, Volume 189, Issue 4, pp 1049–1060 | Cite as

Agricultural land-use history does not reduce woodland understory herb establishment

  • Carrie A. BarkerEmail author
  • Nash E. Turley
  • John L. Orrock
  • Joseph A. Ledvina
  • Lars A. Brudvig
Community ecology – original research


Agricultural land use is a leading cause of habitat degradation, leaving a legacy of ecological impacts long after agriculture has ceased. Yet the mechanisms for legacy effects, such as altered plant community composition, are not well understood. In particular, whether plant community recovery is limited by an inability of populations to establish within post-agricultural areas, owing to altered environmental conditions within these areas, remains poorly known. We evaluated this hypothesis of post-agricultural establishment limitation through a field experiment within longleaf pine woodlands in South Carolina (USA) and a greenhouse experiment using field-collected soils from these sites. In the field, we sowed seeds of 12 understory plant species associated with remnants (no known history of agriculture) into 27 paired remnant and post-agricultural woodlands. We found that post-agricultural woodlands supported higher establishment, resulting in greater species richness of sown species. These results were context dependent, however, with higher establishment in post-agricultural woodlands only when sites were frequently burned, had less leaf litter, or had less sandy soils. In the greenhouse, we found that agricultural history had no impact on plant growth or survival, suggesting that establishment limitation is unlikely driven by differences in soils associated with agricultural history when environmental conditions are not stressful. Rather, the potential for establishment in post-agricultural habitats can be higher than in remnant habitats, with the strength of this effect determined by fire frequency and soil characteristics.


Agricultural legacy Establishment limitation Longleaf pine woodland Fire Soil legacy 



We thank Chelsea Blake, John Blake, Katie Biggert, Joey Bukowski, Chris Habeck, Emily Heald, Bridget Johnson, Skylar Johnson, Clay Lovelace, Ed Olson, Emily Reed, Chris Shaw, Zachary Smith, Jeannie Williams, and Kim Wright, for their roles in creating and maintaining this experiment and collecting data. This work was supported by funds provided to the Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Savannah River, under Interagency Agreement DE-EM0003622 with the Department of Energy, Aiken, SC; JLO was supported by a UW Vilas Associates Fellowship during a portion of this work.

Author contribution statement

LAB, JLO, and NET conceived and designed the experiments. JAL, NET, and CAB performed the experiments. NET analyzed the data. All the authors wrote the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Baeten L, Hermy M, Verheyen K (2009a) Environmental limitation contributes to the differential colonization capacity of two forest herbs. J Veg Sci 20:209–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baeten L, Jacquemyn H, Van Calster H, Van Beek E, Devlaeminck R, Verheyen K, Hermy M (2009b) Low recruitment across life stages partly accounts for the slow colonization of forest herbs. J Ecol 97:109–117. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baeten L, Davies TJ, Verheyen K, Van Calster H, Vellend M (2015) Disentangling dispersal from phylogeny in the colonization capacity of forest understory plants. J Ecol 103:175–183. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartoń K (2016) MuMIn: multi-model inference. R package version 1.15.6. Accessed 8 Mar 2018
  5. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bizzari LE, Collins CD, Brudvig LA, Damschen EI (2015) Historical agriculture and contemporary fire frequency alter soil properties in longleaf pine woodlands. For Ecol Manag 349:45–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bray HR, Kurtz LT (1945) Determination of total, organic, and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Sci 59:39–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Breen DB (2015) The influence of agricultural abandonment and the abiotic environment on the vegetation communities of a suburban deciduous forest. Castanea 80:103–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brockway DG, Lewis CE (1997) Long-term effects of dormant-season prescribed fire on plant community diversity, structure and productivity in a longleaf pine wiregrass ecosystem. For Ecol Manag 96:167–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brudvig LA, Damschen EI (2011) Land-use history, historical connectivity, and land management interact to determine longleaf pine woodland understory richness and composition. Ecography 34:257–266. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brudvig LA, Grman E, Habeck CW, Orrock JL, Ledvina JA (2013) Strong legacy of agricultural land use on soils and understory plant communities in longleaf pine woodlands. For Ecol Manag 310:944–955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brudvig LA, Orrock JL, Damschen EI, Collins CD, Hahn PG, Mattingly WB, Veldman JW, Walker JL (2014) Land-use history and contemporary management inform an ecological reference model for longleaf pine woodland understory plant communities. PLoS ONE 9:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark CJ, Poulsen JR, Levey DJ, Osenberg CW (2007) Are plant populations seed limited? A critique and meta-analysis of seed addition experiments. Am Nat 170:128–142Google Scholar
  14. Compton JE, Boone RD (2000) Long-term impacts of agriculture on soil carbon and nitrogen in New England forests. Ecology 81:2314–2330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cramer VA, Hobbs RJ, Standish RJ (2008) What’s new about old fields? Land abandonment and ecosystem assembly. Trends Ecol Evol 23:104–112. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crawley MJ (2000) Seed predators and plant population dynamics. In: Fenner M (ed) Seeds: the ecology of regeneration in plant communities. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp 167–182. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. de la Peña E, Baeten L, Steel H, Viaene N, De Sutter N, De Schrijver A, Verheyen K (2016) Beyond plant-soil feedbacks: mechanisms driving plant community shifts due to land-use legacies in post-agricultural forests. Funct Ecol 30:1073–1085. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Donohue K, Foster DR, Motzkin G (2000) Effects of the past and the present on species distribution: land-use history and demography of wintergreen. J Ecol 88:303–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dupouey JL, Dambrine E, Laffite JD, Moares C (2002) Irreversible impact of past land use on forest soils and biodiversity. Ecology 83:2978–2984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ehrlén J, Eriksson O (2000) Dispersal limitation and patch occupancy in forest herbs. Ecology 81:1667–1674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Endels P, Adriaens D, Verheyen K, Hermy M (2004) Population structure and adult plant performance of forest herbs in three contrasting habitats. Ecography 27:225–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fernandes DN, Sanford RL (1995) Effects of recent land-use practices on soil nutrients and succession under tropical wet forest in Costa Rica. Conserve Biol 9:915–922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Flinn KM, Vellend M (2005) Recovery of forest plant communities in post-agricultural landscapes. Front Ecol Environ 3:243–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Foster D, Swanson F, Aber J, Burke I, Brokow N, Tilman D, Knapp A (2003) The importance of land-use legacies to ecology and conservation. Bioscience 53:77–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Freschet GT, Östlund L, Kichenin E, Wardle DA (2014) Aboveground and belowground legacies of native Sami land use on boreal forest in northern Sweden 100 years after abandonment. Ecology 95:963–977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Graae BJ, Hansen T, Sunde PB (2004) The importance of recruitment limitation in forest plant species colonization: a seed sowing experiment. Flora 199:263–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grman E, Orrock JL, Habeck CW, Ledvina JA, Brudvig LA (2015) Altered beta diversity in post-agricultural woodlands: two hypotheses and the role of scale. Ecography 38:614–621. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hahn PG, Orrock JL (2016) Ontogenetic responses of four plant species to additive and interactive effects of land-use history, canopy structure and herbivory. J Ecol 104:1518–1526. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harrington TB, Edwards MB (1999) Understory vegetation, resource availability, and litterfall responses to pine thinning and woody vegetation control in longleaf pine plantations. Can J For Res 29:1055–1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hedman CW, Grace SL, King SE (2000) Vegetation composition and structure of southern coastal plain pine forests: an ecological comparison. For Ecol Manag 134:233–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Henry M, Stevens H, Bunker DE, Schnitzer SA, Carson WP (2004) Establishment limitation reduces species recruitment and species richness as soil resources rise. J Ecol 92:339–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hermy M, Verheyen K (2007) Legacies of the past in the present-day forest biodiversity: a review of past land-use effects on forest plant species composition and diversity. Ecol Res 22:361–371. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hiers JK, O’Brien JJ, Will RE, Mitchell RJ (2007) Forest floor depth mediates understory vigor in xeric Pinus palustris ecosystems. Ecol Appl 17:806–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hipps NA, Davies MJ, Dodds P, Buckley GP (2005) The effects of phosphorus nutrition and soil pH on the growth of some ancient woodland indicator plants and their interaction with competitor species. Plant Soil 271:131–141. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Inouye RS, Allison TD, Johnson NC (1994) Old field succession on a Minnesota sand plain: Effects of deer and other factors on invasion by trees. Bull Torr Bot Club 121:266–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jaeger B (2017) r2glmm: computes R squared for mixed (multilevel) models. R package version 0.1.2. Accessed 8 Mar 2018.
  37. Jose S, Jokela EJ, Miller DL (2006) The longleaf pine ecosystem: ecology, silviculture, and restoration. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kardol P, Cornips NJ, Van Kempen MML, Bakx-Schotman JMT, Van der Putten WH (2007) Microbe-mediated plant-soil feedback causes historical contingency effects in plant community assembly. Ecol Monogr 77:147–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kilgo JC, Blake JI (2005) Ecology and management of a forested landscape: fifty years on the Savannah River Site. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  40. Kirkman LK, Mitchell RJ, Helton RC, Drew MB (2001) Productivity and species richness across an environmental gradient in a fire-dependent ecosystem. Am J Bot 88:2119–2128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kirkman LK, Barnett A, Williams BW, Hiers JK, Pokswinski SM, Mitchell RJ (2013) A dynamic reference model: a framework for assessing biodiversity restoration goals in a fire-dependent ecosystem. Ecol Appl 23:1574–1587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Koerner W, Dupouey JL, Dambrine E, Benoît M (1997) Influence of past land use on the vegetation and soils of present day forest in the Vosges mountains, France. J Ecol 85:351–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kreye JK, Varner JM, Hiers JK, Mola J (2013) Toward a mechanism for eastern North American forest mesophication: differential litter drying across 17 species. Ecol Appl 23:1976–1986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lee-Cruz L, Edwards DP, Tripathi BM, Adams JM (2013) Impact of logging and forest conversion to oil palm plantations on soil bacterial communities in Borneo. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:7290–7297. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mattingly WB, Orrock JL (2013) Historic land use influences contemporary establishment of invasive plant species. Oecologia 172:1147–1157. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McLauchlan K (2006) The nature and longevity of agricultural impacts on soil carbon and nutrients: a review. Ecosystems 9:1364–1382. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Newbold T, Hudson LN, Hill SLL, Contu S, Lysenko I et al (2015) Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature 520:45–50. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Noss RF, Platt WJ, Sorrie BA, Weakley AS, Means DB, Costanza J, Peet RK (2015) How global biodiversity hotspots may go unrecognized: lessons from the North American Coastal Plain. Divers Distrib 21:236–244. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Orrock J, Levey DJ, Danielson BJ, Damschen EI (2006) Seed predation, not seed dispersal, explains the landscape-level abundance of an early-successional plant. J Ecol 94:838–845. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Öster M, Ask K, Cousin SAO, Eriksson O (2009) Dispersal and establishment limitation reduces the potential for successful restoration of semi-natural grassland communities on former arable fields. J Appl Ecol 46:1266–1274. Google Scholar
  51. Ramankutty N, Foley JA (1999) Estimating historical changes in global land cover: croplands from 1700 to 1992. Glob Biogeochem Cycl 13:997–1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Standish R, Cramer VA, Wild SL, Hobbs RJ (2007) Seed dispersal and recruitment limitation are barriers to native recolonization of old-fields in western Australia. J Appl Ecol 44:435–445. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stapanian MA, Schumacher W, Gara B, Monteith SE (2016) Negative effects of excessive soil phosphorus on floristic quality in Ohio wetlands. Sci Total Environ 551–552:556–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stuhler JD, Orrock JD (2016a) Historical land use and present-day canopy thinning differentially affect the distribution and abundance of invasive and native ant species. Biol Invasions 18:1813–1825. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stuhler JD, Orrock JL (2016b) Past agricultural land use and present-day fire regimes can interact to determine the nature of seed predation. Oecologia 181:463–473. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Suding KN (2011) Toward an era of restoration in ecology: successes, failures, and opportunities ahead. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 42:465–487. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Turley NE, Brudvig LA (2016) Agricultural land-use history causes persistent loss of plant phylogenetic diversity. Ecology 97:2240–2247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Turley NE, Orrock JL, Ledvina JA, Brudvig LA (2017) Dispersal and establishment limitation slows plant community recovery on post-agricultural longleaf pine savannas. J Appl Ecol 54:1100–1109. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Turnbull LA, Crawley MJ, Rees M (2000) Are plant populations seed-limited? A review of seed sowing experiments. Oikos 88:225–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Vandegehuchte ML, de la Peña E, Bonte D (2010) Relative importance of biotic and abiotic soil components to plant growth and insect herbivore population dynamics. PLoS ONE 5:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Veldman JW, Brudvig LA, Damschen EI, Orrock JL, Mattingly WB, Walker JL (2014) Fire frequency, agricultural history and the multivariate control of pine savanna understorey plant diversity. J Veg Sci 25:1438–1449. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Vellend M, Verheyen K, Jacquemyn H, Kolb A, Van Calster H, Peterken G, Hermy M (2006) Extinction debt of forest plants persists for more than a century following habitat fragmentation. Ecology 87:542–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Verheyen K, Hermy M (2004) Recruitment and growth of herb-layer species with different colonizing capacities in ancient and recent forests. J Veg Sci 15:125–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plant BiologyMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA
  3. 3.Ecology, Evolutionary Biology, and Behavior ProgramMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  4. 4.Department of ZoologyUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations