Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 182, Issue 1, pp 71–84 | Cite as

A kelp with integrity: Macrocystis pyrifera prioritises tissue maintenance in response to nitrogen fertilisation

  • Tiffany A. Stephens
  • Christopher D. Hepburn
Physiological ecology – original research

Abstract

Our understanding of the response of vascular, terrestrial plants to nitrogen (N) addition is advanced and provides the foundation for modern agriculture. In comparison, information on responses of marine macroalgae to increased nitrogen is far less developed. We investigated how in situ pulses of nitrate (NO3 ) affected the growth and N physiology of Macrocystis pyrifera by adding N using potassium nitrate dissolution blocks during a period of low seawater N concentration. Multiple parameters (e.g. growth, pigments, soluble NO3 ) were measured in distinct tissues throughout entire fronds (apical meristem, stipe, adult blade, mature blade, sporophyll, and holdfast). Unexpectedly, N fertilisation did not enhance elongation rates within the frond, but instead thickness (biomass per unit area) increased in adult blades. Increased blade thickness may have enhanced tissue integrity as fertilised kelp had lower rates of blade erosion. Tissue chemistry also responded to enrichment; pigmentation, soluble NO3 , and % N were higher throughout fertilised fronds. Labelled 15N traced N uptake and translocation from N sources in the kelp canopy to sinks in the holdfast, 10 m below. This is the first evidence of long-distance (>1 m) transport of N in macroalgae. Patterns in physiological parameters suggest that M. pyrifera displays functional differentiation between canopy and basal tissues that may aid in nutrient-tolerance strategies, similar to those seen in higher plants and unlike those seen in more simple algae (i.e. non-kelps). This study highlights how little we know about N additions and N-use strategies within kelp compared to the wealth of literature available for higher plants.

Keywords

Growth Nutrient limitation Translocation Stable isotope Differentiation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the staff and students of the University of Otago Marine Science Department, the Portobello Marine Laboratory, and Liina Pajusalu for providing assistance in the field. David Duggins provided useful comments during the final stages of preparation of this manuscript, and input from reviewers on its first submission improved the clarity. This work was funded by a University of Otago International Postgraduate Scholarship and postgraduate research funding to T. A. S., and was supplemented by Departmental Funding from C. D. H.

Author contribution statement

T. A. S. and C. D. H. conceived the experiment. T. A. S. was responsible for the experimental design, performed the lab and field experiments and did the chemical and data analyses. T. A. S. wrote the manuscript with editorial advice from C. D. H.

Compliance with ethical standards

Funding

This research was not funded by any body independent of the University of Otago. It was funded through the Marine Science Department at the University of Otago via postgraduate research funding to T. A. S. and personal research funds given to C. D. H. as part of his professorship.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aerts R, Chapin FS (2000) The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: a re-evaluation of processes and patterns. Adv Ecol Res 30:1–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anten NPR, Martínez-Ramos M, Ackerly DD (2003) Defoliation and growth in an understory palm: quantifying the contributions of compensatory responses. Ecology 84(11):2905–2918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armitage AR, Frankovich TA, Fourqurean JW (2011) Long-term effects of adding nutrients to an oligotrophic coastal environment. Ecosystems 14(3):430–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barsanti L, Paolo G (2014) Algae: anatomy, biochemistry and biotechnology, 2nd edn., vol 1. CRC, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Beardall J, Roberts S, Millhouse J (1991) Effects of nitrogen limitation on uptake of inorganic carbon and specific activity of ribulose-1,5-biphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase in green microalgae. Can J Bot 69(5):1146–1150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown MT, Nyman MA, Keogh JA, Chin NKM (1997) Seasonal growth of the giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera in New Zealand. Mar Biol 129(3):417–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Champan ARO, Craigie JS (1977) Seasonal growth in Laminaria longicruris: relations with dissolved inorganic nutrients and internal reserves of nitrogen. Mar Biol 40(3):197–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chapin FS III (1980) The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11:233–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chapin FS III, Vitousek PM, Van Cleve K (1986) The nature of nutrient limitation in plant communities. Am Nat 127(1):48–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clendenning K (1971) Photosynthesis and general development. In: North WJ (ed) The biology of the giant kelp beds (Macrocystis pyrifera) in California. Hedwigia, Von Cramer, pp 257–263Google Scholar
  11. Colombo-Pallotta MF, García-Mendoza E, Ladah LB (2006) Photosynthetic performance, light absorption, and pigment composition of Macrocystis pyrifera (Laminariales, Phaeophyceae) blades from different depths. J Phycol 42(6):1225–1234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dean TA, Jacobsen FR (1986) Nutrient-limited growth of juvenile kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera, during the 1982–1984 “El Niño” in southern California. Mar Biol 90(4):597–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Desmond MJ, Pritchard DW, Hepburn CD (2015) Light limitation within southern New Zealand kelp forest communities. PLoS One 10(4):e0123676. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123676 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Drobnitch ST, Jensen KH, Prentice P, Pittermann J (2015) Convergent evolution of vascular optimization in kelp (Laminariales). Proc R Soc B 282:20151667. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.1667 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Duncan MJ, Harrison PJ (1982) Comparison of solvente for extracting chlorophylls from marine Macrophytes. Bot Mar 25(9):445–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Evans G (1972) The quantitative analysis of plant growth. Blackwell Scientific, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Ferdie M, Fourqurean JW (2004) Responses of seagrass communities to fertilization along a gradient of relative availability of nitrogen and phosphorus in a carbonate environment. Limnol Oceanogr 49(6):1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fox MD (2013) Resource translocation drives δ13C fractionation during recovery from disturbance in giant kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera. J Phycol 49(5):811–815PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Foyer CH, Ferrario-Méry S, Noctor G (2001) Interactions between carbon and nitrogen metabolism. In: Plant nitrogen. Springer Berlin Heidelberg,  pp 237–254Google Scholar
  20. Fry B (2007) Stable isotope ecology. Springer Science & Business MediaGoogle Scholar
  21. Gao X, Agatsuma Y, Taniguchi K (2013) Effect of nitrate fertilization of gametophytes of the kelp Undaria pinnatifida on growth and maturation of the sporophytes cultivated in Matsushima Bay, northern Honshu, Japan. Aquacult Int 21(1):53–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gerard GA (1982a) In situ rates of nitrate uptake by giant kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera (L.) C. Agardh: tissue differences, environmental effects, and predictions of nitrogen-limited growth. J Exp Biol 62(3):211–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gerard VA (1982b) Growth and utilization of internal nitrogen reserves by the giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera in a low-nitrogen environment. Mar Biol 66(1):27–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Graham MH, Vasquez JA, Buschmann AH (2007) Global ecology of the giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera: from ecotypes to ecosystems. In: Gibson RN, Atkinson RJA, Gordon JM (eds) Oceanography and marine biology: an annual review. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 50–62Google Scholar
  25. Graneli E, Sündback K (1985) The response of planktonic and microbenthic algal assemblages to nutrient enrichment in shallow coastal waters, southwest Sweden. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 85:253–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Grime JP (1977) Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. Am Nat 222:1169–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hepburn CD (2003) Macrocystis and associated epifauana. PhD thesis, University of Otago, DunedinGoogle Scholar
  28. Hepburn CD, Holborow JD, Wing SR, Frew RD, Hurd CL (2007) Exposure to waves enhances the growth rate and nitrogen status of the giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 339:99–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hepburn CD, Frew RD, Hurd CL (2011) Uptake and transport of nitrogen derived from sessile epifauna in the giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera. Aquat Biol 14:121–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hernández I, Peralta G, Pérez-Lloréns L, Vergara JJ (1997) Biomass and dynamics of growth of Ulva species in Palmones River estuary. J Phycol 33:764–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Howarth RW (1988) Nutrient limitation of net primary production in marine ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol 19(1):1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Howarth RW, Billen G, Swaney D, Townsend A, Jaworski N, Lajtha K, Downing JA, Elmgren R, Caraco N, Jordan T, Berendse R, Freney J, Kudeyarov V, Murdoch P, Zhao-Liang Z (1996) Regional nitrogen budgets and riverine N and P fluxes for the drainages to the North Atlantic Ocean: natural and human influences. In: Nitrogen cycling in the North Atlantic Ocean and its watersheds. Springer, Dordrecht,  pp 75–139Google Scholar
  33. Huppe HC, Turpin DH (1994) Integration of carbon and nitrogen metabolism in plant and algal cells. Annu Rev Plant Biol 45(1):577–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kain JM (1989) The seasons in the subtidal. Brit Phycol J 24:203–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Konotchick T, Parnell PE, Dayton P, Leichter JJ (2012) Vertical distribution of Macrocystis pyrifera nutrient exposure in southern California. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 106:85–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Konotchick T, Dupont CL, Valas R, Badger JH, Allen AE (2013) Transcriptomic analysis of metabolic function in the giant kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera, across depth and season. New Phytol. doi: 10.1111/nph.12160 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Lamport DTA (1965) The protein component of primary cell walls. In: Preston RD (ed) Advances in botanical research.. Academic Press, OrlandoGoogle Scholar
  38. Maloney B, Iliffe TM, Gelwick F, Quigg A (2011) Effect of nutrient enrichment on naturally occurring macroalgal species in six cave pools in Bermuda. Phycologia 50(2):132–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Manley SL (1983) Composition of sieve tube sap from Macrocystis pyrifera (Phaeophyta) with emphasis on the inorganic constituents. J Phycol 19:118–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mann K (1973) Seaweeds—their productivity and strategy for growth. Science 182:975–981CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Martínez B, Pato LS, Rico JM (2012) Nutrient uptake and growth responses of three intertidal macroalgae with perennial, opportunistic and summer-annual strategies. Aquat Bot 96:14–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McGlathery KJ, Pedersen MF (1999) The effect of growth irradiance on the coupling of carbon and nitrogen metabolism in Chaetomorpha linum (Chlorophyta). J Phycol 35:721–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McGlathery KJ, Pedersen MF, Borum J (1996) Changes in intracellular nitrogen pools and feedback controls on nitrogen uptake in Chaetomorpha linum (Chlorophyta). J Phycol 32(3):393–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Moore JW, Semmens BX (2008) Incorporating uncertainty and prior information into stable isotope mixing models. Ecol Lett 11(5):470–480CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Neushul M (1971) Species of Macrocystis pyrifera with particular reference to those of North and South America. Nova Hedw 32:211–222Google Scholar
  46. North WJ (1971) The biology of giant kelp beds (Macrocystis pyrifera) in California: introduction and background. Nova Hedw 32:1–68Google Scholar
  47. North WJ, Zimmerman RC (1984) Influences of macronutrients and water temperatures on summertime survival of Macrocystis pyrifera canopies. Hydrobiologia 116–117(1):419–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pastor J, Aber JD, McClaugherty CA, Melillo JM (1984) Aboveground production and N and P cycling along a nitrogen mineralization gradient on Blackhawk Island, Wisconsin. Ecology 65:265–268Google Scholar
  49. Pedersen MF, Borum J (1996) Nutrient control of algal growth in estuarine waters. Nutrient limitation and the importance of nitrogen requirements and nitrogen storage among phytoplankton and species of macroalgae. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 142:261–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pedersen MF, Borum J (1997) Nutrient control of estuarine macroalgae: growth strategy and the balance between nitrogen requirements and uptake. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 161:155–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Perissinotto R, McQuaid CD (1992) Deep occurrence of the giant kelp Macrocystis laevis in the Southern Ocean. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 81:89–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pfister CA, Van Alstyne KL (2003) An experimental assessment of the effects of nutrient enhancement on the intertidal kelp Hedophyllum sessile (Laminariales, Phaeophyceae). J Phycol 39(2):285–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Poorter H, Remkes C, Lambers H (1990) Carbon and nitrogen economy of 24 wild species differing in relative growth rate. Plant Physiol 94:621–627CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Raven JA (2003) Long-distance transport in non-vascular plants. Plant Cell Environ 26(1):73–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Raven JA, Wollenweber B, Handley LL (1992) A comparison of ammonium and nitrate as nitrogen sources for photolithotrophs. New Phytol 19–32Google Scholar
  56. Reich PB, Walters MB, Ellsworth DS (1991) Leaf age and season influence the relationships between leaf nitrogen, leaf mass per area and photosynthesis in maple and oak trees. Plant Cell Environ 14(3):251–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Reiter WD (1998) Arabidopsis thaliana as a model system to study synthesis, structure, and function of the plant cell wall. Plant Physiol Biochem 36(1–2):167–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schilling G, Adgo E, Schulze J (2006) Carbon costs of nitrate reduction in broad bean (Vicia faba L.) and pea (Pisum sativum L.) plants. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 169(5):691–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schmitz K, Srivastava LM (1979) Long distance transport in Macrocystis integrifolia. I. Translocation of 14C-labeled assimilates. Plant Physiol 63(6):995–1002CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Seely GR, Duncan MJ, Vidaver WE (1972) Preparative and analytical extraction of pigments from brown algae with dimethyl sulfoxide. Mar Biol 12(2):184–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Shemesh A, Macko SA, Charles CD, Rau GH (1993) Isotopic evidence for reduced productivity in the glacial Southern Ocean. Science 262(5132):407–410CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Shivji MS (1985) Interactive effects of light and nitrogen on growth and chemical composition of juvenile Macrocystis pyrifera (L.) C. Ag. (Phaeophyta) sporophytes. J Exp Biol 89(1):81–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Stephens TA, Hepburn CD (2014) Mass-transfer gradients across kelp beds influence Macrocystis pyrifera growth over small spatial scales. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 515:97–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Syrett P (1981) Nitrogen metabolism of microalgae. Can Bull Fish Aquat Sci 1(1):12Google Scholar
  65. Teichberg M, Heffner LR, Fox S, Valiela I (2007) Nitrate reductase and glutamine synthetase activity, internal N pools, and growth of Ulva lactuca: responses to long and short-term N supply. Mar Biol 151(4):1249–1259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tilman D (1984) Plant dominance along an experimental nutrient gradient. Ecology 65:1445–1453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wright IJ, Cannon K (2001) Relationships between leaf lifespan and structural defences in a low-nutrient, sclerophyll flora. Funct Ecol 15:351–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zimmerman RC, Kremer JN (1984) Episodic nutrient supply to a kelp forest ecosystem in Southern California. J Mar Res 42(3):591–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zimmerman RC, Kremer JN (1986) In situ growth and chemical composition of the giant kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera: response to temporal changes in ambient nutrient availability. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 27:277–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Marine ScienceUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations