Phylogenetic trophic specialization: a robust comparison of herbivorous guilds
- 600 Downloads
Resource specialization is a key concept in ecology, but it is unexpectedly difficult to parameterize. Differences in resource availability, sampling effort and abundances preclude comparisons of incompletely sampled biotic interaction webs. Here, we extend the distance-based specialization index (DSI) that measures trophic specialization by taking resource phylogenetic relatedness and availability into account into a rescaled version, DSI*. It is a versatile metric of specialization that expands considerably the scope and applicability, hence the usefulness, of DSI. The new metric also accounts for differences in abundance and sampling effort of consumers, which enables robust comparisons among distinct guilds of consumers. It also provides an abundance threshold for the reliability of the metric for rare species, a very desirable property given the difficulty of assessing any aspect of rare species accurately. We apply DSI* to an extensive dataset on interactions between insect herbivores from four folivorous guilds and their host plants in Papua New Guinean rainforests. We demonstrate that DSI*, contrary to the original DSI, is largely independent of sample size and weakly and non-linearly related with several host specificity measures that do not adjust for plant phylogeny. Thus, DSI* provides further insights into host specificity patterns; moreover, it is robust to the number and phylogenetic diversity of plant species selected to be sampled for herbivores. DSI* can be used for a broad range of comparisons of distinct feeding guilds, geographical locations and ecological conditions. This is a key advance in elucidating the interaction structure and evolution of highly diversified systems.
KeywordsHost plant range Distance-based specialization index (DSI*) Statistical comparability Papua New Guinea
This study is part of VN’s visit to the University of Campinas, supported by Fapesp (grant #14/16006-0). LRJ was supported by a postdoc scholarship from Fapesp (grant #14/16082-9). VN acknowledges financial support by The Grant Agency of the Czech Republic (14-04258S), the European Research Foundation (669609) and the National Science Foundation (DEB-841885, -9628840, -9707928, -0211591, and -0515678). STS acknowledges funding from a Univ. of South Bohemia Postdoc project (reg.no. CZ.1.07/2.3.00/30.0006) (funded by the EU Education for Competitiveness Operational Programme, the European Social Fund and the Czech State Budget). TML received a research grant from CNPq (311800/215-7). We thank the very careful reading and insightful suggestions made by the reviewers, which greatly improved the manuscript.
Author contribution statement
LRJ co-developed the idea of the paper, led the analysis and writing; VN contributed to idea of the paper, insect data set, and manuscript writing; STS and GDW developed plant phylogeny data and analysis, commented on the manuscript; SEM led taxonomic analysis of insects, commented on the manuscript; YB contributed to the insect data, commented on the manuscript; TML co-developed the idea of the paper, contributed to writing.
- Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol 289–300Google Scholar
- Ehrlich PR, Raven PH (1964) Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution 586–608Google Scholar
- Manly BFJ, McDonald L, Thomas D (1993) Resource selection by animals: Statistical design and analysis for field studies. SpringerGoogle Scholar
- Miller SE, Novotny V, Basset Y (2003) Studies on New Guinea moths. 1. Introduction (Lepidoptera). Proc Entomol Soc Wash 105:1034–1042Google Scholar
- Strong DR, Southwood R, Lawton JH (1984) Insects on plants: community patterns and mechanisms. Blackwell Scientific, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Weiblen GD, Webb CO, Novotny V et al (2006) Phylogenetic dispersion of host use in a tropical insect herbivore community. Ecology 87:S62–S75. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[62:PDOHUI]2.0.CO;2Google Scholar