Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 186, Issue 2, pp 425–434 | Cite as

Site fidelity facilitates pair formation in aggregations of coral reef cardinalfish

  • Theresa Rueger
  • Naomi M. Gardiner
  • Geoffrey P. Jones
Behavioral ecology –original research

Abstract

Colonial animals often form stable pair bonds, returning to the same site to breed with the same partner every year. Familiarity with both partner and breeding site has the potential to enhance an individual’s reproductive success. However, it is often unknown whether the mating system arises because of site fidelity, mate fidelity or both. Here, observational and experimental studies are used to identify causal links between site fidelity and pair formation in a group-living coral reef cardinalfish, Sphaeramia nematoptera. A long-term field tagging study was undertaken to quantify site and mate attachment. This was followed by both mate removal and mate transplant experiments to test whether the prolonged association with home sites was primarily because of mate or site fidelity. Adult S. nematoptera exhibited a prolonged association with home sites and partners, with some pairs lasting more than 4 months at the same site. A Bayesian mixed effect model showed that individuals in pairs were more likely to remain site attached, regardless of sex and maturity. Following mate removal, 78% of S. nematoptera found a new partner within 2 weeks on the same site, supporting the hypothesis that individuals primarily exhibit site fidelity. This was confirmed by the partner translocation experiment, with only 1 of 24 fish following their translocated partner to a new site. In these cardinalfish, strong site attachment facilitates long-lasting pair bonds, as well as new pair formation when necessary, suggesting that site rather than mate fidelity is the major driver of the reproductive system.

Keywords

Site fidelity Mate fidelity Monogamy Mate removal Cardinalfish Pairing behaviour Social system 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was conducted in association with Mahonia Na Dari Research and Conservation Centre near Kimbe, West New Britain Province (PNG). We would like to thank the Tamare and Kilu communities for allowing access to their reefs and land. We would like to thank Tiffany Sih, James White, Patrick Smallhorn-West and Mat Vickers for field assistance, and Simon Brandl and an anonymous reviewer for helpful comments on the manuscript. This study was conducted in accordance with JCU Ethics Committee, Approval number A1847, and all applicable institutional and/or national guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. Funding was provided by Australian Research Council (Grant no. CE140100020).

Author contribution statement

TR, NMG and GPJ originally formulated the idea and developed methodology, TR conducted fieldwork, TR performed statistical analyses, and TR, NMG and GPJ wrote the manuscript.

Supplementary material

442_2017_4018_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (537 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 537 kb)

References

  1. Aebischer N, Potts G, Coulson J (1995) Site and mate fidelity of Shags Phalacrocorax aristotelis at two British colonies. Ibis (Lond 1859) 137:19–28.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.1995.tb03215.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agresti A, Kateri M (2011) Categorical data analysis. In: Lovric M (ed) International encyclopedia of statistical science. Springer, Berlin, pp 206–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bai ML, Severinghaus LL (2012) Disentangling site and mate fidelity in a monogamous population under strong nest site competition. Anim Behav 84:251–259.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.05.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barlow GW (1984) Patterns of monogamy among teleost fishes. Arch für Fish Wiss 35:75–123Google Scholar
  5. Barlow GW (1986) A comparison of monogamy among freshwater and coral reef fishes. In: Uyeno T, Arai R, Taniuchi T, Matsuura K (eds) Indo-Pacific fish biology: proceedings of the second international conference on Indo-Pacific fishes, ichthyological society of Japan, Tokyo, pp 767–775Google Scholar
  6. Barnett A, Bellwood DR (2005) Sexual dimorphism in the buccal cavity of paternal mouthbrooding cardinalfishes (Pisces: Apogonidae). Mar Biol 148:205–212.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-005-0052-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Booth DJ, Wellington G (1998) Settlement preferences in coral-reef fishes: effects on patterns of adult and juvenile distributions, individual fitness and population structure. Aust J Ecol 23:274–279.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.1998.tb00731.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brandl SJ, Bellwood DR (2013) Pair formation in the herbivorous rabbitfish Siganus doliatus. J Fish Biol 82:2031–2044.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.12131 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Brandl SJ, Bellwood DR (2014) Pair-formation in coral reef fishes: an ecological perspective. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 52:1–80Google Scholar
  10. Bried J, Pontier D, Jouventin P (2003) Mate fidelity in monogamous birds: a re-examination of the Procellariiformes. Anim Behav 65:235–246.  https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2002.2045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown GE, Dreier VM (2002) Predator inspection behaviour and attack cone avoidance in a characin fish: the effects of predator diet and prey experience. Anim Behav 63:1175–1181.  https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2002.3024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown CR, Brown MB, Danchin E (2000) Breeding habitat selection in cliff swallows: the effect of conspecific reproductive success on colony choice. J Anim Ecol 69:133–142.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2000.00382.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Candolin U, Wong BBM (2008) Mate choice. In: Maghagen C, Braithwaite V, Forsgren E, Kapoor BG (eds) Fish behaviour. Science Publishers, New Hampshire, pp 337–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cézilly F, Johnson AR (1995) Re-mating within and between breeding seasons in the greater flamingo, Phoenicopterus ruber roseus. Ibis (Lond 1859) 139:543–546Google Scholar
  15. Cézilly F, Dubois F, Pagel M (2000) Is mate fidelity related to site fidelity? A comparative analysis in Ciconiiforms. Anim Behav 59:1143–1152.  https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1422 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cuthbert FJ (1985) Mate retention in Caspian terns. Condor 87:74–78.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1367133 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Danchin E, Wagner RH (1997) The evolution of coloniality: the emergence of new perspectives. Trends Ecol Evol 12:342–347.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01124-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Donaldson T (1989) Facultative monogamy in obligate coral-dwelling hawkfishes (Cirrhitidae). Environ Biol Fishes 26:295–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Downhower JF, Brown L (1980) Mate preferences of female mottled sculpins, Cottus bairdi. Anim Behav 28:728–734.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(80)80132-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dunlap WP, Jose JM, Vaslow JB, Burke MJ (1996) Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs. Psychol Methods 1:170–177.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.170 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fishelson L (1970) Spawning behavior of the cardinal fish, Cheilodipterus lineatus, in Eilat (Gulf of Aqaba, Red Sea). Copeia 2:370–371.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1441665 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fishelson L (1998) Behaviour, socio-ecology and sexuality in damselfishes (Pomacentridae). Ital J Zool 65:387–398.  https://doi.org/10.1080/11250009809386853 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fricke HW (1986) Pair swimming and mutual partner guarding in monogamous butterflyfish (Pisces, Chaetodontidae): a joint advertisement for territory. Ethology 73:307–333.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1986.tb00812.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gardiner NM, Jones GP (2005) Habitat specialisation and overlap in a guild of coral reef cardinalfishes (Apogonidae). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 305:163–175.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps305163 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hadfield JD (2010) MCMC methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models: the MCMCglmm R package. J Stat Softw 33:1–22.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.22635 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hourigan TF (1987) The behavioral ecology of three species of butterflyfishes (Family Chaetodontidae). (Doctoral dissertation)Google Scholar
  27. Jones GP (1981) Spawning-site choice by female Pseudolabrus celidotus (Pisces: Labridae) and its influence on the mating system. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 8:129–142.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300825 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jones AG, Ratterman NL (2009) Mate choice and sexual selection: what have we learned since Darwin? Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:100001–110008.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0901129106 Google Scholar
  29. Klein NR (2007) Age, growth and reproductive parameters of the Mediterranean cardinal fish, Apogon imberbis. J Appl Ichthyol 23:675–678.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2007.00847.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kolm N, Berglund A (2004) Sex-Specific territorial behaviour in the Banggai cardinalfish, Pterapogon kaunderni. Envirnon Biol Fishes 70:375–379.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EBFI.0000035430.76766.53 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kume G, Yamaguchi A, Aoki I, Taniuchi T (2000) Reproductive biology of the cardinalfish Apogon lineatus in Tokyo Bay, Japan. Fish Sci 66:947–954.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1444-2906.2000.00151.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kume G, Yamaguchi A, Aoki I (2003) Variation in life history parameters of the cardinalfish Apogon lineatus. Fish Sci 69:249–259.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1444-2906.2003.00615.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kuwamura T (1983) Spawning behavior and timing of fertilization in the mouthbrooding cardinalfish Apogon notatus. Jpn J Ichthyol 30:61–71.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1444-2906.2003.00615.x Google Scholar
  34. Kuwamura T (1985) Social and reproductive behavior of three mouthbrooding cardinalfishes, Apogon doederleini, A. niger and A. notatus. Envirnon Biol Fishes 13:17–24.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00004852 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kuwamura T (1986) Parental care and mating systems of cichlid fishes in Lake Tanganyiki: a preliminary field survey. J Ethol 4:129–146.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02348115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Marnane MJ (2000) Site fidelity and homing behaviour in coral reef cardinalfishes. J Fish Biol 57:1590–1600.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jfbi.2000.1422 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Marnane MJ, Bellwood DR (2002) Diet and nocturnal foraging in cardinalfishes (Apogonidae) at one tree reef, great barrier reef, Australia. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 231:261–268.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps231261 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mees J, Mwamasojo GU, Wakwabi EO et al (1999) Aspects of the Biology and Feeding ecology of the orbiculate cardinal fish Shaeramia orbicularis (Cuvier, 1828) (Teleostei: Apogonidae) in a Kenyan mangrove forest. Biol Jaarb Dodonaea 66:134–145Google Scholar
  39. Morse DH, Kress SW (1984) The effect of burrow loss on mate choice in the Leach’s storm-petrel. Auk 101:158–160.  https://doi.org/10.2307/4086236 Google Scholar
  40. Munday PL, Wilson SK (1997) Comparative efficacy of clove oil and other chemicals in anaesthetization of Pomacentrus amboinensis, a coral reef fish. J Fish Biol 51:931–938.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1997.tb01532.x Google Scholar
  41. Myhre LC, de Jong K, Forsgren E, Amundsen T (2012) Sex roles and mutual mate choice matter during mate sampling. Am Nat 179:741–755.  https://doi.org/10.1086/665651 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Naves LC, Cam E, Monnat JY (2007) Pair duration, breeding success and divorce in a long-lived seabird: benefits of mate familiarity? Anim Behav 73:433–444.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.10.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Noda M, Gushima K, Kakuda S (1994) Local prey search based on spatial memory and expectation in the planktivorous reef fish, Chromis chrysurus (Pomacentridae). Anim Behav 47:1413–1422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Okuda N (1999) Female mating strategy and male brood cannibalism in a sand-dwelling cardinalfish. Anim Behav 58:273–279.  https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1999.1148 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Okuda N, Ohnishi N (2001) Nocturnal hatching timing of mouthbrooding male cardinalfish Apogon niger. Ichthyol Res 48:207–212.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10228-001-8138-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Parra JE, Beltran M, Zefania S et al (2014) Experimental assessment of mating opportunities in three shorebird species. Anim Behav 90:83–90.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.12.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pratchett MS, Pradjakusuma OA, Jones GP (2006) Is there a reproductive basis to solitary living versus pair-formation in coral reef fishes? Coral Reefs 25:85–92.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-005-0081-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pyle P, Sydeman WJ, Hester M (2009) Effects of age, breeding experience, mate fidelity and site fidelity on breeding performance in a declining population of Cassin ’ s auklets. J Anim Ecol 70:1088–1097.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0021-8790.2001.00567.x Google Scholar
  49. R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
  50. Rueger T, Gardiner NM, Jones GP (2014) Relationships between pair formation, site fidelity and sex in a coral reef cardinalfish. Behav Process 107:119–126.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2014.07.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rueger T, Gardiner NM, Jones GP (2016a) Homing is not for everyone: displaced cardinalfish find a new place to live. J Fish Biol 89:2182–2188.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.13092 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Rueger T, Gardiner NM, Jones GP (2016b) Size matters: male and female mate choice leads to size-assortative pairing in a coral reef cardinalfish. Behav Ecol 27:1585–1591.  https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arw082 Google Scholar
  53. Sale PF (1971) Extremely limited home range in a coral reef fish, Dascyllus aruanus (Pisces; Pomacentridae). Copeia 1971:324–327.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1442839 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sale PF (1972) Influence of corals in the dispersion of the pomacentrid fish, Dascyllus Aruanus. Ecology 53:741–744.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1934795 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Thompson S (1986) Male spawning success and female choice in the mottled triplefin, Forsterygion varium (Pisces: Tripterygiidae). Anim Behav 34:580–589.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(86)80127-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Vincent ACJ, Ahnesjö I, Berglund A (1994) Operational sex ratios and behavioural sex differences in a pipefish population. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 34:435.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167335 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wall M, Herler J (2008) Postsettlement movement patterns and homing in a coral-associated fish. Behav Ecol 20:87–95.  https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arn118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Warner RR (1987) Female choice of sites versus mates in a coral reef fish, Thalassoma bifasciatum. Anim Behav 147:1470–1478.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(87)80019-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Warner RR (1988) Traditionality of mating-site preferences in a coral reef fish. Nature 335:719–721.  https://doi.org/10.1038/335719a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Warner RR (1990) Male versus female influences on mating-site determination in a coral reef fish. Anim Behav 39:540–548.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80420-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Whiteman EA, Côte IM (2004) Monogamy in marine fishes. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 79:351–375.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1464793103006304 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Whiteman EA, Côté IM (2002) Sex differences in cleaning behaviour and diet of a Caribbean cleaning goby. J Fish Biol 82:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jfbi.2002.1947 Google Scholar
  63. Wong MYL, Buston PM, Munday PL, Jones GP (2007) The threat of punishment enforces peaceful cooperation and stabilizes queues in a coral-reef fish. Proc Biol Sci 274:1093–1099.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.0284 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Marine Biology and Aquaculture, College of Science and EngineeringJames Cook UniversityTownsvilleAustralia
  2. 2.ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef StudiesTownsvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations