Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 184, Issue 4, pp 917–929 | Cite as

Advancement of spring arrival in a long-term study of a passerine bird: sex, age and environmental effects

  • Luis Cadahía
  • Antonieta Labra
  • Endre Knudsen
  • Anna Nilsson
  • Helene M. Lampe
  • Tore Slagsvold
  • Nils Chr. Stenseth
Global change ecology – original research

Abstract

In migratory birds, mistimed arrival might have negative consequences for individual fitness, causing population declines. This may happen if arrival time is not synchronized with breeding time, especially when earlier springs favour earlier reproduction. We studied spring arrival time to the breeding areas in a pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca population in southern Norway during a 30-year period (1985–2014). We investigated trends in arrival both for the entire population and for different population fractions (e.g. early vs. late arrivals). We also studied sex and age class differences, along with repeatability of arrival. Finally, we explored how arrival is influenced by environmental conditions at the areas birds use throughout the year, using mixed-effects models and quantile regressions with individual-based data. Spring arrival advanced over five days, at a similar rate through the entire population. Males and adult birds arrived earlier than females and yearlings. Arrival was significantly repeatable for males and females. Birds arrived earlier in years with high temperature and rainfall at the breeding grounds, and low NDVI both on the Iberian Peninsula and in central Europe. Later fractions of the population showed a steeper response to these environmental variables. This intra-population heterogeneity in the responses to the environment probably stems from a combination between the different selection pressures individuals are subject to and their age-related experience. Our results highlight the importance of studying how migration phenology is affected by the environment not only on the breeding grounds but also on the other areas birds use throughout the year.

Keywords

Mixed-effects models NAO NDVI Phenology Protandry Quantile regression Rainfall Repeatability Temperature 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are indebted to Anders Herland and the many master and PhD students that helped collecting the data, and to Arthur Bass for collaborating in digitizing and organizing the information. L.C. was funded by EU’s PEOPLE Programme (Marie Curie Actions), grant agreement number 255326. Yngvild Vindenes, Andreas Lindén and Andrew Beckerman helped with statistical analyses. Jan Ohlberger, Morten Helberg and Øystein Langangen provided fruitful discussions. Christiaan Both, Blair Wolf and an anonymous reviewer significantly helped improve the manuscript.

Author contribution statement

LC, AL, AN, HML, TS and NCS conceived the idea. HML and TS conducted fieldwork. EK analysed part of the data. LC analysed the rest of data and did the statistical modelling. LC, AL, EK and AN wrote the manuscript. HML, TS and NCS provided editorial advice.

Supplementary material

442_2017_3922_MOESM1_ESM.docx (6.9 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 7110 kb)

References

  1. Ahola M, Laaksonen T, Sippola K, Eeva T, Rainio K, Lehikoinen E (2004) Variation in climate warming along the migration route uncouples arrival and breeding dates. Glob Change Biol 10:1610–1617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alerstam T, Lindström Å (1990) Optimal bird migration: the relative importance of time, energy and safety. In: Gwinner E (ed) Bird migration: the physiology and ecophysiology. Springer, Berlin, pp 331–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balbontín J, Møller AP, Hermosell IG, Marzal A, Reviriego M, de Lope F (2009) Individual responses in spring arrival date to ecological conditions during winter and migration in a migratory bird. J Anim Ecol 78:981–989CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartoń K (2015) MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference. R package version 1.15.1. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn
  5. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2013) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.0-5. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
  6. Bauböck L, Miller-Rushing AJ, Primack RB, Lloyd Evans TL, Wasserman FE (2012) Climate change does not affect protandry in seven passerines in North America. Wilson J Ornithol 124:208–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Both C (2010) Flexibility of timing of avian migration to climate change masked by environmental constraints en route. Curr Biol 20:243–248CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Both C, Visser ME (2001) Adjustment to climate change is constrained by arrival date in a long-distance migratory bird. Nature 411:296–298CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Both C, Artemyev AV, Blaauw B, Cowie RJ, Dekhuijzen AJ, Eeva T et al (2004) Large-scale geographical variation confirms that climate change causes birds to lay earlier. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:1657–1662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Both C, Bouwhuis S, Lessells CM, Visser ME (2006a) Climate change and population declines in a long-distance migratory bird. Nature 441:81–83CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Both C, Sanz JJ, Artemyev AA, Blaauw B, Cowie RJ, Dekhuijzen AJ et al (2006b) Pied flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca travelling from Africa to breed in Europe: differential effects of winter and migration conditions on breeding date. Ardea 94:511–525Google Scholar
  12. Both C, Bijlsma RG, Ouwehand J (2016) Repeatability in spring arrival dates in pied flycatchers varies among years and sexes. Ardea 104:3–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Both C, Burger C, Ouwehand J, Samplonius JM, Ubels R, Bijlsma RG (2017) Delayed age at first breeding and experimental removals show large non- breeding surplus in pied flycatchers. Ardea 105:43–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Briedis M, Hahn S, Adamík P (2017) Cold spell en route delays spring arrival and decreases apparent survival in a long-distance migratory songbird. BMC Ecol 17:11CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Cade BS, Noon BR (2003) A gentle introduction to quantile regression for ecologists. Front Ecol Environ 1:412–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Canal D, Jovani R, Potti J (2012) Male decisions or female accessibility? Spatiotemporal patterns of extra pair paternity in a songbird. Behav Ecol 23:1146–1153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chan K-S, Ripley B (2012) TSA: time series analysis. R package version 1.01. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=TSA
  19. Conklin JR, Battley PF, Potter MA (2013) Absolute consistency: individual versus population variation in annual-cycle schedules of a long-distance migrant bird. PLoS ONE 8:e54535CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Dale S, Rinden H, Slagsvold T (1992) Competition for a mate restricts mate search of female pied flycatchers. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 30:165–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. de la Hera I, Pulido F, Visser M (2014) Longitudinal data reveal ontogenetic changes in the wing morphology of a long-distance migratory bird. Ibis 156:209–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dunn PO, Winkler DW (2010) Effects of climate change on timing of breeding and reproductive success in birds. In: Møller AP, Fiedler WP, Berthold P (eds) Effects of climate change on birds. Oxford University Press, London, pp 113–128Google Scholar
  23. Fox J, Weisberg S (2011) An {R} companion to applied regression. 2nd Edition. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage. http://socserv.socsci.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Books/Companion
  24. Gienapp P, Bregnballe T (2012) Fitness consequences of timing of migration and breeding in cormorants. PLoS ONE 7:e46165CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Gordo O (2007) Why are bird migration dates shifting? A review of weather and climate effects on avian migratory phenology. Clim Res 35:37–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gordo O, Doi H (2012) Drivers of population variability in phenological responses to climate change in Japanese birds. Clim Res 54:95–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gordo O, Sanz JJ (2008) The relative importance of conditions in wintering and passage areas on spring arrival dates: the case of long-distance Iberian migrants. J Ornithol 149:199–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gordo O, Sanz JJ (2010) Impact of climate change on plant phenology in Mediterranean ecosystems. Glob Change Biol 16:1082–1106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gordo O, Tryjanowski P, Kosicki JZ, Fulín M (2013) Complex phenological changes and their consequences in the breeding success of a migratory bird, the white stork Ciconia ciconia. J Anim Ecol 82:1072–1086CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Gwinner E, Helm B (2003) Circannual and circadian contributions to the timing of avian migration. In: Berthold P, Gwinner E, Sonnenschein E (eds) avian migration. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 81–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Harnos A, Nóra Á, Kovács S, Lang Z, Csörgő T (2015) Increasing protandry in the spring migration of the pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca) in Central Europe. J Ornithol 156:543–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hüppop O, Hüppop K (2003) North Atlantic oscillation and timing of spring migration in birds. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:233–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hüppop O, Winkel W (2006) Climate change and timing of spring migration in the long-distance migrant Ficedula hypoleuca in central Europe: the role of spatially different temperature changes along migration routes. J Ornithol 147:344–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hurrell JW (1995) Decadal trends in the North Atlantic oscillation: regional temperatures and precipitation. Science 269:676–679CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. IPCC (2013) Climate Change 2013: the physical science basis. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  36. Johnson PCD (2014) Extension of Nakagawa & Schielzeth’s R2 GLMM to random slopes models. Meth Ecol Evol 6:133–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jonzén N, Lindén A, Ergon T, Knudsen E, Vik JO, Rubolini D et al (2006) Rapid advance of spring arrival dates in long-distance migratory birds. Science 312:1959–1961CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Kanamitsu M, Ebisuzaki W, Woollen J, Yang S-K, Hnilo JJ, Fiorino M, Potter GL (2002) NCEP-DOE AMIP-II reanalysis (R-2). Bull Am Meteor Soc 83:1631–1643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Knudsen E, Lindén A, Ergon T, Jonzén N, Vik JO, Knape J et al (2007) Characterizing bird migration phenology using data from standardized monitoring at bird observatories. Clim Res 35:59–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Knudsen E, Lindén A, Both C, Jonzén N, Pulido F, Saino N et al (2011) Challenging claims in the study of migratory birds and climate change. Biol Rev 86:928–946CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Koenker R (2015) Quantreg: Quantile Regression. R package version 5.19. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=quantreg
  42. Lundberg A, Alatalo RV (1992) The pied flycatcher. T & AD Poyser, LondonGoogle Scholar
  43. Martínez-de la Puente J, Merino S, Lobato E, Moreno J, Tomás G, Morales J (2009) Male nest-building activity influences clutch mass in pied flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca. Bird Study 56:264–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Menzel A, Sparks TH, Estrella N, Koch E, Aasa A, Ahas R et al (2006) European phenological response to climate change matches the warming pattern. Glob Change Biol 12:1969–1976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Møller AP, Merilä J (2004) Analysis and interpretation of long-term studies investigating responses to climate change. Adv Ecol Res 35:111–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Møller AP, Rubolini D, Lehikoinen E (2008) Populations of migratory bird species that did not show a phenological response to climate change are declining. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:16195–16200CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H (2010) Repeatability for Gaussian and non-Gaussian data: a practical guide for biologists. Biol Rev 85:935–956PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H (2013) A general and simple method for obtaining R 2 from Generalized Linear Mixed-effects Models. Meth Ecol Evol 4:133–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Newton I (2007) Weather-related mass-mortality events in migrants. Ibis 149:453–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Newton I (2008) The migration ecology of birds. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  51. Ouwehand J, Both C (2016) Alternate non-stop migration strategies of pied flycatchers to cross the Sahara desert. Biol Lett 12:20151060CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Ouwehand J, Both C (2017) African departure rather than migration speed determines variation in spring arrival in pied flycatchers. J Anim Ecol 86:88–97CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Ouwehand J, Ahola MP, Ausems ANMA et al (2016) Light-level geolocators reveal migratory connectivity in European populations of pied flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca. J Avian Biol 47:69–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pettorelli N, Vik JO, Mysterud A, Gaillard J-M, Tucker CJ, Stenseth NC (2005) Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological responses to environmental change. Trends Ecol Evol 20:503–510CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Potti J (1998) Arrival time from spring migration in male pied flycatchers: individual consistency and familial resemblance. Condor 100:702–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.R-project.org/
  57. Rainio K, Tøttrup AP, Lehikoinen E, Coppack T (2007) Effects of climate change on the degree of protandry in migratory songbirds. Clim Res 35:107–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Robson D, Barriocanal C (2011) Ecological conditions in wintering and passage areas as determinants of timing of spring migration in trans-Saharan migratory birds. J Anim Ecol 80:320–331CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Saino N, Szép T, Romano M, Rubolini D, Spina F, Møller AP (2004) Ecological conditions during winter predict arrival date at the breeding quarters in a trans-Saharan migratory bird. Ecol Lett 7:21–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Saino N, Ambrosini R, Rubolini D, von Hardenberg J, Provenzale A, Hüppop K et al (2011) Climate warming, ecological mismatch at arrival and population decline in migratory birds. Proc R Soc B 278:835–842CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Schaub M, Jenni L, Bairlein F (2008) Fuel stores, fuel accumulation, and the decision to depart from a migration stopover site. Behav Ecol 19:657–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sergio F, Tanferna A, De Stephanis R, López Jiménez L, Blas J, Tavecchia G et al (2014) Individual improvements and selective mortality shape lifelong migratory performance. Nature 515:410–413CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Sparks T, Tryjanowski P, Cooke A, Crick H, Kuźniak S (2007) Vertebrate phenology at similar latitudes: temperature responses differ between Poland and the United Kingdom. Clim Res 34:93–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Spottiswoode CN, Tøttrup AP, Coppack T (2006) Sexual selection predicts advancement of avian spring migration in response to climate change. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:3023–3029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stenseth NC, Ottersen G, Hurrell JW et al (2003) Studying climate effects on ecology through the use of climate indices: the North Atlantic Oscillation, El Niño Southern Oscillation and beyond. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:2087–2096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Studds CE, Marra PP (2011) Rainfall-induced changes in food availability modify the spring departure programme of a migratory bird. Proc R Soc Lond B 278:3437–3443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Svensson L (1992) Identification Guide to European Passerines. Fingraf AB, SödertäljeGoogle Scholar
  68. Tarka M, Hansson B, Hasselquist D (2015) Selection and evolutionary potential of spring arrival phenology in males and females of a migratory songbird. J Evol Biol 28:1024–1038CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Taylor B, Christie DA (2015) European pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca). In: del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J, Christie DA, de Juana E (eds) Handbook of the birds of the world alive. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, pp 128–129Google Scholar
  70. Tøttrup AP, Thorup K (2008) Sex-differentiated migration patterns, protandry and phenology in North European songbird populations. J Ornithol 149:161–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tøttrup AP, Thorup K, Rainio K, Yosef R, Lehikoinen E, Rahbek C (2008) Avian migrants adjust migration in response to environmental conditions en route. Biol Lett 4:685–688CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luis Cadahía
    • 1
  • Antonieta Labra
    • 1
    • 2
  • Endre Knudsen
    • 1
  • Anna Nilsson
    • 1
  • Helene M. Lampe
    • 1
  • Tore Slagsvold
    • 1
  • Nils Chr. Stenseth
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biosciences, Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES)University of OsloOsloNorway
  2. 2.Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Facultad de MedicinaUniversity of ChileSantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations