, Volume 186, Issue 3, pp 843–853 | Cite as

The effect of tar spot pathogen on host plant carbon balance and its possible consequences on a tundra ecosystem

  • Shota Masumoto
  • Masaki Uchida
  • Motoaki Tojo
  • Maria Luz Herrero
  • Akira S. Mori
  • Satoshi Imura
Ecosystem ecology – original research


In Arctic tundra, plant pathogens have substantial effects on the growth and survival of hosts, and impacts on the carbon balance at the scale of ecological systems. To understand these effects on carbon dynamics across different scales including plant organ, individual, population and ecosystem, we focused on two primary factors: host productivity reduction and carbon consumption by the pathogen. We measured the effect of the pathogen on photosynthetic and respiratory activity in the host. We also measured respiration and the amount of carbon in the pathogen. We constructed a model based on these two factors, and calculated pathogenic effects on the carbon balance at different organismal and ecological scales. We found that carbon was reduced in infected leaves by 118% compared with healthy leaves; the major factor causing this loss was pathogenic carbon consumption. The carbon balance at the population and ecosystem levels decreased by 35% and 20%, respectively, at an infection rate of 30%. This case study provides the first evidence that a host plant can lose more carbon through pathogenic carbon consumption than through a reduction in productivity. Such a pathogenic effect could greatly change ecosystem carbon cycling without decreasing annual productivity.


Plant parasite Host carbon balance Ecosystem carbon cycle Arctic tundra Rhytisma polare 



We are grateful to Dr Hiroyuki Muraoka at Gifu University and Dr Yukiko Tanabe at the National Institute of Polar Research for their help with photosynthetic measurements and model estimations. This work was supported by The Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI), the National Institute of Polar Research (Project number KP-11), and the Green Network of Excellence (GRENE) Arctic Climate Change Research Project and Arctic Challenge for Sustainability Project (ArCS) provided by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan.

Author contribution statement

SM and MU conceived and designed the experiments. SM and MU performed the experiments. SM and MU analyzed the data. SM, MU, ASM and SI wrote the manuscript; other authors provided editorial advice.

Supplementary material

442_2017_4037_MOESM1_ESM.pptx (41 kb)
Figure S1 Change in rETR maximum values (mean ± SD) with leaf age. There was no significant difference in the daily values between healthy leaves (open circle) and the non-symptomatic parts of infected leaves (closed circle) (PPTX 41 kb)


  1. ACIA (2004) Impacts of a warming arctic: arctic climate impact assessment. Cambridge University, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander HM (2010) Disease in natural plant populations, communities, and ecosystems: insights into ecological and evolutionary processes. Plant Dis 94:492–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bagchi R, Gallery RE, Gripenberg S, Gurr SJ, Narayan L, Addis CE, Freckleton RP, Lewis OT (2014) Pathogens and insect herbivores drive rainforest plant diversity and composition. Nature 506:85–88CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Berger S, Papadopoulos M, Schreiber U, Kaiser W, Roitsch T (2004) Complex regulation of gene expression, photosynthesis and sugar levels by pathogen infection in tomato. Physiol Plant 122:419–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cannon PF, Minter DW (1986) The Rhytismataceae of the Indian subcontinent. Mycol Pap 155:1–123Google Scholar
  6. CAVM-Team (2003) Circumpolar Arctic Vegetation Map. Scale 1: 7500,000. Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (CAFF) Map No.1. US Fish and Wildlife Service, AnchorageGoogle Scholar
  7. Chou HM, Bundock N, Rolfe SA, Scholes JD (2000) Infection of Arabidopsis thaliana leaves with Albugo candida (white blister rust) causes a reprogramming of host metabolism. Mol Plant Pathol 1:99–113CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Harvell CD, Mitchell CE, Ward JR, Altizer S, Dobson AP, Ostfeld RS, Samuel MD (2002) Climate warming and disease risks for terrestrial and marine biota. Science 296:2158–2163CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Heil M, Bostock MR (2002) Induced systemic resistance (ISR) against pathogens in the context of induced plant defences. Ann Bot 89:503–512CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. IPCC (2013) Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM, eds. Climate Change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Karsten PA (1872) Fungi in insulis Spitsbergen et Beeren Eiland collecti. Examinat, enumerate. Öfvers K Vet-Akd Förth 2:91–108Google Scholar
  12. Mangan SA, Schnitzer SA, Herre EA, Mack KML, Valencia MC, Sanchez EI, Bever JD (2010) Negative plant-soil feedback predicts tree-species relative abundance in a tropical forest. Nature 466:752–755CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Manter DK, Bond BJ, Kavanagh KL, Rosso PH, Filip GM (2000) Pseudothecia of Swiss needle cast fungus Phaeocryptopus gaeumannii physically block stomata of Douglas-fir, reducing CO2 assimilation. New Phytol 14:481–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Manter DK, Bond BJ, Kavanagh KL, Stone JK, Filip GM (2003) Modeling the impacts of the foliar pathogen, Phaeocryptopus gaeumannii, on Douglas-fir physiology: net canopy carbon assimilation, needle abscission and growth. Ecol Model 154:211–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Masumoto S, Tojo M, Uchida M, Imura S (2014) Rhytisma polaris: morphological and molecular characterization of a new species from Spitsbergen Island, Norway. Mycol Prog 13:181–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Meltofte H (ed) (2013) Arctic biodiversity assessment. Status and trends in Arctic biodiversity. Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna, AkureyriGoogle Scholar
  17. Mordecai EA (2011) Pathogen impacts on plant communities: unifying theory, concepts, and empirical work. Ecol Monogr 81:429–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Muraoka H, Uchida M, Mishio M, Nakatsubo T, Kanda H, Koizumi H (2002) Leaf photosynthetic characteristics and net primary production of the polar willow (Salix polaris) in a High Arctic polar semi-desert, Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard. Can J Bot 80:1193–1202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Muraoka H, Noda H, Uchida M, Ohtsuka T, Koizumi H, Nakatsubo T (2008) Photosynthetic characteristics and biomass distribution of the dominant vascular plant species in a High-Arctic tundra ecosystem, Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard: implications to their role in ecosystem carbon gain. J Plant Res 121:137–145CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Nakatsubo T, Bekku Y, Kume A, Koizumi H (1998) Respiration of the belowground parts of vascular plants: its contribution to total soil respiration on a successional glacier foreland in Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard. Polar Res 17:53–59Google Scholar
  21. Nakatsubo T, Bekku YS, Uchida M, Muraoka H, Kume A, Ohtsuka T, Masuzawa T, Kanda H, Koizumi H (2005) Ecosystem development and carbon cycle on a glacier foreland in the high Arctic, Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard. J Plant Res 118:173–179CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Nakatsubo T, Fujiyoshi M, Yoshitake S, Koizumi H, Uchida M (2010) Colonization of the polar willow Salix polaris on the early stage of succession after glacier retreat in the High Arctic, Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard. Polar Res 29:385–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nordin A, Strengbom J, Forsum A, Ericson L (2009) Complex biotic interactions drive long-term vegetation change in a nitrogen enriched boreal forest. Ecosystems 12:1204–1211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ohtsuka T, Adachi M, Uchida M, Nakatsubo T (2006) Relationships between vegetation types and soil properties along a topograph- ical gradient on the northern coast of the Brøgger Peninsula, Svalbard. Polar Biosci 19:63–72Google Scholar
  25. Olofsson J, Ericson L, Torp M, Stark S, Baxter R (2011) Carbon balance of arctic tundra under increased snow cover mediated by a plant pathogen. Nat Clim Change 1:220–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rønning OI (1996) Svalbards flora. Polar handbook, 9th edn. Norwegian Polar Institute, OsloGoogle Scholar
  27. Roy BA, Gusewell S, Harte J (2004) Response of plant pathogens and herbivores to a warming experiment. Ecology 85:2570–2581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Scholes J, Rolfe SA (1996) Photosynthesis in localized regions of oat leaves infected with crown rust (Puccinia coronata): quantitative imaging of chlorophyll fluorescence. Planta 199:573–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Scholler M, Schnittler M, Piepenbring M (2003) Species of Anthracoidea (Ustilaginales, Basidiomycota) on Cyperaceae in Arctic Europe. Novia Hedwig 76:415–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Skarpe C, van der Wal R (2002) Effects of simulated browsing and length of growing season on leaf characteristics and flowering in a deciduous Arctic shrub, Salix polaris. Arct Antarct Alp Res 34:282–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Smith JA, Blanchette RA, Newcombe G (2004) Molecular and morphological characterization of the willow rust fungus, Melampsora epitea, from arctic and temperate hosts in North America. Mycologia 96:1330–1338CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Swarbrick PJ, Schulze-Lefert P, Scholes JD (2006) Metabolic consequences of susceptibility and resistance in barley leaves challenged with powdery mildew. Plant, Cell Environ 29:1061–1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Thornley JHM (1976) Mathematical models in plant physiology. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Tojo M, Newsham KK (2012) Snow moulds in polar environments. Fungal Ecology 5:395–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tojo M, Nishitani S (2005) The effects of the smut fungus Microbotryum bistortarum on survival and growth of Polygonum viviparum in Svalbard, Norway. Can J Bot 83:1513–1517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tojo M, Masumoto S, Hoshino T (2013) Phytopathogenic fungi and fungal-like microbes in svalbard. In: Imai R, Yoshida M, Matsumoto N (eds) Plant and microbe adaptations to cold in a changing world. Springer, NewYork, pp 263–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Uchida M, Muraoka H, Nakatsubo T (2016) Sensitivity analysis of ecosystem CO2 exchange to climate change in High Arctic tundra using an ecological process-based model. Polar Biol 39:251–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wiedermann MM, Nordin A, Gunnarsson U, Nilsson MB, Ericson L (2007) Global change shifts vegetation and plant–parasite interactions in a boreal mire. Ecology 88:454–464CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Environment and Information SciencesYokohama National UniversityYokohamaJapan
  2. 2.National Institute of Polar ResearchTachikawaJapan
  3. 3.School of Multidisciplinary SciencesSOKENDAI (The Graduate University for Advanced Studies)TachikawaJapan
  4. 4.Graduate School of Life and Environmental SciencesOsaka Prefecture UniversitySakaiJapan
  5. 5.Division of Biotechnology and Plant HealthNIBIO - Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy ResearchÅsNorway

Personalised recommendations