Comparative reproductive dormancy differentiation in European black scavenger flies (Diptera: Sepsidae)
- 7 Downloads
Seasonality is a key environmental factor that regularly promotes life history adaptation. Insects invading cold–temperate climates need to overwinter in a dormant state. We compared the role of temperature and photoperiod in dormancy induction in the laboratory, as well as winter survival and reproduction in the field and the laboratory, of 5 widespread European dung fly species (Diptera: Sepsidae) to investigate their extent of ecological differentiation and thermal adaptation. Unexpectedly, cold temperature is the primary environmental factor inducing winter dormancy, with short photoperiod playing an additional role mainly in species common at high altitudes and latitudes (Sepsis cynipsea, neocynipsea, fulgens), but not in those species also thriving in southern Europe (thoracica, punctum). All species hibernate as adults rather than juveniles. S. thoracica had very low adult winter survivorship under both (benign) laboratory and (harsh) field conditions, suggesting flexible quiescence rather than genetically fixed winter diapause, restricting their distribution towards the pole. All other species appear well suited for surviving cold, Nordic winters. Females born early in the season reproduce before winter while late-born females reproduce after winter, fulgens transitioning earliest before winter and thoracica and punctum latest; a bet-hedging strategy of reproduction during both seasons occurs rarely but is possible physiologically. Fertility patterns indicate that females can store sperm over winter. Winter dormancy induction mechanisms of European sepsids are congruent with their geographic distribution, co-defining their thermal niches. Flexible adult winter quiescence appears the easiest route for insects spreading towards the poles to evolve the necessary overwinter survival.
KeywordsDiapause Dormancy Diptera Genetic differentiation Overwinter survival Phylogenetic signal Plasticity Quiescence Species comparison Thermal adaptation
This work is in part based on an UZH Master’s Thesis (2015) by Valérian Zeender, and was supported over the years by the University of Zurich and several grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation, most recently Grant No. 31003A_143787.
Author contribution statement
WUB, MAS and PTR conceived and designed the entire study and analysed the final data; VZ conducted the laboratory diapause induction experiment (his MSc project); JR, AW, PTR and NG performed the field experiment over 2 years; WUB, PTR and MAS wrote the manuscript with input from all others.
- Appenzeller C, Bey I, Croci-Maspoli M, Fuhrer J, Kull C, Appenzeller C, Knutti R, Schär CJ (2011) Swiss climate change scenarios CH2011. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-006720559
- Bährmann R (1993) Zum Vorkommen der Sepsidae in unterschiedlichen Rasenökosystemen Thüringens. Beitr Ent 43:97–113Google Scholar
- Blanckenhorn WU, Dixon AFG, Fairbairn DJ, Gibert P, van der Linde K, Meier R, Nylin S, Pitnick S, Schoff C, Signorelli M, Teder T, Wiklund C (2007) Proximate causes of Rensch’s rule: does sexual size dimorphism in arthropods result from sex differences in development time? Am Nat 169:245–257PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Blanckenhorn WU, Bauerfeind SS, Berger D, Davidowitz G, Fox CW, Guillaume F, Nakamura S, Nishimura K, Sasaki H, Stillwell RC, Tachi T, Schäfer MA (2018) Life history traits, but not body size, vary systematically along latitudinal gradients on three continents in the widespread yellow dung fly. Ecography 41:2080–2091. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.03752 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bybee S, Córdoba-Aguilar A, Duryea MC, Futahashi R, Hansson B, Lorenzo-Carballa MO, Schilder R, Stoks R, Suvorov A, Svensson EI, Swaegers J, Takahashi Y, Watts PC, Wellenreuther M (2016) Odonata (dragonflies and damselflies) as a bridge between ecology and evolutionary genomics. Front Zool 13:46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12983-016-0176-7 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Danilevskii AS (1965) Photoperiodism and seasonal development in insects. Oliver and Boyd, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Danks HV (1987) Insect dormancy: an ecological perspective. Biological Survey of Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
- Ozerov A (2005) World catalogue of the family Sepsidae (Insecta: Diptera). Zoological Museum, MoscowGoogle Scholar
- Pont AC, Meier R (2002) The Sepsidae (Diptera) of Europe. Fauna Entomol Scand 37:1–221Google Scholar
- Rohner PT, Puniamoorthy N, Ang Y, Lei Z, Blanckenhorn WU, Meier R (2014) Genetic data confirm the species status of Sepsis nigripes, Meigen 1826 (Diptera: Sepsidae) and adds one species to the Alpine fauna while questioning the synonymy of Sepsis helvetica, Munari 1985. Invert Syst 28:555–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rohner PT, Bächli G, Pollini Paltrinieri L, Duelli P, Obrist MK, Jochmann J, Blanckenhorn WU (2015) Distribution, diversity gradients and Rapoport’s elevational rule in the black scavenger flies of the Swiss Alps (Diptera: Sepsidae). Insect Conserv Divers 4:367–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tauber MJ, Tauber CA, Masaki S (1986) Seasonal adaptations of insects. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Warncke E, Terndrup U, Michelsen V, Erhard A (1993) Flower visitors to Saxifraga hirculus in Switzerland and Denmark, a comparative study. Bot Helvetica 103:141–147Google Scholar