Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 189, Issue 3, pp 829–840 | Cite as

Nitrogen–phosphorous interactions in young northern hardwoods indicate P limitation: foliar concentrations and resorption in a factorial N by P addition experiment

  • Kara GonzalesEmail author
  • Ruth Yanai
Ecosystem ecology – original research
  • 70 Downloads

Abstract

Resorption, the process of withdrawing foliar nutrients prior to leaf abscission, is one of the most important nutrient conservation mechanisms in trees. Along with foliar nutrient concentrations, foliar resorption can be used to infer nutrient limitation. We collected green and senesced leaves of five species in early successional stands in the White Mountains of New Hampshire. In unmanipulated controls, foliar N:P ratios ranged from 20 to 31 and litter N:P ratios ranged from 19 to 36. These values suggest P limitation, although this forest type has been assumed to be N-limited. Additionally, N:P resorption ratios in control plots were < 1, reflecting proportionately more conservation of P through resorption than N. Four years into a full-factorial N × P fertilization experiment, N and P additions had increased N and P concentrations in leaves; more importantly, P addition reduced N concentration, possibly indicating alleviation of growth limitation by P. Resorption of P was less proficient (indicated by the concentration of an element in leaf litter) with P addition, as expected. Resorption proficiency and efficiency (the proportion of leaf nutrients resorbed) of N increased with P addition, suggesting increased demand for N with alleviation of P limitation. Resorption of P was more proficient and efficient with N addition, consistent with exacerbated P limitation. Temperate forests on glaciated soils are generally thought to be N-limited, but long-term N × P manipulations in this biome are lacking. Our results suggest that decades of anthropogenic N deposition may have tipped the balance to P limitation in these forests.

Keywords

Resorption proficiency Resorption efficiency Nutrient limitation Northern hardwoods Fertilization Foliar nutrients 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was conducted on plots established by Matt Vadeboncoeur, Steve Hamburg, and others almost 15 years ago under funding to Yanai from the National Science Foundation (DEB 0235650). Beginning in 2010, Multiple Element Limitation in Northern Hardwood Ecosystems (http://www.esf.edu/melnhe) was funded (by DEB 0949324 to Yanai), guided by the early vision of Tim Fahey and Melany Fisk. Maintaining the sites and fertilizing them has involved 69 summer interns and 33 graduate students. We are especially grateful to Bali Quintero, Adam Wild, and Nora Yanai, who shot and processed green leaves in August 2014. Jerome Barner, Stephanie Suttenberg, and Alex Kuhn helped collect leaf litter in fall 2014. The paper was improved by comments from Keith Killingbeck, Craig See, and students in FOR 694 at SUNY-ESF. The Bartlett Experimental Forest is owned and operated by the USDA Forest Service. This paper is a product of the Hubbard Brook Long-Term Ecological Research network, funded by the National Science Foundation (DEB 1633026).

Author contribution statement

The idea for this study was part of a much larger project led by RDY. KEG joined the project in her final semester as an undergraduate student, collecting samples and processing them. As a graduate student, KEG analyzed the data. KEG and RDY interpreted the results, wrote the paper, and enhanced its value through extended revision.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Science Foundation (DEB 0235650 and 0949324).

Supplementary material

442_2019_4350_MOESM1_ESM.docx (23 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 24 kb)

References

  1. Aber JD, Goodale CL, Ollinger SV et al (2003) Is nitrogen deposition altering the nitrogen status of northeastern forests? AIBS Bull 53:375–389Google Scholar
  2. Adams MB, Loughry LH, Plaugher LL (2003) Experimental forests and ranges of the USDA forest serviceGoogle Scholar
  3. Aerts R (1990) Nutrient use efficiency in evergreen and deciduous species from heathlands. Oecologia 84:391–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aerts R (1996) Nutrient resorption from senescing leaves of perennials: are there general patterns? J Ecol 84:597–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aerts R, Chapin FS (1999) The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: a re-evaluation of processes and patterns. Adv Ecol Res 30:1–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ågren GI (2004) The C:N:P stoichiometry of autotrophs—theory and observations. Ecol Lett 7:185–191.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00567.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bai Y, Wu J, Clark CM et al (2010) Tradeoffs and thresholds in the effects of nitrogen addition on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: evidence from inner Mongolia Grasslands. Glob Change Biol 16:358–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berendse F, Aerts R (1987) Nitrogen-use-efficiency: a biologically meaningful definition? JSTOR 1:293–296Google Scholar
  9. Bloom AJ, Chapin FS III, Mooney HA (1985) Resource limitation in plants-an economic analogy. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 16:363–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buchanan-Wollaston V (1997) The molecular biology of leaf senescence. J Exp Bot 48:181–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chapin FS, Matson PA, Mooney HA (2002) Terrestrial decomposition. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  12. Chapin FS III, Matson PA, Vitousek P (2011) Principles of terrestrial ecosystem ecology. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Danger M, Daufresne T, Lucas F et al (2008) Does Liebig’s law of the minimum scale up from species to communities? Oikos 117:1741–1751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davidson EA, Reis de Carvalho CJ, Vieira IC et al (2004) Nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of biomass growth in a tropical secondary forest. Ecol Appl 14:150–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. dos Santos Jr UM, de Carvalho Gonçalves JF, Feldpausch TR (2006) Growth, leaf nutrient concentration and photosynthetic nutrient use efficiency in tropical tree species planted in degraded areas in central Amazonia. For Ecol Manag 226:299–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elser JJ, Bracken ME, Cleland EE et al (2007) Global analysis of nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of primary producers in freshwater, marine and terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol Lett 10:1135–1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fahey TJ, Battles JJ, Wilson GF (1998) Responses of early successional northern hardwood forests to changes in nutrient availability. Ecol Monogr 68:183–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fei S, Steiner KC (2007) Evidence for increasing red maple abundance in the eastern United States. For Sci 53:473–477Google Scholar
  19. Finzi AC, Austin AT, Cleland EE et al (2011) Responses and feedbacks of coupled biogeochemical cycles to climate change: examples from terrestrial ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 9:61–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fisk MC, Ratliff TJ, Goswami S, Yanai RD (2014) Synergistic soil response to nitrogen plus phosphorus fertilization in hardwood forests. Biogeochemistry 118:195–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goswami S, Fisk MC, Vadeboncoeur MA et al (2018) Phosphorus limitation of aboveground production in northern hardwood forests. Ecology 99:438–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gradowski T, Thomas SC (2006) Phosphorus limitation of sugar maple growth in central Ontario. For Ecol Manag 226:104–109.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.12.062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grime JP (1979) Plant strategies and vegetation processes. Plant Strateg Veg Process 206:1176–1177Google Scholar
  24. Güsewell S (2004) N:P ratios in terrestrial plants: variation and functional significance. New Phytol 164:243–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Haase DL, Rose R (1995) Vector analysis and its use for interpreting plant nutrient shifts in response to silvicultural treatments. For Sci 41:54–66Google Scholar
  26. Hagen-Thorn A, Varnagiryte I, Nihlgard B, Armolaitis K (2006) Autumn nutrient resorption and losses in four deciduous forest tree species. For Ecol Manag 228:33–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Harpole WS, Ngai JT, Cleland EE et al (2011) Nutrient co-limitation of primary producer communities. Ecol Lett 14:852–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hedwall P-O, Bergh J, Brunet J (2017) Phosphorus and nitrogen co-limitation of forest ground vegetation under elevated anthropogenic nitrogen deposition. Oecologia 185:317–326.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-017-3945-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ji H, Wen J, Du B et al (2018) Comparison of the nutrient resorption stoichiometry of Quercus variabilis Blume growing in two sites contrasting in soil phosphorus content. Ann For Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-018-0727-5 Google Scholar
  30. Killingbeck KT (1996) Nutrients in senesced leaves: keys to the search for potential resorption and resorption proficiency. Ecology 77:1716–1727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kobe RK, Lepczyk CA, Iyer M (2005) Resorption efficiency decreases with increasing green leaf nutrients in a global data set. Ecology 86:2780–2792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Koerselman W, Meuleman AF (1996) The vegetation N: P ratio: a new tool to detect the nature of nutrient limitation. J Appl Ecol 1:1441–1450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Marklein AR, Houlton BZ (2012) Nitrogen inputs accelerate phosphorus cycling rates across a wide variety of terrestrial ecosystems. New Phytol 193:696–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McGroddy ME, Daufresne T, Hedin LO (2004) Scaling of C:N:P stoichiometry in forests worldwide: implications of terrestrial redfield-type ratios. Ecology 85:2390–2401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Menge DN, Field CB (2007) Simulated global changes alter phosphorus demand in annual grassland. Glob Change Biol 13:2582–2591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mohren GMJ, Van Den Burg J, Burger FW (1986) Phosphorus deficiency induced by nitrogen input in Douglas fir in the Netherlands. Plant Soil 95:191–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. NADP Program Office (2017) National Atmospheric Deposition ProgramGoogle Scholar
  38. Naples BK, Fisk MC (2010) Belowground insights into nutrient limitation in northern hardwood forests. Biogeochemistry 97:109–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Niinemets Ü, Kull K (2005) Co-limitation of plant primary productivity by nitrogen and phosphorus in a species-rich wooded meadow on calcareous soils. Acta Oecol 28:345–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ostertag R (2010) Foliar nitrogen and phosphorus accumulation responses after fertilization: an example from nutrient-limited Hawaiian forests. Plant Soil 334:85–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rastetter EB, Shaver GR (1992) A model of multiple-element limitation for acclimating vegetation. Ecology 73:1157–1174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rastetter EB, Yanai RD, Thomas RQ et al (2013) Recovery from disturbance requires resynchronization of ecosystem nutrient cycles. Ecol Appl 23:621–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Reed SC, Townsend AR, Davidson EA, Cleveland CC (2012) Stoichiometric patterns in foliar nutrient resorption across multiple scales. New Phytol 196:173–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Reich PB, Oleksyn J (2004) Global patterns of plant leaf N and P in relation to temperature and latitude. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:11001–11006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Reich PB, Walters MB, Ellsworth DS (1997) From tropics to tundra: global convergence in plant functioning. Proc Natl Acad Sci 94:13730–13734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Reich PB, Wright IJ, Cavender-Bares J et al (2003) The evolution of plant functional variation: traits, spectra, and strategies. Int J Plant Sci 164:S143–S164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. See CR, Yanai RD, Fisk MC et al (2015) Soil nitrogen affects phosphorus recycling: foliar resorption and plant–soil feedbacks in a northern hardwood forest. Ecology 96:2488–2498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Soudzilovskaia NA, Onipchenko VG, Cornelissen JH, Aerts R (2007) Effects of fertilisation and irrigation on ‘foliar afterlife’in alpine tundra. J Veg Sci 18:755–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Staaf H (1982) Plant nutrient changes in beech leaves during senescence as influenced by site characteristics. ACTA OECOL OECOL PLANT 3:161–170Google Scholar
  50. Townsend AR, Cleveland CC, Asner GP, Bustamante M (2007) Controls over foliar N:P ratios in tropical rain forests. Ecology 88:107–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Treseder KK, Vitousek PM (2001) Effects of soil nutrient availability on investment in acquisition of N and P in Hawaiian rain forests. Ecology 82:946–954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tripler C, Canham C, Inouye R, Schnurr J (2002) Soil nitrogen availability, plant luxury consumption, and herbivory by white-tailed deer. Oecologia 133:517–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. US Environmental Protection Agency Clean Air Markets Division (2017) Clean air status and trends network (CASTNET)Google Scholar
  54. Vadeboncoeur MA (2010) Meta-analysis of fertilization experiments indicates multiple limiting nutrients in northeastern deciduous forests. Can J For Res 40:1766–1780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vadeboncoeur MA, Hamburg SP, Blum JD et al (2012) The quantitative soil pit method for measuring belowground carbon and nitrogen stocks. Soil Sci Soc Am J 76:2241.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2012.0111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Vadeboncoeur MA, Hamburg SP, Yanai RD, Blum JD (2014) Rates of sustainable forest harvest depend on rotation length and weathering of soil minerals. For Ecol Manag 318:194–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Van Heerwaarden LM, Toet S, Aerts R (2003) Nitrogen and phosphorus resorption efficiency and proficiency in six sub-arctic bog species after 4 years of nitrogen fertilization. J Ecol 91:1060–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Venterink HO, Güsewell S (2010) Competitive interactions between two meadow grasses under nitrogen and phosphorus limitation. Funct Ecol 24:877–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vergutz L, Manzoni S, Porporato A et al (2012) Global resorption efficiencies and concentrations of carbon and nutrients in leaves of terrestrial plants. Ecol Monogr 82:205–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Vitousek PM (1984) Litterfall, nutrient cycling, and nutrient limitation in tropical forests. Ecology 65:285–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Vitousek PM, Sanford RL Jr (1986) Nutrient cycling in moist tropical forest. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 17:137–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Vitousek PM, Porder S, Houlton BZ, Chadwick OA (2010) Terrestrial phosphorus limitation: mechanisms, implications, and nitrogen–phosphorus interactions. Ecol Appl 20:5–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Walker TW, Syers JK (1976) The fate of phosphorus during pedogenesis. Geoderma 15:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wood Tana E, Deborah Lawrence, Wells Jessie A (2011) Inter-specific variation in foliar nutrients and resorption of nine canopy-tree species in a secondary neotropical rain forest. Biotropica 43:544–551.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2010.00740.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M et al (2004) The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428:821–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Yanai RD (1992) Phosphorus budget of a 70-year-old northern hardwood forest. Biogeochemistry 17:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Yang Y, Yanai RD, Fatemi FR et al (2016) Sources of variability in tissue chemistry in northern hardwood species. Can J For Res 46:285–296.  https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2015-0302 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Yuan ZY, Chen HY (2015) Negative effects of fertilization on plant nutrient resorption. Ecology 96:373–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate Program in Environmental ScienceState University of New York College of Environmental Science and ForestrySyracuseUSA
  2. 2.CaltransOaklandUSA

Personalised recommendations