, Volume 188, Issue 4, pp 1239–1251 | Cite as

Reduced resistance to sediment-trapping turfs with decline of native kelp and establishment of an exotic kelp

  • S. E. ReevesEmail author
  • N. Kriegisch
  • C. R. Johnson
  • S. D. Ling
Global change ecology – original research


Understanding the strength and type of interactions among species is vital to anticipate how ecosystems will respond to ongoing anthropogenic stressors. Here, we examine the ecological function of native (Ecklonia radiata) and invasive (Undaria pinnatifida) kelps in resisting shifts to sediment-trapping turf on reefs within the highly urbanized temperate Port Phillip Bay (PPB), Australia. Short-term (30 days) and long-term (232 days) manipulations demonstrated that kelp laminae can clear and maintain the substratum free of turfs, while conversely, removal of kelp leads to a proliferation of turfs. Analyses looking at the relationship between total length of E. radiata and U. pinnatifida and the area cleared of turf algae showed that the clearing effect of E. radiata over a year was greater than that of U. pinnatifida due to the annual die-back of the invasive. A natural experiment (608 days) identified that ongoing sea urchin (Heliocidaris erythrogramma) grazing led to native kelp bed decline, facilitating turf dominance. Even though U. pinnatifida establishes once native beds are disturbed, its ecological function in clearing turf is weaker than E. radiata, given its annual habit. In PPB, turfs represent the more persistent and problematic algal group and are likely changing the structure, function, and energy flows of shallow temperate reefs in this urbanised embayment.


Introduced seaweed Herbivory Sea urchin Reef degradation Novel alternative states 



We thank S. Swearer for logistical support and M. Reeves, J. van Oosterom, D. Chamberlain, E. Fobert, and L. Barrett for invaluable assistance with fieldwork. This study was supported by a Victorian State Government, Department of Environment Land Water and Planning, Seagrass and Reefs program grant to CRJ and S. Swearer; a Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment—Equity Trustees Charitable Foundation Grant to SER and SDL; and an Australian Postgraduate Awards to SER and NK. This manuscript has been greatly improved by the constructive review of two anonymous reviewers and editor D. Reed.

Author contribution statement

SER and SDL conceived and designed the experiments. SER, NK and SDL performed the experiments. SER analysed the data. SER, SDL and CRJ wrote the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement of human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.


  1. Airoldi L, Cinelli F (1997) Effects of sedimentation on subtidal macroalgal assemblages: an experimental study from a Mediterranean rocky shore. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 215:269–288. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennett S, Wernberg T (2014) Canopy facilitates seaweed recruitment on subtidal temperate reefs. J Ecol 102:1462–1470. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennett S, Wernberg T, Connell SD, Hobday AJ, Johnson CR, Poloczanska ES (2016) The ‘Great Southern Reef’: social, ecological and economic value of Australia’s neglected kelp forests. Mar Freshw Res 67:47–56. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowler J (1966) The geology and geomorphology, Port Phillip Survey 1957–1963. Mem Nat Mus Vict 27:19–67. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Britton D, Cornwall CE, Revill AT, Hurd CL, Johnson CR (2016) Ocean acidification reverses the positive effects of seawater pH fluctuations on growth and photosynthesis of the habitat-forming kelp, Ecklonia radiata. Sci Rep. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Brooker RW (2006) Plant–plant interactions and environmental change. New Phytol 171:271–284. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Campbell SJ, Burridge TR (1998) Occurrence of Undaria pinnatifida (Phaeophyta: Laminariales) in Port Phillip Bay, Victoria, Australia. Mar Freshw Res 49:379–381. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell AH, Marzinelli EM, Vergés A, Coleman MA, Steinberg PD (2014) Towards restoration of missing underwater forests. PLoS One 9:e84106. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Carnell PE, Keough MJ (2014) Spatially variable synergistic effects of disturbance and additional nutrients on kelp recruitment and recovery. Oecologia 175:409–416. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Christie H, Norderhaug KM, Fredriksen S (2009) Macrophytes as habitat for fauna. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 396:221–234. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Connell SD (2003a) The monopolization of understorey habitat by subtidal encrusting coralline algae: a test of the combined effects of canopy-mediated light and sedimentation. Mar Biol 142:1065–1071. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Connell SD (2003b) Negative effects overpower the positive of kelp to exclude invertebrates from the understorey community. Oecologia 137:97–103. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Connell SD, Russell BD, Turner DJ, Shepherd SA, Kildea T, Miller D, Airoldi L, Cheshire A (2008) Recovering a lost baseline: missing kelp forests from a metropolitan coast. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 360:63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Copertino M, Connell SD, Cheshire A (2005) The prevalence and production of turf-forming algae on a temperate subtidal coast. Phycologia 44:241–248.;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Crockett P, Johnson K, Brenker M, Ierodiaconou D, Carnell P (2017) Undaria pinnatifida in Port Phillip Bay Marine Sanctuaries: Removal strategies and interactions with the native algal canopy. Parks Victoria Technical Series No. 113. Parks Victoria, Melbourne. Parks Victoria Technical Series: 3Google Scholar
  16. Curiel D, Bellemo G, Marzocchi M, Scattolin M, Parisi G (1998) Distribution of introduced Japanese macroalgae Undaria pinnatifida, Sargassum muticum (Phaeophyta) and Antithamnion pectinatum (Rhodophyta) in the Lagoon of Venice. Hydrobiologia 385:17–22. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dayton PK (1972) Toward an understanding of community resilience and the potential effects of enrichments to the benthos at McMurdo Sound, Antarctica Proceedings of the colloquium on conservation problems in Antarctica. Allen Press, Lawrence, pp 81–95Google Scholar
  18. Dayton PK (1975) Experimental evaluation of ecological dominance in a rocky intertidal algal community. Ecol Monogr 45:137–159. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dayton PK (1985) Ecology of kelp communities. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 16:215–245. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dean PR, Hurd CL (2007) Seasonal growth, erosion rates, and nitrogen and photosynthetic ecophysiology of Undaria pinnatifida (Heterokontophyta) in southern New Zealand. J Phycol 43:1138–1148. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eckman JE, Duggins DO, Sewell AT (1989) Ecology of under story kelp environments. I. Effects of kelps on flow and particle transport near the bottom. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 129:173–187. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ekstrom C (2014) MESS: Miscellaneous Esoteric Statistical Scripts, vol. 0.3-2. R package version.
  23. Epstein G, Smale DA (2017) Undaria pinnatifida: a case study to highlight challenges in marine invasion ecology and management. Ecol Evol 7:8624–8642. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Falkenberg LJ, Connell SD, Coffee OI, Ghedini G, Russell BD (2015) Species interactions can maintain resistance of subtidal algal habitats to an increasingly modified world. Glob Ecol Conserv 4:549–558. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Filbee-Dexter K, Wernberg T (2018) Rise of turfs: a new battlefront for globally declining kelp forests. Bioscience 68:64–76. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Filbee-Dexter K, Wernberg T, Norderhaug KM, Ramirez-Llodra E, Pedersen MF (2018) Movement of pulsed resource subsidies from kelp forests to deep fjords. Oecologia. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Forrest BM, Hopkins GA (2013) Population control to mitigate the spread of marine pests: insights from management of the Asian kelp Undaria pinnatifida and colonial ascidian Didemnum vexillum. Manag Biol Invasions 4:317–326. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fowler-Walker M, Connell S (2002) Opposing states of subtidal habitat across temperate Australia: consistency and predictability in kelp canopy-benthic associations. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 240:49–56. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Goodsell P, Fowler-Walker M, Gillanders B, Connell S (2004) Variations in the configuration of algae in subtidal forests: implications for invertebrate assemblages. Austral Ecol 29:350–357. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gorgula SK, Connell SD (2004) Expansive covers of turf-forming algae on human-dominated coast: the relative effects of increasing nutrient and sediment loads. Mar Biol 145:613–619. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gorman D, Connell SD (2009) Recovering subtidal forests in human-dominated landscapes. J Appl Ecol 46:1258–1265. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hambäck PA, Beckerman AP (2003) Herbivory and plant resource competition: a review of two interacting interactions. Oikos 101:26–37. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Harper JL (1967) A Darwinian approach to plant ecology. J Appl Ecol 4:267–290. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Harper JL, Clatworthy J, McNaughton I, Sagar G (1961) The evolution and ecology of closely related species living in the same area. Evolution 15:209–227. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hay C, Villouta E (1993) Seasonality of the adventive Asian kelp Undaria pinnatifida in New Zealand. Bot Mar 36:461–476. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hofmann GE, Smith JE, Johnson KS, Send U, Levin LA, Micheli F, Paytan A, Price NN, Peterson B, Takeshita Y (2011) High-frequency dynamics of ocean pH: a multi-ecosystem comparison. PLoS One 6:e28983. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Irigoyen AJ, Eyras C, Parma AM (2011) Alien algae Undaria pinnatifida causes habitat loss for rocky reef fishes in north Patagonia. Biol Invasions 13:17–24. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Irving AD, Connell SD (2006) Physical disturbance by kelp abrades erect algae from the understorey. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 324:127–137. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jackson GA (1997) Currents in the high drag environment of a coastal kelp stand off California. Cont Shelf Res 17:1913–1928. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jung CA, Dwyer PD, Minnegal M, Swearer SE (2011) Perceptions of environmental change over more than six decades in two groups of people interacting with the environment of Port Phillip Bay, Australia. Ocean Coast Manag 54:93–99. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kennelly S (1987a) Inhibition of kelp recruitment by turfing algae and consequences for an Australian kelp community. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 112:49–60. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kennelly S (1987b) Physical disturbances in an Australian kelp. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 40:145–153. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kennelly SJ (1989) Effects of kelp canopies on understory species due to shade and scour. Mar Ecol Prog Ser Oldendorf 50:215–224. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kiirikki M (1996) Experimental evidence that Fucus vesiculosus (Phaeophyta) controls filamentous algae by means of the whiplash effect. Eur J Phycol 31:61–66. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kriegisch N, Reeves S, Johnson CR, Ling SD (2016) Phase-shift dynamics of sea urchin overgrazing on nutrified reefs. PLoS One 11:e0168333. Scholar
  46. Krumhansl KA, Scheibling RE (2011) Detrital production in Nova Scotian kelp beds: patterns and processes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 421:67–82. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Krumhansl KA, Okamoto DK, Rassweiler A, Novak M, Bolton JJ, Cavanaugh KC, Connell SD, Johnson CR, Konar B, Ling SD (2016) Global patterns of kelp forest change over the past half-century. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113:13785–13790. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Lilley SA, Schiel DR (2006) Community effects following the deletion of a habitat-forming alga from rocky marine shores. Oecologia 148:672–681. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Ling S (2008) Range expansion of a habitat-modifying species leads to loss of taxonomic diversity: a new and impoverished reef state. Oecologia 156:883–894. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Ling SD, Ibbott S, Sanderson JC (2010) Recovery of canopy-forming macroalgae following removal of the enigmatic grazing sea urchin Heliocidaris erythrogramma. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 395:135–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ling S, Scheibling R, Rassweiler A, Johnson C, Shears N, Connell S, Salomon A, Norderhaug K, Pérez-Matus A, Hernández J (2015) Global regime shift dynamics of catastrophic sea urchin overgrazing. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 370:20130269. CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. MacDougall AS, Turkington R (2005) Are invasive species the drivers or passengers of change in degraded ecosystems? Ecology 86:42–55. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Moy FE, Christie H (2012) Large-scale shift from sugar kelp (Saccharina latissima) to ephemeral algae along the south and west coast of Norway. Mar Biol Res 8:309–321. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. O’Brien JM, Scheibling RE (2018) Turf wars: competition between foundation and turf-forming species on temperate and tropical reefs and its role in regime shifts. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 590:1–17. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Paine R (1984) Ecological determinism in the competition for space. Ecology 65:1339–1348. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Perkol-Finkel S, Airoldi L (2010) Loss and recovery potential of marine habitats: an experimental study of factors maintaining resilience in subtidal algal forests at the Adriatic Sea. PLoS One 5:e10791. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Primo C, Hewitt C, Campbell M (2010) Reproductive phenology of the introduced kelp Undaria pinnatifida (Phaeophyceae, Laminariales) in Port Phillip Bay (Victoria, Australia). Biol Invasions 12:3081–3092. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. R Development Core Team (2015) R Core Team. 2015. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL
  59. Reed DC (1990) The effects of variable settlement and early competition on patterns of kelp recruitment. Ecology 71:776–787. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Roleda MY, Cornwall CE, Feng Y, McGraw CM, Smith AM, Hurd CL (2015) Effect of ocean acidification and pH fluctuations on the growth and development of coralline algal recruits, and an associated benthic algal assemblage. PLoS One 10:e0140394. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. R Studio Team (2015) R Studio: integrated development for R. R Studio Inc, BostonGoogle Scholar
  62. Sanderson J (1990) A preliminary survey of the distribution of the introduced macroalga, Undaria pinnatifida (Harvey) Suringer on the east coast of Tasmania, Australia. Bot Mar 33:153–158. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schiel DR, Lilley SA (2011) Impacts and negative feedbacks in community recovery over eight years following removal of habitat-forming macroalgae. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 407:108–115. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schiel DR, Thompson GA (2012) Demography and population biology of the invasive kelp Undaria pinnatifida on shallow reefs in southern New Zealand. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 434:25–33. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671–675. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. South PM, Thomsen MS (2016) The ecological role of invading Undaria pinnatifida: an experimental test of the driver–passenger models. Mar Biol 163:175. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. South PM, Lilley SA, Tait LW, Alestra T, Hickford MJ, Thomsen MS, Schiel DR (2016) Transient effects of an invasive kelp on the community structure and primary productivity of an intertidal assemblage. Mar Freshw Res 67:103–112. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. South PM, Floerl O, Forrest BM, Thomsen MS (2017) A review of three decades of research on the invasive kelp Undaria pinnatifida in Australasia: an assessment of its success, impacts and status as one of the world’s worst invaders. Mar Environ Res. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Steneck R, Johnson C (2014) Kelp forests: dynamic patterns, processes, and feedbacks. In: Bertness JB, Silliman BR, Stachowicz JJ (eds) Marine community ecology and conservation. Sinauer Associates Inc, Massachusetts, pp 315–336Google Scholar
  70. Strain E, Thomson RJ, Micheli F, Mancuso FP, Airoldi L (2014) Identifying the interacting roles of stressors in driving the global loss of canopy-forming to mat-forming algae in marine ecosystems. Glob Change Biol 20:3300–3312. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Suárez-Jiménez R, Hepburn CD, Hyndes GA, McLeod RJ, Hurd CL (2015a) Contributions of an annual invasive kelp to native algal assemblages: algal resource allocation and seasonal connectivity across ecotones. Phycologia 54:530–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Suárez-Jiménez R, Hepburn CD, Hyndes GA, McLeod RJ, Taylor RB, Hurd CL (2015b) Do native subtidal grazers eat the invasive kelp Undaria pinnatifida? Mar Biol. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Suárez-Jiménez R, Hepburn CD, Hyndes GA, McLeod RJ, Taylor RB, Hurd CL (2017) Importance of the invasive macroalga Undaria pinnatifida as trophic subsidy for a beach consumer. Mar Biol 164:113. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Tait LW, South PM, Lilley SA, Thomsen MS, Schiel DR (2015) Assemblage and understory carbon production of native and invasive canopy-forming macroalgae. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 469:10–17. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Thompson GA, Schiel DR (2012) Resistance and facilitation by native algal communities in the invasion success of Undaria pinnatifida. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 468:95–105. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Thornber CS, Kinlan BP, Graham MH, Stachowicz JJ (2004) Population ecology of the invasive kelp Undaria pinnatifida in California: environmental and biological controls on demography. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Valentine JP, Johnson CR (2003) Establishment of the introduced kelp Undaria pinnatifida in Tasmania depends on disturbance to native algal assemblages. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 295:63–90. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Valentine JP, Johnson CR (2004) Establishment of the introduced kelp Undaria pinnatifida following dieback of the native macroalga Phyllospora comosa in Tasmania, Australia. Mar Freshw Res 55:223–230. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Valentine JP, Johnson CR (2005) Persistence of the exotic kelp Undaria pinnatifida does not depend on sea urchin grazing. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 285:43–55. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Velimirov B, Griffiths C (1979) Wave-induced kelp movement and its importance for community structure. Bot Mar 22:169–172. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Venables W, Ripley B (2002) Modern applied statistics with S, 4th edn. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wernberg T, Kendrick GA, Toohey BD (2005) Modification of the physical environment by an Ecklonia radiata (Laminariales) canopy and implications for associated foliose algae. Aquat Ecol 39:419–430. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wernberg T, Bennett S, Babcock RC, de Bettignies T, Cure K, Depczynski M, Dufois F, Fromont J, Fulton CJ, Hovey RK, Harvey ES, Holmes TH, Kendrick GA, Radford B, Santana-Garcon J, Saunders BJ, Smale DA, Thomsen MS, Tuckett CA, Tuya F, Vanderklift MA, Wilson S (2016) Climate-driven regime shift of a temperate marine ecosystem. Science 353:169–172. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  84. Worm B, Chapman AR (1998) Relative effects of elevated grazing pressure and competition from a red algal turf on two post-settlement stages of Fucus evanescens C. Ag. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 220:247–268. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. E. Reeves
    • 1
    Email author
  • N. Kriegisch
    • 1
  • C. R. Johnson
    • 1
  • S. D. Ling
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Marine and Antarctic StudiesUniversity of TasmaniaHobartAustralia

Personalised recommendations