Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 188, Issue 2, pp 491–500 | Cite as

Host plant iridoid glycosides mediate herbivore interactions with natural enemies

  • Caitlin A. KellyEmail author
  • M. Deane Bowers
Plant-microbe-animal interactions - original research

Abstract

Many insect herbivores are dietary specialists capable of sequestering the secondary metabolites produced by their host plants. These defensive compounds have important but complex implications for tritrophic interactions between plants, herbivores, and natural enemies. The sequestration of host plant secondary metabolites defends herbivores from attack by generalist predators, but may also compromise the immune response, making insect herbivores more vulnerable to parasitism. Here, we investigate the role of plant secondary metabolites in mediating interactions between a specialist herbivore and its natural enemies. The host plants are two Penstemon species, Penstemon glaber and Penstemon virgatus, which are chemically defended by iridoid glycosides (IGs). First, we examined how Penstemon iridoid glycoside content influences the sequestration of IGs by a specialist herbivore, Euphydryas anicia. Then, we performed ant bioassays to assess how host plant species influences larval susceptibility to predators and phenoloxidase assays to assess the immunocompetence and potential vulnerability to parasitoids and pathogens. We found that the concentration of IGs sequestered by E. anicia larvae varied with host plant diet. Larvae reared on P. glaber sequestered more IGs than larvae reared on P. virgatus. Yet, ant predators found larvae unpalatable regardless of host plant diet and were also repelled by sugar solutions containing isolated IGs. However, E. anicia larvae reared on P. glaber showed higher levels of phenoloxidase activity than larvae reared on P. virgatus. Our results suggest that the sequestration of some secondary metabolites can effectively protect herbivores from predation, yet may also increase vulnerability to parasitism via decreased immunocompetence.

Keywords

Tritrophic interactions Iridoid glycosides Herbivory Sequestration Lepidoptera 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Lauren Bradley, Hadley Hanson, and Abby Thrasher for assistance with laboratory experiments and specimen collection. We gratefully acknowledge Scott Kavanaugh for assistance with the phenoloxidase assays, and Rebecca Safran and Pei-San Tsai for use of their microplate reader. Thanks to Helen McCreery and Michael Breed for the input on rearing ant colonies and Marcus Cohen and the Cruz Lab for use of their high-definition camera during ant experiments. We also thank P. Molgaard (University of Copenhagen) for providing a standard of scutellarioside. This work was supported by grants from the Undergraduate Research Opportunity Program (to MDB), the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at the University of Colorado, Boulder (to CAK), and the National Science Foundation (DEB 1407053).

Author contribution statement

CAK and MDB conceived and designed the experiments, CAK performed the experiments, conducted the chemical analyses, and analyzed the data, and CAK and MDB wrote the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ahmed AM, Baggot SL, Maingon R, Hurd H (2002) The costs of mounting an immune response are reflected in the reproductive fitness of the mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Oikos 97:371–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ardia DR, Gantz JE, Schneider BC, Strebel S (2012) Costs of immunity in insects: an induced immune response increases metabolic rate and decreases antimicrobial activity. Funct Ecol 26:732–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Awmack CS, Leather SR (2002) Host plant quality and fecundity in herbivorous insects. Annu Rev Entomol 47:817–844CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Barbosa P, Saunders JA, Kemper J, Trumbule R, Olechno J, Martinat P (1986) Plant allelochemicals and insect parasitoids effects of nicotine on Cotesia-congregata (say) (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) and Hyposoter annulipes (Cresson) (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae). J Chem Ecol 12:1319–1328CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Berenbaum MR, Nitao JK, Zangerl AR (1991) Adaptive significance of furanocoumarin diversity in Pastinaca sativa (Apiaceae). J Chem Ecol 17(1):207–215CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernays EA (2001) Neural limitations in phytophagous insects: implications for diet breadth and evolution of host affiliation. Annu Rev Entomol 46(1):703–727CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Bernays EA, Chapman RF (1994) Host-plant selection by phytophagous insects. Chapman and Hall, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bernays E, Graham M (1988) On the evolution of host speci city in phytophagous arthropods. Ecology 69:886–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bobbitt JM, Segebarth KP (1969) Iridoid glycosides and similar substances. In: Taylor WI, Battersby AR (eds) Cyclopentanoid terpene derivatives. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 1–145Google Scholar
  10. Boros CA, Stermitz FR (1990) Iridoids: an updated review. Part I. J Nat Prod 53:1055–1147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bowers MD (1991) Iridoid glycosides. In: Rosenthal GA, Berenbaum MR (eds) Herbivores: their interactions with secondary plant metabolites, vol 1, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 297–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bowers MD, Collinge SK (1992) Fate of iridoid glycosides in different life stages of the buckeye, Junonia coenia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). J Chem Ecol 18:817–831CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Bowers MD, Stamp NE (1997) Effect of host plant genotype and predators on iridoid glycoside content of pupae of a specialist insect herbivore, Junonia coenia (Nymphalidae). Biochem Syst Ecol 25(7):571–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Camara MD (1997) Predator responses to sequestered plant toxins in buckeye caterpillars: are tritrophic interactions locally variable? J Chem Ecol 23:2093–2106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cerenius L, Söderhäll K (2004) The prophenoloxidase-activating system in invertebrates. Immunol Rev 198(1):116–126CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Chapman RF (1982) The insects: structure and function, 3rd edn. Hodder and Stoughton, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Coley P, Bateman ML, Kursar TA (2006) The effects of plant quality on caterpillar growth and defense against natural enemies. Oikos 115(2):219–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cornell HV, Hawkins BA (1995) Survival patterns and mortality sources of herbivorous insects: some demographic trends. Am Nat 145(4):563–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Crosswhite FS (1967) Revision of Penstemon Section Habroanthus (Scrophulariaceae). III: series Virgati. Am Midl Nat 77(1):28–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cullenward MJ, Ehrlich PR, White RR, Holdren CE (1979) The ecology and population genetics of an alpine checkerspot butterfly, Euphydryas anicia. Oecologia 38:1–12CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Da Costa CP, Jones CM (1971) Cucumber beetle resistance and mite susceptibility controlled by the bitter gene in Cucumis sativus L. Science 172:1145–1146CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. De la Fuente MA, Dyer LA, Bowers MD (1994) /1995) The iridoid glycoside, catalpol, as a deterrent to the predator Camponotus floridanus (Formicidae). Chemoecology 5(6):13–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dicke M, van Loon JJA (2000) Multitrophic effects of herbivore-induced plant volatiles in an evolutionary context. Entomol Exp Appl 97:237–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dyer LA (1995) Tasty generalists and nasty specialists? A comparative study of antipredator mechanisms in tropical lepidopteran larvae. Ecology 76:1483–1496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dyer LA, Bowers MD (1996) The importance of sequestered iridoid glycosides as a defense against an ant predator. J Chem Ecol 22:1527–1539CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Dyer LA, Gentry G (1999) Predicting natural-enemy responses to herbivores in natural and managed systems. Ecol Appl 9:402–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dyer LA, Letourneau DK, Dodson CD, Tobler MA, Stireman JO, Hsu A (2004) Ecological causes and consequences of variation in defensive chemistry of a neotropical shrub. Ecology 85:2795–2803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. El-Naggar LJ, Beal JL (1980) Iridoids: a review. J Nat Prod 43:649–707CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Fajer ED, Bowers MD, Bazzaz FA (1992) The effect of nutrients and enriched CO2 environments on production of carbon-based allelochemicals in Plantago: a test of the carbon/nutrient balance hypothesis. Am Nat 140:707–723CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Ferris CD, Brown FM (1981) Butterflies of the Rocky Mountain states. University of Oklahoma Press, NormanGoogle Scholar
  31. Freitak D, Ots I, Vanatoa A, Horak P (2003) Immune response is energetically costly in white cabbage butterfly pupae. P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci 270:S220–S222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gardner DR, Stermitz FR (1988) Host plant utilization and iridoid glycoside sequestration by Euphydryas anicia (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae). J Chem Ecol 14:2147–2168CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Gentry G, Dyer LA (2002) On the conditional nature of neotropical caterpillar defenses against their natural enemies. Ecology 83:3108–3119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Godfray HCJ (1994) Parasitoids: behavioral and evolutionary ecology. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  35. González-Santoyo I, Córdoba-Aguilar A (2012) Phenoloxidase: a key component of the insect immune system. Entomol Exp Appl 142(1):1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Harvey JA, Van Nouhuys S, Biere A (2005) Effects of quantitative variation in allelochemicals in Plantago lanceolata on development of a generalist and a specialist herbivore and their endoparasitoids. J Chem Ecol 31:287–302CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Honkavaara J, Rantala MJ, Suhonen J (2009) Mating status, immune defence, and multi-parasite burden in the damselfly Coenagrion armatum. Entomol Exp Appl 132:165–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jensen SR, Nielsen BJ, Dahlgren R (1975) Iridoid compounds, their occurrence and systematic importance in the angiosperms. Bot Notiser 128:148–180Google Scholar
  39. Kelly CA, Bowers MD (2016) Preference and performance of generalist and specialist herbivores on chemically defended host plants. Ecol Entomol 41(3):308–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shonle I, Klett, JE, Vickerman LG (2004) Native Herbaceous Perennials for Colorado Landscapes http://www.ext.colostate.edu/pubs/garden/07242.html. Colorado State University Cooperative Extension, Fort Collins, CO, USA
  41. L’Empereur KM (1989) Iridoid glycoside and pyrrolizidine alkaloid sequestration by specialist Lepidoptera. PhD dissertation, Department of Chemistry, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USAGoogle Scholar
  42. L’Empereur KM, Stermitz FR (1990a) Iridoid glycoside content of Euphydryas anicia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) and its major host plant, Besseya plantaginea (Scrophulariaceae), at a high plains Colorado site. J Chem Ecol 16(1):187–197CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. L’Empereur KM, Stermitz FR (1990b) Iridoid glycoside metabolism and sequestration by Poladryas minuta (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) feeding on Penstemon virgatus (Scrophulariaceae). J Chem Ecol 16(5):1495–1506CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Lampert EC, Bowers MD (2010) Host plant influences on iridoid glycoside sequestration of generalist and specialist caterpillars. J Chem Ecol 36(10):1101–1104CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Macel M, Vrieling K (2003) Pyrrolizidine alkaloids as oviposition stimulants for the cinnabar moth, Tyria jacobaeae. J Chem Ecol 29:1435–1446CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. McKay AF, Ezenwa VO, Altizer S (2016a) Unraveling the costs of flight for immune defenses in the migratory monarch butterfly. Integr Comp Biol 56(2):278–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McKay AF, Ezenwa VO, Altizer S (2016b) Consequences of food restriction for immune defense, parasite infection, and fitness in monarch butterflies. Physiol Biochem Zool 89(5):389–401CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. McKean KA, Yourth CP, Lazzaro BP, Clark AG (2008) The evolutionary costs of immunological maintenance and deployment. BMC Evol Biol 8:76CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Murphy SM, Lill JT, Bowers MD, Singer MS (2014) Enemy-free space for parasitoids. Environ Entomol 43(6):1465–1474CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Nelson AC, Kursar TA (1999) Interactions among plant defense compounds: a method for analysis. Chemoecology 9:81–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nieminen M, Suomi J, Van Nouhuys S, Sauri P, Riekkola ML (2003) Effect of iridoid glycoside content on oviposition host plant choice and parasitism in a specialist herbivore. J Chem Ecol 29:823–844CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Nishida R (2002) Sequestration of defensive substances from plants by Lepidoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 47:57–92CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Optiz SEW, Müller C (2009) Plant chemistry and insect sequestration. Chemoecology 19:117–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Quintero C, Bowers MD (2013) Effects of insect herbivory on induced chemical defences and compensation during early plant development in Penstemon virgatus. Ann Bot 112(4):661–669CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Råberg L, Nilsson JÅ, Ilmonen P, Stjernman M, Hasselquist D (2000) The cost of an immune response: vaccination reduces parental effort. Ecol Lett 3(5):382–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Raybould AF, Moyes CL (2001) The ecological genetics of aliphatic glucosinolates. Heredity 87:383–391CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Rayor LS, Munson S (2002) Larval feeding experience influences adult generalist predators to accept chemically defended prey. Entomol Exp Appl 104:193–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Satterfield DA, Wright AE, Altizer S (2013) Lipid reserves and immune defense in healthy and diseased migrating monarchs Danaus plexippus. Curr Zool 59(3):393–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schlenke TA, Morales J, Govind S, Clark AG (2007) Contrasting infection strategies in generalist and specialist wasp parasitoids of Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Pathog 3(10):e158.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.0030158 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Sime K (2002) Chemical defence of Battus philenor larvae against attack by the parasitoid Trogus pennator. Ecol Entomol 27:337–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Siva-Jothy MR, Moret Y, Rolff J (2005) Insect immunity: an evolutionary ecology perspective. Adv Insect Physiol 32:1–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Smilanich AM, Dyer LA, Chambers JQ, Bowers MD (2009a) Immunological cost of chemical defence and the evolution of herbivore diet breadth. Ecol Lett 12:612–621CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Smilanich AM, Dyer LA, Gentry GL (2009b) The insect immune response and other putative defenses as effective predictors of parasitism. Ecology 90(6):1434–1440CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Smilanich AM, Vargas J, Dyer LA, Bowers MD (2011) Effects of ingested secondary metabolites on the immune response of a polyphagous caterpillar Grammia incorrupta. J Chem Ecol 37:239–245CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Stermitz FR, Gardner DR, Odendaal FJ, Ehrlich PR (1986) Euphydryas anicia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) utilization of iridoid glycosides from Castilleja and Besseya (Scrophulariaceae) host plants. J Chem Ecol 12(6):1459–1468CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Stubbendieck J, Hatch SL, Bryan NM, Dunn CD (2017) North American wildland plants: a field guide, 3rd edn. University of Nebraska Press, LincolnCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sugumaran M (2002) Comparative biochemistry of eumelanogenesis and the protective roles of phenoloxidase and melanin in insects. Pigm Cell Res 15(1):2–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sznajder B, Harvey JA (2003) Second and third trophic level effects of differences in plant species reflect dietary specialisation of herbivores and their endoparasitoids. Entomol Exp Appl 109:73–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Teder T, Tammaru T (2002) Cascading effects of variation in plant vigour on the relative performance of insect herbivores and their parasitoids. Ecol Entomol 27(1):94–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Turlings TCJ, Tumlinson JH, Lewis WJ (1990) Exploitation of herbivore-induced plant odors by host-seeking parasitic wasps. Science 250:1251–1253CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  71. Vogelweith F, Thiery D, Quaglietti B, Moret Y, Moreau J (2011) Host plant variation plastically impacts different traits of the immune system of a phytophagous insect. Funct Ecol 25(6):1241–1247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. White RR (1979) Foodplant of alpine Euphydryas anicia (Nymphalidae). J Lepid Soc 33(3):170–173Google Scholar
  73. Wilson K, Cotter SC, Reeson AF, Pell JK (2001) Melanism and disease resistance in insects. Ecol Lett 4(6):637–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zuk M, Stoehr AM (2002) Immune defense and host life history. Am Nat 160:S9–S22CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  75. Zvereva EL, Rank NE (2003) Host plant effects on parasitoid attack on the leaf beetle Chrysomela lapponica. Oecologia 135:258–267CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and University of Colorado Museum of Natural HistoryUniversity of Colorado BoulderBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations