Bulletin of Volcanology

, Volume 66, Issue 6, pp 492–513 | Cite as

Palaeotemperature determinations for the 1.8-ka Taupo ignimbrite, New Zealand, and implications for the emplacement history of a high-velocity pyroclastic flow

  • Elizabeth McClelland
  • Colin J. N. WilsonEmail author
  • Leon Bardot
Research Article


Palaeomagnetic data from lithic clasts collected at 46 sites within layers 1 and 2 of the 1.8-ka Taupo ignimbrite, New Zealand, have been used to determine the palaeotemperatures and thermal structure of the deposit on its emplacement. Equilibrium temperatures from sites less than 30–40 km from vent are 150–300 °C, whereas at greater distances site equilibrium temperatures increase up to 400–500 °C. This variation is seen in both layer 1 and 2 deposits, with values for layer 1 being somewhat cooler, and with its increase in temperature occurring at a greater distance from vent. A temperature maximum at ~50 km from vent coincides with a zone of pink thermal-oxidation colouration of pumices previously inferred to reflect higher emplacement temperatures. Additional palaeomagnetic data collected by us and others from pumice clasts show comparable temperature variations, but these temperature estimates are shown here to be due to a chemical remanence and unreliable for accurate temperature estimates. Cooler temperatures in proximal parts of the ignimbrite are consistent with admixture of >20% cold lithic clasts at source and interaction with the pre-eruption Lake Taupo. The similar, but offset, increases in equilibrium temperatures for medial and distal layers 1 and 2 are consistent with both layers being deposited from the same flow. However, any proximal deposits left by the later, hotter material must have been subsequently eroded, or be so thin that our collection failed to sample them. Radial asymmetries in equilibrium temperatures as well as other physical parameters suggest that the deposit emplacement temperature is primarily determined at source, rather than by interaction with air during transport. These data support previous interpretations that a concentrated basal flow played a dominant role in emplacement and deposition of the Taupo ignimbrite.


Palaeomagnetism Taupo ignimbrite Palaeotemperature Rock magnetism Ignimbrite emplacement 



We thank the Royal Society (EM), the UK Natural Environment Research Council (LB) and the New Zealand Foundation for Research, Science & Technology (CJNW) for financial support. We also thank P. Kokelaar and an un-named reviewer for reviews, Tim Druitt for additional discussion and editorial assistance, and Dave Sansom for his help with the figures.


  1. Aramaki S, Akimoto S (1957) Temperature estimation of pyroclastic deposits by natural remanent magnetism. Am J Sci 255:619–627Google Scholar
  2. Bahar D, Smith GA, Geissman JW, Grubensky MJ (1993) Estimated paleomagnetic emplacement temperatures of the Taupo ignimbrite, New Zealand: defining thermal characteristics of a pyroclastic flow (abstract). EOS Trans AGU 74(Suppl 43):639Google Scholar
  3. Bardot L (2000) Emplacement temperature determinations of proximal pyroclastic deposits on Santorini, Greece, and their implications. Bull Volcanol 61:450–467Google Scholar
  4. Bardot L, McClelland E (2000) The reliability of emplacement temperature estimates using paleomagnetic methods: a case study from Santorini, Greece. Geophys J Int 143:39–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bardot L, Thomas R, McClelland E (1996) Emplacement temperatures of pyroclastic deposits on Santorini deduced from paleomagnetic measurements: constraints on eruption mechanisms. In: Morris A, Tarling DH (eds) Paleomagnetism and tectonics of the Mediterranean region. Geol Soc Lond Spec Publ 105:345–358Google Scholar
  6. Bierwirth PN (1982) Experimental welding of volcanic ash. BSc (Hons) Thesis, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  7. Branney MJ, Kokelaar BP (1992) A reappraisal of ignimbrite emplacement: progressive aggradation and changes from particulate to non-particulate flow during emplacement of high-grade ignimbrite. Bull Volcanol 54:504–520Google Scholar
  8. Bursik MI, Woods AW (1996) The dynamics and thermodynamics of large ash flows. Bull Volcanol 58:175–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cas RAF, Wright JV (1987) Volcanic successions modern and ancient. Allen & Unwin, London, pp 1–528Google Scholar
  10. Chernet T (1987) Lithic inclusions in the Taupo Pumice Formation. MSc Thesis, Victoria University, Wellington, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  11. Choux CM, Druitt TH (2002) Analogue study of particle segregation in pyroclastic density currents, with implications for the emplacement mechanisms of large ignimbrites. Sedimentology 49:907–928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cole JW, Brown SJA, Burt RM, Beresford SW, Wilson CJN (1998) Lithic types in ignimbrites as a guide to the evolution of a caldera complex: Taupo volcanic centre, New Zealand. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 80:217–237Google Scholar
  13. Dade WB, Huppert HE (1996) Emplacement of the Taupo ignimbrite by a dilute turbulent flow. Nature 381:509–512Google Scholar
  14. Dade WB, Huppert HE (1997) Emplacement of the Taupo ignimbrite (reply to comments by CJN Wilson). Nature 385:306–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dodson MH, McClelland-Brown E (1980) Magnetic blocking temperatures during slow cooling. J Geophys Res 85:2625–2637Google Scholar
  16. Donoghue SL, Palmer AS, McClelland E, Hobson K, Stewart RB, Neall VE, Lecointre J, Price R (1999) The Taurewa eruptive episode: evidence for climactic eruptions at Ruapehu volcano, New Zealand. Bull Volcanol 60:223–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Downey WS, Tarling DH (1984) Archaeomagnetic dating of Santorini volcanic eruptions and fired destruction levels of late Minoan civization. Nature 309:519–523Google Scholar
  18. Friedman I, Long W, Smith RL (1963) Viscosity and water contents of rhyolitic glass. J Geophys Res 68:6523–6535Google Scholar
  19. Henry CD, Wolff JA (1992) Distinguishing strongly rheomorphic tuffs from extensive silicic lavas. Bull Volcanol 54:171–186Google Scholar
  20. Hoblitt RP, Kellogg KS (1979) Emplacement temperatures of unsorted and unstratified deposits of volcanic rock debris as determined by paleomagnetic techniques. Geol Soc Am Bull Part I 90:633–642Google Scholar
  21. Huppert HE, Turner JS, Carey SN, Sparks RSJ, Hallworth MA (1986) A laboratory study of pyroclastic flows down slopes. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 30:179–199Google Scholar
  22. Jaeger JC (1964) Thermal effects of intrusions. Rev Geophys 2:443–466Google Scholar
  23. Kent DV, Ninkovitch D, Pescatore T, Sparks RSJ (1981) Paleomagnetic determination of emplacement temperature of the Vesuvius AD 79 pyroclastic deposits. Nature 290:393–396Google Scholar
  24. Kent JT, Briden JC, Mardia KV (1983) Linear and planar structure in ordered multivariate data as applied to progressive demagnetization of paleomagnetic remanence. Geophys J R Astron Soc 75:593–621Google Scholar
  25. Kono Y, Osima Y (1971) Numerical experiments on the welding processes in the pyroclastic flow deposits. Bull Volcanol Soc Japan 16:1–14Google Scholar
  26. Lindsley DH (ed) (1991) Oxide minerals: petrologic and magnetic significance. Mineral Soc Am Rev Mineral 25:1–509Google Scholar
  27. Mandeville CW, Carey S, Sigurdsson H, King J (1994) Paleomagnetic evidence for high-temperature emplacement of the 1883 subaqueous pyroclastic flows from Krakatau volcano, Indonesia. J Geophys Res 99:9487–9504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maury R (1971) Application de la spectrométrie infrarouge à l’étude des bois fossilisés dans les formations volcaniques. Bull Soc Géol Fr (7)XIII:532–538Google Scholar
  29. McClelland E (1996) Theory of CRM acquired by grain growth, and its implications for TRM discrimination and paleointensity determination in igneous rocks. Geophys J Int 126:271–280Google Scholar
  30. McClelland E, Druitt TH (1989) Paleomagnetic estimation of emplacement temperatures of pyroclastic deposits on Santorini, Greece. Bull Volcanol 51:16–27Google Scholar
  31. McClelland E, Thomas RME (1990) A paleomagnetic study of Minoan age tephra from Thera. In: Hardy DA, Keller J, Galanopoulos VP, Flemming NC, Druitt TH (eds) Thera and the Aegean World III, vol 2 (Earth Sciences). The Thera Foundation, London, pp 129–139Google Scholar
  32. McClelland-Brown E (1982) Discrimination of TRM and CRM by blocking temperature spectrum analysis. Phys Earth Planet Inter 30:405–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mitchell KL (2001) The thermodynamics and fluid mechanics of explosive volcanic eruptions on the Earth and Mars. PhD Thesis, Lancaster UniversityGoogle Scholar
  34. Riehle JR (1973) Calculated compaction profiles of rhyolitic ash-flow tuffs. Geol Soc Am Bull 84:2193–2216Google Scholar
  35. Riehle JR, Miller TF, Bailey RA (1995) Cooling, degassing and compaction of rhyolitic ash flow tuffs: a computational model. Bull Volcanol 57:319–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smith RT, Houghton BF (1995) Vent migration and changing eruptive style during the 1800 a Taupo eruption: evidence from the Hatepe and Rotongaio phreatoplinian ashes. Bull Volcanol 57:432–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sparks RSJ (1976) Grain size variations in ignimbrites and implications for the transport of pyroclastic flows. Sedimentology 23:147–188Google Scholar
  38. Sparks RSJ, Wilson CJN (1990) The Minoan deposits: a review of their characteristics and interpretation. In: Hardy DA, Keller J, Galanopoulos VP, Flemming NC, Druitt TH (eds) Thera and the Aegean World III, Volume 2 (Earth Sciences). The Thera Foundation, London, pp 89–99Google Scholar
  39. Sparks RSJ, Self S, Walker GPL (1973) Products of ignimbrite eruptions. Geology 1:115–118Google Scholar
  40. Sutton AN, Blake S, Wilson CJN (1995) An outline geochemistry of rhyolite eruptives from Taupo volcanic centre, New Zealand. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 68:153–175Google Scholar
  41. Sutton AN, Blake S, Wilson CJN, Charlier BLA (2000) Late Quaternary evolution of a hyperactive rhyolite magmatic system: Taupo volcanic centre, New Zealand. J Geol Soc Lond 157:537–552Google Scholar
  42. Todesco M, Neri A, Esposito Ongaro T, Papale P, Macedonio G, Santacroce R, Longo, A (2002) Pyroclastic flow hazard assessment at Vesuvius (Italy) by using numerical modeling. I. Large-scale dynamics. Bull Volcanol 64:155–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tsuboi S, Tsuya H (1930) On the temperature of the pumiceous ejecta of Komagatake, Hokkaidò, as inferred from their modes of oxidation. Bull Earthq Res Inst Univ Tokyo 8:271–273Google Scholar
  44. Walker GPL (1983) Ignimbrite types and ignimbrite problems. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 17:65–88Google Scholar
  45. Walker GPL, Heming RF, Wilson CJN (1980) Low-aspect ratio ignimbrites. Nature 283:286–287Google Scholar
  46. Walker GPL, Self S, Froggatt PC (1981a) The ground layer of the Taupo ignimbrite: a striking example of sedimentation from a pyroclastic flow. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 10:1–11Google Scholar
  47. Walker GPL, Wilson CJN, Froggatt PC (1981b) An ignimbrite veneer deposit: the trail marker of a pyroclastic flow. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 9:409–421Google Scholar
  48. Watson GS (1956) A test for randomness. Mon Notes R Astron Soc 7:160–161Google Scholar
  49. Wilson CJN (1985) The Taupo eruption, New Zealand. II. The Taupo ignimbrite. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A314:229–310Google Scholar
  50. Wilson CJN (1993) Stratigraphy, chronology, styles and dynamics of late Quaternary eruptions from Taupo volcano, New Zealand. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A343:205–306Google Scholar
  51. Wilson CJN (1997) Emplacement of the Taupo ignimbrite. Nature 385:306–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wilson CJN, Hildreth W (2003) Assembling an ignimbrite: mechanical and thermal building blocks in the Bishop Tuff, California. J Geol 111:653–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wilson CJN, Walker GPL (1981) Violence in pyroclastic flow eruptions. In: Self S, Sparks RSJ (eds) Tephra studies. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 441–448Google Scholar
  54. Wilson CJN, Walker GPL (1982) Ignimbrite depositional facies: the anatomy of a pyroclastic flow. J Geol Soc Lond 139:581–592Google Scholar
  55. Wilson CJN, Walker GPL (1985) The Taupo eruption, New Zealand. I. General aspects. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A314:199–228Google Scholar
  56. Woods AW, Bursik MI (1994) A laboratory study of ash flows. J Geophys Res 99:4375–4393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Yagi K (1966) Experimental study on pumice and obsidian. Bull Volcanol 29:559–572Google Scholar
  58. Zlotniki J, Pozzi JP, Boudon G, Moreau MG (1984) A new method for the determination of the setting temperature of pyroclastic deposits (example of Guadeloupe: French West Indies). J Volcanol Geotherm Res 21:297–312Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizabeth McClelland
    • 1
  • Colin J. N. Wilson
    • 2
    Email author
  • Leon Bardot
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Earth SciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  2. 2.Institute of Geological & Nuclear SciencesLower Hutt 6315New Zealand

Personalised recommendations