Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 183, Issue 4, pp 1197–1210 | Cite as

Warmest extreme year in U.S. history alters thermal requirements for tree phenology

  • Jacob M. Carter
  • Maria E. Orive
  • Laci M. Gerhart
  • Jennifer H. Stern
  • Renée M. Marchin
  • Joane Nagel
  • Joy K. Ward
Global change ecology – original research

Abstract

The frequency of extreme warm years is increasing across the majority of the planet. Shifts in plant phenology in response to extreme years can influence plant survival, productivity, and synchrony with pollinators/herbivores. Despite extensive work on plant phenological responses to climate change, little is known about responses to extreme warm years, particularly at the intraspecific level. Here we investigate 43 populations of white ash trees (Fraxinus americana) from throughout the species range that were all grown in a common garden. We compared the timing of leaf emergence during the warmest year in U.S. history (2012) with relatively non-extreme years. We show that (a) leaf emergence among white ash populations was accelerated by 21 days on average during the extreme warm year of 2012 relative to non-extreme years; (b) rank order for the timing of leaf emergence was maintained among populations across extreme and non-extreme years, with southern populations emerging earlier than northern populations; (c) greater amounts of warming units accumulated prior to leaf emergence during the extreme warm year relative to non-extreme years, and this constrained the potential for even earlier leaf emergence by an average of 9 days among populations; and (d) the extreme warm year reduced the reliability of a relevant phenological model for white ash by producing a consistent bias toward earlier predicted leaf emergence relative to observations. These results demonstrate a critical need to better understand how extreme warm years will impact tree phenology, particularly at the intraspecific level.

Keywords

Bud break Climate change Extreme years Fraxinus Global change Leaf emergence Phenology Thermal models White ash 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank K. Becklin, J. Medeiros, K. Kluthe, E. Duffy, S. M. Walker II, T. Leibbrandt, and C. Bone for field assistance, as well as E. Luedeling, S.-J. Jeong, A. Richardson, M. Migliavacca, and M. T. Holder for helpful modeling advice. We thank the University of Kansas Field Station staff for maintaining the common garden. This work was supported by NSF CAREER and other IOS awards to JKW. An NSF C-CHANGE IGERT fellowship supported JMC. MEO and JKW also acknowledge University of Kansas GRF grants. The Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and the University of Kansas Research Investment Council also provided funding.

Author contribution statement

JMC, MEO, RMM and JKW conceived and designed the experiments. JMC, LMG, JHS, RMM and JKW conducted field work, and MEO, JMC and JKW developed and performed modeling and statistical analyses. JMC, MEO, JN and JKW wrote the manuscript; all authors provided editorial advice.

Supplementary material

442_2017_3838_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (445 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 444 kb)

References

  1. Anderson JL, Richardson EA (1986) Validation of winter chill unit and flower bud phenology models for ‘monmorency’ sour cherry. Acta Hortic 184:71–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Augspurger CK (2013) Reconstructing patterns of temperature, phenology, and frost damage over 124 years: spring damage risk is increasing. Ecology 94:41–50CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Basler D, Körner C (2012) Photoperiod sensitivity of bud burst in 14 temperate forest tree species. Agric For Meteorol 165:73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borchert R, Robertson K, Schwartz MD, Williams-Linera G (2005) Phenology of temperate trees in tropical climates. Int J Biometerol 50:57–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  6. Cesaraccio C, Spano D, Snyder RL, Duce P (2004) Chilling and forcing model to predict bud-burst of crop and forest species. Agric For Meteorol 126:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.03.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chang CT, Wang HC, Huang CY (2013) Impacts of vegetation onset time on the net primary productivity in a mountainous island in Pacific Asia. Environ Res Lett 8:11. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/045030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chang H, Castro CL, Carillo CM (2015) The more extreme nature of U.S. warm season climate in the observational record and two “well-performing” dynamically downscaled CMIP3 models. J Geophys Res 120:8244–8263Google Scholar
  9. Chuine I, Cour P, Rousseau DD (1998) Fitting models predicting dates of flowering of temperate-zone trees using simulated annealing. Plant Cell Environ 21:455–466. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.1998.00299.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chuine I, Kramer K, Hanninen H (2003) Plant development models. In: Schwartz M (ed) Phenology: an integrative environmental science. Springer, Rotterdam, pp 217–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark JS, Salk C, Melillo J, Mohan J, Anten N (2014) Tree phenology responses to winter chilling, spring warming, at north and south range limits. Funct Ecol 28:1344–1355. doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.12309 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cleland EE, Allen JM, Crimmins TM, Dunne JA, Pau S, Travers SE, Zavaleta ES, Wolkovich EM (2012) Phenological tracking enables positive species responses to climate change. Ecology 93:1765–1771CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cook BI, Wolkovich EM, Parmesan C (2012) Divergent response to spring and winter warming drive community level flowering trends. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:9000–9005. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1118364109 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Cooke JE, Eriksson ME, Junttila O (2012) The dynamic nature of bud dormancy in trees: environmental control and molecular mechanisms. Plant Cell Environ 10:1707–1728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dantec CF, Vitasse Y, Bonhomme M, Louvet JM, Kremer A, Delzon S (2014) Chilling and heat requirements for leaf unfolding in European beech and sessile oak populations at the southern limit of their distribution range. Int J Biometereol 58:1853–1864. doi: 10.1007/s00484-014-0787-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Donat MG, Alexander LV, Yang H, Durre I, Vose R, Dunn RJH, Willett KM, Aguilar E, Brunet M, Caesar J, Hewitson B, Jack C, Klein Tank AMG, Kruger AC, Marengo J, Peterson TC, Renom M, Oria Rojas C, Rusticucci M, Salinger J, Elrayah AS, Sekele SS, Srivastava AK, Trewin B, Villarroel C, Vincent LA, Zhai P, Zhang X, Kitching S (2013) Updated analyses of temperature and precipitation extreme indices since the beginning of the twentieth century: the HadEX2 dataset. J Geophys Res Atmos 118:2098–2118. doi: 10.1002/jgrd.50150 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ellwood ER, Temple SA, Primack RB, Bradley NL, Davis CC (2013) Record-breaking early flowering in the Eastern United States. PLoS One 8:9. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053788 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fahey RT (2016) Variation in responsiveness of woody plant leaf out phenology to anomalous spring onset. Ecosphere. doi: 10.1002/ecs2.1209 Google Scholar
  19. Forrest JRK (2015) Plant-pollinator interactions and phenological change: what can we learn about climate impacts from experiments and observations? Oikos 124:4–13. doi: 10.1111/oik.01386 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Friedl MA, Gray JM, Melaas EK, Richardson AD, Hufkens K, Keenan TF, Bailey A, O’Keefe J (2014) A tale of two springs: using recent climate anomalies to characterize the sensitivity of temperate forest phenology to climate change. Environ Res Lett 9:9. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/9/5/054006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fu YH, Campioli M, Deckmyn G, Janssens IA (2013) Sensitivity of leaf unfolding to experimental warming in three temperate tree species. Agric For Meteorol 181:125–132. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.07.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hansen J, Sato M, Ruedy R (2012) Perception of climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:E2415–E2423. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1205276109 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Hunter AF, Lechowicz MJ (1992) Predicting the timing of budburst in temperate trees. J Appl Ecol 29:597–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. IPCC (2012) Managing the risks of extreme events and disaster to advance climate change adaptation. A special report of working groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  25. IPCC (2013) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  26. Jeong S-J, Ho C-H, Gim H-J, Brown ME (2011) Phenology shifts at start vs. end of growing season in temperate vegetation over the Northern Hemisphere for the period 1982–2008. Glob Chang Biol 17:2385–2399. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02397.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jeong S-J, Medvigy D, Shevliakova E, Malyshev S (2012) Uncertainties in terrestrial carbon budgets related to spring phenology. J Geophys Res. doi: 10.1029/2011JG001868 Google Scholar
  28. Laube J, Sparks TH, Estrella N, Hofler J, Ankerst DP, Menzel A (2014) Chilling outweighs photoperiod in preventing precocious spring development. Glob Chang Biol 20:170–182. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12360 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Liang L (2015) Geographic variations in spring and autumn phenology of white ash in a common garden. Phys Geogr. doi: 10.1080/02723646.2015.1123538 Google Scholar
  30. Luedeling E, Brown PH (2011) A global analysis of the comparability of winter chill models for fruit and nut trees. Int J Biometeorol 55:411–421. doi: 10.1007/s00484-010-0352-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Luedeling E, Zhang MH, McGranahan G, Leslie C (2009) Validation of winter chill models using historic records of walnut phenology. Agric For Meteorol 149:1854–1864. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.06.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Luterbacher J, Liniger MA, Menzel A, Estrella N, Della-Marta PM, Pfister C, Rutishauser T, Xoplaki E (2007) Exceptional European warmth of autumn 2006 and winter 2007: Historical context, the underlying dynamics, and its phenological impacts. Geophys Res Lett 34:6. doi: 10.1029/2007gl029951 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Marchin RM, Sage EL, Ward JK (2008) Population-level variation of Fraxinus americana (white ash) is influenced by precipitation differences across the native range. Tree Physiol 28:151–159CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Marchin RM, Salk CF, Hoffmann WA, Dunn RD (2015) Temperature alone does not explain phenological variation of diverse temperate plants under experimental warming. Glob Chang Biol 21:3138–3151CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Migliavacca M, Sonnentag O, Keenan TF, Cescatti A, O’Keefe J, Richardson AD (2012) On the uncertainty of phenological response to climate change, and implications for a terrestrial biosphere model. Biogeosciences 9:2063–2083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Morin X, Lechowicz MJ, Augspurger C, O’Keefe J, Viner D, Chuine I (2009) Leaf phenology in 22 North American tree species during the 21st century. Glob Chang Biol 15:961–975. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01735.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mutiibwa D, Vavrus S, McAfee S, Albright T (2015) Recent spatiotemporal patterns in temperature extremes across conterminous United States. J Geophys Res Atmos 120:7378–7392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. National Weather Service (2014) Monthly and seasonal mean temperature for Topeka, KSGoogle Scholar
  39. NOAA (2012) State of the climate: national overview for annual 2012Google Scholar
  40. Pletsers A, Caffarra A, Kelleher C, Donnelly A (2015) Chilling temperature and photoperiod influence the timing of bud burst in juvenile Betula pubescens Ehrh. and Populus tremula L. trees. Ann For Sci 72:941–953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Poland TM, McCullough DG (2006) Emerald ash borer: invasion of the urban forest and the threat to North America’s ash resource. J For 104:118–124Google Scholar
  42. Polgar CA, Primack RB (2011) Leaf-out phenology of temperate woody plants: from trees to ecosystems. New Phytol 191:926–941. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03803.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Polgar CA, Gallinat A, Primack RB (2013) Drivers of leaf-out phenology and their implications for species invasions: insights from Thoreau’s Concord. New Phytol 202:106–115CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Press WH, Teulosky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP (1992) Numerical recipes in C: the art of scientific computing, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. Primack RB, Laube J, Gallinat A, Menzel A (2015) From observations to experiments in phenology: investigating climate change impacts on trees and shrubs using dormant twigs. Ann Bot 116:889–897CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Rea R, Eccel E (2006) Phenological models for blooming of apple in a mountainous region. Int J Biometeorol 51:1–16. doi: 10.1007/s00484-006-0043-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Richardson EA, Seeley SD, Walker DR (1974) A model for estimating the completion of rest for ‘Redhaven’ and ‘Elberta’ peach trees. HortSci 9:331–332Google Scholar
  48. Rousi M, Pusenius J (2005) Variations in phenology and growth of European white birch (Betula pendula) clones. Tree Physiol 25:201–210CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Rutishauser T, Luterbacher J, Defila C, Frank D, Wanner H (2008) Swiss spring plant phenology 2007: Extremes, a multi-century perspective, and changes in temperature sensitivity. Geophys Res Lett 35:5. doi: 10.1029/2007gl032545 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Salk CF (2011) Will the timing of temperate deciduous trees’ budburst and leaf senescence keep up with a warming climate? PhD dissertation, Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USAGoogle Scholar
  51. Sanz-Pérez V, Castro-Díez P, Valladares F (2009) Differential and interactive effects of temperature and photoperiod on budburst and carbon reserves in two co-occurring Mediterranean oaks. Plant Biol 11:142–151. doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2008.00119.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Suzuki M, Yoda K, Suzuki H (1996) Phenological comparison of the onset of vessel formation between ring-porous and diffuse-porous deciduous trees in a Japanese temperate forest. IAWA J 17:431–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. United States Weather Bureau (1942) Kansas weather and climate. Kansas State Printing Plant, W.C. Austin, State Printer, TopekaGoogle Scholar
  54. Vihera-Aarnio A, Sutinen S, Partanen J, Hakkinen R (2014) Internal development of vegetative buds of Norway spruce trees in relation to accumulated chilling and forcing temperatures. Tree Physiol 34:547–556. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpu038 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Vitasse Y, François C, Delpierre N, Dufrêne E, Kremer A, Chuine I, Delzon S (2011) Assessing the effects of climate change on the phenology of European temperate trees. Agric For Meteorol 151:969–980. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.03.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Vitasse Y, Lenz A, Kollas C, Randin CF, Hoch G, Körner C (2014a) Genetic vs. non-genetic responses of leaf morphology and growth to elevation in temperate tree species. Funct Ecol 28:243–252. doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.12161 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vitasse Y, Lenz A, Korner C (2014b) The interaction between freezing tolerance and phenology in temperate deciduous trees. Front Plant Sci 5:541. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00541 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Wang J, Ives NE, Lechowicz MJ (1992) The relation of foliar phenology to xylem embolism in trees. Funct Ecol 6:469–475. doi: 10.2307/2389285 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Way DA, Montgomery RA (2014) Photoperiod constraints on tree phenology, performance and migration in a warming world. Plant Cell Environ 38(9):1725–1736. doi: 10.1111/pce.12431 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Weaver SJ, Kumar A, Chen MY (2014) Recent increases in extreme temperature occurrence over land. Geophys Res Lett 41:4669–4675. doi: 10.1002/2014gl060300 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yordanov YS, Ma C, Strauss SH, Busov VB (2014) EARLY BUD-BREAK 1 (EBB1) is a regulator of release from seasonal dormancy in poplar trees. Proc Natl Acad of Sci USA 111:10001–10006. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1405621111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Yu H, Luedeling E, Xu J (2010) Winter and spring warming result in delayed spring phenology on the Tibetan Plateau. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:22151–22156. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1012490107 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Zohner C, Renner S (2014) Common garden comparison of the leaf-out phenology of woody species from different native climates, combined with herbarium records, forecasts long-term change. Ecol Lett 17:1016–1025CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jacob M. Carter
    • 1
  • Maria E. Orive
    • 1
  • Laci M. Gerhart
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jennifer H. Stern
    • 1
  • Renée M. Marchin
    • 3
  • Joane Nagel
    • 4
  • Joy K. Ward
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA
  2. 2.Deparment of GeographyKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA
  3. 3.Centre for Carbon, Water and FoodUniversity of SydneyCamdenAustralia
  4. 4.Department of SociologyUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA

Personalised recommendations