Advertisement

Oecologia

pp 1–10 | Cite as

Low food availability during gestation enhances offspring post-natal growth, but reduces survival, in a viviparous lizard

  • Thomas Botterill-James
  • Kirke L. Munch
  • Ben Halliwell
  • David G. Chapple
  • Michael G. Gardner
  • Erik Wapstra
  • Geoffrey M. WhileEmail author
Behavioral ecology – original research

Abstract

The environment experienced by a mother can have profound effects on the fitness of her offspring (i.e., maternal effects). Maternal effects can be adaptive when the developmental environments experienced by offspring promote phenotypes that provide fitness benefits either via matching offspring phenotype to the post-developmental environment (also known as anticipatory maternal effects) or through direct effects on offspring growth and survival. We tested these hypotheses in a viviparous lizard using a factorial experimental design in which mothers received either high or low amounts of food during gestation, and resultant offspring were raised on either high or low amounts of food post-birth. We found no effect of food availability during gestation on reproductive traits of mothers or offspring traits at birth. However, offspring from mothers who received low food during gestation exhibited a greater increase in condition in the post-birth period, suggesting some form of priming of offspring by mothers to cope with an anticipated poor environment after birth. Offspring that received low food during gestation were also more likely to die, suggesting a trade-off for this accelerated growth. There were also significant effects of post-birth food availability on offspring snout-vent length and body condition growth, with offspring with high food availability post birth doing better. However, the effects of the pre- and post-natal resource evnironment on offspring growth were independent on one another, therefore, providing no support for the presence of anticipatory maternal effects in the traditional sense.

Keywords

Egernia Liopholis Lizard Developmental plasticity Maternal effect 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Tobias Uller for discussion of ideas and detailed comments on earlier versions of the manuscript. The work was funded by the Holsworth Wildlife Research Fund (to TBJ) and the Australian Research Council (grant number DP150102900 to GMW, MGG and DGC). GMW was supported by the Australian Research Council (Grant number DE150100336). All work was carried out with approval from the Animal Ethics Committee at the University of Tasmania (Ethics Approval Number A0015058).

Author contribution statement

TBJ, BH, EW, and GMW conceived the ideas and designed methodology with input from all other authors. TBJ, BH, and KM collected the data. TBJ analysed the data. TBJ and GMW led the writing of the manuscript with all authors contributing critically to the drafts and giving final approval for publication.

References

  1. Agrawal AA, Laforsch C, Tollrian R (1999) Transgenerational induction of defences in animals and plants. Nature 401:60–63.  https://doi.org/10.1038/43425 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Badyaev AV, Uller T (2009) Parental effects in ecology and evolution: mechanisms, processes and implications. Philos T Roy Soc B 364:1169–1177.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0302 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, Geange SW, Poulsen JR, Stevens MHH, White JSS (2009) Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 24:127–135.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.08 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Botterill-James T, Halliwell B, Cooper-Scott E, Uller T, Wapstra E, While GM (2016) Habitat structure influences parent-offspring association in a social lizard. Front Ecol Evol 4:96.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2016.00096 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Botterill-James T, Halliwell B, McKeown S, Sillince J, Uller T, Wapstra E, While GM (2017) Family aggression in social lizard. Sci Rep 7:3502.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Botterill-James T, Munch KL, Halliwell B, Chapple DG, Gardner MG, Wapstra E, While GM (2019) Data from: Low food availability during gestation enhances offspring post-natal growth, but reduces survival, in a viviparous lizard. Dryad Digital Repository.  https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.3sk8ht4 Google Scholar
  7. Burgess SC, Marshall DJ (2014) Adaptive parental effects: the importance of estimating environmental predictability and offspring fitness appropriately. Oikos 123:769–776.  https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.01235 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cadby CD, Jones SM, Wapstra E (2011) Potentially adaptive effects of maternal nutrition during gestation on offspring phenotype of a viviparous reptile. J Exp Biol 214:4234–4239.  https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.057349 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caley MJ, Schwarzkopf L (2004) Complex growth rate evolution in a latitudinally widespread species. Evolution 58:862–869.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb00417.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cartledge VA, Jones S (2007) Does adrenal responsiveness vary with sex and reproductive status in Egernia whitii, a viviparous skink? Gen Comp Endoc 150:132–139.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2006.07.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chapple DG (2003) Ecology, life-history, and behavior in the Australian scincid genus Egernia, with comments on the evolution of complex sociality in lizards. Herpetol Monogr 17:145–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chapple DG, Keogh JS (2006) Group structure and stability in social aggregations of White’s skink, Egernia whitii. Ethology 112:247–257.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2006.01153.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Doody SJ, Guarino E, Georges A, Corey B, Murray G, Ewert M (2006) Nest site choice compensates for climate effects on sex ratios in a lizard with environmental sex determination. Evol Ecol 20:307–330.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-006-0003-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. English S, Fawcett TW, Higginson AD, Trimmer PC, Uller T (2016) Adaptive use of information during growth can explain long-term effects of early life experiences. The Am Nat 187:620–632.  https://doi.org/10.1086/685644 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Engqvist L, Reinhold K (2016) Adaptive trans-generational phenotypic plasticity and the lack of an experimental control in reciprocal match/mismatch experiments. Methods Ecol Evol 7:1482–1488.  https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12618 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gluckman PD, Hanson MA, Cooper C, Thornburg KL (2008) Effect of in utero and early-life conditions on adult health and disease. New Engl J Med 359:61–73.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra0708473 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Groothuis TGG, Taborsky B (2015) Introducing biological realism into the study of developmental plasticity in behaviour. Front Zool 12(Suppl):1.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-12-S1-S6 Google Scholar
  18. Gvodzik L (2002) To heat or to save time? Thermoregulation in the lizard Zootoca vivipara (Squamata: Lacertidae) in different thermal environments along an altitudinal gradient. Can J Zool 80:479–492.  https://doi.org/10.1139/z02-015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hales CN, Barker DJ (2001) The thrifty phenotype hypothesis. Brit Med Bull 60:5–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Halliwell B, Uller T, Chapple DG, Gardner MG, Wapstra E, While GM (2017) Habitat saturation promotes delayed dispersal in a social reptile. Behav Ecol 28:515–522.  https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arw181 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hopwood PE, Moore AJ, Royle NJ (2014) Effects of resource variation during early life and adult social environment on contest outcomes in burying beetles: a context-dependent silver spoon strategy? P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci 281:20133102.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.3102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Itonaga K, Jones SM, Wapstra E (2012) Effects of maternal basking and food quantity during gestation provide evidence for the selective advantage of matrotrophy in a viviparous lizard. PLoS ONE 7:e41835.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041835 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kelly D, Coutts A (2000) Early nutrition and the development of immune function in the neonate. P Nutr Soc 59:177–185.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665100000197 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kofman O (2002) The role of prenatal stress in the etiology of developmental behavioural disorders. Neurosci Biobehav R 26(4):457–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kotrschal A, Heckel G, Bonfils D, Taborsky B (2012) Life-stage specific environments in a cichlid fish: implications for inducible maternal effects. Evol Ecol 26:123–137.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-011-9495-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kotrschal A, Szidat S, Taborsky B (2014) Developmental plasticity of growth and digestive efficiency in dependence of early-life food availability. Funct Ecol 28:878–885.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12230 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marshall DJ, Uller T (2007) When is a maternal effect adaptive? Oikos 116:1957–1963.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2007.0030-1299.16203.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Metcalfe NB, Monaghan P (2001) Compensation for a bad start: grow now, pay later? Trends Ecol Evol 16:254–260.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02124-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mousseau TA, Dingle H (1991) Maternal effects in insect life histories. Annu Rev Entomol 36:511–534.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.36.010191.002455 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mousseau TA, Fox CW (1998) The adaptive significance of maternal effects. Trends Ecol Evol 13:403–407.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01472-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Muller W, Groothuis TGG, Kasprzik A, Dijkstra X, Alatalo RV, Siitari H (2005) Prenatal androgen exposure modulates cellular and humoral immune function of blackheaded gull chicks. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 272:1971–1977.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3178 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Peig J, Green AJ (2009) New perspectives for estimating body condition from mass/length data: the scaled mass index as an alternative method. Oikos 118:1883–1891.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17643.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Peig J, Green AJ (2010) The paradigm of body condition: a critical reappraisal of current methods based on mass and length. Funct Ecol 24:1323–1332.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01751.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Räsänen K, Kruuk L (2007) Maternal effects and evolution at ecological time-scales. Funct Ecol 21:408–421.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01246.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rossiter M (1996) Incidence and consequences of inherited environmental effects. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27:451–476.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.27.1.451 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rutkowska J, Cichoń M (2002) Maternal investment during egg laying and offspring sex: an experimental study of zebra finches. Anim Behav 64:817–822.  https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2002.1973 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Segers FHID, Berishvili G, Taborsky B (2012) Egg size-dependent expression of growth hormone receptor accompanies compensatory growth in fish. Proc Roy Soc B-Biol Sci 279:592–600.  https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2002.1973 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shine R, Downes SJ (1999) Can pregnant lizards adjust their offspring phenotypes to environmental conditions? Oecologia 119:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Taborsky B (2006) Mothers determine offspring size in response to own juvenile growth conditions. Biol Lett 22:225–228.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2005.0422 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Taborsky B (2017) Developmental plasticity: Preparing for life in a complex world. Adv Stud Behav 49:49–99.  https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.asb.2016.12.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Telemeco RS, Elphick MJ, Shine R (2009) Nesting lizards (Bassiana duperreyi) compensate partly, but not completely, for climate change. Ecology 90:17–22.  https://doi.org/10.1890/08-1452.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Uller T (2008) Developmental plasticity and the evolution of parental effects. Trends Ecol Evol 23:432–438.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.04.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Uller T, While GM, Cadby CD, Harts A, OʼConnor K, Pen I, Wapstra E (2011) Altitudinal divergence in maternal thermal effects in a viviparous lizard is concordant with patterns of behavioural thermoregulation and natural selection on offspring phenotype. Evolution 65:2313–2315.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01303.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Uller T, Nakagawa S, English S (2013) Weak evidence for anticipatory parental effects in plants and animals. J Evol Biol 26:2161–2170.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12212 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wade MJ (1998) The evolutionary genetics of maternal effects. In: Mousseau T, Fox C (eds) Maternal effects as adaptations. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 5–21Google Scholar
  46. Wang Y, Li SR, Zeng ZG, Liang L, Du WG (2017) Maternal food availability affects offspring performance and survival in a viviparous lizard. Funct Ecol 31:1950–1956.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12903 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wapstra E, Swain R, Jones SM, O’Reilly J (1999) Geographic and annual variation in reproductive cycles in the Tasmanian spotted snow skink, Niveoscincus ocellatus (Squamata: Scincidae). Aust J Zool 47:539–550.  https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO99038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Warner DA, Buckelew AM, Pearson PR, Dhawan A (2015) The effect of prey availability on offspring survival depends on maternal food resources. Biol J Linn Soc 115:437–447.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bij.12519 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. While GM, Wapstra E (2008) Are there benefits to being born asynchronously? Behav Ecol 19:208–216.  https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arm124 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. While GM, Uller T, Wapstra E (2009a) Within-population variation in social strategies characterize the social and mating system of an Australian lizard, Egernia whitii. Austral Ecol 34:938–949.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2009.02002.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. While GM, Uller T, McEvoy J, Wapstra E (2009b) Long-lasting effects of among-but not within-litter timing of birth in a viviparous lizard. Evol Ecol Res 11:1259–1270Google Scholar
  52. While GM, Uller T, Bordogna G, Wapstra E (2014) Promiscuity resolves constraints on social mate choice imposed by population viscosity. Mol Ecol 23:721–732.  https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12618 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wilson S, Swan G (2017) A complete guide to Australian reptiles, 5th edn. New Holland, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  54. Wolf JB, Wade MJ (2009) What are maternal effects (and what are they not)? Philos T Roy Soc B 364:1107–1115.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0238 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Biological SciencesUniversity of TasmaniaHobartAustralia
  2. 2.School of Biological SciencesMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia
  3. 3.College of Science and EngineeringFlinders UniversityAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations