Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 180, Issue 4, pp 1195–1203 | Cite as

Interference in the tundra predator guild studied using local ecological knowledge

  • Dorothee Ehrich
  • Marita A. Strømeng
  • Siw T. Killengreen
Community ecology - Original research

Abstract

The decline or recolonization of apex predators such as wolves and lynx, often driven by management decisions, and the expansion of smaller generalist predators such as red foxes, can have important ecosystem impacts. The mesopredator release hypothesis proposes that apex predators control medium-sized predator populations through competition and/or intraguild predation. The decline of apex predators thus leads to an increase in mesopredators, possibly with a negative impact on prey populations. Information about the abundance of mammalian tundra predators, wolf (Canis lupus), wolverine (Gulo gulo), lynx (Lynx lynx), red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and arctic fox (Vulpes lagopus) was collected from local active outdoors people during semi-structured interviews in 14 low arctic or sub-arctic settlements in western Eurasia. The perceived abundance of red fox decreased with higher wolf abundance and in more arctic areas, but the negative effect of wolves decreased in more arctic and therefore less productive ecosystems. The perceived abundance of arctic fox increased towards the arctic and in areas with colder winters. Although there was a negative correlation between the two fox species, red fox was not included in the model for perceived arctic fox abundance, which received most support. Our results support the mesopredator release hypothesis regarding the expansion of red foxes in subarctic areas and indicate that top–down control by apex predators is weaker in less productive and more arctic ecosystems. We showed that local ecological knowledge is a valuable source of information about large-scale processes, which are difficult to study through direct biological investigations.

Keywords

Lynx Wolf Wolverine Arctic fox Red fox 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank L. D. Salinder, N. V. Salinder, E. L. Palyanov, I. V. Kushnir, K. Y. Vanuito, I. K. Yande, D. V. Loginov, V. A. Matrekhin, A. A. Sharev, S. V. Fedoseevich, R. A. Kupchik, A. Anttila, Ø. Z. Arntzen, T. Halvari, B. H. Kristoffersen, M. Ballovara, F. Utsi, G. Vilho, K. Kivil, A. Ørjebu, K. Harjo, M. J. Fjeld, E. Sundland, I. Trane, A. P. Sarre, P. R. Hansen and all the other people providing information for this study. K. B. Klokov, S. A. Khrushev, O. Trofimova, A. Bocharnikova, D. Kaekhtin, V. H. Hausner and E. G. Broderstad participated in interviewing people. T. Tveraa and R. A. Ims provided valuable comments to drafts of the manuscript, and, A. Angerbjörn and two anonymous referees provided helpful comments on an earlier version. This study was funded by the Research Council of Norway through the project “TUNDRA” (grant no S192040/S30) and by the Norwegian Environment Agency through the project “Fjellrev i Finnmark”.

Author contribution statement

DE designed the study, all authors participated in collecting the data, DE and MAS analysed the data, all authors interpreted and discussed the results, DE and MAS wrote the manuscript with input from STK.

Supplementary material

442_2015_3521_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (382 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 381 kb)

References

  1. Angerbjorn A, Eide NE, Dalen L, Elmhagen B, Hellstrom P, Ims RA, Killengreen S, Landa A, Meijer T, Mela M, Niemimaa J, Noren K, Tannerfeldt M, Yoccoz NG, Henttonen H (2013) Carnivore conservation in practice: replicated management actions on a large spatial scale. J Appl Ecol 50:59–67. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barton KA, Zalewski A (2007) Winter severity limits red fox populations in eurasia. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16:281–289. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00299.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Breitenmoser U, Mallon DP, von Arx M, Breitenmoser-Wursten C (2008) Lynx lynx. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2014.3. www.iucnredlist.org
  4. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Christensen RHB (2014) Ordinal—regression models for ordinal data. R package version 2014.12–23. http://www.cran.r-project.org/package=ordinal/
  6. Daniel Anadon J, Gimenez A, Ballestar R, Perez I (2009) Evaluation of local ecological knowledge as a method for collecting extensive data on animal abundance. Conserv Biol 23:617–625. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01145.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis A, Wagner JR (2003) Who knows? On the importance of identifying “Experts” when researching local ecological knowledge. Hum Ecol 31:463–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elmhagen B, Rushton SP (2007) Trophic control of mesopredators in terrestrial ecosystems: top-down or bottom-up? Ecol Lett 10:197–206. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.01010.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Elmhagen B, Ludwig G, Rushton SP, Helle P, Linden H (2010) Top predators, mesopredators and their prey: interference ecosystems along bioclimatic productivity gradients. J Anim Ecol 79:785–794. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01678.x PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Estes JA, Terborgh J, Brashares JS, Power ME, Berger J, Bond WJ, Carpenter SR, Essington TE, Holt RD, Jackson JBC, Marquis RJ, Oksanen L, Oksanen T, Paine RT, Pikitch EK, Ripple WJ, Sandin SA, Scheffer M, Schoener TW, Shurin JB, Sinclair ARE, Soule ME, Virtanen R, Wardle DA (2011) Trophic downgrading of planet earth. Science 333:301–306. doi: 10.1126/science.1205106 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gallant D, Slough BG, Reid DG, Berteaux D (2012) Arctic fox versus red fox in the warming arctic: four decades of den surveys in north Yukon. Polar Biol 35:1421–1431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hamel S, Killengreen ST, Henden JA, Yoccoz NG, Ims RA (2013) Disentangling the importance of interspecific competition, food availability, and habitat in species occupancy: recolonization of the endangered fennoscandian arctic fox. Biol Conserv 160:114–120. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.01.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hersteinsson P, Macdonald DW (1992) Interspecific competition and the geographical distribution of red and arctic foxes Vulpes vulpes and Alopex lagopus. Oikos 64:505–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ims RA, Ehrich D, Forbes BC, Huntley B, Walker DA, Wookey PA, Berteaux D, Bhatt US, Bråthen KA, Edwards ME, Epstein HE, Forchhammer MC, Fuglei E, Gauthier G, Gilbert S, Leung M, Menyushina IE, Ovsyanikov NG, Post E, Raynolds MK, Reid DG, Schmidt NM, Stien A, Sumina OI, Van der Wal R (2013) Terrestrial ecosystems. In: Meltofte H (ed) arctic biodiversity assessment. Status and trends in arctic biodiversity. Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna, AkureyriGoogle Scholar
  15. Killengreen ST, Ims RA, Yoccoz NG, Brathen KA, Henden JA, Schott T (2007) Structural characteristics of a low arctic tundra ecosystem and the retreat of the arctic fox. Biol Conserv 135:459–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Killengreen ST, Lecomte N, Ehrich D, Schott T, Yoccoz N, Ims RA (2011) The importance of marine vs. Human-induced subsidies in the maintenance of an expanding mesocarnivore in the arctic tundra. J Anim Ecol 80:1049–1060CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Killengreen ST, Ims RA, Henden JA, Yoccoz NG, Ehrich D (2013) Prosjekt ‘‘Fjellrev i Finnmark’’: rapport for 2008–2012. Institutt for Arktisk og Marin Biologi, Universitetet i Tromsø, Tromsø (in Norwegian) Google Scholar
  18. Koskela A, Kaartinen S, Aspi J, Kojola I, Helle P, Rytkoenen S (2013) Does grey wolf presence affect habitat selection of wolverines? Ann Zool Fenn 50:216–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Krebs J, Lofroth E, Copeland J, Banci V, Cooley D, Golden H, Magoun A, Mulders R, Shults B (2004) Synthesis of survival rates and causes of mortality in north american wolverines. J Wildl Manag 68:493–502. doi:  10.2193/0022-541X(2004)068[0493:SOSRAC]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lomanova NV (2011) Studies of the state monitoring of hunting resources in the Russian Federation in 2008–2011. Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie resursami, special edition 2011: hunting and hunting resources of the Russian Federation 2011: 15–129 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  21. Mattisson J, Andren H, Persson J, Segerstrom P (2011) Influence of intraguild interactions on resource use by wolverines and eurasian lynx. J Mammal 92:1321–1330. doi: 10.1644/11-mamm-a-099.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ministry of Natural Resources and Ecology of the Russian Federation (2010) Hunting regulations of the Russian Federation. http://docus.me/d/1069243/ (in Russian)
  23. Newsome TM, Ripple WJ (2015) A continental scale trophic cascade from wolves through coyotes to foxes. J Anim Ecol 84:49–59. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12258 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Oksanen L, Oksanen T (2000) The logic and realism of the hypothesis of exploitation ecosystems. Am Nat 155:703–723CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Pablo Holgado-Tello F, Chacon-Moscoso S, Barbero-Garcia I, Vila-Abad E (2010) Polychoric versus pearson correlations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables. Qual Quant 44:153–166. doi: 10.1007/s11135-008-9190-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pasanen-Mortensen M, Pyykonen M, Elmhagen B (2013) Where lynx prevail, foxes will fail—limitation of a mesopredator in eurasia. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 22:868–877. doi: 10.1111/geb.12051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Polfus JL, Heinemeyer K, Hebblewhite M, Taku River Tlingit First N (2014) Comparing traditional ecological knowledge and western science woodland caribou habitat models. J Wildl Manag 78:112–121. doi: 10.1002/jwmg.643 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Prugh LR, Stoner CJ, Epps CW, Bean WT, Ripple WJ, Laliberte AS, Brashares JS (2009) The rise of the mesopredator. Bioscience 59:779–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for statistical computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  30. Reid DG, Berteaux D, Laidre KL, Angerbjörn A, Angliss R, Born EW, Boveng P, Cluff D, Ehrich D, Ferguson SH, Garlich-Miller J, Gauthier G, Gunn A, Kovacs KM, Lecomte N, Lowry LF, McLoughlin P, Litovka D, Moore S, Mustonen K, Mustonen T, Nguyen L, Peacock E, Poole K, Quakenbush L, Russell D, Schmidt NM, Sheftel B, Simpkins M, Sittler B, Slough B, Smith A, Ugarte F, Vongraven D, Wiig Ø (2013) Mammals. In: Meltofte H (ed) Arctic biodiversity assessment. Status and trends in arctic biodiversity. Conservation of arctic Flora and Fauna, AkureyriGoogle Scholar
  31. Revelle W (2014) Psych: procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research. R package version 1.5.1. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych
  32. Ripple WJ, Estes JA, Beschta RL, Wilmers CC, Ritchie EG, Hebblewhite M, Berger J, Elmhagen B, Letnic M, Nelson MP, Schmitz OJ, Smith DW, Wallach AD, Wirsing AJ (2014) Status and ecological effects of the world’s largest carnivores. Science 343:151. doi: 10.1126/science.1241484 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ritchie EG, Johnson CN (2009) Predator interactions, mesopredator release and biodiversity conservation. Ecol Lett 12:982–998. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01347.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Shtro VG (2009) Arctic fox on Yamal. Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, EkaterinburgGoogle Scholar
  35. Stickney AA, Obritschkewitsch T, Burgess RM (2014) Shifts in fox den occupancy in the greater prudhoe bay area, alaska. Arctic 67:196–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tannerfeldt M, Elmhagen B, Angerbjorn A (2002) Exclusion by interference competition? The relationship between red and arctic foxes. Oecologia 132:213–220. doi: 10.1007/s00442-002-0967-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. van Dijk J, Andersen T, May R, Andersen R, Andersen R, Landa A (2008) Foraging strategies of wolverines within a predator guild. Can J Zool 86:966–975. doi: 10.1139/z08-073 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Walker DA, Raynolds MK, Daniels FJA, Einarsson E, Elvebakk A, Gould WA, Katenin AE, Kholod SS, Markon CJ, Melnikov ES, Moskalenko NG, Talbot SS, Yurtsev BA (2005) The circumpolar arctic vegetation map. J Veg Sci 16:267–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. White PCL, Jennings NV, Renwick AR, Barker NHL (2005) Questionnaires in ecology: a review of past use and recommendations for best practice. J Appl Ecol 42:421–430. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01032.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zelenskiy VM, Samandas AM, Tyupkina GI, Kolpashikov LA, Zarubetskaya VV (2011) Strategies for conservation of rare species and management of hunting resources in the fauna of the far north of central Siberia. Far North Research Institute of Agriculture, Norilsk (in Russian) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dorothee Ehrich
    • 1
  • Marita A. Strømeng
    • 1
  • Siw T. Killengreen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Arctic and Marine BiologyUniversity of Tromsø - The Arctic University of NorwayTromsøNorway

Personalised recommendations