The balancing act of foraging: mammalian herbivores trade-off multiple risks when selecting food patches
- 746 Downloads
Animals face multiple risks while foraging such as the risk of acquiring inadequate energy from food and the risk of predation. We evaluated how two sympatric rabbits (pygmy rabbits, Brachylagus idahoensis, and mountain cottontail rabbits, Sylvilagus nuttallii) that differ in size, use of burrows, and habitat specialization in the sagebrush-steppe of western North America respond to different types and levels of perceived risks (i.e., fitness cost × probability of occurrence), including fiber and toxins in food, exposure to predation, and distance from a refuge. We measured food intake by the rabbits at paired food patches that varied in these risks and used the method of paired comparisons to create a relative ranking of habitat cues, which revealed an animal’s perceived risk on a single scale representing an integrated response to a variety of risks. Pygmy rabbits perceived exposure to predation risk and distance from a burrow as riskier than did cottontails, whereas cottontails perceived dietary toxin as riskier. Pygmy rabbits consumed lower quality food, containing higher fiber or toxins, thereby avoided feeding in exposed patches or traveling far from their burrow to forage. In contrast, cottontails fed in exposed patches and traveled farther from the burrow to obtain higher quality food. We have shown how risks can be integrated into a single model that allows animals to reveal their perceptions of risks on a single scale that can be used to create a spatially explicit landscape of risk.
KeywordsLandscape of fear Marginal rate of substitution Method of paired comparisons Monoterpene Optimal foraging Plant secondary metabolite
We would like to thank the undergraduate volunteers and researchers at Washington State University who cared for animals and collected data. J. Fluegel provided valuable assistance in creating experimental patches and arenas, and R. Camp (EcoLogical Research) assisted in creating figures. This research was funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF; DEB-1146368, L.A. Shipley; DEB-1146166, J.L. Rachlow; DEB-1146194, J.S. Forbey), and USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA; Hatch Project 1005876, L.A. Shipley).
Author contribution statement
MJC and LAS conceived and designed the experiments, MJC performed the experiments. MJC, LAS, TRJ, PJO analyzed the data. MJC and LAS wrote the manuscript; other authors provided editorial advice.
- David HA (1988) The method of paired comparisons, 2nd edn. Hodder Arnold, London, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Demment MW, Van Soest PJ (1985) A nutritional explanation for body-size patterns of ruminant and nonruminant herbivores. Am Nat 641–672Google Scholar
- Goering HK, Van Soest PJ (1970) Forage fiber analysis (apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications). U.S. Department of Agriculture Research Station. Agriculture Handbook 379. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., USAGoogle Scholar
- Iason G, Van Wieren SE (1999) Digestive and ingestive adaptations of mammalian herbivores to low-quality forage. In: Olff H, Brown VK, Drent RH (eds) Herbivores: between plants and predators. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 337–370Google Scholar
- Kleiber M (1975) The fire of life: an introduction to animal energetics. Krieger, HuntingtonGoogle Scholar
- MacCracken JG, Hansen RM (1984) Seasonal foods of blacktail jackrabbits and Nuttall cottontails in southeastern Idaho. J Range Manag 256–259Google Scholar
- McArthur C, Hagerman AE, Robbins CT (1991) Physiological strategies of mammalian herbiores against plant defenses. In: Palo RT, Robbins CT (eds) Plant defenses against mammalian herbivores. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 103–114Google Scholar
- Nobler JD (2016) Risky business: tradeoffs between nutrition, toxicity, and predation by a specialist mammalian herbivore. Master’s Thesis, Boise State University, Boise, IDGoogle Scholar
- Orr RT (1940) The rabbits of California. California academy of sciences, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
- R Development Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org/
- Rachlow JL, Sanchez DM, Estes-Zumpf WA (2005) Natal burrows and nests of free-ranging pygmy rabbits (Brachylagus idahoensis). West North Am Nat 65:136–139Google Scholar
- Schmidt KA (2000) Interactions between food chemistry and predation risk in fox squirrels. Ecology 81:2077–2085. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[2077:IBFCAP]2.0.CO;2