Advertisement

Bulletin of Volcanology

, Volume 70, Issue 2, pp 123–138 | Cite as

Volcanic hazard communication using maps: an evaluation of their effectiveness

  • Katharine Haynes
  • Jenni Barclay
  • Nick Pidgeon
Research Article

Abstract

Hazard maps are considered essential tools in the communication of volcanic risk between scientists, the local authorities and the public. This study investigates the efficacy of such maps for the volcanic island of Montserrat in the West Indies using both quantitative and qualitative research techniques. Normal plan view maps, which have been used on the island over the last 10 years of the crisis, are evaluated against specially produced three-dimensional (3D) maps and perspective photographs. Thirty-two demographically representative respondents of mixed backgrounds, sex, education and location were interviewed and asked to complete a range of tasks and identification on the maps and photographs. The overall results show that ordinary people have problems interpreting their environment as a mapped representation. We found respondents’ ability to locate and orientate themselves as well as convey information relating to volcanic hazards was improved when using aerial photographs rather than traditional plan view contour maps. There was a slight improvement in the use of the 3D maps, especially in terms of topographic recognition. However, the most striking increase in effectiveness was found with the perspective photographs, which enabled people to identify features and their orientation much more readily. For Montserrat it appears that well labelled aerial and perspective photographs are the most effective geo-spatial method of communicating volcanic risks.

Keywords

Volcanic hazard map Volcanic risk map Montserrat Volcanic risk communication Evaluation Geo-spatial 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the people of Montserrat, for their time invested in completing the survey. The MVO and staff are also thanked for their help as are Miguel Dorio and Wouter Poortinga for their statistical advice and Iain Lake for his help with the GIS maps. Thanks are due to the reviwers Dr Willy Aspinall and Dr Shane Cronin for their helpfull comments and advice and also to Tom Lowe and John McAneney for proof reading earlier drafts of this manuscript. This work was supported by the UK NERC/ESRC and carried out within the School of Environmental Sciences at the University of East Anglia.

References

  1. Alexander DE (2004) Cognitive mapping as an emergency management exercise. J Conting Crisis Man 12:150–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asian Disaster Reduction Centre (2005) Community-based hazard mapping: an effective tool to raise public awareness. In: Jeggle T (ed) Know risk. United Nations publication, Tudor Rose, pp 78–79Google Scholar
  3. Aspinall WP, Loughlin SC, Michael FV, Miller AD, Norton GE, Rowley KC, Sparks RSJ, Young SR (2002) The Montserrat Volcano Observatory: its evolution, organization, role and activities. In: Druitt TH, Kokelaar BP (eds) The eruption of Soufrière Hills Volcano, Montserrat, from 1995 to 1999. Geol Soc London Mem 21:71–91Google Scholar
  4. Bryman A (1988) Quantity and quality in social research. Unwin Hyman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Clay E, Barrow C, Benson C, Dempster J, Kokelaar P, Pillai N, Seaman J (1999) An evaluation of HMG’s response to the Montserrat volcanic emergency, 2 vols. Evaluation Report EV635, Department for International Development, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Cole PD, Calder ES, Sparks RSJ, Clarke AB, Druitt TH, Young SR, Herd RA, Harford CL, Norton GE (2002) Deposits from dome-collapse and fountain-collapse pyroclastic flows at Soufriere Hills Volcano, Montserrat. In: Druitt TH, Kokelaar BP (eds) The eruption of Soufrière Hills Volcano, Montserrat, from 1995 to 1999. Geol Soc London Mem 21:231–262Google Scholar
  7. Cronin SJ, Gaylord DR, Charley P, Wallez S, Alloway BV, Esau JW (2004) Participatory methods of incorporating scientific with traditional knowledge for volcanic hazard assessment on Ambae Island, Vanuatu. Bull Volcanol 66:652–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Vaus D (2004) Surveys in social research, 5th edition. Routledge, London & New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Delucia AA (1978) An analysis of the communication effectiveness of public planning maps. Can Cartog 16:168–182Google Scholar
  10. Downs R, Stea D (1973) Cognitive maps and spatial behaviour. In: Downs R, Stea D (eds) Image and environment. Edward Arnold, London, pp 1–26Google Scholar
  11. Downs R, Stea D (1977) Maps in minds: reflections on cognitive maps. Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Dymon UJ, Winter NL (1991) Emergency mapping in grass roots America: a derailment evacuation case study. Geoforum 22:337–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dymon UJ, Winter NL (1993) Evacuation mapping: the utility of guidelines. Disasters 17:12–24Google Scholar
  14. Gould P, White R (1986) Mental maps, 2nd edition. Allen, BostonGoogle Scholar
  15. Gregg CE, Houghton BF, Johnston DM, Paton D, Swanson DA (2004) The perception of volcanic risk in Kona communities from Mauna Loa and Hualalai volcanoes, Hawaii. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 130:179–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hammersley M (1996) The relationship between qualitative and quantitative research: paradigm loyalty versus methodological eclecticism. In: Richardson TE (ed) Handbook of qualitative research methods for psychology and the social sciences. BPS Books (The British Psychological Society), Leicester, UK, pp 159–174Google Scholar
  17. Handmer J (1985) Floodplain maps: uses and limitations as public information. In: Abstracts of the 13th New Zealand Geographical Society Conference, Hamilton, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  18. Handmer J, Milne J (1981) Flood maps as public education. In: Abstracts of the Floodplain Management Conference. Australian Water Resources Council, Canberra, Australia, pp 1–26Google Scholar
  19. Henwood KL, Pidgeon NF (1992) Qualitative research and psychological theorizing. British J Psychol 83:97–111Google Scholar
  20. Herd RA, Edmonds M, Bass VA (2005) Catastrophic lava dome failure at Soufrière Hills Volcano, Montserrat, 12–13 July 2003. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 148:234–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Horlick-Jones T, Sime J, Pidgeon N (2003) The social dynamics of environmental risk perception: implications for risk communication research and practice. In: Pidgeon N, Kasperson RE, Slovic P (eds) The social amplification of risk. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 262–285Google Scholar
  22. Johnston D, Bebbington MS, Lai CD, Houghton BF, Paton D (1999) Volcanic hazard perceptions: Comparative shifts in knowledge and risk. Disast Prevent Man 8:118–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kokelaar BP (2002) Setting, chronology and consequences of the eruption of Soufrière Hills Volcano, Montserrat (1995–1999). In: Druitt TH, Kokelaar BP (eds) The eruption of Soufrière Hills Volcano, Montserrat, from 1995 to 1999. Geol Soc London Mem 21:1–44Google Scholar
  24. Krimsky S, Golding D (1992) Social theories of risk. Praeger, Westport, CTGoogle Scholar
  25. Lantzy RJ, Cichy PT, Leitzinger AH (1998) Use of geographical maps to manage risk from groundwater contamination. J Haz Mat 61:319–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Loughlin SC, Baxter PJ, Aspinall WP, Darroux B, Harford CL, Miller AD (2002) Eyewitness accounts of the 25th June 1997 pyroclastic flows at Soufrière Hills Volcano, Montserrat, and implications for disaster mitigation. In: Druitt TH, Kokelaar BP (eds) The eruption of Soufrière Hills Volcano, Montserrat, from 1995 to 1999. Geol Soc London Mem 21:211–230Google Scholar
  27. McKay JM (1984) Community response to hazard information. Disasters 8:118–123Google Scholar
  28. Mitchell TC (2006) Building a disaster resilient future: lessons from participatory research in St. Kitts and Montserrat. PhD thesis, University College LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. Moen JET, Ale BJM (1998) Risk maps and communication. J Haz Mat 61:271–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Monmonier M (1996) How to lie with maps. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  31. Monmonier M (1997) Cartographies of danger: mapping hazards in America. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  32. Muehrcke PC (1978) Map use: reading, analysis and interpretation. JP Publications, Madison, WIGoogle Scholar
  33. Newhall C (2000) Volcano warnings. In: Sigurdsson H, Houghton B, McNutt S, Rymer H, Stix J (eds) Encyclopaedia of volcanoes. Academic, New York, pp 1185–1197Google Scholar
  34. Nourbakhsh I, Sargent R, Wright A, Cramer K, McClendon B, Jones M (2006) Mapping disaster zones. Nature 439:787–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pallant J (2001) SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS. Open University Press, Buckingham, UKGoogle Scholar
  36. Pattullo P (2000) Fire from the mountain: the tragedy of Montserrat and the betrayal of its people. Constable, LondonGoogle Scholar
  37. Pidgeon N, Henwood K (2004) Grounded theory. In: Hardy M, Bryman A (eds) Handbook of data analysis. Sage, London, pp 625–648Google Scholar
  38. Plester B, Richards J, Blades M, Spencer C (2002) Young children’s ability to use aerial photographs as maps. J Env Psychol 22:29–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Possekel AK (1999) Living with the unexpected. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  40. Roder W (1961) Attitude and knowledge on the Topeka flood plain. In: White G (ed) Papers on flood problems. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 62–83Google Scholar
  41. Skelton T (2000) Political uncertainties and natural disasters: Montserratian identity and colonial status. Interventions: Intl J Postcolonial Stud 2:103–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vajjhala S, Fischbeck P (2000) Re inventing GIS: From information to communication. Carnegie Mellon University, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
  43. Yeo S (2004) Are residential property values adversely affected by disclosure of flood risk? In: Abstracts of Staying afloat: floodplain management conference of NSW, Coffs HarbourGoogle Scholar
  44. Young SR, Barclay J, Miller AD, Sparks RSJ, Stewart RC, Davies MA (1997) Deformation of the Galways Wall and related volcanic activity, November 1996 to March 1997. MVO special report 2, Montserrat Volcano ObservatoryGoogle Scholar
  45. Young SR, Sparks RS, Aspinall WP, Lynch LL, Miller AD, Robertson REA, Shepherd JB (1998) Overview of the eruption of Soufriere Hills volcano, Montserrat, 18 July 1995 to December 1997. Geophys Res Lett 25:3389–3392CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katharine Haynes
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jenni Barclay
    • 1
  • Nick Pidgeon
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Environmental SciencesUniversity of East AngliaNorwichUK
  2. 2.Risk Frontiers, Natural Hazards Research CentreMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia
  3. 3.School of PsychologyCardiff UniversityWalesUK

Personalised recommendations