Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 189, Issue 3, pp 795–802 | Cite as

Different degrees of water-related stress affect evolutionary diversity in a seasonally dry biome

  • Felipe D. C. AraújoEmail author
  • Rubens M. Santos
Community ecology – original research

Abstract

Environmental gradients play a key role in shaping diversity in tropical forests. However, we have a little understanding of how evolutionary diversity is affected by gradients and the role of niche persistence in flooded forests in dry biomes. Here, we assessed the evolutionary diversity across a flooding gradient in the Caatinga Domain of South America. We established 120 plots across four tributaries of the São Francisco River, eastern Brazil, consisting of 72 plots in flooded, 24 in occasionally flooded, and 24 in unflooded forests. We computed richness, phylogenetic diversity (PD), mean nearest taxon distance (MNTD), and mean pairwise phylogenetic distance (MPD) and their standardized effect sizes (ses.PD, ses.MNTD, and ses.MPD). We found low richness, low PD, and high MNTD values in flooded forests relative to unflooded and occasionally flooded forests. MPD did not differ across the flooding gradient. The standardized effect size metrics were higher in flooded forests. Despite the unflooded and occasionally flooded forests being rich in terms of species and correlated phylogenetic structure, flooded forests showed more lineage diversity than expected by chance. We assessed whether this pattern could be driven by resprouting ability testing its phylogenetic signal. Resprouting is randomly distributed across phylogeny, but plant communities are likely assembled from random draws of the resprouters’ lineage pool. Quantifying evolutionary diversity across flooding gradients in dry environments brought new insights to how the same environmental filters may lead to disparate patterns of evolutionary diversity and the role of response traits in allowing certain clades to persist in flooded habitats.

Keywords

Phylogenetic diversity Stress gradients Caatinga Flooding Dry forests 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento Pessoal de Nível Superior), FAPEMIG (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa de Minas Gerais), and CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico) for financial support. We thank Dr. Danilo Neves, who helped improve an earlier version of this manuscript and helped with statistical analysis. We thank Dr. Martin Sullivan for providing comments on this work and for editing the manuscript to improve the quality of the English. We thank the editors and four reviewers for their valuable comments, which greatly improved the manuscript.

Author contribution statement

FDCA and RMS conceived and designed the experiments. FDCA and RMS performed the experiments. FDCA analyzed the data. FDCA and RMS wrote the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

442_2019_4358_MOESM1_ESM.docx (290 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 289 kb)

References

  1. Aldana AM, Carlucci MB, Fine PVA, Stevenson PR (2016) Environmental filtering of eudicot lineages underlies phylogenetic clustering in tropical South American flooded forests. Oecologia 183(2):327–335.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-016-3734-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Araujo FDC, Mendes CN, Pires GG, Menino GCO, Fontes MAL, Santos RM (2017) Adaptive strategy of tree communities on an environmental harshness hinterland inselberg in Minas Gerais, Brazil. Aust J Bot.  https://doi.org/10.1071/BT16252 Google Scholar
  3. Augusto L, Davies TJ, Delzon S, Schrijver ADE (2014) The enigma of the rise of angiosperms: can we untie the knot? Ecol Lett 17:1326–1338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Batalha-Filho H, Fjeldsa J, Fabre P-H, Myiaki CY (2013) Connections between the Atlantic and the Amazonian forest avifaunas represent distinct historical events. J Ornithol 154:41–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bellingham PJ, Sparrow AD (2009) Multi stemmed trees in montane rain forests: their frequency and demography in relation to elevation, soil nutrients and disturbance. J Ecol 97:472–483.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01479.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blomberg SP, Garland T Jr, Ives AR (2003) Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57(4):717–745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bond WJ, Midgley JJ (2001) Ecology of sprouting in woody plants: the persistence niche. Trends Ecol Evol 16:45–51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(00)02033-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bond WJ, Midgley JJ (2003) The evolutionary ecology of sprouting in woody plants. Int J Plant Sci 164:S103–S114.  https://doi.org/10.1086/374191 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Budke JC, Jarenkow JA, Oliveira-Filho AT (2007) Relationships between tree component structure, topography and soils of a riverside forest, Rio Botucaraí, Southern Brazil. Plant Ecol 189:187–200.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-006-9174-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Budke JC, Jarenkow JA, Oliveira-Filho AT (2008) Tree community features of two stands of riverine forest under diferente flooding regimes in Southern Brazil. Flora 203:162–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Budke JC, Jarenkow JA, Oliveira-Filho AT (2010) Intermediary disturbance increases tree diversity in riverine forest of southern Brazil. Biodivers Conserv 19:2371–2387.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9845-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Capon SJ (2005) Flood variability and spatial variation in plant community composition and structure on a large arid floodplain. J Arid Environ 60:283–302.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2004.04.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carlucci MB, Seger GDS, Sheil D, Amaral IL, Chuyong GB, Ferreira LV, Galatti U, Hurtado J, Kenfack D, Leal DC, Lewis SL, Lovett JC, Marshall AR, Martin E, Mugerwa B, Munishi P, Oliveira ÁCA, Razafimahaimodison JC, Rovero F, Sainge MN, Thomas D, Pillar VD, Duarte LDS (2017) Phylogenetic composition and structure of tree communities shed light on historical processes influencing tropical rainforest diversity. Ecography 40:521–530.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.02104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carvajal-Endara S, Hendry AP, Emery NC, Davies TJ (2017) Habitat filtering not dispersal limitation shapes oceanic island floras: species assembly of the Galápagos archipelago. Ecol Lett 20(4):495–504.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12753 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Charles-Dominique T, Midgley JF, Bond WJ (2017) Fire frequency filters species by bark traits in a savanna-forest mosaic. J Veg Sci 28:728–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coronado HEN, Dexter KG, Pennington RT, Chave J, Lewis SL, Alexiades MN, Alvarez E, Alves de Oliveira A, Amaral IL, Araujo-Murakami A, Arets EJMM, Aymard GA, Baraloto C, Bonal D, Brienen R, Cerón C, Cornejo Valverde F, Di Fiore A, Farfan-Rios W, Feldpausch TR, Higuchi N, Huamantupa-Chuquimaco I, Laurance SG, Laurance WF, López-Gonzalez G, Marimon BS, Marimon-Junior BH, Monteagudo Mendoza A, Neill D, Palacios Cuenca W, Peñuela Mora MC, Pitman NCA, Prieto A, Quesada CA, Ramirez Angulo H, Rudas A, Ruschel AR, Salinas Revilla N, Salomão RP, Segalin de Andrade A, Silman MR, Spironello W, ter Steege H, Terborgh J, Toledo M, Valenzuela Gamarra L, Vieira ICG, Vilanova Torre E, Vos V, Phillips OL (2015) Phylogenetic diversity of Amazonian tree communities. Divers Distrib 21:1295–1307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dinno A (2017) Dunn.test: Dunn’s test of multiple comparisons using rank sums. R package version 1.3.3. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dunn.test. Accessed 7 Jan 2017
  18. Dryflor (2016) Plant diversity patterns in neotropical dry forests and their conservation implications. Science 353:1383–1387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dunphy BK, Murphy PG, Lugo AE (2000) The tendency for trees to be multiple-stemmed in tropical and subtropical dry forests: studies of Guanica Forest, Puerto Rico. Trop Ecol 41:161–167Google Scholar
  20. Eiserhardt WL, Couvreur TLP, Baker WJ (2017) Plant phylogeny as a window on the evolution of hyperdiversity in the tropical rainforest biome. New Phytol.  https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14516 Google Scholar
  21. Faith DP (1992) Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biol Conserv 61:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fernandes A (2003) Conexões florísticas do Brasil. Banco do Nordeste, Fortaleza, Brazil, 1st edn. Banco do Nordeste, FortalezaGoogle Scholar
  23. Gianuca AT, Engelen J, Brans KI, Hanashiro FTT, Vanhamel M, van den Berg EW, Souffreau C, De Meester Luc (2017) Taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic metacommunity ecology of cladoceran zooplankton along urbanization gradientes. Ecography 40:001–011.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.02926 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Giehl EL, Jarenkow JA (2015) Disturbance and stress gradients result in distinct taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic diversity patterns in a subtropical riparian tree community. J Veg Sci 26(5):889–901.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12288 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gonzalez MA, Roger A, Courtois EA, Jabot F, Norden N, Paine CET, Baraloto C, Thébaud C, Chave J (2010) Shifts in species and phylogenetic diversity between sapling and tree communities indicate negative density dependence in a lowland rain forest. J Ecol 98:137–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gonzalez-Caro S, Umaña MN, Stevenson PR, Swenson NG (2014) Phylogenetic alpha and beta diversity in tropical tree assemblages along regionalscale environmental gradients in northwest south America. J Plant Ecol 7:145–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Guevara JE, Damasco G, Baraloto C, Fine PVA, Peñuela MC, Castilho C, Vincentini A, Cárdenas D, Wittmann F, Targhetta N, Phillips O, Stropp J, Amaral I, Maas P, Monteagudo A, Jimenez EM, Thomas R, Brienen R, Duque A, Magnusson W, Ferreira C, Honorio E, Matos FA, Arevalo FR, Engel J, Petronelli P, Vasquez R, ter Steege H (2016) Low phylogenetic beta diversity and geographic neo-endemism in Amazonian white-sand forests. Biotropica 48(1):34–46.  https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12298 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jablonski D, Roy K, Valentine JW (2006) Out of the tropics: evolutionary dynamics of the latitudinal diversity gradient. Science 314:102–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kembel SW, Cowan PD, Helmus MR et al (2010) Picante: r tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. Bioinformatics 26:1463–1464.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq166 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kerkhoff AJ, Moriarty PE, Weiser MD (2014) The latitudinal species richness gradient in New World woody angiosperms is consistent with the tropical conservatism hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:8525–8530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kotowski W, Beauchard O, Opdekamp W, Meire P, van Diggelen R (2010) Waterlogging and canopy interact to control species recruitment in floodplains. Funct Ecol 24:918–926.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2009.01682 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Latham RE, Ricklefs RE (1994) Continental comparisons of temperate-zone tree species diversity. In: Ricklefs RE, Schluter D (eds) Species diversity in ecological communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 294–314Google Scholar
  33. Luo FL, Huang L, Lei T, Xue W, Li HL, Yu FH, Cornelissen JHC (2016) Responsiveness of performance and morphological traits to experimental submergence predicts field distribution pattern ofwetland plants. J Veg Sci 27:340–351.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12352 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Meira-Neto JAA, Tolentino GS, Silva MCNA, Neri AV, Gastauer M, Magnago LFS, Yuste JC, Valladares F (2017) Functional antagonism between nitrogen-fi xing leguminous trees and calcicole-drought-tolerant trees in the Cerrado. Acta Bot Bras 31(1):11–18.  https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-33062016abb0380 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moor H, Hylander K, Norberg J (2015) Predicting climate change effects on wetland ecosystem services using species distribution modeling and plant functional traits. Ambio 44(1):113–126.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0593-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moreira SN, Eisenlohr PV, Pott A, Pott V, Oliveira-Filho AT (2015) Similar vegetation structure in protected and non-protected wetlands in Central Brazil: conservation significance. Environ Conserv 42(4):356–362.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892915000107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Oliveira-Filho AT, Ratter JA (1995) A study of the origin of Central Brazilian forests by the analysis of plant species distribution patterns. Edinb J Bot 52(2):141–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K (2004) APE: analisys of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20(2):289–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Parolin P (2008) Submerged in darkness: adaptations to prolonged submergence by woody species of the Amazonian floodplains. Ann Bot 103:359–376.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcn216 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pennington RT, Lavin M, Oliveira-Filho AT (2009) Woody plant diversity, evolution, and ecology in the tropics: perspectives from seasonally dry tropical forests. Ann Rev 40:437–457.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120327 Google Scholar
  41. Pereira DGS (2013) Conexões estruturais e florísticas de ecounidades da vegetação arbórea de uma planície inundável do Médio São Francisco. PhD dissertation, Department of Forestry, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  42. Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Core Team (2017) nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-131. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme. Accessed 8 Oct 2017
  43. Qian H, Sandel B (2017) Phylogenetic structure of regional angiosperm assemblages across latitudinal and climatic gradients in North America. Global Ecol Biogeogr 26:1258–1269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Qian H, Jin Y, Ricklefs RE (2017) Patterns of phylogenetic relatedness of angiosperm woody plants across biomes and life-history stages. J Biogeogr.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12936 Google Scholar
  45. Quattrini AM, Gómez CE, Cordes EE (2017) Environmental filtering and neutral processes shape octocoral community assembly in the deep sea. Oecologia 183:221–236.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-016-3765-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Revell LJ (2012) phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods Ecol Evol 3(2):217–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Santos RM, Oliveira-Filho AT, Eisenlohr PV, Queiroz LP, Cardoso DBOS, Rodal MJN (2012) Identity and relationships of the Arboreal Caatinga among other floristic units of seasonally dry tropical forests (SDTFs) of north-eastern and Central Brazil. Ecol Evol 2(2):409–428.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.91 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schluter D, Price T, Mooers AO, Ludwig D (1997) Likelihood ancestor states in adaptive radiation. Evolution 51(6):1699–1711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Violle C, Navas M-L, Vile D, Kazakou E, Fortunel C, Hummel I, Garnier E (2007) Let the concept of trait be functional! Oikos 116:882–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Violle C, Bonis A, Plantegenest M, Cudennec C, Damgaard C, Marion B, Le Coeur D, Bouzillé JB (2010) Plant functional traits capture species richness variations along a flooding gradient. Oikos 00:001–017.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18525.x Google Scholar
  51. Webb CO (2000) Exploring the phylogenetic structure of ecological communities: an example for rain forest trees. Am Nat 152(2):145–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Webb CO, Domoghue MJ (2005) Phylomatic: tree assembly for applied phylogenetics. Mol Ecol Notes 5(1):181–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Webb CO, Ackerly DD, McPeek MA, Donoghue MJ (2002) Phylogenies and community ecology. Ann Rev 33:475–505.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150448 Google Scholar
  54. Webb CO, Ackerly DD, Kembel SW (2008) Phylocom: software for the analysis of phylogenetic community structure and character evolution. Bioinformatics 24(18):2098–2100.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn358 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wiens JJ, Donoghue MJ (2004) Historical biogeography, ecology and species richness. Trends Ecol Evol 19(12):639–644.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2004.09.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wiens JJ, Ackerly DD, Allen AP, Anacker BL, Buckley LB, Cornell HV, Damschen EI, Davies J, Grytnes JA, Harrison SP, Hawkins BA, Holt RD, McCain CM, Stephens PR (2010) Niche conservatism as an emerging principle in ecology and conservation biology. Ecol Lett 13:1310–1324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wikstrom N, Savolainen V, Chase MW (2001) Evolution of the angiosperms: calibrating the family tree. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:2211–2220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wittmann F, Schongart J, Junk WJ (2010) Phytogeography, species diversity, community structure and dynamics of Amazonian floodplain forests. In: Junk WJ, Piedade MTF, Wittmann F, Schongart J, Parolin P (eds) Amazonian floodplain forests: ecophysiology, biodiversity and sustainable management. Ecological studies 210. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 61–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wittmann F, Householder E, Piedade MTF, Assis RL, Schongart J, Parolin P, Junk WJ (2013) Habitat specifity, endemism and the neotropical distribution of Amazonian white-water floodplain trees. Ecography 36:690–707.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07723.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zanne AE, Tank DC, Cornwell WK, Eastman JM, Smith SA, FitzJohn RG, McGlinn DJ, O’Meara BC, Moles AT, Reich PB, Royer DL, Soltis DE, Stevens PF, Westoby M, Wright IJ, Aarssen L, Bertin RI, Calaminus A, Govaerts R, Hemmings F, Leishman MR, Oleksyn J, Soltis PS, Swenson NG, Warman L, Beaulieu JM (2014) Three keys to the radiation of angiosperms into freezing environments. Nature 506:89–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biology, Graduate Program in Applied BotanyFederal University of LavrasLavrasBrazil
  2. 2.Department of ForestryFederal University of LavrasLavrasBrazil

Personalised recommendations