Habitats shape taxonomic and functional composition of Neotropical ant assemblages
Determining assembly rules of co-occurring species persists as a fundamental goal in community ecology. At local scales, the relative importance of environmental filtering vs. competitive exclusion remains a subject of debate. In this study, we assessed the relative importance of habitat filtering and competition in structuring understory ant communities in tropical forests of French Guiana. Leaf-litter ants were collected using pitfall and Winkler traps across swamp, slope and plateau forests near Saül, French Guiana. We used a combination of univariate and multivariate analyses to evaluate trait response of ants to habitat characteristics. Null model analyses were used to investigate the effects of habitat filtering and competitive interactions on community assembly at the scale of assemblages and sampling points, respectively. Swamp forests presented a much lower taxonomic and functional richness compared to slope and plateau forests. Furthermore, marked differences in taxonomic and functional composition were observed between swamp forests and slope or plateau forests. We found weak evidence for competitive exclusion based on null models. Nevertheless, the contrasting trait composition observed between habitats revealed differences in the ecological attributes of the species in the different forest habitats. Our analyses suggest that competitive interactions may not play an important role in structuring leaf-litter ant assemblages locally. Rather, habitats are responsible for driving both taxonomic and functional composition of ant communities.
KeywordsFormicidae Traits Functional diversity Habitat filtering Rainforest
Financial support for this study was provided by an Investissement d’Avenir grant of the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (CEBA: ANR-10-LABX-25-01) through a PhD fellowship to MF and the funding of the DIADEMA project (Dissecting Amazonian Diversity by Enhancing a Multiple taxonomic-groups approach), by the Programme Convergence 2007–2013, Région Guyane from the European community (BREGA, 757/2014/SGAR/DE/BSF) and by the PO-FEDER 2014-2020 Région Guyane (BING, GY0007194). JHCD acknowledges his research grant from CNPq.
Author contribution statement
JO and CB designed protocol and methodology. JO and JD carried out the field sampling. MF and JD sorted specimen to morphospecies and JHCD supervised species identifications. JM performed the molecular analyses. BB and AW performed the morphological measurements. MF analysed the data and wrote the manuscript, with comments from all authors.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Agosti D, Alonso LE (2000) The ALL protocol: a standard protocol for the collection of ground-dwelling ants. In: Agosti D, Majer J, Alonso LE, Schultz T (eds) Ants: standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, pp 204–206Google Scholar
- Baraloto C, Morneau F, Bonal D et al (2007) Seasonal water stress tolerance and habitat associations within four Neotropical tree genera. Ecology 88:478–489. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2007)88%5b478:SWSTAH%5d2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bestelmeyer BT, Agosti D, Alonso LE et al (2000) Field techniques for the study of ground-dwelling ants: an overview, description, and evaluation. In: Agosti D, Majer J, Alonso LE, Schultz T (eds) Ants: standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, pp 122–144Google Scholar
- Cornwell WK, Schwilk DW, Ackerly DD (2006) A trait-based test for habitat filtering: convex hull volume. Ecology 87:1465–1471. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87%5b1465:ATTFHF%5d2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Delabie JHC, Fisher BL, Majer JD, Wright IW (2000) Sampling effort and choice of method. In: Agosti D, Majer J, Alonso LE, Schultz T (eds) Ants: standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, pp 145–154Google Scholar
- Diamond JM (1975) Assembly of species communities. In: Cody ML, Diamond JM (eds) Ecology and evolution of communities. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 342–444Google Scholar
- Ellis LM, Crawford CS, Molles MC Jr (2001) Influence of annual flooding on terrestrial arthropod assemblages of a Rio Grande riparian forest. Regul Rivers Res Manag 17:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1646(200101/02)17:1<1::AID-RRR603>3.0.CO;2-L CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fowler HG, Forti LC, Brandão CRF et al (1991) Ecologia nutricional de formigas. In: Panizzi AR, Parra JRP (eds) Ecologia nutricional de insetos e suas implicaçoes no manejo de pragas. Editora Manole, São Paulo, pp 131–223Google Scholar
- Hubbell SP (2001) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Kunstler G, Lavergne S, Courbaud B et al (2012) Competitive interactions between forest trees are driven by species’ trait hierarchy, not phylogenetic or functional similarity: implications for forest community assembly. Ecol Lett 15:831–840. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01803.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Laliberté E, Legendre P, Shipley B (2014) FD: measuring functional diversity from multiple traits, and other tools for functional ecology. R package version 1.0-12Google Scholar
- Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, et al (2017) vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.4-6Google Scholar
- Pielou EC (1975) Ecological diversity. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- R Core Team (2018) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
- Roberts DW (2016) labdsv: ordination and multivariate analysis for ecology. R package version 1.8-0Google Scholar
- Weber NA (1938) The biology of the fungus-growing ants. Part 4. Additional new forms. Part 5. The Attini of Bolivia. Rev Entomol 7:154–206Google Scholar
- Weiher E, Keddy P (2001) Ecological assembly rules: perspectives, advances, retreats. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar