Testing the suitability of frictional behaviour for pyroclastic flow simulation by comparison with a well-constrained eruption at Tungurahua volcano (Ecuador)
- 466 Downloads
We use a well-monitored eruption of Tungurahua volcano to test the validity of the frictional behaviour, also called Mohr–Coulomb, which is generally used in geophysical flow modelling. We show that the frictional law is not appropriate for the simulation of pyroclastic flows at Tungurahua. With this law, the longitudinal shape of the simulated flows is a thin wedge of material progressively passing, over several hundreds of metres, from an unrealistic thickness at the front (<<1 mm) to some tens of centimetres. Simulated deposits form piles which accumulate at the foot of the volcano and are more similar to sand piles than natural pyroclastic deposits. Finally, flows simulated with a frictional rheology are not channelised by the drainage system, but affect all the flanks of the volcano. In addition, their velocity can exceed 150 m s−1, allowing pyroclastic flows to cross interfluves at bends in the valley, affecting areas that would not have been affected in reality and leaving clear downstream areas that would be covered in reality. Instead, a simple empirical law, a constant retarding stress (i.e. a yield strength), involving only one free parameter, appears to be much better adapted for modelling pyroclastic flows. A similar conclusion was drawn for the Socompa debris avalanche simulation (Kelfoun and Druitt, J Geophys Res 110:B12202, 2005).
KeywordsPyroclastic flows Numerical simulation Rheology Tungurahua
Those studies have been funded by the French Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD). We thanks the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) and Dr Hiroyuki Kumagai for the use of seismic data. The paper was improved by Fran van Wyk de Vries and by the useful comments of A. Neri, M. Bursik, an anonymous reviewer and the editor. The authors deeply thank the staff of the Tungurahua Volcano Observatory (IG-EPN), especially those in charge during the July 14th and August 16th eruptions.
Thickness of pyroclastic flows at Tungurahua simulated using the frictional model. Same parameters and colour scale as for Fig. 6. The red points above the crater indicate pyroclastic flow genesis (duration, 40 min). (AVI 6018 kb)
Thickness of pyroclastic flows at Tungurahua simulated using the constant retarding stress model. Same parameters and colour scale as for Fig. 9. The red points above the crater indicate pyroclastic flow genesis (duration, 40 min). (AVI 8375 kb)
- Hall ML, Mothes PA, Ramon P, Arellano S, Barba D, Palacios P (2007) Dense pyroclastic flows of the 16–17 August 2006 Eruption of Tungurahua Volcano, Ecuador. AGU Joint Assembly, Acapulco, MexicoGoogle Scholar
- Heim A (1882) Der Bergsturz von Elm. Z Dtsch Geol Ges 34:74–115 (in German)Google Scholar
- Hobblit RP (1986) Observations of the eruptions of July 22 and August 7, 1980, at Mount St. Helens, Washington. USGS Prof Paper, 1335Google Scholar
- Kumagai H, Yepes H, Vaca M, Caceres V, Nagai T, Yokoe K, Imai T, Miyakawa K, Yamashina T, Arrais S, Vasconez F, Pinajota E, Cisneros C, Ramos C, Paredes M, Gomezjurado L, Garcia-Aristizabal A, Molina I, Ramon P, Segovia M, Palacios P, Troncoso L, Alvarado A, Aguilar J, Pozo J, Enriquez W, Mothes P, Hall M, Inoue I, Nakano M, Inoue H (2007) Enhancing volcano-monitoring capabilities in Ecuador. Eos Trans AGU 88(23):245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mothes PA and staff IG-EPN (2007) Tungurahua Volcano's 1999–2007 eruptive process, monitoring results and risk mitigation. AGU, Joint Assembly, Acapulco, MexicoGoogle Scholar
- Pudasaini SP, Hutter K (2006) Avalanche dynamics: dynamics of rapid flows of dense granular avalanches. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- Samaniego P, Yepes H, Arellano S, Palacios P, Mothes P, Le Pennec JL, Troncoso L, IG-EPN staff (2007) Monitoring a waxing and waning volcanic activity: the July 14th and August 16th 2006 eruptions of Tungurahua volcano (Ecuador). Cities on Volcanoes 5, Shimabara, JapanGoogle Scholar
- Sheridan MF (1979) Emplacement of pyroclastic flows: a review. Sp Paper Geol Soc Amer 180:125–136Google Scholar