Oecologia

, Volume 181, Issue 2, pp 369–379 | Cite as

Phosphorus resorption by young beech trees and soil phosphatase activity as dependent on phosphorus availability

Physiological ecology – Original research

Abstract

Motivated by decreasing foliar phosphorus (P) concentrations in Fagus sylvatica L. forests, we studied P recycling depending on P fertilization in mesocosms with juvenile trees and soils of two contrasting F. sylvatica L. forests in a greenhouse. We hypothesized that forests with low soil P availability are better adapted to recycle P than forests with high soil P availability. The P resorption efficiency from senesced leaves was significantly higher at the P-poor site (70 %) than at the P-rich site (48 %). P fertilization decreased the resorption efficiency significantly at the P-poor site to 41 %, while it had no effect at the P-rich site. Both acid and alkaline phosphatase activity were higher in the rhizosphere of the P-poor than of the P-rich site by 53 and 27 %, respectively, while the activities did not differ in the bulk soil. Fertilization decreased acid phosphatase activity significantly at the P-poor site in the rhizosphere, but had no effect on the alkaline, i.e., microbial, phosphatase activity at any site. Acid phosphatase activity in the P-poor soil was highest in the rhizosphere, while in the P-rich soil, it was highest in the bulk soil. We conclude that F. sylvatica resorbed P more efficiently from senescent leaves at low soil P availability than at high P availability and that acid phosphatase activity in the rhizosphere but not in the bulk soil was increased at low P availability. Moreover, we conclude that in the P-rich soil, microbial phosphatases contributed more strongly to total phosphatase activity than plant phosphatases.

Keywords

Forest nutrition Nutrient resorption Rhizosphere Phosphomonoesterase Plant–microbe interaction 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Karin Söllner and Uwe Hell for technical support. Furthermore, we thank the German Research Foundation (DFG) for financial support of the project SP1389/4-1 within the framework of the DFG priority program SPP1685 Ecosystem nutrition.

Author contribution statement

M. S. designed the experiment; K. H. and C. H. performed the experiment; K. H., C. H. and M. S. conducted lab and data analyses; M. S. wrote the manuscript, and C. H. and K. H. provided editorial advice.

Supplementary material

442_2016_3581_MOESM1_ESM.docx (550 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 550 kb)

References

  1. Aerts R (1996) Nutrient resorption from senescing leaves of perennials: are there general patterns? J Ecol 597–608Google Scholar
  2. Aerts R, Chapin FS III (2000) The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited. Adv Ecol Res 30:1–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aldén L, Demoling F, Baath E (2001) Rapid method of determining factors limiting bacterial growth in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:1830–1838CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Braun S, Thomas VF, Quiring R, Flückiger W (2010) Does nitrogen deposition increase forest production? The role of phosphorus. Environ Pollut 158:2043–2052CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Brookes PC, Powlson DS, Jenkinson DS (1984) Phosphorus in the soil microbial biomass. Soil Biol Biochem 16:169–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cross AF, Schlesinger WH (1995) A literature review and evaluation of the Hedley fractionation: applications to the biogeochemical cycle of soil phosphorus in natural ecosystems. Geoderma 64:197–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crowley KF, McNeil BE, Lovett GM, Canham CD, Driscoll CT, Rustad LE, Weathers KC (2012) Do nutrient limitation patterns shift from nitrogen toward phosphorus with increasing nitrogen deposition across the northeastern United States? Ecosystems 15:940–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dick WA, Juma NG, Tabatabai MA (1983) Effects of soils on acid phosphatase and inorganic pyrophosphatase of corn roots. Soil Sci 136:19–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dietz GW, Heppel LA (1971) Studies on the uptake of hexose phosphates 3 mechanism of uptake of glucose 1-phosphate in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 246:2891–2897PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Duquesnay A, Dupouey JL, Clement A, Ulrich E, Le Tacon F (2000) Spatial and temporal variability of foliar mineral concentration in beech (Fagus sylvatica) stands in northeastern France. Tree Physiol 20:13–22CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Flückiger W, Braun S (1998) Nitrogen deposition in Swiss forests and its possible relevance for leaf nutrient status, parasite attacks and soil acidification. Environ Pollut 102:69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fox TR, Comerford NB (1992) Rhizosphere phosphatase activity and phosphatase hydrolyzable organic phosphorus in two forested spodosols. Soil Biol Biochem 24:579–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harrison AF, Pearce T (1979) Seasonal variation of phosphatase activity in woodland soils. Soil Biol Biochem 11:405–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Häussling M, Marschner H (1989) Organic and inorganic soil phosphates and acid phosphatase activity in the rhizosphere of 80-year-old Norway spruce [Picea abies (L) Karst] trees. Biol Fertil Soils 8:128–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hayes P, Turner BL, Lambers H, Laliberté E (2014) Foliar nutrient concentrations and resorption efficiency in plants of contrasting nutrient-acquisition strategies along a 2-million-year dune chronosequence. J Ecol 102:396–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heath RT (2005) Microbial turnover of organic phosphorus in aquatic systems. In: Turner BL, Frossard E, Baldwin DS (eds) Organic phosphorus in the environment. CABI, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Hernandez I, Hwang SJ, Heath RT (1996) Measurement of phosphomonoesterase activity with a radiolabelled glucose-6-phosphate—role in the phosphorus requirement of phytoplankton and bacterioplankton in a temperate mesotrophic lake. Arch Hydrobiol 137:265–280Google Scholar
  18. Heuck C, Weig A, Spohn M (2015) Soil microbial biomass C:N:P stoichiometry and microbial use of organic phosphorus. Soil Biol Biochem 85:119–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoppe H-G (2003) Phosphatase activity in the sea. Hydrobiologia 493(187):200Google Scholar
  20. Ilg K, Wellbrock N, Lux W (2009) Phosphorus supply and cycling at long-term forest monitoring sites in Germany. Eur J For Res 128:483–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Juma NG, Tabatabai MA (1988) Hydrolysis of organic phosphates by corn and soybean roots. Plant Soil 107:31–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Khan KS, Joergensen RG (2012) Relationships between P fractions and the microbial biomass in soils under different land use management. Geoderma 173:274–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ljungström M, Nihlgård B (1995) Effects of lime and phosphate additions on nutrient status and growth of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) seedlings. For Ecol Manage 74:133–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Marklein AR, Houlton BZ (2012) Nitrogen inputs accelerate phosphorus cycling rates across a wide variety of terrestrial ecosystems. New Phytol 193:696–704CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Mellert KH, Göttlein A (2012) Comparison of new foliar nutrient thresholds derived from van den Burg’s literature compilation with established central European references. Eur J For Res 131:1461–1472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nannipieri P, Giagnoni L, Landi L, Renella G (2011) Role of phosphatase enzymes in soil, 1st edn. In: Bünemann EK, Oberson A, Frossard E (eds) Phosphorus in action. Soil biology series, vol 26Google Scholar
  27. Olander LP, Vitousek PM (2000) Regulation of soil phosphatase and chitinase activity by N and P availability. Biogeochemistry 49:175–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. R Core Team (2013) A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  29. Rastin N, Rosenplänter K, Hüttermann A (1988) Seasonal variation of enzyme activity and their dependence on certain soil factors in a beech forest soil. Soil Biol Biochem 20:637–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Reed SC, Townsend AR, Davidson EA, Cleveland CC (2012) Stoichiometric patterns in foliar nutrient resorption across multiple scales. New Phytol 196:173–180CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Richardson SJ, Peltzer DA, Allen RB, McGlone MS, Parfitt RL (2004) Rapid development of phosphorus limitation in temperate rainforest along the Franz Josef soil chronosequence. Oecologia 139:267–276CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Richardson A, Barea J-M, McNeill A, Prigent-Combaret C (2009) Acquisition of phosphorus and nitrogen in the rhizosphere and plant growth promotion by microorganisms. Plant Soil 321:305–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. See CR, Yanai RD, Fisk MC, Vadeboncoeur MA, Quintero BA, Fahey TJ (2015) Soil nitrogen affects phosphorus recycling: foliar resorption and plant-soil feedbacks in a northern hardwood forest. Ecology 96:2488–2498CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Sinsabaugh RL, Lauber CL, Weintraub MN, Ahmed B, Allison SD, Crenshaw C, Contosta AR, Cusack D, Frey S, Gallo ME, Gartner TB, Hobbie SE, Holland K, Keeler BL, Powers JS, Stursova M, Takacs-Vesbach C, Waldrop M, Wallenstein M, Zak DR, Zeglin LH (2008) Stoichiometryof soil enzyme activity at global scale. Ecol Lett 11:1252–1264PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Skujins JJ, Braal L, McLaren AD (1962) Characterization of phosphatase in a terrestrial soil sterilized with an electron beam. Enzymologia 25:125–133Google Scholar
  36. Spohn M, Kuzyakov Y (2013a) Distribution of microbial- and root-derived phosphatase activities in the rhizosphere depending on P availability and C allocation—coupling soil zymography with 14C imaging. Soil Biol Biochem 67:106–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Spohn M, Kuzyakov Y (2013b) Phosphorus mineralization can be driven by microbial need for carbon. Soil Biol Biochem 61:69–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Spohn M, Carminati A, Kuzyakov Y (2013a) Soil zymography—a novel in situ method for mapping distribution of enzyme activity in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 58:275–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Spohn M, Ermak A, Kuzyakov Y (2013b) Microbial gross organic phosphorus mineralization can be stimulated by root exudates—a 33P isotopic dilution study. Soil Biol Biochem 65:254–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Spohn M, Treichel NS, Cormann M, Schloter M, Fischer D (2015) Distribution of phosphatase activity and various bacterial phyla in the rhizosphere of Hordeum vulgare L. depending on P availability. Soil Biol Biochem 89:44–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Staaf H (1982) Plant nutrient changes in beech leaves during senescence as influenced by site characteristics. Acta Oecol/Oecol Plant 3:161–170Google Scholar
  42. Steenbergh AK, Bodelier PLE, Hoogveld HL, Slomp CP, Laanbroek HJ (2011) Phosphatases relieve carbon limitation of microbial activity in Baltic Sea sediments along a redox-gradient. J Limnol Oceanogr 56:2018–2026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stutter MI, Shand CA, George TS, Blackwell MS, Bol R, MacKay RL, Haygarth PM (2012) Recovering phosphorus from soil: a root solution? Environ Sci Technol 46:1977–1978CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Talkner U, Meiwes KJ, Potočić N, Seletković I, Cools N, De Vos B, Rautio P (2015) Phosphorus nutrition of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) is decreasing in Europe. Ann For Sci 72:919–928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tarafdar JC, Jungk A (1987) Phosphatase activity in the rhizosphere and its relation to the depletion of soil organic phosphorus. Biol Fertil Soils 199–204Google Scholar
  46. Turner L, Wright SJ (2014) The response of microbial biomass and hydrolytic enzymes to a decade of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium addition in a lowland tropical rain forest. Biogeochemistry 117:115–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Turner BL, Baxter R, Whitton BA (2002) Seasonal phosphatase activity in three characteristic soils of the English uplands polluted by long-term atmospheric nitrogen deposition. Environ Pollut 120:313–317CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Vance CP, Uhde-Stone C, Allan DL (2003) Phosphorus acquisition and use: critical adaptations by plants for securing a nonrenewable resource. New Phytol 157:423–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yagil EZRA, Beacham IR (1975) Uptake of adenosine 5′-monophosphate by Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 121:401–405PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Yang X, Post WM (2011) Phosphorus transformations as a function of pedogenesis: a synthesis of soil phosphorus data using Hedley fractionation method. Biogeosciences 8:2907–2916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yuan ZY, Chen HY (2009) Global-scale patterns of nutrient resorption associated with latitude, temperature and precipitation. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 18:11–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Soil EcologyBayreuth Center of Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER), University of BayreuthBayreuthGermany

Personalised recommendations