Advertisement

Bulletin of Volcanology

, Volume 67, Issue 5, pp 457–468 | Cite as

Large-scale failures on domes and stratocones situated on caldera ring faults: sand-box modeling of natural examples from Kamchatka, Russia

  • Alexander Belousov
  • Thomas R. Walter
  • Valentin R. Troll
Research Article

Abstract

Edifices of stratocones and domes are often situated eccentrically above shallow silicic magma reservoirs. Evacuation of such reservoirs forms collapse calderas commonly surrounded by remnants of one or several volcanic cones that appear variously affected and destabilized. We studied morphologies of six calderas in Kamchatka, Russia, with diameters of 4 to 12 km. Edifices affected by caldera subsidence have residual heights of 250–800 m, and typical amphitheater-like depressions opening toward the calderas. The amphitheaters closely resemble horseshoe-shaped craters formed by large-scale flank failures of volcanoes with development of debris avalanches. Where caldera boundaries intersect such cones, the caldera margins have notable outward embayments. We therefore hypothesize that in the process of caldera formation, these eccentrically situated edifices were partly displaced and destabilized, causing large-scale landslides. The landslide masses are then transformed into debris avalanches and emplaced inside the developing caldera basins. To test this hypothesis, we carried out sand-box analogue experiments, in which caldera formation (modeled by evacuation of a rubber balloon) was simulated. The deformation of volcanic cones was studied by placing sand-cones in the vicinity of the expected “caldera” rim. At the initial stage of the modeled subsidence, the propagating ring fault of the caldera bifurcates within the affected cone into two faults, the outermost of which is notably curved outward off the caldera center. The two faults dissect the cone into three parts: (1) a stable outer part, (2) a highly unstable and subsiding intracaldera part, and (3) a subsiding graben structure between parts (1) and (2). Further progression of the caldera subsidence is likely to cause failure of parts (2) and (3) with failed material sliding into the caldera basin and with formation of an amphitheater-like depression oriented toward the developing caldera. The mass of material which is liable to slide into the caldera basin, and the shape of the resulted amphitheater are a function of the relative position of the caldera ring fault and the base of the cone. A cone situated mostly outside the ring fault is affected to a minor degree by caldera subsidence and collapses with formation of a narrow amphitheater deeply incised into the cone, having a small opening angle. Accordingly, the caldera exhibits a prominent outward embayment. By contrast, collapse of a cone initially situated mostly inside the caldera results in a broad amphitheater with a large opening angle, i.e. the embayment of the caldera rim is negligible. The relationships between the relative position of an edifice above the caldera fault and the opening angle of the formed amphitheater are similar for the modeled and the natural cases of caldera/cone interactions. Thus, our experiments support the hypothesis that volcanic edifices affected by caldera subsidence can experience large-scale failures with formation of indicative amphitheaters oriented toward the caldera basins. More generally, the scalloped appearance of boundaries of calderas in contact with pre-caldera topographic highs can be explained by the gravitational influence of topography on the process of caldera formation.

Keywords

Caldera subsidence Volcano instability Large-scale landslides Debris avalanche 

Notes

Acknowledgements

A. Belousov thanks the Russian Foundation of Basic Research, which supported this study, and funding by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation during his stay at the Dept. of Volcanology and Petrology at GEOMAR, Germany. T.R. Walter was supported by a grant of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (WA1642–1/2) and V.R. Troll through a travel grant by Trinity College to visit GEOMAR. Special thanks to M. Belousova for final preparation of the manuscript. Reviews by J. Stix and J. Lavallée helped to improve the manuscript.

References

  1. Acocella V, Cifelli F, Funiciello R (2001) The control of overburden thickness of resurgent domes: insights from analogue models. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 111:137–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belousov A (1995) The Shiveluch volcanic eruption of 12 November 1964—explosive eruption provoked by failure of the edifice. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 66: 357–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belousov A, Belousova M (1996) Large scale landslides on active volcanoes in XXth century—examples from Kurile-Kamchatka region (Russia). In: Senneset K (ed) Landslides. Balkema, Rotterdam pp 953–957Google Scholar
  4. Belousov A, Belousova M, Voight B (1999) Multiple edifice failures, debris avalanches and associated eruptions in the Holocene history of Shiveluch volcano, Kamchatka, Russia. Bull Volcanol 61:324–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Braitseva OA, Melekestsev IV, Ponomareva VV, Sulerzhitsky LD (1995) Ages of calderas, large explosive craters and active volcanoes in the Kuril-Kamchatka region, Russia. Bull Volcanol 57:383–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Branney MJ (1995) Downsag and extension at calderas: new perspectives on collapse geometries from ice-melt, mining and volcanic subsidence. Bull Volcanol 57:303–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Druitt DH, Sparks RSJ (1984) On the formation of calderas during ignimbrite eruptions. Nature 310:679–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Druitt TH, Edwards L, Mellors RM, Pyle DM, Sparks RSJ, Lanphere M, Davies M, Barriero B (1999) Santorini volcano. Geol Soc Lond Mem 19:1–165Google Scholar
  9. Francis PW (1985) The origin of the Krakatau tsunamis. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 25:349–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Francis PW (1993) Volcanoes: a planetary perspective. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 1–443Google Scholar
  11. Glicken G (1998) Rockslide-debris avalanche of May 18, 1980, Mount St. Helens volcano, Washington. Bull Geol Soc Jpn 49:55–105Google Scholar
  12. Hubbert M (1937) Theory of scale models as applied to the study of geologic structures. Geol Soc Am Bull 48:1459–1520Google Scholar
  13. Ivanov BV (1970) Eruption of Karymsky volcano in 1962–1965 and volcanoes of Karymsky group (in Russian). Nauka, Moscow, pp 1–134Google Scholar
  14. Ivanov BV, Braitseva OA, Zubin MI (1991) Karymsky volcano. In: Fedotov SA, Masurenkov YuP (eds) Active volcanoes of Kamchatka. vol. 2, Nauka, Moscow, pp 182–203Google Scholar
  15. Kennedy B, Stix J, Vallance JW, Lavallée Y, Longpré M-A (2004) Controls on caldera structure: results from analogue sandbox modeling. Geol Soc Am Bull 116:515–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kienle J, Kowalik Z, Murty TS (1987) Tsunamis generated by eruptions from Mount St. Augustine volcano, Alaska. Science 236:1142–1147Google Scholar
  17. Komuro H (1987) Experiments of cauldron formation: a polygonal cauldron and ring fractures. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 31:139–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Latter JH (1981) Tsunamis of volcanic origin: summary of cases with particular reference to Krakatoa, 1883. Bull Volcanol 44:467–490Google Scholar
  19. Lavallée Y, Stix J, Kennedy B, Richer M, Longpré M-A (2004) Caldera subsidence in areas of variable topographic relief: results from analogue modeling. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 129:219–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Leonov VL, Grib EN, Karpov GA et al. (1991) Caldera Uzon and Valley of Geysers. In: Fedotov SA, Masurenkov YP (eds) Active volcanoes of Kamchatka. vol. 2, Nauka, Moscow, pp 94–137Google Scholar
  21. Lipman PW (1976) Caldera-collapse breccias in the western San Juan Mountains, Colorado. Geol Soc Am Bull 87:1397–1410Google Scholar
  22. Lipman PW (1997) Subsidence of ash flow calderas: relation to caldera size and chamber geometry. Bull Volcanol 59:198–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Marti J, Ablay GJ, Redshaw LT, Sparks RSJ (1994) Experimental studies of collapse calderas. J Geol Soc Lond 151:919–929Google Scholar
  24. Merle O, Vidal N, Van Wyk de Wries B (2001) Experiments on vertical basement fault reactivations below volcanoes. J Geophys Res 106:2153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Newhall C, Dzurisin D (1988) Historical unrest at large calderas of the world. US Geol Surv Bull 1855:1–1108Google Scholar
  26. Newhall C, Punongbayan R (eds) (1996) Fire and mud: eruptions and lahars of Mount Pinatubo, Philippines. University of Washington Press, Seattle, pp 1–1126Google Scholar
  27. Piip BI (1961) Kronotskie ignimbrites at Kamchatka. Tr Lab Vulc AN USSR 20Google Scholar
  28. Pinel V, Jaupart C (2003) Magma chamber behavior beneath a volcanic edifice J Geophys Res 108(B2), 2072, DOI: 10.1029/2002JB001751
  29. Ramberg H (1981) Deformation structures in theory and experiments. Geol Soc Swed pp 1–131Google Scholar
  30. Roche O, Druitt T, Merle O (2000) Experimental studies of caldera formation. J Geophys Res 105:395–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sanford A (1959) Analytical and experimental study of simple geological structures. Geol Soc Am Bull 42:19–52Google Scholar
  32. Schultz RA (1996) Relative scale and the strength and deformability of rock masses. J Struct Geol 18:1139–1149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Seibert L (1984) Large volcanic debris avalanches: characteristics of source areas, deposits, and associated eruptions. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 22:163–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Selyangin OB (1987) Petrogenesis of basalt-dacites in the connection with evolution of volcano-structures (in Russian). Nauka, Moscow, pp 1–148 Google Scholar
  35. Simkin T, Fiske RS (1983) Krakatau 1883: The volcanic eruption and its effects. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, 494 ppGoogle Scholar
  36. Troll VR, Emeleus CH, Donaldson CH (2000) Caldera formation in the Rum Igneous Complex, Scotland. Bull Volcanol 62:301–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Troll VR, Walter TR, Schmincke H-U (2002) Cyclic caldera collapse: piston or piecemeal subsidence? Field and experimental evidence. Geology 30:135–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vidal N, Merle O (2000) Reactivation of basement faults beneath volcanoes: a new model of flank collapse. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 99:9–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Voight B, Glicken G, Janda RL, Douglass PM (1981) Catastrophic rockslide avalanche of May 18. In: Lipman PW, Mullineaux DR (eds) The 1980 eruptions of Mount St. Helens, Washington. US Geol Surv Prof Pap 1250:347–378Google Scholar
  40. Walker GPL (1984) Downsag calderas, ring faults, caldera sizes and incremental growth. J Geophys Res 89:8407–8416Google Scholar
  41. Walter TR, Troll VR (2001) Formation of caldera periphery faults: an experimental study. Bull Volcanol 63:191–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Williams H (1941) Calderas and their origin. Univ Calif Publ Bull Dep Geol Sci 25:239–346Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander Belousov
    • 1
  • Thomas R. Walter
    • 2
  • Valentin R. Troll
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Marine Geology and GeophysicsYuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Russia and Institute of Volcanology and SeismologyRussia
  2. 2.MGG/RSMASUniversity of MiamiUSA
  3. 3.Dept. of GeologyTrinity College, College GreenDublin 2Ireland

Personalised recommendations