Characteristics of submarine pumice-rich density current deposits sourced from turbulent mixing of subaerial pyroclastic flows at the shoreline: field and experimental assessment
- 395 Downloads
This study investigates the types of subaqueous deposits that occur when hot pyroclastic flows turbulently mix with water at the shoreline through field studies of the Znp marine tephra in Japan and flume experiments where hot tephra sample interacted with water. The Znp is a very thick, pumice-rich density current deposit that was sourced from subaerial pyroclastic flows entering the Japan Sea in the Pliocene. Notable characteristics are well-developed grain size and density grading (lithic-rich base, pumice-rich middle, and ash-rich top), preponderance of sedimentary lithic clasts picked up from the seafloor during transport, fine ash depletion in coarse facies, and presence of curviplanar pumice clasts. Flume experiments provide a framework for interpreting the origin and proximity to source of the Znp tephra. On contact of hot tephra sample with water, steam explosions produced a gas-supported pyroclastic density current that advanced over the water while a water-supported density current was produced on the tank floor from the base of a turbulent mixing zone. Experimental deposits comprise proximal lithic breccia, medial pumice breccia, and distal fine ash. Experiments undertaken with cold, water-saturated slurries of tephra sample and water did not produce proximal lithic breccias but a medial basal lithic breccia beneath an upper pumice breccia. Results suggest the characteristics and variations in Znp facies were strongly controlled by turbulent mixing and quenching, proximity to the shoreline, and depositional setting within the basin. Presence of abundant curviplanar pumice clasts in submarine breccias reflects brittle fracture and dismembering that can occur during fragmentation at the vent or during quenching. Subsequent transport in water-supported pumiceous density currents preserves the fragmental textures. Careful study is needed to distinguish the products of subaerial versus subaqueous eruptions.
KeywordsExperiment Znp tephra Pyroclastic density current Submarine Pumice
We acknowledge the help of Martin Launer in constructing the experiments and Makiko Tan, Haruna Yahagi, and Norie Fujibayashi in the field. J McPhie, R Fiske, M Manga, and an anonymous reviewer made useful comments on a previous version of this manuscript. This research was undertaken while SA was an Australian Research Council Research Fellow. The research was funded by the Australian Academy of Science Scientific Visits to Europe Award for Young Researchers (SA), the Australian Academy of Science bilaterial exchange program with the Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science (SA) and grants Fr947/7-1 and 7–2 from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (AF).
- Fisher RV (1965) Settling velocities of glass shards. Deep-Sea Res 12:345–353Google Scholar
- Freundt A (2003) Entrance of hot pyroclastic flows into the sea: experimental observations. Bull Volcanol 65:144–164Google Scholar
- Kurokawa K, Takahashi H, Aono N, Abe Y, Iizuka K, Sugawara N, Chino K (1987) Subaqueous tephra layers in the Shiiya and Nishiyama Formations in the northern Nishiyama Oil Field, Niigata Prefecture, central Japan. Mem Fac Educ Niigata Univ (Natural Sci) 29:1–14, Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar
- Kurokawa K, Maruyama E, Sawaguri T (1989) Subaqueous tephra layers in the Shiiya and Nishiyama Formations in the northern Chuo Oil Field Niigata, Prefecture, central Japan. Mem Fac Educ Niigata Univ (Natural Sci) 30:39–64, Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar
- Kurokawa K, Noguchi N, Higuchi Y (2002) Tephra marker beds and their correlation in the Higashiyama Hills east of Nagaoka City (part 2). Detection of the Znp and Ysc Tephra beds in Pliocene series and their significance. Mem Fac Educ and Human Sci, Niigata Univ (Natural Sci) 5:41–68Google Scholar
- Kurokawa K, Higuchi Y, Aoki T, Kawaksaki Y (2004) Correlation of the early Pliocene Znp Tephra Bed to the Hjp Tephra Beda round Yoneyama in the Niigata region, central Japan. Mem Fac Educ and Human Sci, Niigata Univ (Natural Sci) 6:135–148Google Scholar
- Lowe DR (1982) Sediment gravity flows; II. Depositional models with special reference to the deposits of high-density turbidity currents. J Sediment Res 52:279–297Google Scholar
- Nagahashi Y, Takahashi T, Yanagisawa Y, Kurokawa K, Yoshida T (2004) Widespread tephra beds in the Pliocene Dainenji Formation in the Pacific coast, Fukushima Prefecture, northeastern Japan. Earth Sci (Chikyu Kagaku) 58:337–344 (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
- Simpson JE (1987) Gravity currents in the environment and the laboratory. Wiley, New York, pp 1–244Google Scholar
- Takeuchi K, Yoshimura T, Kato H (1996) Geology of the Kakizaki district with geologicial sheet Map at 1:50,000. Geol Surv Japan 1–48 (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
- Trofimovs J, Amy L, Boudon G, Deplus C, Doyle E, Fournier N, Hart MB, Komorowski JC, Le Friant A, Lock EJ, Pudsey C, Ryan G, Sparks RSJ, Talling PJ (2006) Submarine pyroclastic deposits formed at the Soufrière Hills volcano, Montserrat (1995–2003): what happens when pyroclastic flows enter the ocean? Geology 34:549–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar