The independent effects of nutrient enrichment and pulsed nutrient delivery on a common wetland invader and its native conspecific
Human activities often lead natural systems to be nutrient enriched, with anthropogenically derived nutrients commonly delivered in discrete pulses. Both nutrient enrichment and nutrient pulses can impact plant performance and phenotypic plasticity, especially in invasive species, but quantifying their independent effects remains challenging. To explore the effects of nutrient enrichment and nutrient pulse magnitude, we established a common garden experiment using the North American wetland invader Phragmites australis and its native conspecific Phragmites australis subsp. americanus (five source populations each). We exposed plants to three levels of nutrient enrichment that were delivered either in small or large-magnitude pulses, examining productivity and plasticity responses over a single growing season. Productivity and biomass allocation differed by lineage, with invasive Phragmites producing 73% more biomass and 66% more culms, but with the native growing 31% taller and allocating more of its biomass belowground. Contrary to expectations, both lineages responded similarly to nutrient enrichment and were similarly plastic in their traits. Nutrient enrichment, rather than nutrient pulses, led to large productivity gains and trait plasticity magnitudes. However, total biomass and leaf-level traits (specific leaf area and chlorophyll concentration) were responsive to variation in nutrient pulse magnitudes. By decoupling the effects of nutrient enrichment from nutrient pulses, our study demonstrates the independent effects of these two key factors for plant performance and, by extension, invasion success. We report trait-based similarities between two lineages of Phragmites that play contrasting ecological roles in North American wetlands, and we highlight the potentially detrimental effects of nutrient pulses.
KeywordsPhragmites australis Invasive species Phenotypic plasticity Leaf traits Anthropogenic land-use
For assistance in the field and lab, we wish to thank Olivia Petryszyn, Phoebe Honscheid, Ivan Gonzalez-Alvarez, Nate Hofford, Colin Day, Raleigh Ricart and the Waterman Agricultural and Natural Resources Laboratory staff. Native Phragmites collection sites were identified with help from Rick Gardner. Funding was provided to SH by The Ohio State University.
Author contribution statement
DF and SH conceived the ideas and study methodology. DF carried out the experiment, analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. SH funded the research. Both authors contributed to manuscript revisions.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Álvarez-Rogel J, Jiménez-Cárceles FJ, Nicolás CE (2006) Phosphorus and nitrogen content in the water of a coastal wetland in the Mar Menor Lagoon (Se Spain): relationships with effluents from urban and agricultural areas. Water Air Soil Pollut 173:21–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-005-9020-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bartoń K (2014). MuMIn: multi-model inference. R package version 1.10. 0. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn
- Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Campbell BD, Grime JP (1989) A comparative study of plant responsiveness to the duration of episodes of mineral nutrient enrichment. New Phytol 112:261–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1989.tb02382.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Daehler CC (2003) Performance comparisons of co-occurring native and alien invasive plants: implications for conservation and restoration. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:183–211. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132403 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Drexler JZ, Bedford BL (2002) Pathways of nutrient loading and impacts on plant diversity in a New York peatland. Wetlands 22:263–281. https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2002)022%5b0263:ponlai%5d2.0.co;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gotelli NJ, Ellison AM (2004) A primer of ecological statistics. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
- Hoagland DR, Arnon DI (1950) The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. Circular California Agricultural Experiment Station 347: 2nd editGoogle Scholar
- Lajtha K, Driscoll CT, Jarrell WM, Elliott ET (1999) Soil phosphorus: characterization and total element analysis. Standard soil methods for long-term ecological research. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 115–142Google Scholar
- Lichvar RW (2014) The national wetland plant list: 2014 wetland ratings. Phytoneuron 41:1–42Google Scholar
- Meyerson L, Saltonstall K, Chambers R (2009) Phragmites australis in Eastern North America: a historical and ecological perspective. In: Silliman BR, Grosholz ED, Bertness MD (eds) Human impacts on salt marshes: a global perspective. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 57–82Google Scholar
- Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2015) Wetlands, 5th edn. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
- Saltonstall K, Peterson PM, Soreng RJ (2004) Recognition of Phragmites australis subso. americanus (Poaceae: Arundinoideae) in North America: evidence from morphological and genetic analyses. Sida 21:683–692Google Scholar