231–242Google Scholar
- Heiken G, Murphy M, Hackett W, Scott W (1995) Volcanic hazards on energy infrastructure of the United States. United States Department of Energy, Washington DC, LA-UR 95-1087Google Scholar
- Miller TP, Casadevall TJ (2000) Volcanic ash hazards to aviation. In: Sigurdsson H (ed) Encyclopedia of volcanoes. Academic, San Diego, pp 915–930Google Scholar
- Pyle DM (2000) Sizes of volcanic eruptions. In: Sigurdsson H et al. (eds) Encyclopedia of volcanoes. Academic, San Diego, pp 263–269Google Scholar
- Sparks RSJ (1986) The dimension and dynamics of volcanic eruption columns. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 48:13–15Google Scholar
- Sparks RSJ, Bursik M, Carey SN, Gilbert JS, Glaze LS, Sigurdsson H, Woods AW (1997) Volcanic plumes. Wiley, Chichester, pp 574Google Scholar