Plant–plant interactions influence phylogenetic diversity at multiple spatial scales in a semi-arid mountain rangeland
- 105 Downloads
Molecular phylogenies are increasingly used to understand how biotic interactions and environment shape phylogenetic community structure (PCS). However, we do not understand the effects of plant–plant interactions and environment on PCS and phylogenetic diversity across spatial scales, particularly in rangelands. Here, we ask: (1) do plant–plant interactions and environment affect PCS and phylogenetic diversity differently across the three spatial scales of the patch, the community, and the habitat? (2) What are the impacts of dominant cushion-nurse plants on the phylogenetic structure of plant communities? We assessed the PCS of semi-arid plant communities along an elevation gradient at the patch, community and habitat scales. Then, we assessed co-occurrence patterns along two sample slopes. Our results indicated important roles for biotic interactions and environmental filtering in determining phylogenetic diversity, with biotic interactions, in particular, having a stronger tendency to increase phylogenetic diversity. This is most likely due to the asymmetrical effects of nurse plants across the three spatial scales on our two different slopes. The impact of biotic interactions caused non-random phylogenetic patterns in more severe environments. In conclusion, biotic interactions influence phylogenetic diversity by altering PCS across aspects and along elevation gradients.
KeywordsPlant–plant interactions Environmental filtering Altered phylogenetic community structure Habitat specialization Micro-refugia
We wish to thank Ferdowsi University of Mashhad for financial support. This study was funded by Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (Grant Number: 3/41572).
Author contributions statement
MP performed the project, wrote the MS and analyzed all of data as a Ph.D. student. HE defined the project as the main supervisor. JV collaborated as the co-supervisor of the project. RS edited the MS, also allocated his laboratory in Tokyo university to carry out molecular experiments.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Alejandro GFB, Chinchilla FA, Magrach A, Romero V, Reyos M, Velilla M, Serrano JM, Amador-Vargas S (2009) Slope orientation enhances the nurse effect of a paramo shrub, Hypericum irazuense (Hypericaceae) in Costa Rica. J Trop Ecol 25:331–335. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25562622
- Borcard D, Gillet F, Legendre P (2012) Numerical ecology with R. Springer, New York, pp 1–306Google Scholar
- Cavender-Bares J, Keen A, Miles B (2006) Phylogenetic structure of Floridian plant communities depends on taxonomic and spatial scale. Ecology 87:109–122. https://doi.org/10.1890/00129658(2006)87%5b109:PSOFPC%5d2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- De’ath G (2002) Multivariate regression trees: a new technique for modeling species–environment relationships. Ecology 83:1105–1117. https://doi.org/10.1890/00129658(2002)083%5b1105:MRTANT%5d2.0.CO;2 Google Scholar
- De’ath G (2010) mvpart: Multivariate partitioning. R package version 1.3-1Google Scholar
- Flores J, Jurado E (2003) Are nurse-protege’ interactions more common among plants from arid environments? J Veg Sci 14:911–916. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02225.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gotelli NJ, Graves GR (1996) Null models in ecology. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
- Jankju M, Delavari A, Ganjali A (2008) Interseeding Bromus kopetdaghensis, in shrublands. Rangeland J Iran Soc Range Manag 2:314–328Google Scholar
- Kembel SW, Hubbel SP (2006) The phylogenetic structure of a neotropical forest tree community. Ecology 87:86–99. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87%5b86:TPSOAN%5d2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kores PJ, Cameron KM, Molvray M, Chase MW (1997) The phylogenetic relationships of orchidoideae and spiranthoideae (Orchidaceae) as inferred from rbcL plastid sequences. Lindleyana 12:1–11Google Scholar
- Soliveres S, Torices R, Maestre F (2012) Environmental conditions and biotic interactions acting together promote phylogenetic randomness in semiarid plant communities: new methods help to avoid misleading conclusions. J Veg Sci 23:822–836. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01410.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Valiente-Banuet A, Verdú M (2013) Plant facilitation and phylogenetics. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 44(25):1–25Google Scholar
- Webb CO, Ackerly DD, McPeek MA, Donoghue MJ (2002) Phylogenies and community ecology. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:475–505. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150448 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- White TJ, Burns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds) PCR protocols. A guide to methods and applications. Academic Press Inc, San Diego, pp 315–322Google Scholar