, Volume 191, Issue 3, pp 587–599 | Cite as

Plant invader alters soil food web via changes to fungal resources

  • Matthew A. McCaryEmail author
  • David H. Wise
Plant-microbe-animal interactions – original research


While aboveground impacts of invasive plants are well documented, their influence on soil food webs remains less understood. Previous research has revealed that bottom-up forces are widespread in soil food webs of woodlands. Thus, an invasive plant that negatively impacts the base of the food web will likely decrease primary consumers as well as their predators. We examined how a North American plant invader, garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata), affects arthropod primary (springtails and oribatid mites) and secondary (predaceous mites) consumers of the soil food web via changes to fungal resources. We measured the abundances of plants, soil fungi, fungivores, and predators in garlic mustard-invaded and uninvaded 1-m2 plots in five Midwestern USA woodlands. We then conducted a mesocosm (0.25-m2 plots) experiment to tease apart the direct and indirect effects of garlic mustard by manipulating plant identity (garlic mustard vs. native plant), soil history (invaded vs. uninvaded), and fungicide application (fungicide vs. no fungicide). Our first study revealed that plots without garlic mustard had 2.8 and 1.4 × more fungi and fungivores, respectively. Predator densities did not differ. Fungal composition and structural equation modeling (SEM) revealed the garlic mustard effects on fungivores were correlated with fungal declines. The mesocosm experiment confirmed that the impacts were indirect, as fungicide plots harbored similar fungivore densities, whereas fungivore densities differed according to plant identity and soil history in the fungicide-free plots. Our results reveal that by altering soil fungal abundance, an invasive plant can indirectly affect primary consumers in soil food webs, but this indirect effect does not influence predators.


Arthropods Food webs Fungi Garlic mustard Invasive plants 



Several sources provided financial support: Dean’s Scholar Award at UIC; Pre-doctoral Fellowship from the Institute for Environmental Science and Policy at UIC; Elmer Hadley Award at UIC; and a Campus Research Board Grant from the Vice Chancellor’s Office at UIC. We thank the Illinois Forest Preserve Districts of DuPage, Lake, and McHenry counties, as well as the Morton Arboretum, for giving permission to conduct this research.

Author contribution statement

MM and DW conceived and designed the experiments. MM performed the experiments. MM analyzed the data. MM and DH wrote the manuscript; both the authors contributed substantially to manuscript revisions and gave final approval.

Supplementary material

442_2019_4510_MOESM1_ESM.docx (73 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 73 kb)
442_2019_4510_MOESM2_ESM.docx (21 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 20 kb)
442_2019_4510_MOESM3_ESM.docx (709 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (DOCX 709 kb)
442_2019_4510_MOESM4_ESM.docx (284 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (DOCX 283 kb)


  1. Abgrall C, Forey E, Mignot L, Chauvat M (2018) Invasion by Fallopia japonica alters soil food webs through secondary metabolites. Soil Biol Biochem 127:100–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abgrall C, Forey E, Chauvat M (2019) Soil fauna responses to invasive alien plants are determined by trophic groups and habitat structure: a global meta-analysis. Oikos. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alerding AB, Hunter RM (2013) Increased springtail abundance in a garlic mustard-invaded forest. Northeast Nat 20:275–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson RC, Dhillion SS, Kelley TM (1996) Aspects of the ecology of an invasive plant, garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata), in central Illinois. Restor Ecol 4:181–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson MJ, Gorley RN, Clarke KR (2008) PERMANOVA + for PRIMER: Guide to software and statistical methods. PRIMER-E, PlymouthGoogle Scholar
  6. Ayres E, Steltzer H, Berg S, Wall DH (2009) Soil biota accelerate decomposition in high-elevation forests by specializing in the breakdown of litter produced by the plant species above them. J Ecol 97:901–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bardgett R (2005) The biology of soil: a community and ecosystem approach. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bardgett RD, Wardle DA (2010) Aboveground-belowground linkages: biotic interactions, ecosystem processes, and global change. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Behan VM, Hill SB (1978) Feeding habits and spore dispersal of oribatid mites in the North American arctic. Rev Ecol Biol Sol 15:497–516Google Scholar
  10. Bezemer TM, Harvey JA, Cronin JT (2014) Response of native insect communities to invasive plants. Annu Rev Entomol 59:119–141PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Bultman TL, Uetz GW (1984) Effect of structure and nutritional quality of litter on abundances of litter-dwelling arthropods. Am Midl Nat 111:165–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Callaway RM, Cipollini D, Barto K et al (2008) Novel weapons: invasive plant suppresses fungal mutualists in America but not in its native Europe. Ecology 89:1043–1055PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J et al (2010) QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 7:335–336PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen B, Wise DH (1999) Bottom-up limitation of predaceous arthropods in a detritus-based terrestrial food web. Ecology 80:761–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Coleman DC, Crossley DA Jr (2003) Fundamentals of soil ecology. Academic Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Coleman DC, Hendrix PF (2000) Invertebrates as webmasters in ecosystems. CABI, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Coleman DC, Blair JM, Elliott ET, Wall DH (1999) Soil invertebrates. In: Robertson GP, Coleman DC, Bledsoe CS, Sollins P (eds) Standard soil methods for long-term ecological research. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Crotty FV, Adl SM (2019) Competition and predation in soil fungivorous microarthropods using stable isotope ratio mass spectrometry. Front Microbiol 10:1274PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Daubenmire RF (1959) A canopy coverage method of vegetational analysis. Northwest Sci 35:43–64Google Scholar
  20. deHart PAP, Strand SE (2012) Effects of garlic mustard invasion on arthropod diets as revealed through stable-isotope analyses. Southeast Nat 11:575–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Edgar RC (2010) Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26:2460–2461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gerber E, Krebs C, Murrell C et al (2008) Exotic invasive knotweeds (Fallopia spp.) negatively affect native plant and invertebrate assemblages in European riparian habitats. Biol Conserv 141:646–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grace JB (2006) Structural equation modeling and natural systems. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Green SJ, Venkatramanan R, Naqib A (2015) Deconstructing the polymerase chain reaction: understanding and correcting bias associated with primer degeneracies and primer-template mismatches. PLoS One 10:e0128122PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harkes P, Verhoeven A, Sterken MG et al (2017) The differential impact of a native and non-native ragwort species (Senecioneae) on the first and second trophic level of the rhizosphere food web. Oikos 126:1790–1803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jabaji-Hare SH, Kendrick WB (1987) Response of an endomycorrhizal fungus in Allium porrum L. to different concentrations of the systemic fungicides, metalaxyl (Ridomil®) and fosetyl-Al (Aliette®). Soil Biol Biochem 19:95–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Klironomos JN, Widden P, Deslandes I (1992) Feeding preferences of the collembolan Folsomia candida in relation to microfungal successions on decaying litter. Soil Biol Biochem 24:685–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lankau RA, Bauer JT, Anderson MR, Anderson RC (2014) Long-term legacies and partial recovery of mycorrhizal communities after invasive plant removal. Biol Invasions 16:1979–1990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lau JA (2013) Trophic consequences of a biological invasion: do plant invasions increase predator abundance? Oikos 122:474–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lawrence KL, Wise DH (2017) Long-term resource addition to a detrital food web yields a pattern of responses more complex than pervasive bottom-up control. PeerJ 5:e3572PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lefcheck JS (2016) piecewiseSEM: piecewise structural equation modelling in r for ecology, evolution, and systematics. Methods Ecol Evol 7:573–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lenoir L, Persson T, Bengtsson J et al (2007) Bottom-up or top-down control in forest soil microcosms? Effects of soil fauna on fungal biomass and C/N mineralisation. Biol Fertil Soils 43:281–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McCary MA, Zellner M, Wise D (2019) The role of plant-mycorrhizal mutualisms in deterring plant invasions: insights from an individual-based model. Ecol Evol 9:2018–2030PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Moore JC, McCann K, Setälä H, De Ruiter PC (2003) Top-down is bottom-up: does predation in the rhizosphere regulate aboveground dynamics? Ecology 84:846–857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Morris SJ, Herrmann DL, McClain J et al (2012) The impact of garlic mustard on sandy forest soils. Appl Soil Ecol 60:23–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nakamori T, Suzuki A (2005) Spore-breaking capabilities of collembolans and their feeding habitat within sporocarps. Pedobiologia 49:261–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Newell K (1984) Interaction between two decomposer basidiomycetes and a collembolan under Sitka spruce: distribution, abundance and selective grazing. Soil Biol Biochem 16:227–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Newman EI (1966) A method of estimating the total length of root in a sample. J Appl Ecol 3:139–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. NRCS (2016) Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Web Soil Survey. Accessed 19 July 2016Google Scholar
  40. Nuzzo (1999) Invasion pattern of herb garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata) in high quality forests. Biol Invasions 1:169–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pearson DE (2009) Invasive plant architecture alters trophic interactions by changing predator abundance and behavior. Oecologia 159:549–558PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P et al (2013) The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucl Acids Res 41:D590–D596PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. R Development Core Team (2018) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Development Core Team, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  44. Ridenour WM, Callaway RM (2001) The relative importance of allelopathy in interference: the effects of an invasive weed on a native bunchgrass. Oecologia 126:444–450PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Roberts KJ, Anderson RC (2001) Effect of garlic mustard [Alliaria petiolata (Beib. Cavara & Grande)] extracts on plants and arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi. Am Midl Nat 146:146–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rodgers VL, Wolfe BE, Werden LK, Finzi AC (2008) The invasive species Alliaria petiolata (garlic mustard) increases soil nutrient availability in northern hardwood-conifer forests. Oecologia 157:459–471PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Rusek J (1998) Biodiversity of Collembola and their functional role in the ecosystem. Biodivers Conserv 7:1207–1219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Scheu S, Schaefer M (1998) Bottom-up control of the soil macrofauna community in a beechwood on limestone: manipulation of food resources. Ecology 79:1573–1585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Scheu S, Simmerling F (2004) Growth and reproduction of fungal feeding Collembola as affected by fungal species, melanin and mixed diets. Oecologia 139:347–353PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Shao Y, Bao W, Chen D et al (2015) Using structural equation modeling to test established theory and develop novel hypotheses for the structuring forces in soil food webs. Pedobiologia 58:137–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shipley B (2013) The AIC model selection method applied to path analytic models compared using ad-separation test. Ecology 94:560–564PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Stinson KA, Campbell SA, Powell JR et al (2006) Invasive plant suppresses the growth of native tree seedlings by disrupting belowground mutualisms. PLoS Biol 4:727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sylvia DM (1992) Quantification of external hyphae of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Methods Microbiol 24:53–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vainio EJ, Hantula J (2000) Direct analysis of wood-inhabiting fungi using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of amplified ribosomal DNA. Mycol Res 104:927–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vilá M, Espinar JL, Hejda M et al (2011) Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecol Lett 14:702–708PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Von Alten H, Lindemann A, Schönbeck F (1993) Stimulation of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza by fungicides or rhizosphere bacteria. Mycorrhiza 2:167–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wardle DA, Nicholson KS, Ahmed M, Rahman A (1994) Interference effects of the invasive plant Carduus nutans L. against the nitrogen fixation ability of Trifolium repens L. Plant Soil 163:287–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Warrix AR, Moore D, Marshall JM (2015) Influence of low density garlic mustard presence and hardwood leaf litter composition on litter dwelling arthropod diversity. Proc Indian Acad Sci 124:16–25Google Scholar
  59. Wilson GWT, Williamson MM (2008) Topsin-M: the new benomyl for mycorrhizal-suppression experiments. Mycologia 100:548–554PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Wolfe BE, Rodgers VL, Stinson KA, Pringle A (2008) The invasive plant Alliaria petiolata (garlic mustard) inhibits ectomycorrhizal fungi in its introduced range. J Ecol 96:777–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zhang P, Li B, Wu J, Hu S (2019) Invasive plants differentially affect soil biota through litter and rhizosphere pathways: a meta-analysis. Ecol Lett 22:200–210PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ et al (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Spring, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of IllinoisChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Institute for Environmental Science and PolicyUniversity of IllinoisChicagoUSA
  3. 3.Department of EntomologyUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations