Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 189, Issue 4, pp 1061–1070 | Cite as

Human altered disturbance patterns and forest succession: impacts of competition and ungulate herbivory

  • Jordan D. Maxwell
  • Aaron C. Rhodes
  • Samuel B. St. ClairEmail author
Community ecology – original research

Abstract

Human activities are altering patterns of ungulate herbivory and wildfire regimes globally with large potential impacts on plant community succession and ecosystem resilience. Aspen (Populus tremuloides) is a keystone species which co-exists with conifer species across temperate forests in North America. Aspen sucker regeneration which is the foundation of aspen–conifer forests succession is often a targeted food source by multiple ungulate species. Using a region-wide exclosure network across a broad gradient of aspen–conifer overstory abundance, we empirically tested the effects of ungulate herbivory and conifer competition (that increases with fire suppression), on the regeneration and recruitment of aspen forests over a 4-year period. The study results indicate that ungulate herbivory and increasing abundance of overstory conifers dramatically reduced aspen regeneration and recruitment success. The average height of aspen suckers exposed to ungulate herbivory was 72% shorter than aspen suckers in fenced plots and resulted in 24% less recruitment. There was a 9% decrease in aspen recruitment and 12% decrease in average aspen height with every 20% increase in overstory conifer density. Aspen suckers were most vulnerable to herbivory at 70 cm height, with the probability of herbivory decreasing under 50 cm or above 90 cm. Steep slope angles and higher winter precipitation increased aspen regeneration and recruitment success. Reduction in aspen recruitment in response to ungulate herbivory and competition by conifers may result in loss of biodiversity, altered forest function and loss of key ecosystem services because of the important role that aspen plays in facilitating forest succession and biodiversity.

Keywords

Aspen Deer Elk Fire Herbivory Populus tremuloides Ungulates 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the important contributions of Justin Taylor, Rebecca Lee, and Ho Yi Wan for assistance in data collection. We are grateful for the assistance of the Fishlake, Dixie and Manti-Lasal National Forests for their assistance in establishing the exclosure networks.

Author contribution statement

SS conceived the ideas and SS and AR set up the experimental design, AR and JM collected the data, JM analyzed the data, JM led the writing of the manuscript with the assistance of both SS and AR.

Funding

Funding for this study was provided by the Utah Division of Natural Resources (2012).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Adams MA (2013) Mega-fires, tipping points and ecosystem services: managing forests and woodlands in an uncertain future. For Ecol Manag 294:250–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Augustine DJ, Derner JD (2014) Controls over the strength and timing of fire–grazer interactions in a semi-arid rangeland. J Appl Ecol 51:242–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Augustine DJ, McNaughton SJ (1998) Ungulate effects on the functional species composition of plant communities: herbivore selectivity and plant tolerance. J Wildl Manag 62:1165–1183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beck JL, Peek JM (2005) Diet composition, forage selection, and potential for forage competition among elk, deer, and livestock on aspen–sagebrush summer range. Rangel Ecol Manag 58:135–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berdanier AB, Klein JA (2011) Growing season length and soil moisture interactively constrain high elevation aboveground net primary production. Ecosystems 14:963–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Binkley D (2008) Age distribution of aspen in Rocky Mountain National Park, USA. For Ecol Manag 255:797–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bork EW, Carlyle CN, Cahill JF, Haddow RE, Hudson RJ (2013) Disentangling herbivore impacts on Populus tremuloides: a comparison of native ungulates and cattle in Canada’s Aspen Parkland. Oecologia 173:895–904CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bowman D, Balch JK, Artaxo P, Bond WJ, Carlson JM, Cochrane MA, D’Antonio CM, DeFries RS, Doyle JC, Harrison SP, Johnston FH, Keeley JE, Krawchuk MA, Kull CA, Marston JB, Moritz MA, Prentice IC, Roos CI, Scott AC, Swetnam TW, van der Werf GR, Pyne SJ (2009) Fire in the earth system. Science 324:481–484CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Buck JR, Clair SBS (2012) Aspen increase soil moisture, nutrients, organic matter and respiration in Rocky Mountain forest communities. PLoS One 7:e52369CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Buck JR, St Clair SB (2014) Stand composition, proximity to overstory trees and gradients of soil moisture influence patterns of subalpine fir seedling emergence and survival. Plant Soil 381:61–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Calder WJ, St Clair SB (2012) Facilitation drives mortality patterns along succession gradients of aspen-conifer forests. Ecosphere 3:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Calder WJ, Horn KJ, St Clair SB (2011) Conifer expansion reduces the competitive ability and herbivore defense of aspen by modifying light environment and soil chemistry. Tree Physiol 31:582–591CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dormann CF, McPherson JM, Araújo MB, Bivand R, Bolliger J, Carl G, Davies RG, Hirzel A, Jetz W, Daniel Kissling W (2007) Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review. Ecography 30:609–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Franklin J, Syphard AD, He HS, Mladenoff DJ (2005) Altered fire regimes affect landscape patterns of plant succession in the foothills and mountains of southern California. Ecosystems 8:885–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frey BR, Lieffers VJ, Landhausser SM, Comeau PG, Greenway KJ (2003) An analysis of sucker regeneration of trembling aspen. Can J For Res 33:1169–1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Frey BR, Lieffers VJ, Hogg EH, Landhausser SM (2004) Predicting landscape patterns of aspen dieback: mechanisms and knowledge gaps. Can J For Res 34:1379–1390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gallant AL, Hansen AJ, Councilman JS, Monte DK, Betz DW (2003) Vegetation dynamics under fire exclusion and logging in a Rocky Mountain watershed, 1856–1996. Ecol Appl 13:385–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gervasi V, Sand H, Zimmermann B, Mattisson J, Wabakken P, Linnell JD (2013) Decomposing risk: landscape structure and wolf behavior generate different predation patterns in two sympatric ungulates. Ecol Appl 23:1722–1734CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Goetz S, Mack M, Gurney K, Randerson J, Houghton R (2007) Ecosystem responses to recent climate change and fire disturbance at northern high latitudes: observations and model results contrasting northern Eurasia and North America. Environ Res Lett 2:045031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Group PC (2004) Oregon State University. PRISM Climate DataGoogle Scholar
  21. Hanley TA (1982) The nutritional basis for food selection by ungulates. J Range Manag 35:146–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harding SA, Jarvie MM, Lindroth RL, Tsai C-J (2009) A comparative analysis of phenylpropanoid metabolism, N utilization, and carbon partitioning in fast-and slow-growing Populus hybrid clones. J Exp Bot 60:3443–3452CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Harrison XA, Donaldson L, Correa-Cano ME, Evans J, Fisher DN, Goodwin CE, Robinson BS, Hodgson DJ, Inger R (2018) A brief introduction to mixed effects modelling and multi-model inference in ecology. PeerJ 6:e4794CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Holeski LM, Vogelzang A, Stanosz G, Lindroth RL (2009) Incidence of Venturia shoot blight in aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) varies with tree chemistry and genotype. Biochem Syst Ecol 37:139–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hollenbeck JP, Ripple WJ (2007) Aspen and conifer heterogeneity effects on bird diversity in the northern Yellowstone ecosystem. West N Am Nat 67:92–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Johnstone JF, Hollingsworth TN, Chapin FS, Mack MC (2010) Changes in fire regime break the legacy lock on successional trajectories in Alaskan boreal forest. Glob Change Biol 16:1281–1295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kauffman MJ, Brodie JF, Jules ES (2010) Are wolves saving Yellowstone’s aspen? A landscape-level test of a behaviorally mediated trophic cascade. Ecology 91:2742–2755CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kaye MW, Binkley D, Stohlgren TJ (2005) Effects of conifers and elk browsing on quaking aspen forests in the central Rocky Mountains, USA. Ecol Appl 15:1284–1295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Knowles J, Frederick C (2016) merTools: tools for analyzing mixed effect regression models (R package version 0.2. 1). See https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=merTools. Accessed 15 May 2018
  30. Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB (2015) lmerTest: tests in linear mixed effects models (R package version:2-0). http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTest. Accessed 15 May 2018
  31. LaMalfa EM, Ryle R (2008) Differential snowpack accumulation and water dynamics in aspen and conifer communities: implications for water yield and ecosystem function. Ecosystems 11:569–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Launchbaugh KL, Howery LD (2005) Understanding landscape use patterns of livestock as a consequence of foraging behavior. Rangel Ecol Manag 58:99–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lindroth RL, St Clair SB (2013) Adaptations of quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) for defense against herbivores. For Ecol Manag 299:14–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Long RA, Bowyer RT, Porter WP, Mathewson P, Monteith KL, Kie JG (2014) Behavior and nutritional condition buffer a large-bodied endotherm against direct and indirect effects of climate. Ecol Monogr 84:513–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mauricio R, Rausher MD, Burdick DS (1997) Variation in the defense strategies of plants: are resistance and tolerance mutually exclusive? Ecology 78:1301–1311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Midoko-Iponga D, Krug CB, Milton SJ (2005) Competition and herbivory influence growth and survival of shrubs on old fields: implications for restoration of renosterveld shrubland. J Veg Sci 16:685–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Myking T, Bøhler F, Austrheim G, Solberg EJ (2011) Life history strategies of aspen (Populus tremula L.) and browsing effects: a literature review. Forestry 84:61–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mysterud A, Austrheim G (2014) Lasting effects of snow accumulation on summer performance of large herbivores in alpine ecosystems may not last. J Anim Ecol 83:712–719CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. NRCS National Water and Climate Center, home (2019) https://www.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/snow/snow_map.html. Accessed 2.5.19
  40. Painter LE, Beschta RL, Larsen EJ, Ripple WJ (2015) Recovering aspen follow changing elk dynamics in Yellowstone: evidence of a trophic cascade? Ecology 96:252–263CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Pollard J (1971) On distance estimators of density in randomly distributed forests. Biometrics 991–1002Google Scholar
  42. RC Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, p 2016Google Scholar
  43. Rehfeldt GE, Ferguson DE, Crookston NL (2009) Aspen, climate, and sudden decline in western USA. For Ecol Manag 258:2353–2364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rhodes AC, Clair SBS (2018) Measures of browse damage and indexes of ungulate abundance to quantify their impacts on aspen forest regeneration. Ecol Ind 89:648–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rhodes AC, Anderson V, St Clair SB (2017a) Ungulate herbivory alters leaf functional traits and recruitment of regenerating aspen. Tree Physiol 37:402–413PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Rhodes AC, Wan HY, Clair SBS (2017b) Herbivory impacts of elk, deer and cattle on aspen forest recruitment along gradients of stand composition, topography and climate. For Ecol Manag 397:39–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rogers PC, Mittanck CM (2014) Herbivory strains resilience in drought-prone aspen landscapes of the western US. J Veg Sci 25:457–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Romme WH, Turner MG, Wallace LL, Walker JS (1995) Aspen, elk, and fire in northern Yellowstone-National-Park. Ecology 76:2097–2106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Seager ST, Eisenberg C, St Clair SB (2013) Patterns and consequences of ungulate herbivory on aspen in western North America. For Ecol Manag 299:81–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Smith AE, Smith FW (2005) Twenty-year change in aspen dominance in pure aspen and mixed aspen/conifer stands on the Uncompahgre Plateau, Colorado, USA. For Ecol Manag 213:338–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Smith EA, O’Loughlin D, Buck JR, Clair SBS (2011) The influences of conifer succession, physiographic conditions and herbivory on quaking aspen regeneration after fire. For Ecol Manag 262:325–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Smith DS, Fettig SM, Bowker MA (2016) Elevated Rocky Mountain elk numbers prevent positive effects of fire on quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides) recruitment. For Ecol Manag 362:46–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Spear D, Chown SL (2009) Non-indigenous ungulates as a threat to biodiversity. J Zool 279:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. St Clair SB, Cavard X, Bergeron Y (2013) The role of facilitation and competition in the development and resilience of aspen forests. For Ecol Manag 299:91–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Strand EK, Vierling LA, Bunting SC, Gessler PE (2009) Quantifying successional rates in western aspen woodlands: current conditions, future predictions. For Ecol Manag 257:1705–1715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tilman D, Isbell F, Cowles JM (2014) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 45:471–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Turner MG (2010) Disturbance and landscape dynamics in a changing world. Ecology 91:2833–2849CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Villalba JJ, Burritt EA, St Clair SB (2014) Aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) intake and preference by mammalian herbivores: the role of plant secondary compounds and nutritional context. J Chem Ecol 40:1135–1145CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Wagner CEV, Finney MA, Heathcott M (2006) Historical fire cycles in the Canadian Rocky Mountain parks. For Sci 52:704–717Google Scholar
  60. Wan HY, Olson AC, Muncey KD, Clair SBS (2014a) Legacy effects of fire size and severity on forest regeneration, recruitment, and wildlife activity in aspen forests. For Ecol Manag 329:59–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wan HY, Rhodes AC, St Clair SB (2014b) Fire severity alters plant regeneration patterns and defense against herbivores in mixed aspen forests. Oikos 123:1479–1488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Weisberg PJ, Bugmann H (2003) Forest dynamics and ungulate herbivory: from leaf to landscape. For Ecol Manag 181:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Westerling AL (2016) Increasing western US forest wildfire activity: sensitivity to changes in the timing of spring. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 371:20150178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wood S, Scheipl F (2014) gamm4: generalized additive mixed models using mgcv and lme4. R package version 0.2-3Google Scholar
  65. Wooley SC, Walker S, Vernon J, Lindroth RL (2008) Aspen decline, aspen chemistry, and elk herbivory: are they linked? Aspen chemical ecology can inform the discussion of aspen decline in the West. Rangelands 30:17–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Worrall JJ, Hogg EH, Rehfeldt GE, Hamann A, Michaelian M, Gray L (2012) Recent mortality episodes of Populus tremuloides and climate in North America. Phytopathology 102:137Google Scholar
  67. Worrall JJ, Rehfeldt GE, Hamann A, Hogg EH, Marchetti SB, Michaelian M, Gray LK (2013) Recent declines of Populus tremuloides in North America linked to climate. For Ecol Manag 299:35–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Worrall JJ, Keck AG, Marchetti SB (2015) Populus tremuloides stands continue to deteriorate after drought-incited sudden aspen decline. Can J For Res 45:1768–1774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Elphick CS (2010) A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods Ecol Evol 1:3–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plant and Wildlife SciencesBrigham Young UniversityProvoUSA

Personalised recommendations