Understanding a migratory species in a changing world: climatic effects and demographic declines in the western monarch revealed by four decades of intensive monitoring
- 1k Downloads
Migratory animals pose unique challenges for conservation biologists, and we have much to learn about how migratory species respond to drivers of global change. Research has cast doubt on the stability of the eastern monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) population in North America, but the western monarchs have not been as intensively examined. Using a Bayesian hierarchical model, sightings of western monarchs over approximately 40 years were investigated using summer flight records from ten sites along an elevational transect in Northern California. Multiple weather variables were examined, including local and regional temperature and precipitation. Population trends from the ten focal sites and a subset of western overwintering sites were compared to summer and overwintering data from the eastern migration. Records showed western overwintering grounds and western breeding grounds had negative trends over time, with declines concentrated early in the breeding season, which were potentially more severe than in the eastern population. Temporal variation in the western monarch also appears to be largely independent of (uncorrelated with) the dynamics in the east. For our focal sites, warmer temperatures had positive effects during winter and spring, and precipitation had a positive effect during spring. These climatic associations add to our understanding of biotic-abiotic interactions in a migratory butterfly, but shifting climatic conditions do not explain the overall, long-term, negative population trajectory observed in our data.
KeywordsClimate change Danaus plexippus Hierarchical model Monarch butterfly Western population
We thank the citizen science participants of the Western Monarch Thanksgiving Count and the Fourth of July Butterfly Counts, as well as two anonymous reviewers of an early draft. Much appreciation goes to the Xerces Society and the North American Butterfly Association, respectively associated with the aforementioned counts, for making the data publicly available and providing them online through Monarch Net. This research was supported in part by the Trevor James McMinn professorship to M. L. F. and by the National Science Foundation (DEB-1050726, and DEB-1145609).
Author contribution statement
A. E. E. and M. L. F. conceived the idea. A. M. S. collected the data. C. C. N., A. E. E., J. G. H., M. L. F., and J. A. F. developed the statistical models; J. H. T. and D. P. W. managed and archived the data; A. E. E., J. G. H., and M. L. F. wrote the manuscript, while A. M. S., C. C. N., J. H. T., D. P. W., and J. A. F. reviewed the manuscript before submission.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Brindza LJ, Brower LP, Davis AK, Van Hook T (2008) Comparative success of monarch butterfly migration to overwintering sites in Mexico from inland and coastal sites in Virginia. J Lepid Soc 62:189–200Google Scholar
- Brower LP (1995) Understanding and misunderstanding the migration of the monarch butterfly (Nymphalidae) in North America: 1857–1995. J Lepid Soc 49:304–385Google Scholar
- Congdon P (2014) Applied Bayesian modeling, vol. 595. WileyGoogle Scholar
- Davis, AK, Dyer LA (2015) Long-term trends in eastern North American monarch butterflies: a collection of studies focusing on spring, summer, and fall dynamics. Ann Entomol Soc Am 1–3Google Scholar
- Frey DF, Schaffer A (2004) Spatial and temporal patterns of monarch overwintering abundance in Western North America. Monarch butterfly biology and conservation. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, pp 167–176Google Scholar
- Harrison JG, Shapiro AM, Espeset AE, Nice CC, Jahner JP, Forister ML (2015) Species with more volatile population dynamics are differentially impacted by weather. Biol Lett 11:5Google Scholar
- Jepsen S, Black SH (2015) Understanding and conserving the Western North American monarch population. In: Oberhauser KR, Altizer NS (eds) Monarchs in a changing world. Biology and conservation of an iconic butterfly, chapter 11. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
- Krischik V, Rogers M, Gupta G, Varshney A (2015) Soil-applied imidacloprid translocates to ornamental flowers and reduces survival of adult Coleomegilla maculata, Harmonia axyridis, and Hippodamia convergens lady beetles, and larval Danaus plexippus and Vanessa cardui butterflies. PLoS One 10:22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Monarch Net (2015) Monarch abundance data. http://monarchnet.uga.edu/
- Morris GM, Kline C, Morris SM (2015) Status of Danaus plexippus population in Arizona. J Lepid Soc 69:91–107Google Scholar
- North American Butterfly Association (NABA) (2015) NABA butterfly counts from 1990 to 2009Google Scholar
- Oberhauser KS, Nail KR, Altizer SM (2015) Monarchs in a changing world: biology and conservation of an iconic butterfly. Comstock, IthacaGoogle Scholar
- Parmesan C (2006) Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37:637–669Google Scholar
- Plummer M (2013) JAGS: a program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling. Version 3:4Google Scholar
- Plummer M (2015) Package rjags. Version 3-15Google Scholar
- PRISM Climate Group (2015) Weather data. Oregon State University. http://prism.oregonstate.edu/
- Ries L, Taron DJ, Rendón-Salinas E (2015) The disconnect between summer and winter monarch trends for the Eastern migratory population: possible links to differing drivers. Ann Entomol Soc Am 1–9Google Scholar
- Royle JA, Dorazio RM (2008) Hierarchical modeling and inference in ecology: the analysis of data from populations, metapopulations and communities. Academic Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
- R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Version 3.1.2. R Foundation for Statistical computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- Shapiro AM (2014) Species presence by site. Art Shapiro’s butterfly site. http://butterfly.ucdavis.edu/
- The Xerces Society (2015)Western Monarch Thanksgiving Count from 1997 to 2014. http://www.xerces.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/WMTC-Data-1997-2014.pdf
- Wolter K, Timlin MS (1993) Monitoring ENSO in COADS with a seasonally adjusted principal component index. Proceedings of the 17th Climate Diagnostic,Norman, OK. pp 52–57Google Scholar
- Zalucki MP, Brower LP, Malcolm SB, Slager BH (2015) Estimating the climate signal in monarch population decline. In: Oberhauser KR, Altizer NS (eds)Monarchs in a changing world. Biology and conservation of an iconic butterfly, chapter 11. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar