Advertisement

Bulletin of Volcanology

, Volume 73, Issue 3, pp 335–346 | Cite as

Lava tube shatter rings and their correlation with lava flux increases at Kīlauea Volcano, Hawai‘i

  • Tim R. OrrEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

Shatter rings are circular to elliptical volcanic features, typically tens of meters in diameter, which form over active lava tubes. They are typified by an upraised rim of blocky rubble and a central depression. Prior to this study, shatter rings had not been observed forming, and, thus, were interpreted in many ways. This paper describes the process of formation for shatter rings observed at Kīlauea Volcano during November 2005–July 2006. During this period, tilt data, time-lapse images, and field observations showed that episodic tilt changes at the nearby Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō cone, the shallow magmatic source reservoir, were directly related to fluctuations in the level of lava in the active lava tube, with periods of deflation at Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō correlating with increases in the level of the lava stream surface. Increases in lava level are interpreted as increases in lava flux, and were coincident with lava breakouts from shatter rings constructed over the lava tube. The repetitive behavior of the lava flux changes, inferred from the nearly continuous tilt oscillations, suggests that shatter rings form from the repeated rise and fall of a portion of a lava tube roof. The locations of shatter rings along the active lava tube suggest that they form where there is an abrupt decrease in flow velocity through the tube, e.g., large increase in tube width, abrupt decrease in tube slope, and (or) sudden change in tube direction. To conserve volume, this necessitates an abrupt increase in lava stream depth and causes over-pressurization of the tube. More than a hundred shatter rings have been identified on volcanoes on Hawai‘i and Maui, and dozens have been reported from basaltic lava fields in Iceland, Australia, Italy, Samoa, and the mainland United States. A quick study of other basaltic lava fields worldwide, using freely available satellite imagery, suggests that they might be even more common than previously thought. If so, this confirms that episodic fluctuation in lava effusion rate is a relatively common process at basaltic volcanoes, and that the presence of shatter rings in prehistoric lava flow fields can be used as evidence that such fluctuations have occurred.

Keywords

Hawai‘i Kīlauea Volcano Lava tube Shatter ring Lava flux 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I thank the staff of the Hawaiian Volcano Observatory for many important field observations and useful discussions about shatter ring behavior. Roger Denlinger and James Kauahikaua provided valuable insight into the fluid mechanics of lava. Finally, I am grateful to Matthew Patrick, Richard Hoblitt, Scott Rowland, and Sonia Calvari whose helpful comments improved this manuscript. This work was funded by the U.S. Geological Survey’s Volcano Hazards Program.

Supplementary material

445_2010_414_MOESM1_ESM.mpg (4.4 mb)
Online Resource 1 Time-lapse movie comparing the timing of lava stream level changes within the PKK lava tube to radial tilt at the nearby POC tiltmeter on the north flank of the Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō cone. The time-lapse images were captured every minute, and the movie spans the period from 0130 H.s.t. to 0530 H.s.t. on June 11, 2006. The background stream level, prior to POC deflation, is characterized by a relatively smooth, laminar-flow surface. Within minutes of the onset of POC deflation, a standing wave develops on the surface of the lava stream. With additional deflation, this gives way to a turbulent-flow surface with a wave rolling upstream back upon itself, and culminates in a bubbling, rising then falling surface with no significant downstream motion. The lava stream then reverses through these stages until the background level is again reached just before the start of POC inflation. The view is downstream at an angle of about 35º from horizontal. The size of the opening is about 1 m, and the depth to the lava stream is estimated at 5–6 m. The vertical change in stream height is estimated at 3–4 m (MPG 4.43 mb)
Online Resource 2

Time-lapse movie comparing the timing of shatter ring uplift and lava tube breakouts to radial tilt at the nearby POC tiltmeter on the north flank of the Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō cone. The time-lapse images were captured every ten minutes, and the movie spans the period from 1130 H.s.t. on March 20, 2006 to 0700 H.s.t. on March 22, 2006. Shatter ring uplift, followed by the emergence of lava from the base of the shatter ring, is clearly visible during daylight hours and occurs during deflation at POC. The breakouts stop and the shatter ring drops back down prior to the onset of inflation. At night, only the breakouts are visible, but the shatter ring presumably rises and falls as well. The shatter ring is approximately 40 m in diameter (MPG 4967 kb)

445_2010_414_MOESM3_ESM.kmz (18.3 mb)
Online Resource 3 Google Earth placemark file (.KMZ) cataloguing the worldwide occurrence of shatter rings based on satellite imagery displayed by Google Earth. This placemark includes those features known or presumed to be shatter rings, as well as those features thought to be shatter rings based on their map-view appearance and alignment with lava tube features such as roof collapses. Green pins refer to features known to be shatter rings, yellow pins refer to features described in other publications that are presumed to be shatter rings, and red pins refer to those features that appear to be shatter rings but have not been verified. (KMZ 18700 kb)

References

  1. Atkinson A, Griffin TJ, Stephenson PJ (1975) A major lava tube system from Undara Volcano, North Queensland. Bull Volcanol 39:266–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailey JE, Harris AJL, Dehn J, Calvari S, Rowland SK (2006) The changing morphology of an open lava channel on Mt. Etna Bull Volcanol 68:497–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burr DM, Bruno BC, Lanagan PD, Glaze LS, Jaeger WL, Soare RJ, Wan Bun Tseung JM, Skinner JA Jr, Baloga SM (2009) Mesoscale raised rim depressions (MRRDs) on Earth: A review of the characteristics, process, and spatial distributions of analogs for Mars. Planet Space Sci 57:579–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Calvari S, Pinkerton H (1999) Lava tube morphology on Etna and evidence for lava flow emplacement mechanisms. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 90:263–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cervelli PF, Miklius A (2003) The shallow magmatic system of Kīlauea Volcano. In: Heliker C, Swanson DA, Takahashi TJ (eds) The Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō–Kupaianaha eruption of Kīlauea Volcano, Hawai‘i: The first 20 years. US Geol Surv Prof Pap 1676:149–163Google Scholar
  6. Clague DA, Hagstrum JT, Champion DE, Beeson MH (1999) Kīlauea summit overflows; their ages and distribution in the Puna District, Hawai‘i. Bull Volcanol 61:363–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Greeley R, Hyde JH (1972) Lava tubes of the Cave Basalt, Mount St. Helens, Washington. Geol Soc Am Bull 83:2397–2418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Guest JE, Wood CA, Greeley R (1984) Lava tubes, terraces and megatumuli on the 1614–24 pahoehoe lava flow field, Mount Etna, Sicily. Bull Volcanol 47:635–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harris AJL, Favalli M, Mazzarini F, Hamilton CW (2009) Construction dynamics of a lava channel. Bull Volcanol 71:459–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heliker C, Mattox TN (2003) The first two decades of the Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō–Kupaianaha eruption: Chronology and selected bibliography. In: Heliker C, Swanson DA, Takahashi TJ (eds) The Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō–Kupaianaha eruption of Kīlauea Volcano, Hawai‘i: The first 20 years. US Geol Surv Prof Pap 1676:1–27Google Scholar
  11. Heliker C, Kauahikaua J, Sherrod DR, Lisowski M, Cervelli PF (2003) The rise and fall of Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō cone, 1983–2002. In: Heliker C, Swanson DA, Takahashi TJ (eds) The Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō–Kupaianaha eruption of Kīlauea Volcano, Hawai‘i: The first 20 years. US Geol Surv Prof Pap 1676:29–51Google Scholar
  12. Hroarsson B (2006) Íslenskir Hellar. Vaka-Helgafell, Reykjavik, 2 Vol, 672 pGoogle Scholar
  13. Hoffman JP, Ulrich GE, Garcia MO (1990) Horizontal ground deformation patterns and magma storage during the Puu Oo eruption of Kīlauea volcano, Hawai‘i: episodes 22–42. Bull Volcanol 52:522–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. James MR, Pinkerton H, Robson S (2007) Image-based measurement of flux variation in distal regions of active lava flows. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 8:Q03006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kauahikaua J, Cashman KV, Mattox TN, Heliker CC, Hon KA, Mangan MT, Thornber CR (1998) Observations on basaltic lava streams in tubes from Kīlauea Volcano, island of Hawai‘i. J Geophys Res 103:27303–27323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kauahikaua J, Sherrod DR, Cashman KV, Heliker C, Hon K, Mattox TN, Johnson JA (2003) Hawaiian lava-flow dynamics during the Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō-Kupaianaha eruption: A tale of two decades. In: Heliker C, Swanson DA, Takahashi TJ (eds) The Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō–Kupaianaha eruption of Kīlauea Volcano, Hawai‘i: The first 20 years. US Geol Surv Prof Pap 1676:63–87Google Scholar
  17. Kear D, Wood BL (1959) The geology and hydrology of Western Samoa. N Zeal Geol Surv Bull 63Google Scholar
  18. Lipman Pw, Ng B (1987) Aa flow dynamics, Mauna Loa 1984. US Geol Surv Prof Pap 1350:1527–1567Google Scholar
  19. Orr TR, Hoblitt RP (2008) A versatile time-lapse camera system developed by the Hawaiian Volcano Observatory for use at Kīlauea Volcano, Hawai‘i. US Geol Surv Sci Investig Rep 2008–5117Google Scholar
  20. Summerour JH (1989) The geology of five unusual craters, Aden Basalts, Dona Ana County, New Mexico. Thesis, University of Texas, El PasoGoogle Scholar
  21. Waters AC, Donnelly-Nolan JM, Rogers BW (1990) Selected Caves and Lava-Tube Systems in and near Lava Beds National Monument, California. US Geol Surv Bull 1673Google Scholar
  22. Wood CA, Watts R, Waters E, Cheetham P (2002) Laki Underground 2001 Expedition Report: The Bournemouth University and Shepton Mallet Caving Club Expedition to Iceland. Bournemouth University, UKGoogle Scholar
  23. Wood CA, Cheetham P, Polonen H, Watts R (2004) Hallmundarhraun 2003 Iceland Expedition Report: A Bournemouth University project undertaken in association with Icelandic Speleological Society. Bournemouth University, UKGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag (outside the USA)  2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hawaiian Volcano Observatory—US Geological SurveyHawai‘i National ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations