Consequences of exotic host use: impacts on Lepidoptera and a test of the ecological trap hypothesis
- 453 Downloads
Investigating the effects of invasive species on native biodiversity is one of the most pressing challenges in ecology. Our goal in this study was to quantify the effects of invasive plants on butterfly and moth communities. In addition, we sought to elucidate the fitness consequences of non-native hosts on lepidopterans. We conducted a meta-analysis on a total of 76 studies which provided data on larval performance, survival, oviposition preference, abundance, and species richness of Lepidoptera on native and exotic plants. Overwhelmingly, we found that performance and survival were reduced for larvae developing on exotic hosts, relative to native hosts. At the community level, alien plant invasion was associated with a reduction in the overall abundance and richness of lepidopteran communities. We found that lepidopterans did not show strong oviposition preference for native hosts. This result suggests that many invasive plant species may decrease lepidopteran abundance by providing a target for oviposition where larvae have a relatively poor chance of survival. Among studies that tested both survival and preference on exotic hosts, 37.5 % found evidence for novel hosts that could function as ecological traps (the figure was 18 % when considering studies that only assayed larval performance). Thus, although the majority of novel hosts included in our analyses are not likely to act as ecological traps, the potential clearly exists for this effect, and the role of ecological traps should be considered along with other aspects of global change impacting natural communities.
KeywordsInvasive plants Oviposition preference Performance Survival Ecological traps
We would like to thank Matthew Forister and Angela Smilanich for their many helpful comments throughout the preparation of this manuscript. This work was supported by a National Science Foundation Graduate Fellowship (DGE-1447692) to S. Y. and the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at the University of Tennessee Knoxville to Q. R.
Author contribution statement
S. Y. did the literature review, extracted the data, and was responsible for preparing the manuscript. Q. R. performed the statistical analyses, wrote the Materials and methods and Results sections, and made the graphs. S. Y. wrote the first draft of the manuscript, with subsequent revisions by both S. Y. and Q. R.
- Davis MA, Chew MK, Hobbs RJ, Lugo AE, Ewel JJ, Vermeij GJ, Brown JH, Rosenzweig ML, Gardener MR, Carroll SP, Thompson K, Pickett ST, Stromberg JC, Tredici PD, Suding KN, Ehrenfeld JG, Grime JP, Mascaro J, Briggs JC (2011) Don’t judge species on their origins. Nature 474:153–154CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dowell RV, Scriber JM, Lederhouse RC (1990) Survival of Papilio rutulus Lucas (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) larvae on 42 potential host plants. Pan-Pac Entomol 66:140–146Google Scholar
- Harris RJ, Toft RJ, Dugdale JS, Williams PA, Rees JA (2004) Insect assemblages in a native (kanuka-Kunzea ericoides) and an invasive (gorse-Ulex europaeus) shrubland. N Z J Ecol 28:35–47Google Scholar
- Harvey JA, Biere A, Fortuna TM, Vet LEM, Engelkes T, Morrien E, Gols R, Verhoeven K, Vogel H, Macel M, Heidel-Fischer HM, Schramm K, Van Der Putten WH (2010) Ecological fits, mis-fits and lotteries involving insect herbivores on the invasive plant, Bunias orientalis. Biol Invasions 12:3045–3059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hobbs RJ, Arico S, Aronson J, Baron JS, Bridgewater P, Cramer VA, Epstein PR, Ewel JJ, Klink CA, Lugo AE, Norton D, Ojima D, Richardson DM, Sanderson EW, Valladares F, Vila M, Zamora R, Zobel M (2006) Novel ecosystems: theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 15:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Philips CR (2010) Why some plants host more species of Lepidoptera than others: how natural enemies and native lineage influence lepidopteran use of native and alien plants. Master’s thesis, Department of Entomology and Wildlife Ecology, University of Delaware, NewarkGoogle Scholar
- Plummer M (2016) rjags: Bayesian Graphical Models using MCMC. R package version 4–5. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rjags
- R Development Core Team (2010). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
- Reed E (2010) Bottom-up effect on top-down control in a suburban landscape. Master’s thesis, Department of Wildlife Ecology, University of Delaware, NewarkGoogle Scholar
- Singer MC (2008) Rapid natural and anthropogenic diet evolution: three examples from checkerspot butterflies. Specialization, speciation, and radiation: the evolutionary biology of herbivorous insects. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 311–324Google Scholar
- Stefanescu C, Jubany J, Dantart J (2006) Egg-laying by the butterfly Iphiclides podalirius (Lepidoptera, Papilionidae) on alien plants: a broadening of host range or oviposition mistakes? Anim Biodivers Conserv 29:83–90Google Scholar