Aggression, interference, and the functional response of coral-feeding butterflyfishes
Functional responses describing how foraging rates change with respect to resource density are central to our understanding of interspecific interactions. Competitive interactions are an important determinant of foraging rates; however, the relationship between the exploitation and interference components of competition has received little empirical or theoretical consideration. Moreover, little is known about the relationship between aggressive behavioural interactions and interference competition. Using a natural gradient of consumer and resource densities, we empirically examine how aggressiveness relates to consumer–consumer encounter rates and foraging for four species of Chaetodon reef fish spanning a range of dietary niche breadths. The probability of aggression was most strongly associated with both total consumer and resource densities. In contrast, total encounter rates were best predicted by conspecific consumer density, and were highest for the most specialised consumer (Chaetodon trifascialis), not the most aggressive (Chaetodon baronessa). The most specialised consumer, not the most aggressive, also exhibited the largest reduction in foraging rates with increasing consumer density. Our results support the idea of a positive link between the exploitation and interference components of competition for the most specialised consumer. Moreover, our results caution against inferring the presence of ecological interactions (competition) from observations of behaviour (aggression and agonism) alone.
KeywordsTerritoriality Butterflyfish Chaetodontidae Competition Coral reef Prey risk
We thank James Cook University and the Australian Research Council for financial support; SAB was also supported by a Queensland Smart State Ph.D. fellowship. We thank E. Graham, S. Montanari, K. Nicolet, M. Norstad, and the staff of the Lizard Island Research Station for assistance in the field. We thank Craig Osenberg, Jeffrey Shima, and anonymous reviewers for constructive criticism that significantly improved this manuscript, and the JCU Ecological Modelling Research Group for support and feedback.
SAB, MSP and SRC conceived and designed the research; SAB and MSP conducted the fieldwork; SAB analysed the data and wrote the first draft of the manuscript, and all authors contributed to revisions.
- Adams ES (2001) Approaches to the study of territory size and shape. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 277–303Google Scholar
- Berumen ML, Pratchett MS (2006) Effects of resource availability on the competitive behaviour of butterflyfishes (Chaetondontidae). In: Proceedings of the 10th international coral reef symposium, pp 644–650Google Scholar
- Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multi-model inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Case TJ (2000) An illustrated guide to theoretical ecology. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- DeLong JP, Vasseur DA (2013) Linked exploitation and interference competition drives the variable behavior of a classic predator–prey system. Oikos 122:1393–1400Google Scholar
- Pratchett MS (2007) Dietary selection by coral-feeding butterflyfishes (Chaetodontidae) on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Raffles Bull Zool 14:155–160Google Scholar
- Pratchett MS, Berumen ML, Kapoor BG (eds) (2014) Biology of butterflyfishes. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
- Reese ES (1977) Coevolution of corals and coral feeding fishes of the family Chaetodontidae. In: Proceedings of the third international coral reef symposium, vol. 1, pp 267–274Google Scholar
- Turchin P (2003) Complex population dynamics: a theoretical/empirical synthesis. Princeton University Press, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
- Wood S (2006) Generalized additive models: an introduction with R. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
- Wood SN, Scheipl F (2014) gamm4: generalized additive mixed models using mgcv and lme4. R package version 0.2–3. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gamm4