Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 187, Issue 3, pp 689–699 | Cite as

Limited dietary overlap amongst resident Arctic herbivores in winter: complementary insights from complementary methods

  • Niels M. Schmidt
  • Jesper B. Mosbacher
  • Eero J. Vesterinen
  • Tomas Roslin
  • Anders Michelsen
Plant-microbe-animal interactions - original research

Abstract

Snow may prevent Arctic herbivores from accessing their forage in winter, forcing them to aggregate in the few patches with limited snow. In High Arctic Greenland, Arctic hare and rock ptarmigan often forage in muskox feeding craters. We therefore hypothesized that due to limited availability of forage, the dietary niches of these resident herbivores overlap considerably, and that the overlap increases as winter progresses. To test this, we analyzed fecal samples collected in early and late winter. We used molecular analysis to identify the plant taxa consumed, and stable isotope ratios of carbon and nitrogen to quantify the dietary niche breadth and dietary overlap. The plant taxa found indicated only limited dietary differentiation between the herbivores. As expected, dietary niches exhibited a strong contraction from early to late winter, especially for rock ptarmigan. This may indicate increasing reliance on particular plant resources as winter progresses. In early winter, the diet of rock ptarmigan overlapped slightly with that of muskox and Arctic hare. Contrary to our expectations, no inter-specific dietary niche overlap was observed in late winter. This overall pattern was specifically revealed by combined analysis of molecular data and stable isotope contents. Hence, despite foraging in the same areas and generally feeding on the same plant taxa, the quantitative dietary overlap between the three herbivores was limited. This may be attributable to species-specific consumption rates of plant taxa. Yet, Arctic hare and rock ptarmigan may benefit from muskox opening up the snow pack, thereby allowing them to access the plants.

Keywords

Competition Greenland Metabarcoding Stable isotopes Tundra 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the Greenland Ecosystem Monitoring programme for access to ecosystem data, and Aarhus University for the logistic support. Arctic Research Centre, Aarhus University, is thanked for financial support of the winter field campaign. We thank Aage V Jensen Charity Foundation, the Danish National Research Foundation (CENPERM DNRF100), Jane and Aatos Erkko Foundation, and the Academy of Finland (Grant Number 276909) for financial support. The Finnish Functional Genomics Centre, University of Turku, Åbo Akademi, Biocenter Finland is thanked for supporting the molecular analyses. The authors wish to acknowledge CSC—IT Center for Science, Finland, for computational resources.

Authors contribution statement

NMS, TR and AM conceived the ideas and designed methodologies; NMS and JBM collected samples. NMS, EJV and AM conducted the analyses; NMS and TR led the writing of the manuscript. All authors contributed critically to the drafts and gave final approval for publication.

Supplementary material

442_2018_4147_MOESM1_ESM.docx (38 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 37 kb)
442_2018_4147_MOESM2_ESM.docx (29 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 29 kb)
442_2018_4147_MOESM3_ESM.docx (105 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (DOCX 105 kb)
442_2018_4147_MOESM4_ESM.docx (53 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (DOCX 52 kb)

References

  1. Adamczewski JZ, Fargey PJ, Laarveld B, Gunn A, Flood PF (1998) The influence of fatness on the likelihood of early-winter pregnancy in muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus). Theriogenology 50:605–614CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Arndal MF, Illeris L, Michelsen A, Albert K, Tamstorf M, Hansen BU (2009) Seasonal variation in gross ecosystem production, plant biomass, and carbon and nitrogen pools in five high arctic vegetation types. Arct Antarct Alp Res 41:164–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berg TB, Schmidt NM, Høye TT, Aastrup PJ, Hendrichsen DK, Forchhammer MC, Klein DR (2008) High-arctic plant-herbivore interactions under climate influence. Adv Ecol Res 40:275–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blix AS (2005) Arctic animals and their adaptations to life on the edge. Tapir Academic Press, TrondheimGoogle Scholar
  6. Boag B, Neilson R, Robinson D, Scrimgeour CM, Handley LL (1997) Wild rabbit host and some parasites show trophic-level relationships for δ13C and δ15 N: a first report. Isot Environ Healt S 33:81–85Google Scholar
  7. Boecklen WJ, Yarnes CT, Cook BA, James AC (2011) On the use of stable isotopes in trophic ecology. Annu Rev Ecol Evol S 42:411–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bokhorst S, Pedersen SH, Brucker L, Anisimov O, Bjerke JW, Brown RD, Ehrich D, Essery RLH, Heilig A, Ingvander S, Johansson C, Johansson M, Jónsdóttir IS, Inga N, Luojus K, Macelloni G, Mariash H, McLennan D, Rosqvist GN, Sato A, Savela H, Schneebeli M, Sokolov A, Sokratov SA, Terzago S, Vikhamar-Schuler D, Williamson S, Qiu Y, Callaghan TV (2016) Changing Arctic snow cover: a review of recent developments and assessment of future needs for observations, modelling, and impacts. Ambio 45:516–537CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Callaghan T, Johansson M, Brown R, Groisman P, Labba N, Radionov V, Bradley R, Blangy S, Bulygina O, Christensen T, Colman J, Essery R, Forbes B, Forchhammer M, Golubev V, Honrath R, Juday G, Meshcherskaya A, Phoenix G, Pomeroy J, Rautio A, Robinson D, Schmidt NM, Serreze M, Shevchenko V, Shiklomanov A, Shmakin A, Sköld P, Sturm M, Mk Woo, Wood E (2011) Multiple effects of changes in Arctic snow cover. Ambio 40:32–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Caut S, Angulo E, Courchamp F (2009) Variation in discrimination factors (Δ15 N and Δ13C): the effect of diet isotopic values and applications for diet reconstruction. J Appl Ecol 46:443–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clare EL (2014) Molecular detection of trophic interactions: emerging trends, distinct advantages, significant considerations and conservation applications. Evol Appl 7:1144–1157CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Clemmensen KE, Michelsen A, Jonasson S, Shaver GR (2006) Increased ectomycorrhizal fungal abundance after long-term fertilization and warming of two arctic tundra ecosystems. New Phytol 171:391–404CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Codron D, Sponheimer M, Codron J, Hammer S, Tschuor A, Braun U, Bernasconi S, Clauss M (2012) Tracking the fate of digesta 13C and 15N compositions along the ruminant gastrointestinal tract: does digestion influence the relationship between diet and faeces? Eur J Wildl Res 58:303–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deagle BE, Thomas AC, Shaffer AK, Trites AW, Jarman SN (2013) Quantifying sequence proportions in a DNA-based diet study using Ion Torrent amplicon sequencing: which counts count? Mol Ecol Resour 13:620–633CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Edgar RC (2010) Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26:2460–2461CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Elberling B, Tamstorf MP, Michelsen A, Arndal MF, Sigsgaard C, Illeris L, Bay C, Hansen BU, Christensen TR, Hansen ES, Jakobsen BH, Beyens L (2008) Soil and plant community-characteristics and dynamics at Zackenberg. Adv Ecol Res 40:223–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fogel ML, Cifuentes LA (1993) Isotope fractionation during primary production. In: Engel MH, Macko SA (eds) Organic geochemistry. Plenum Press, New York, pp 73–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gray DR (1993) Behavioural adaptations to Arctic winter: shelter seeking by Arctic hare (Lepus arcticus). Arctic 46:340–353Google Scholar
  19. Gustine DD, Barboza PS, Lawler JP, Arthur SM, Shults BS, Persons K, Adams LG (2011) Characteristics of foraging sites and protein status in wintering muskoxen: insights from isotopes of nitrogen. Oikos 120:1546–1556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hansen BU, Sigsgaard C, Rasmussen L, Cappelen J, Hinkler J, Mernild SH, Petersen D, Tamstorf MP, Rasch M, Hasholt B (2008) Present-day climate at Zackenberg. Adv Ecol Res 40:111–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hansen BB, Grøtan V, Aanes R, Sæther BE, Stien A, Fuglei E, Ims RA, Yoccoz NG, Pedersen ÅØ (2013) Climate events synchronize the dynamics of a resident vertebrate community in the high Arctic. Science 339:313–315CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hardy CM, Krull ES, Hartley DM, Oliver RL (2010) Carbon source accounting for fish using combined DNA and stable isotope analyses in a regulated lowland river weir pool. Mol Ecol 19:197–212CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Henry GHR, Svoboda J, Freedman B (1990) Standing crop and net production of sedge meadows of an ungrazed polar desert oasis. Can J Bot 68:2660–2667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hurlbert SH (1978) The measurement of niche overlap and some relatives. Ecology 59:67–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ihrmark K, Bödeker ITM, Cruz-Martinez K, Friberg H, Kubartova A, Schenck J, Strid Y, Stenlid J, Brandström-Durling M, Clemmensen KE, Lindahl BD (2012) New primers to amplify the fungal ITS2 region—evaluation by 454-sequencing of artificial and natural communities. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 82:666–677CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Jackson AL, Inger R, Parnell AC, Bearhop S (2011) Comparing isotopic niche widths among and within communities: sIBER—stable isotope bayesian ellipses in R. J Anim Ecol 80:595–602CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Klein DR, Bay C (1991) Diet selection by vertebrate herbivores in the high arctic of Greenland. Holarctic Ecol 14:152–155Google Scholar
  28. Klein DR, Bay C (1994) Resource partitioning by mammalian herbivores in the high Arctic. Oecologia 97:439–450CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Körner C, Leuzinger S, Riedl S, Siegwolf RT, Streule L (2016) Carbon and nitrogen stable isotope signals for an entire alpine flora, based on herbarium samples. Alpine Bot 126:153–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Krebs CJ (1998) Ecological methodology. Benjamin-Collins, Menlo ParkGoogle Scholar
  31. Kristensen DK, Kristensen E, Forchhammer MC, Michelsen A, Schmidt NM (2011) Arctic herbivore diet can be inferred from stable carbon and nitrogen isotopes in C-3 plants, faeces and wool. Can J Zool 89:892–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Layman CA, Arrington DA, Montaña CG, Post DM (2007) Can stable isotope ratios provide for community-wide measures of trophic structure? Ecology 88:42–48CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Leslie DM Jr, Bowyer RT, Jenks JA (2008) Facts from feces: nitrogen still measures up as a nutritional index for mammalian herbivores. J Wildl Manage 72:1420–1433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Martin M (2011) Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EBMnet Journal 17:10–12Google Scholar
  35. Mech LD (2000) Lack of reproduction in Muskoxen and Arctic hares caused by early winter? Arctic 53:69–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mosbacher JB, Kristensen DK, Michelsen A, Stelvig M, Schmidt NM (2016a) Quantifying muskox plant biomass removal and spatial relocation of nitrogen in a High Arctic tundra ecosystem. Arct Antarct Alp Res 48:229–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mosbacher JB, Michelsen A, Stelvig M, Hendrichsen DK, Schmidt NM (2016b) Show me your rump hair and I will tell you what you ate—the dietary history of muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus) revealed by sequential stable isotope analysis of guard hairs. PLoS ONE 11:e0152874CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Nielsen JM, Clare EL, Hayden B, Brett MT, Kratina P (2018) Diet tracing in ecology: method comparison and selection. Methods Ecol Evol 9:278–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Norbury GL (1988) Microscopic analysis of herbivore diets—a problem and a solution. Wildl Res 15:51–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pedersen AO, Lier M, Routti H, Christiansen HH, Fuglei E (2006) Co-feeding between Svalbard rock ptarmigan (Lagopus muta hyperborea) and Svalbard reindeer (Rangifer tarandus platyrhynchus). Arctic 59:61–64Google Scholar
  41. Pedersen SH, Liston GE, Tamstorf MP, Westergaard-Nielsen A, Schmidt NM (2015) Quantifying episodic snowmelt events in Arctic ecosystems. Ecosystems 18:839–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pedersen SH, Tamstorf MP, Abermann J, Westergaard-Nielsen A, Lund M, Skov K, Sigsgaard C, Mylius MR, Hansen BU, Liston GE, Schmidt NM (2016) Spatiotemporal characteristics of seasonal snow cover in Northeast Greenland from in situ observations. Arct Antarct Alp Res 48:653–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Phillips DL, Inger R, Bearhop S, Jackson AL, Moore JW, Parnell AC, Semmens BX, Ward EJ (2014) Best practices for use of stable isotope mixing models in food-web studies. Can J Zool 92:823–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pompanon F, Deagle BE, Symondson WO, Brown DS, Jarman SN, Taberlet P (2012) Who is eating what: diet assessment using next generation sequencing. Mol Ecol 21:1931–1950CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Putman RJ (1984) Facts from faeces. Mammal Rev 14:79–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Roslin T, Majaneva S (2016) The use of DNA barcodes in food web construction—terrestrial and aquatic ecologists unite! Genome 59:603–628CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Schaefer JA, Messier F (1995) Habitat selection as a hierarchy: the spatial scales of winter foraging by muskoxen. Ecography 18:333–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schaefer JA, Stevens SD, Messier F (1996) Comparative winter habitat use and associations among herbivores in the high arctic. Arctic 49:387–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schmidt NM, Berg TB, Forchhammer MC, Hendrichsen DK, Kyhn LA, Meltofte H, Høye TT (2008) Vertebrate predator-prey interactions in a seasonal environment. Adv Ecol Res 40:345–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schmidt NM, Pedersen SH, Mosbacher JB, Hansen LH (2015) Long-term patterns of muskox (Ovibos moschatus) demographics in high arctic Greenland. Polar Biol 38:1667–1675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schmidt NM, van Beest FM, Mosbacher JB, Stelvig M, Hansen LH, Grøndahl C (2016) Ungulate movement in an extreme seasonal environment: year-round movement patterns of high-arctic muskoxen. Wildlife Biol 22:253–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Smith DM, Grasty RC, Theodosiou NA, Tabin CJ, Nascone-Yoder NM (2000) Evolutionary relationships between the amphibian, avian, and mammalian stomachs. Evol Dev 2:348–359CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Soininen EM, Valentini A, Coissac E, Miquel C, Gielly L, Brochmann C, Brysting AK, Sønstebø JH, Ims RA, Yoccoz NG, Taberlet P (2009) Analysing diet of small herbivores: the efficiency of DNA barcoding coupled with high-throughput pyrosequencing for deciphering the composition of complex plant mixtures. Front Zool 6:16CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Soininen EM, Gauthier G, Bilodeau F, Berteaux D, Gielly L, Taberlet P, Gussarova G, Bellemain E, Hassel K, Stenøien HK, Epp L, Schrøder-Nielsen A, Brochmann C, Yoccoz NG (2015) Highly overlapping winter diet in two sympatric lemming species revealed by DNA metabarcoding. PLoS ONE 10:e0115335CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Sponheimer M, Robinson T, Ayliffe L, Passey B, Roeder B, Shipley L, Lopez E, Cerling T, Dearing D, Ehleringer J (2003) An experimental study of carbon-isotope fractionation between diet, hair, and feces of mammalian herbivores. Can J Zool 81:871–876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stone L, Roberts A (1990) The checkerboard score and species distributions. Oecologia 85:74–79CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Swanson HK, Lysy M, Power M, Stasko AD, Johnson JD, Reist JD (2015) A new probabilistic method for quantifying n-dimensional ecological niches and niche overlap. Ecology 96:318–324CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Syväranta J, Lensu A, Marjomäki TJ, Oksanen S, Jones RI (2013) An empirical evaluation of the utility of convex hull and standard ellipse areas for assessing population niche widths from stable isotope data. PLoS ONE 8:e56094CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Taberlet P, Coissac E, Pompanon F, Gielly L, Miquel C, Valentini A, Vermat T, Corthier G, Brochmann C, Willerslev E (2007) Power and limitations of the chloroplast trn L (UAA) intron for plant DNA barcoding. Nucleic Acids Res 35:e14CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Thing H, Klein DR, Jingfors K, Holt S (1987) Ecology of Muskoxen in Jameson Land, Northeast Greenland. Holarctic Ecol 10:95–103Google Scholar
  61. Thomas VG (1987) Similar winter energy strategies of grouse, hares and rabbits in northern biomes. Oikos 50:206–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Traugott M, Kamenova S, Ruess L, Seeber J, Plantegenest M (2013) Empirically characterising trophic networks: what emerging DNA-based methods, stable isotope and fatty acid analyses can offer. Adv Ecol Res 49:177–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vesterinen EJ, Ruokolainen L, Wahlberg N, Peña C, Roslin T, Laine VN, Vasko V, Sääksjärvi IE, Norrdahl K, Lilley TM (2016) What you need is what you eat? Prey selection by the bat Myotis daubentonii. Mol Ecol 25:1581–1594CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee SJWT, Taylor JW (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR Protoc 18:315–322Google Scholar
  65. Willerslev E, Davison J, Moora M, Zobel M, Coissac E, Edwards ME, Lorenzen ED, Vestergard M, Gussarova G, Haile J, Craine J, Gielly L, Boessenkool S, Epp LS, Pearman PB, Cheddadi R, Murray D, Brathen KA, Yoccoz N, Binney H, Cruaud C, Wincker P, Goslar T, Alsos IG, Bellemain E, Brysting AK, Elven R, Sonstebo JH, Murton J, Sher A, Rasmussen M, Ronn R, Mourier T, Cooper A, Austin J, Moller P, Froese D, Zazula G, Pompanon F, Rioux D, Niderkorn V, Tikhonov A, Savvinov G, Roberts RG, MacPhee RDE, Gilbert MT, Kjaer KH, Orlando L, Brochmann C, Taberlet P (2014) Fifty thousand years of Arctic vegetation and megafaunal diet. Nature 506:47–51CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Wirta HK, Hebert PD, Kaartinen R, Prosser SW, Várkonyi G, Roslin T (2014) Complementary molecular information changes our perception of food web structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:1885–1890CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. Wirta H, Várkonyi G, Rasmussen C, Kaartinen R, Schmidt NM, Hebert P, Barták M, Blagoev G, Disney H, Ertl S, Gjelstrup P, Gwiazdowicz D, Huldén J, Ilmonen J, Jakovlev J, Jaschhof M, Kahanpää J, Kankaanpää T, Krogh PH, Labbee R, Lettner C, Michelsen V, Nielsen SA, Nielsen TR, Paasivirta L, Pedersen S, Pohjoismäki J, Salmela J, Vilkamaa P, Väre H, von Tschirnhaus M, Roslin T (2016) Establishing a community-wide DNA barcode library as a new tool for arctic research. Mol Ecol Resour 16:809–822CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Bioscience, Arctic Research CentreAarhus UniversityRoskildeDenmark
  2. 2.Department of Agricultural SciencesUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  3. 3.Biodiversity UnitUniversity of TurkuTurkuFinland
  4. 4.Department of EcologySwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUppsalaSweden
  5. 5.Department of BiologyUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
  6. 6.Center for Permafrost (CENPERM)University of CopenhagenCopenhagen KDenmark

Personalised recommendations