Advertisement

Bulletin of Volcanology

, Volume 74, Issue 6, pp 1293–1311 | Cite as

Vent temperature trends at the Vulcano Fossa fumarole field: the role of permeability

  • Andrew HarrisEmail author
  • Salvatore Alparone
  • Alessandro Bonforte
  • Jonathan Dehn
  • Salvatore Gambino
  • Luigi Lodato
  • Letizia Spampinato
Research Article

Abstract

Between 1994 and 2010, we completed 16 thermal surveys of Vulcano’s Fossa fumarole field (Aeolian Islands, Italy). In each survey, between 400 and 1,200 vent temperatures were collected using a thermal infrared thermometer from distances of ∼1 m. The results show a general decrease in average vent temperature during 1994–2003, with the average for the entire field falling from ∼220°C in 1994 to ∼150°C by 2003. However, between 2004 and 2010, we witnessed heating, with the average increasing to ∼190°C by 2010. Alongside these annual-scale field-wide trends, we record a spatial re-organisation of the fumarole field, characterised by shut down of vent zones towards the crater floor, matched by rejuvenation of zones located towards the crater rim. Heating may be expected to be associated with deflation because increased amounts of vaporisation will remove volume from the hydrothermal system Gambino and Guglielmino (J Geophys Res 113:B07402, 2008). However, over the 2004–2010 heating period, no ground deformation was observed. Instead, the number of seismic events increased from a typical rate of 37 events per month during 1994–2000 to 195 events per month during 2004–2010. As part of this increase, we noticed a much greater number of high-frequency events associated with rock fracturing. We thus suggest that the heating event of 2004–2010 was the result of changed permeability conditions, rather than change in the heat supply from the deeper magmatic source. Within this scenario, cooling causes shut down of lower sectors and re-establishment of pathways located towards the crater rim, causing fracturing, increased seismicity and heat flow in these regions. This is consistent with the zone of rejuvenation (which lies towards and at the rim) being the most favourable location for fracturing given the stress field of the Fossa cone Schöpa et al. (J Volcanol Geotherm Res 203:133–145, 2011); it is also the most established zone, having been active at least since the early twentieth century. Our data show the value of deploying multi-disciplinary geophysical campaigns at degassing (fumarolic) hydrothermal systems. This allows more complete and constrained understanding of the true heat loss dynamics of the system. In the case study presented here, it allows us to distinguish true heating from apparent heating phases. While the former are triggered from the bottom-up, i.e. they are driven by increases in heat supply from the magmatic source, the latter are triggered from the top-down, i.e. by changing permeability conditions in the uppermost portion of the system to allow more efficient heat flow over zones predisposed to fracturing.

Keywords

Fumaroles Vulcano Vent temperature Seismicity Deformation Permeability 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the work and support of the Gruppo Analisi Dati Sismici and the staff of the periodic GPS surveys group of INGV, Sez. Catania (Osservatorio Etneo). AH is indebted to the hospitality of La Giara.

The authors acknowledge the helpful suggestions and support of the two reviewers: Laszlo Kestay and anonymous. AH was supported by la Région Auvergne. This is Laboratory of Excellence ClerVolc contribution no. 20.

Supplementary material

445_2012_593_MOESM1_ESM.doc (54 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 54 kb)

References

  1. Alparone S, Cannata A, Gambino S, Gresta S, Milluzzo V, Montalto P (2010) Time–space variation of volcano-seismic events at La Fossa (Vulcano, Aeolian Islands, Italy): new insights into seismic sources in a hydrothermal system. Bull Volcanol 72:803–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aubert M, Diliberto S, Finizola A, Chébli Y (2008) Double origin of hydrothermal convective flux variations in the Fossa of Vulcano (Italy). Bull Volcanol 70:743–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barberi F, Neri G, Valenza M, Villari L (1991) 1987–1990 unrest at Vulcano. Acta Vulcanol 1:95–106Google Scholar
  4. Bolognesi L, D’Amore F (1983) Isotopic variation of the hydrothermal system on Vulcano Island, Italy. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 57:2069–2082Google Scholar
  5. Bonaccorso A, Bonforte A, Gambino S (2010) Thermal expansion–contraction and slope instability of a fumarole field inferred from geodetic measurements at Vulcano. Bull Volcanol. doi: 10.1007/s00445-010-0366-7
  6. Bonforte A, Guglielmino F (2008) Transpressive strain on the Lipari–Vulcano volcanic complex and dynamics of the “La Fossa” cone (Aeolian Islands, Sicily) revealed by GPS surveys on a dense network. Tectonophysics 457:64–70. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2008.05.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bukumirovic T, Italiano F, Nuccio PM, Pecoraino G, Principio E (1996) Evolution of the fumarolic activity at La Fossa crater of Vulcano. Acta Vulcanol 8:210–212Google Scholar
  8. Bukumirovic T, Italiano F, Nuccio PM (1997) The evolution of a dynamic geological system: the support of a GIS for geochemical measurements at the fumarole field of Vulcano, Italy. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 79:253–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Capasso G, Inguaggiato S, Nuccio PM, Pecoraino G, Sortino F (1994) Chemical variations in the fumarolic gases of La Fossa di Vulcano crater. Acta Vulcanol 4:41–43Google Scholar
  10. Cannata A, Diliberto S, Alparone S, Gambino S, Gresta S, Liotta M, Madonia P, Milluzzo V, Aliotta M, Montalto P (2012) Multiparametric approach in investigating volcano-hydrothermal systems: the case study of Vulcano (Aeolian Islands, Italy). Pure App Geophy 169:167–182. doi: 10.1007/s00024-011-0297-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carapezza M, Nuccio PM, Valenza M (1981) Genesis and evolution of the fumaroles of Vulcano (Aeolian Island Italy). Bull Volcanol 44:547–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chiodini G, Cioni R, Guidi M, Marini L, Raco B, Taddeucci G (1992a) Gas geobarometry in boiling hydrothermal systems: a possible tool to evacuate the hazard of hydrothermal explosions. Acta Vulcanol 2:99–107Google Scholar
  13. Chiodini G, Cioni R, Falsaperla S, Montalto A, Guidi M, Marini L (1992b) Geochemical and seismological investigations at Vulcano (Aeolian Islands) during 1978–1989. J Geophys Res 97(B7):11025–11032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chiodini G, Cioni R, Marini L (1993) Reactions governing the chemistry of crater fumaroles from Vulcano Island Italy, and implications for volcanic surveillance. Appl Geoch 8:357–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chiodini G, Cioni R, Marini L, Panichi C (1995) Origin of the fumarolic fluids of Vulcano Island, Italy, and implication for volcanic surveillance. Bull Volcanol 57:99–110Google Scholar
  16. Chiodini G, Granieri D, Avino R, Caliro S, Costa A (2005) Carbon dioxide diffuse degassing and estimation of heat release from volcanic and hydrothermal systems. J Geophys Res 110:B08204. doi: 10.1029/2004JB003542 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cioni R, D’Amore F (1984) A genetic model for the crater fumaroles of Vulcano Island (Sicily, Italy). Geothermics 13:375–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Diliberto IS (2011) Long-term variations of fumaroles temperatures on Vulcano Island (Italy). Ann Geophys 54:175–185Google Scholar
  19. Falsaperla S, Frazzetta G, Neri G, Nunnari G, Velardita R, Villari L (1989) Volcano monitoring in the Aeolian Islands (Southern Tyrrenian Sea): the Lipari–Vulcano eruptive complex. In: Latter JH (ed) Volcanic hazards: assessment and monitoring IAVCEI Proceedings in Volcanology 1. Springer, New York, pp 337–356Google Scholar
  20. Gambino S, Guglielmino F (2008) Ground deformation induced by geothermal processes: a model for La Fossa Crater (Vulcano Island, Italy). J Geophys Res 113:B07402. doi: 10.1029/2007JB005016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gaonac’h H, Vandemeulebrouck J, Stix J, Halbachs M (1994) Thermal infrared satellite measurements of volcanic activity at Stromboli and Vulcano. J Geophys Res 99(B5):9477–9485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Granieri D, Avino R, Carapezza ML, Chiodini G, Ranaldi M, Ricci T, Tarchini L (2006) Correlated increase in CO2 fumarolic content and diffuse emission from La Fossa crater (Vulcano, Italy). Evidence of volcanic unrest or increasing gas release from a stationary deep magma body? Geophys Res Lett 33:L13316. doi: 10.1029/2006GL026460 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Giustolisi V, de Oliveira HA (2005) Bibliografia generale delle Isole Eolie: Vulcano. Centro di Documentazione e Ricerca per La Sicilia Antica “P. Orsi”—Onlus (Palmermo), p 216Google Scholar
  24. Hardee HC (1982) Permeable convection above magma bodies. Tectonophysics 84:179–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harris AJL, Maciejewski AJH (2000) Thermal survey’s of the Vulcano Fossa fumarole field 1994–1999: evidence for fumarole migration and sealing. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 102(1–2):119–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Harris AJL, Stevenson DS (1997) Thermal observations of degassing open conduits and fumaroles at Stromboli and Vulcano using remotely sensed data. J Volcanol Geothem Res 76:175–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Harris AJL, Lodato L, Dehn J, Spampinato L (2009) Thermal characterization of the Vulcano fumarole field. Bull Volcanol 71:441–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Italiano F, Nuccio PM, Valenza M (1984) Geothermal energy and mass release at Vulcano, Aeolian Island, Italy. Rend Soc Ital Min Petrol 39:379–386Google Scholar
  29. Italiano F, Nuccio P (1992) Volcanic steam output directly measured in fumaroles: the observed variations at Vulcano Island Italy, between 1983 and 1987. Bull Volcanol 54:623–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lodato L, Spampinato L, Harris AJL, Dehn J, James MR, Pecora E, Biale E, Curcuruto A (2008) Use of forward looking infrared thermal cameras at active volcanoes. In: Marzocchi W, Zollo A (eds) Conception, verification and application of innovative techniques to study active volcanoes. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Italy, pp 427–434Google Scholar
  31. Martini M, Giannini L, Capaccioni B (1991a) The influence of water on chemical changes of fumarolic gases: different characters and their implications for forecasting volcanic activity. Acta Volcanol 1:13–16Google Scholar
  32. Matsushima N, Kazahaya K, Saito G, Shinohara H (2003) Mass and heat flux of volcanic gas discharging from the summit crater of Iwodake volcano, Satsuma-Iwojima, Japan, during 1996–1999. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 126:285–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Martini M, Giannini L, Capaccioni B (1991b) Geochemical and seismic precursors to volcanic activity. Acta Volcanol 1:7–11Google Scholar
  34. Mazor E, Cioni R, Corazza E, Fratta M, Magro G, Matsuo S, Hirabayashi J, Shinohara H, Martini M, Piccardi G, Cellini-Legittimo P (1988) Evolution of fumarolic gases—boundary conditions set by measured parameters: case study at Vulcano, Italy. Bull Volcanol 50:71–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Oppenheimer CMM, Rothery DA (1991) Infrared monitoring of volcanoes by satellite. J Geol Soc Lon 148:563–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schöpa A, Pantaleo M, Walter TA (2011) Scale-dependent location of hydrothermal vents: stress field models and infrared field observations of the Fossa Cone, Vulcano Island, Italy. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 203:133–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sicardi L (1940) Il recente ciclo dell’attività fumarolica dell’isola di Vulcano. Bull Volcanol 7:85–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stevenson DS (1993) Physical models of fumarolic flow. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 57:139–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Todesco M, Rinaldi AP, Bonafede M (2010) Modeling of unrest signals in heterogeneous hydrothermal systems. J Geophys Res 115:B09213. doi: 10.1029/2010JB007474 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew Harris
    • 1
    Email author
  • Salvatore Alparone
    • 2
  • Alessandro Bonforte
    • 2
  • Jonathan Dehn
    • 3
  • Salvatore Gambino
    • 2
  • Luigi Lodato
    • 2
  • Letizia Spampinato
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.Laboratoire Magmas et VolcansUniversité Blaise PascalClermont FerrandFrance
  2. 2.Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia—Sezione di CataniaCataniaItaly
  3. 3.University of Alaska FairbanksAlaskaUSA
  4. 4.Department of GeographyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations