Advertisement

Bulletin of Volcanology

, Volume 74, Issue 9, pp 2023–2036 | Cite as

Standardisation of the USGS Volcano Alert Level System (VALS): analysis and ramifications

  • C. J. FearnleyEmail author
  • W. J. McGuire
  • G. Davies
  • J. Twigg
Research Article

Abstract

The standardisation of volcano early warning systems (VEWS) and volcano alert level systems (VALS) is becoming increasingly common at both the national and international level, most notably following UN endorsement of the development of globally comprehensive early warning systems. Yet, the impact on its effectiveness, of standardising an early warning system (EWS), in particular for volcanic hazards, remains largely unknown and little studied. This paper examines this and related issues through evaluation of the emergence and implementation, in 2006, of a standardised United States Geological Survey (USGS) VALS. Under this upper-management directive, all locally developed alert level systems or practices at individual volcano observatories were replaced with a common standard. Research conducted at five USGS-managed volcano observatories in Alaska, Cascades, Hawaii, Long Valley and Yellowstone explores the benefits and limitations this standardisation has brought to each observatory. The study concludes (1) that the process of standardisation was predominantly triggered and shaped by social, political, and economic factors, rather than in response to scientific needs specific to each volcanic region; and (2) that standardisation is difficult to implement for three main reasons: first, the diversity and uncertain nature of volcanic hazards at different temporal and spatial scales require specific VEWS to be developed to address this and to accommodate associated stakeholder needs. Second, the plural social contexts within which each VALS is embedded present challenges in relation to its applicability and responsiveness to local knowledge and context. Third, the contingencies of local institutional dynamics may hamper the ability of a standardised VALS to effectively communicate a warning. Notwithstanding these caveats, the concept of VALS standardisation clearly has continuing support. As a consequence, rather than advocating further commonality of a standardised VALS, we recommend adoption of a less prescriptive VALS that is scalable and sufficiently flexible for use by local stakeholders via standardised communication products designed to accommodate local contingency, while also adhering to national policy.

Keywords

Volcano alert levels Standardisation Scaling-up Early warning systems 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thanks must be given to Deborah Dixon and Nick Pearce for their critical comments and suggestions, and to the two reviewers who provided valuable insights to help strengthen the paper and its appeal. This research would not have been possible without the guidance of Bill McGuire, John Twigg and Gail Davies at University College London. Finally, staff from the USGS volcano hazard program, along with numerous users of the volcano alert level systems, many at U.S. federal agencies, dedicated hours to this research across all five observatories, and thanks must be given for their generosity and kind hospitality during my fieldwork. Carina Fearnley’s thesis, ‘Standardising the USGS Volcano Alert Level System: acting in the context of risk, uncertainty and complexity’, was funded by an interdisciplinary grant between the UK Natural Environment and Economic and Social Research Councils (NERC and ESRC), project no. PTA-036-2006-00040 and was completed at the Aon Benfield UCL Hazard Research Centre at UCL.

References

  1. Airport-technology.com (2010, 09 March) The world's top ten cargo hub airports. http://www.airport-technology.com/features/feature78850. Accessed 07 September 2010
  2. Bailey RA, USGS (1983) The volcano hazards program: objectives and long-range plans. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, p 33Google Scholar
  3. Bakun WH (1988) Parkfield earthquake alert levels. Calif Geol 41(3):61–62Google Scholar
  4. Bakun WH, Breckenridge KS, Bredehoeft J, Burford RO, Ellsworth WL, Johnston MS, Jones L, Lindh AG, Mortensen C, Mueller RJ, Poley C, Roeloffs E, Schulz S, Segall P, Thatcher W (1987) Parkfield earthquake prediction scenarios and response plans. In: USGS Open-File Report 87–192. Menlo Park, CAGoogle Scholar
  5. Brantley SR, Casadevall TJ, Geological Survey (U.S.) (1990) The eruption of Redoubt Volcano, Alaska, December 14, 1989–August 31, 1990. In: USGS Circular 1061. US GPO, Washington, Denver, CO, p 33Google Scholar
  6. Casadevall TJ (1994) Volcanic ash and aviation safety: proceedings of the First International Symposium on Volcanic Ash and Aviation Safety. In: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 2047. US GPO, Washington, Denver, CO, p 450Google Scholar
  7. Department of Homeland Security (2008) National Incident Management System. http://www.fema.gov/pdf/emergency/nims/NIMS_core.pdf
  8. Ewert JW, Miller CD, Hendley II JW, Stauffer PH (2007) Mobile response team saves lives in volcano crises. In: US Geological Survey Fact Sheet 064-97. U.S. Geological SurveyGoogle Scholar
  9. US Forest Service (1992) Mt St Helens Contingency PlanGoogle Scholar
  10. Fujimura JH (1987) Constructing ‘Do-Able’ problems in cancer research: articulating alignment. Soc Stud Sci 17(2):257–293. doi: 10.1177/030631287017002003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gardner CA, Guffanti MC (2006) U.S. Geological Survey’s Alert Notification System for Volcanic Activity. In: Fact Sheet 2006-3139. U.S. Geological SurveyGoogle Scholar
  12. Gardner C, Guffanti M, Heliker C, Hill D, Lowenstern J, Murray T (2004) White Paper: Volcano alert-level notification within the Volcano Hazards Program: a report to look at the feasibility of a single unified system for all U.S. volcanoes. p 12Google Scholar
  13. GNS (2010) Volcano alert levels explained. http://www.gns.cri.nz/what/earthact/volcanoes/alertl_1.html. Accessed 05 January 2010
  14. Hawaii State Dept. of Health and County Civil Defense (2008) Emissions from Kilauea Volcano: brief summary of hazards and protective measures. http://www.uhh.hawaii.edu/∼nat_haz/volcanoes/SO2Brochure.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2008
  15. Hawaii Volcanoes National Park (2008) Hawaii Volcanoes National Park sulfur dioxide advisory program. http://www.nature.nps.gov/air/WebCams/parks/havoso2alert/havoadvisories.cfm. Accessed 25 June 2008
  16. Heliker C, Grigg JD, Takahashi TJ, Wright TL (1968) Volcano monitoring at the U.S geological Survey’s Hawaiian volcano observatory. Earthquakes & Volcanoes 18:1–72Google Scholar
  17. Hill DP (1998) 1998 SSA Meeting—Presidential Address: Science, Geologic Hazards, and the Public in a Large, Restless Caldera. Seismol Res Lett 69(5). doi: 10.1785/gssrl.69.5.400
  18. Hill DPJ, M.J.S; Langbein, J.O; McNutt, S.R; Miller, C.D; Mortensen, C.E; Pitt, A.M; Rojstaczer, S. (1991) Response plans for volcanic hazards in the Long Valley Caldera and Mono Craters Area, California. In: Open File Report 91-270. U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological SurveyGoogle Scholar
  19. Hill DP, Dzurisin D, Ellsworth WL, Endo ET, Galloway DL, Gerlach TM, Johnston MJS, Langbein J, McGee K, Miller CD, Oppenheimer D, Sorey ML (2002) Response plan for volcano hazards in the Long Valley Caldera and Mono Craters region, California. In: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 2185. U.S. Dept. of the InteriorGoogle Scholar
  20. Hogle LF (1995) Standardization across non-standard domains: the case of organ procurement. Sci Tech Hum Val 20(4):482–500. doi: 10.1177/016224399502000405 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. ICAO (2004) Handbook on the International Airways Volcano Watch (IAVW) and Annex 15Google Scholar
  22. ICAO (2005) Second meeting of the international airways volcano watch operations group (IAVWOPSG). Lima, PeruGoogle Scholar
  23. Japan Meteorological Agency (2010) Volcanic warnings and volcanic alert levels. http://www.seisvol.kishou.go.jp/tokyo/STOCK/kaisetsu/English/level.html. Accessed 06 January 2010
  24. Keith TEC (1995) The 1992 eruptions of Crater Peak vent, Mount Spurr volcano, Alaska. US GPO; U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Denver, CO, p 220Google Scholar
  25. Lockhart AB, Murray TL (2004) The Puyallup River Valley Pilot Lahar Detection System. In: Open File Report 2004-1028. USGS, Reston, VirginiaGoogle Scholar
  26. Marcus GE (1995) Ethnography in/of the world system: the emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annu Rev Anthropol 24:95–117. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.000523 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Newhall CG, Dzurisin D (1988) Historical unrest at large calderas of the World. In: U.S. Geological Survey bulletin 1855. US GPO, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  28. Scott KM, Macías JL, Naranjo JA, Rodriguez S, McGeehin JP (2001) Catastrophic debris flows transformed from landslides in volcanic terrains: mobility, hazard assessment and mitigation strategies. In: Professional Paper 1630 USGS, Reston, VirginiaGoogle Scholar
  29. Sorey ML, Farrar CD, Gerlach TM, McGee KA, Evans WC, Colvard EM, Hill DP, Bailey R, Rogie JD, Hendley II JW, Stauffer PH (1996) Invisible CO2 gas killing trees at Mammoth Mountain, California. In: U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 172-96. U.S Geological Survey, Reston, VirginiaGoogle Scholar
  30. Steenblik JW (1990) Volcanic ash: a rain of terra. In: Airline Pilot June/July, pp. 9–15Google Scholar
  31. Tilling RI, Heliker CC, Wright TL (1987) Eruptions of Hawaiian volcanoes: past, present, and future. Dept. of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO, p 54Google Scholar
  32. Timmermans S, Berg M (1997) Standardization in action: achieving local universality through medical protocols. Soc Stud Sci 27(2):273–305. doi: 10.1177/030631297027002003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Timmermans S, Epstein S (2010) A world of standards but not a standard world: toward a sociology of standards and standardization. Annu Rev Sociol 36(1):69–89. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102629 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Troise C, De Natale G, Kilburn CRJ (2006) Mechanisms of activity and unrest at large calderas. Geological Society, London, p 198Google Scholar
  35. UNDRO (1985) Volcanic emergency management. UNDRO, New York, US, p 87Google Scholar
  36. US Department of Homeland Security (2010) Department of Homeland Security Advisory System. http://www.dhs.gov/files/programs/Copy_of_press_release_0046.shtm#5. Accessed 6 May 2010.
  37. Waythomas CF, Power JA, Richter DH, McGimsey RG (1998) Preliminary volcano-hazard assessment for Akutan Volcano east-central Aleutian Islands, Alaska. In: Open-File Report 98-0360. Alaska Volcano Observatory, USGS, Anchorage, Alaska, p 36Google Scholar
  38. USGS VHP Website (2008) The consortium of U.S. volcano observatories. http://volcanoes.usgs.gov/vhp/cusvo.php. Accessed 31 March 2008
  39. WOVO (2008) Volcano alert levels. http://www.wovo.org/volcanic-alert-levels.html. Accessed 06 September 2008

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. J. Fearnley
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • W. J. McGuire
    • 5
  • G. Davies
    • 3
  • J. Twigg
    • 4
  1. 1.Aon Benfield UCL Hazard CentreUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Institute of Geography and Earth SciencesAberystwyth UniversityLondonUK
  3. 3.Department of GeographyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  4. 4.Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic EngineeringUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  5. 5.Department of Earth SciencesUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations