Abstract
Predators can drive trait divergence among populations of prey by imposing differential selection on prey traits. Habitat characteristics can mediate predator selectivity by providing refuge for prey. We quantified the effects of stream characteristics on biases in the sizes of spawning salmon caught by bears (Ursus arctos and U. americanus) on the central coast of British Columbia, Canada by measuring size-biased predation on spawning chum (Oncorhynchus keta) and pink (O. gorbuscha) salmon in 12 streams with varying habitat characteristics. We tested the hypotheses that bears would catch larger than average salmon (size-biased predation) and that this bias toward larger fish would be higher in streams that provide less protection to spawning salmon from predation (e.g., less pools, wood, undercut banks). We then we tested for how such size biases in turn translate into differences among populations in the sizes of the fish. Bears caught larger-than-average salmon as the spawning season progressed and as predicted, this was most pronounced in streams with fewer refugia for the fish (i.e., wood and undercut banks). Salmon were marginally smaller in streams with more pronounced size-biased predation but this predictor was less reliable than physical characteristics of streams, with larger fish in wider, deeper streams. These results support the hypothesis that selective forces imposed by predators can be mediated by habitat characteristics, with potential consequences for physical traits of prey.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersson LC, Reynolds JD (2017) Habitat-mediated, selective consumption of spawning salmon by bears. Freshw Sci. Submitted
Bain MB, Stevenson NJ (1999) Aquatic habitat assessment: common methods. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda
Beacham TD (1984) Age and morphology of chum salmon in southern British Columbia. Trans Am Fish Soc 113:727–736
Beacham TD, Murray CB (1987) Adaptive variation in body size, age, morphology, egg size, and developmental biology of chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) in British Columbia. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 44:244–261
Braun DC, Reynolds JD (2011) Relationships between habitat characteristics and breeding population densities in sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 68:758–767. doi:10.1139/f2011-015
Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multi-model inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New York
Carlson SM, Quinn TP (2007) Ten years of varying lake level and selection on size-at-maturity in sockeye salmon. Ecology 88:2620–2629
Carlson SM, Rich HB, Quinn TP (2009) Does variation in selection imposed by bears drive divergence among populations in the size and shape of sockeye salmon? Evolution 63:1244–1261. doi:10.1111/j.l558-5646.2009.00643.x
Carlson SM, Quinn TP, Hendry AP (2011) Eco-evolutionary dynamics in Pacific salmon. Heredity 106:438–447. doi:10.1038/hdy.2010.163
R Core Team computing (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical. R foundation for statistical computing. http://www.r-project.org/
Cunningham CJ, Ruggerone GT, Quinn TP (2013) Size selectivity of predation by brown bears depends on the density of their sockeye salmon prey. Am Nat 181:663–673
Darimont CT, Reimchen TE, Paquet PC (2003) Foraging behaviour by gray wolves on salmon streams in Coastal British Columbia. Can J Zool 81:349–353. doi:10.1139/z02-246
Derocher AE, Lunn NJ, Stirling I (2004) Polar bears in a warming climate. Integr Comp Biol 44:163–176
Domenici P, Claireaux G, McKenzie DJ (2007) Environmental constraints upon locomotion and predator–prey interactions in aquatic organisms: an introduction. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B 362:1929–1936. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2078
English KK, Bocking RC, Irvine JR (1992) A robust procedure for estimating salmon escapement based on the area-under-the-curve method. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 49:1982–1989. doi:10.1139/f92-220
Fausti K, Dugaw D, Chambers J, Dykstra J, Sedell T,Moyer C, Lanigan S, Anderson A, Archer E, Henderson R (2004) Stream channel methods for core attributes. In: Multi-federal Agency Monitoring Program, Logan, Aquatic and Riparian Effectiveness Monitoring Program and PACFISH/INFISH Biological Opinions (PIBO), Corvallis (eds) Effectiveness monitoring for streams and riparian areas within the Pacific Northwest. http://www.reo.gov/monitoring/reports/watershed-reports-publications.shtml
Field RD, Reynolds JD (2011) Sea to sky: impacts of residual salmon-derived nutrients on estuarine breeding bird communities. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 278:3081–3088. doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.2731
Fleming IA, Gross MR (1989) Evolution of adult female life history and morphology in a Pacific salmon (coho: Oncorhynchus kisutch). Evolution 43:141–157
Fleming IA, Gross MR (1994) Breeding competition in a Pacific salmon (coho: Oncorhynchus kisutch): measures of natural and sexual selection. Evolution 48:637–657
Foote CJ (1990) An experimental comparison of male and female spawning territoriality in a Pacific salmon. Behaviour 115:283–314
Gelman A (2008) Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations. Stat Med 27:2865–2873
Gende SM, Quinn TP, Willson MF (2001) Consumption choice by bears feeding on salmon. Oecologia 127:372–382. doi:10.1007/s004420000590
Gende SM, Quinn TP, Hilborn R, Hendry AP, Dickerson B (2004) Brown bears selectively kill salmon with higher energy content but only in habitats that facilitate choice. Oikos 104:518–528. doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12762.x
Gilbert BK, Lanner RM (1995) Energy, diet selection and restoration of brown bear populations. International Conference on Bear Research and Management. French Ministry of the Environment and the Natural History Museum of Grenoble, vol 9. pp 231–240
Helfield JM, Naiman RJ (2006) Keystone interactions: salmon and bear in riparian forests of Alaska. Ecosystems 9:167–180
Hendry AP, Berg OK (1999) Secondary sexual characters, energy use, senescence, and the cost of reproduction in sockeye salmon. Can J Zool 77:1663–1675. doi:10.1139/z99-158
Hocking MD, Reynolds JD (2011) Impacts of salmon on riparian plant diversity. Science 331:1609–1612. doi:10.1126/science.1201079
Hocking MD, Dulvy NK, Reynolds JD, Ring RA, Reimchen TE (2013) Salmon subsidize an escape from the size spectrum. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 280:2012243
Janetski DJ, Chaloner DT, Tiegs SD, Lamberti GA (2009) Pacific salmon effects on stream ecosystems: a quantitative synthesis. Oecologia 159:583–595. doi:10.1007/s00442-008-1249-x
Lisle TE (1987) Using ‘residual depths’ to monitor pool depths independently of discharge. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment, Berkeley
Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H (2013) A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol Evol 4:133–142
Nelson RA (1980) Protein and fat metabolism in hibernating bears. Fed Proc 39:2955–2958
Nelson RA, Folk GE Jr, Pfeiffer EW, Craighead JJ, Jonkel CJ, Steiger DL (1983) Behavior, biochemistry, and hibernation in black, grizzly, and polar bears. Int Conf Bear Res Manag 5:284–290. doi:10.2307/3872551
O’Connell MF, Dempson JB, Reddin DG (1992) Evaluation of the impacts of major management changes in the Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar L.) fisheries of Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada, 1984–1988. ICES J Mar Sci 49:69–87
Palkovacs EP, Wasserman BA, Kinnison MT (2011) Eco-evolutionary trophic dynamics: loss of top predators drives trophic evolution and ecology of prey. PLoS ONE 6(4):e18879. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018879
Pelletier F, Garant D, Hendry AP (2009) Eco-evolutionary dynamics. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B 364:1483–1489. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0027
Quinn TP (2005) The behavior and ecology of Pacific salmon and trout. University of Washington Press, Seattle
Quinn TP, Buck GB (2001) Size- and sex-selective mortality of adult sockeye salmon: bears, gulls, and fish out of water. Trans Am Fish Soc 130:995–1005. doi:10.1577/1548-8659(2001)130
Quinn TP, Foote CJ (1994) The effects of body size and sexual dimorphism on the reproductive behaviour of sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka. Anim Behav 48:751–761
Quinn TP, Kinnison MT (1999) Size-selective and sex-selective predation by brown bears on sockeye salmon. Oecologia 121:273–282
Quinn TP, Hendry AP, Wetzel LA (1995) The influence of life history trade-offs and the size of incubation gravels on egg size variation in sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Oikos 74:425–438
Quinn TP, Hendry AP, Buck GB (2001a) Balancing natural and sexual selection in sockeye salmon: interactions between body size, reproductive opportunity and vulnerability to predation by bears. Evol Ecol Res 3:917–937
Quinn TP, Wetzel L, Bishop S, Overberg K, Rogers DE (2001b) Influence of breeding habitat on bear predation and age at maturity and sexual dimorphism of sockeye salmon populations. Can J Zool 79:1782–1793
Quinn TP, Gende SM, Ruggerone GT, Rogers DE (2003) Density-dependent predation by brown bears (Ursus arctos) on sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 60:553–562. doi:10.1139/F03-045
Quinn TP, Cunningham CJ, Wirsing AJ (2016) Diverse foraging opportunities drive the functional response of local and landscape-scale bear predation on Pacific salmon. Oecologia. In Press
Reimchen TE (1994) Further studies of predator and scavenger use of chum salmon in stream and estuarine habitats at Bag Harbour, Gwaii Haanas. Islands Ecological Research Press, Queen Charlotte City
Reimchen TE (2000) Some ecological and evolutionary aspects of bear-salmon interactions in coastal British Columbia. Can J Zool 78:448–457. doi:10.1139/z99-232
Ruggerone GT, Hanson R, Rogers DE (2000) Selective predation by brown bears (Ursus arctos) foraging on spawning sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Can J Zool 78:974–981
Sahashi G, Yoshiyama T (2016) A hump-shaped relationship between migration distance and adult pink salmon morphology suggests interactive effects of migration costs and bear predation. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 73:427–735
Schielzeth H (2010) Simple means to improve the interpretability of regression coefficients. Methods Ecol Evol 1:103–113. doi:10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00012.x
Schindler DE, Scheuerell MD, Moore JW, Gende SM, Francis TB, Palen WJ (2003) Pacific salmon and the ecology of coastal ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 1:31–37. doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0031:PSATEO]2.0.CO;2
Smith RD, Sidle RC, Porter PE, Noel JR (1993) Effects of experimental removal of woody debris on the channel morphology of a forest, gravel-bed stream. J Hydrol 152:153–178
Steen RP, Quinn TP (1999) Egg burial depth by sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka): implications for survival of embryos and natural selection on female body size. Can J Zool 77:836–841
Stirling I, Derocher AE (1993) Possible impacts of climatic warming on polar bears. Arctic 46:240–245
Svenning MA, Gullestad N (2002) Adaptations to stochastic environmental variations: the effects of seasonal temperatures on the migratory window of Svalbard Arctic Charr. Environ Biol Fishes 64:165–174. doi:10.1023/A:1016002102945
Vamosi SM (2005) On the role of enemies in divergence and diversification of prey: a review and synthesis. Can J Zool 83:894–910. doi:10.1139/z05-063
Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saleliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New York
Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Elphick CS (2010) A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods Ecol Evol 1:3–14
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the Heiltsuk First Nation for their support of our research. We thank Aaron Gaffney, Howard Humchitt, Jane Pendray, Ben Rabinovich, Michelle Segal, Mary Vasey, Marlene Wagner, Kirsten Wilcox and Ross Wilcox for field assistance and for making this such an enjoyable project. We also thank Isabelle Côté, Larry Dill and the Earth to Ocean Research Group at Simon Fraser University for their valuable project input. We thank Andy Cooper, Will Atlas, Joel Harding and Sean Godwin for their guidance in statistical analyses, and Lindsay Davidson for editing the manuscript. Finally, we thank Tom Quinn, Brian Shuter and an anonymous reviewer for suggestions that greatly improved this paper.
Author contribution statement
JDR obtained funding and supervised the project. LCA and JDR designed the study. LCA did the fieldwork and analyzed the data. LCA and JDR wrote the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
All applicable institutional and/or national guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Funding
This research was funded by Simon Fraser University, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and the Tom Buell BC Leadership Chair endowment funded by the Pacific Salmon Foundation and the BC Leading Edge Endowment Fund. Additional support was provided to LCA by the W. Garfield Weston Foundation.
Additional information
Communicated by Brian Shuter.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Andersson, L.C., Reynolds, J.D. Effects of habitat features on size-biased predation on salmon by bears. Oecologia 184, 101–114 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-017-3845-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-017-3845-0