Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 180, Issue 3, pp 823–832 | Cite as

Ecological specialisation in habitat selection within a macropodid herbivore guild

  • Sarah GarnickEmail author
  • Julian Di Stefano
  • Mark A. Elgar
  • Graeme Coulson
Community ecology - Original research

Abstract

Specialist species show stronger resource selection, narrower niches and lower niche overlap than generalist species. We examined ecological specialisation with respect to habitat selection in a macropodid community comprising the western grey kangaroo Macropus fuliginosus, red-necked wallaby M. rufogriseus and swamp wallaby Wallabia bicolor in the Grampians National Park, Victoria, Australia. We used radio tracking to quantify habitat selection. We predicted that because the fitness benefits of generalisation and specialisation differ, there would be a mix of generalised and specialised species in our community. As all three macropodid species show marked sexual dimorphism, we also expected that they would show sex-based specialisation. Finally, because many large herbivores select different habitats for foraging and resting, we predicted that our species would specialise on a subset of their overall selected habitat based on activity period (diurnal or nocturnal). All three species specialised on the available resources to some degree. Western grey kangaroos were specialists, at least during the active period. Niche data for the two wallaby species were harder to interpret so we could not determine their degree of specialisation. Within species, we found no evidence of sex-based specialisation. However, we found clear evidence of specialisation by activity period in western grey kangaroos and red-necked wallabies, but not in swamp wallabies. The strength of behavioural decisions made during the active period in influencing specialisation points to the likelihood that bottom-up processes regulate this community.

Keywords

Specialist Generalist Sexual segregation Resource use Foraging 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Daryl Panther, Jemma Cripps and many volunteers for assistance with macropod capture, Michelle Wilson for general assistance, and Parks Victoria and the (former) Department of Sustainability and Environment for logistical support and the use of Victoria Valley Airbase. Funding came from an Australian Research Council Discovery Project 0664120 grant to GC and a Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment Fund grant to SG. SG was supported by an Australian Postgraduate Award.

Author contribution statement

SG and GC conceived and designed the study. SG conducted the field work with assistance from GC. SG, JD and ME analysed the data. SG wrote the manuscript; other authors provided editorial advice.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable institutional and/or national guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. This work was conducted under The University of Melbourne’s Faculty of Science, School of Land & Environment, and Optometry and Vision Sciences Animal Ethics Committee Project Number 0810628 and the Department of Sustainability and Environment Permit Numbers 10004582, 10005421 and 10006116.

Supplementary material

442_2015_3510_MOESM1_ESM.docx (15 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 15 kb)

References

  1. Aebischer N, Robertson P, Kenward R (1993) Compositional analysis of habitat use from animal radio-tracking data. Ecology 75:1313–1325. doi: 10.2307/1940062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B (2012) lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999999-0. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4. Accessed 3 Nov 2012
  3. Beier P, McCullough DR (1990) Factors influencing white-tailed deer activity patterns and habitat use. Wildl Monogr 109:3–51Google Scholar
  4. Blumstein DT, Daniel JC (2005) The loss of anti-predator behaviour following isolation on islands. Proc R Soc B 272:1663–1668. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3147 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Bolnick DI, Svanbäck R, Fordyce JA, Yang LH, Davis JM, Hulsey CD, Forister ML (2003) The ecology of individuals: incidence and implications of individual specialization. Am Nat 161:1–28. doi: 10.1086/343878 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonesi L, Macdonald DW (2004) Differential habitat use promotes sustainable coexistence between the specialist otter and the generalist mink. Oikos 106:509–519. doi: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.13034.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown JS (1996) Coevolution and community organization in three habitats. Oikos 75:193–206 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chave J (2013) The problem of pattern and scale in ecology: what have we learned in 20 years? Ecol Lett 16:s4–s16. doi: 10.1111/ele.12048
  9. Coulson G (1993) Use of heterogeneous habitat by the western grey kangaroo, Macropus fuliginosus. Wildl Res 20:137–149. doi: 10.1071/WR9930137 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coulson G (1999) Monospecific and heterospecific grouping and feeding behaviour in grey kangaroos and red-necked wallabies. J Mamm 80:270–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coulson G, MacFarlane AM, Parsons SE, Cutter J (2006) Evolution of sexual segregation in mammalian herbivores: kangaroos as evolutionary models. Aust J Zool 54:217–224. doi: 10.1071/ZO05062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dawson TJ (2012) Kangaroos, 2nd edn. CSIRO, CollingwoodGoogle Scholar
  13. Department of Environment and Primary Industries (DEPI) (2014) EVC benchmarks–Greater Grampians bioregion. http://www.depi.vic.gov.au/environment-and-wildlife/biodiversity/evc-benchmarks#ggr. Accessed 26 Jan 2015
  14. Devictor V, Clavel J, Julliard R, Lavergne S, Mouillot D, Thuiller W, Venail P, Villéger S, Mouquet N (2010) Defining and measuring ecological specialization. J Appl Ecol 47:15–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01744.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Di Stefano J, Newell G (2008) Diet selection by the swamp wallaby (Wallabia bicolor): feeding strategies under conditions of changed food availability. J Mamm 89:1540–1549. doi: 10.1644/07-MAMM-A-193.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Di Stefano J, Moyle R, Coulson G (2005) A soft-walled double-layered trap for capture of swamp wallabies Wallabia bicolor. Aust Mamm 27:235–238. doi: 10.1071/AM05235 Google Scholar
  17. Di Stefano J, York A, Swan M, Greenfield A, Coulson G (2009) Habitat selection by the swamp wallaby (Wallabia bicolor) in relation to diel period, food and shelter. Austral Ecol 34:143–155. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2008.01890.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Di Stefano J, Swan M, Greenfield A, Coulson G (2010) Effect of habitat type, sex and time of day on space use by the swamp wallaby. In: Coulson G, Eldridge M (eds) Macropods: the biology of kangaroos, wallabies and rat-kangaroos. CSIRO, Collingwood, pp 187–196Google Scholar
  19. ESRI (Environmental Systems Resource Institute) (2009) ArcMap 9.2. ESRI, Redlands, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  20. Fox LR, Morrow PA (1981) Specialization: species property or local phenomenon? Science 211:887–893. doi: 10.1126/science.211.4485.887 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Futuyma DJ, Moreno G (1988) The evolution of ecological specialisation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 19:207–233. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.19.110188.001231 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Garnick S (2014) Resource use in a community of large herbivores in south-eastern Australia. PhD dissertation. University of Melbourne, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  23. Garnick S, Di Stefano J, Elgar MA, Coulson G (2014) Inter- and intraspecific effects of body size on habitat use among sexually-dimorphic macropodids. Oikos 123:984–992. doi: 10.1111/oik.00861 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Garshelis D (2000) Delusions in habitat evaluation: measuring use, selection and importance. In: Boitani L, Fuller T (eds) Research techniques in animal ecology. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 111–164Google Scholar
  25. Gillies CS, Hebblewhite M, Nielsen SE, Krawchuk MA, Aldridge CL, Fraia JL, Saher DJ, Stevens CE, Jerde CL (2006) Application of random effects to the study of resource selection by animals. J Anim Ecol 57:887–898. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01106.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gutman R, Dayan T (2005) Temporal partitioning: an experiment with two species of spiny mice. Ecology 86:164–173. doi: 10.1890/03-0369 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hood GM (2011) PopTools version 3.2.5. http://www.poptools.org. Accessed 3 Nov 2012
  28. Horn HS (1966) Measurement of ‘overlap’ in comparative ecological studies. Am Nat 100:419–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Illius AW, Gordon IJ (1987) The allometry of food intake in grazing ruminants. J Anim Ecol 56:989–999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jarman PJ (1989) Sexual dimorphism in the Macropodoidea. In: Grigg GC, Jarman P, Hume ID (eds) Kangaroos, wallabies and rat-kangaroos. Surrey Beatty, Sydney, pp 433–437Google Scholar
  31. Jarman PJ, Calaby JH (2008) Red-necked wallaby. In: Van Dyck S, Strahan R (eds) The mammals of Australia, 3rd edn. Reed New Holland, Sydney, pp 349–351Google Scholar
  32. Julliard R, Clavel J, Devictor V, Jiguet F, Couvet D (2006) Spatial segregation of specialists and generalists in bird communities. Ecol Lett 9:1237–1244. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00977.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kie J, Bowyer R, Nicholson M, Boroski B, Loft E (2002) Landscape heterogeneity at differing scales: effects on spatial distribution of mule deer. Ecology 83:530–544. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[0530:LHADSE]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kotler BP, Brown JS (1988) Environmental heterogeneity and the coexistence of desert rodents. Ann Rev Ecol Sys 19:281–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Krebs C (1999) Ecological methodology. Benjamin Cummings, Menlo ParkGoogle Scholar
  36. Lindeman PV (2000) Resource use of five sympatric turtle species: effects of competition, phylogeny, and morphology. Can J Zool 78:992–1008. doi: 10.1139/z00-013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. MacFarlane A, Coulson G (2005a) Sexual segregation in Australian marsupials. In: Ruckstuhl KE, Neuhaus P (eds) Sexual segregation in vertebrates: ecology of the two sexes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 254–279Google Scholar
  38. MacFarlane AM, Coulson G (2005b) Synchrony and timing of breeding influences sexual segregation in western grey and red kangaroos (Macropus fuliginosus and M. rufus). J Zool 267:419–429. doi: 10.1017/S0952836905007636 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Manly B, McDonald L, Thomas D, McDonald T, Erickson W (2002) Resource selection by animals, 2nd edn. Kluwer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Meredith RW, Westerman M, Springer MS (2008) A phylogeny and timescale for the living genera of kangaroos and kin (Macropodiformes: Marsupialia) based on nuclear DNA sequences. Aust J Zool 56:395–410. doi: 10.1071/ZO08044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Morris DW (1996) Coexistence of specialist and generalist rodents via habitat selection. Ecology 77:2352–2364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mysterud A (2000) The relationship between ecological segregation and sexual body size dimorphism in large herbivores. Oecologia 124:40–54. doi: 10.1071/WR01057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Parks Victoria (2003) Grampians National Park Management Plan March 2003. http://parkweb.vic.gov.au. Accessed 01 Aug 2008
  44. Patterson JE, Steinberg BD, Litzgus JD (2012) Generally specialized or especially general? Habitat selection by Snapping turtles (Chelydra serpentina) in central Ontario. Can J Zool 90:139–149. doi: 10.1139/Z11-118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Peers MJL, Thornton DH, Murray DL (2012) Reconsidering the specialist-generalist paradigm in niche breadth dynamics: resource gradient selection by Canada lynx and bobcat. PLoS One 7:e51488. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051488 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Pianka ER (2014) Rarity in Australian desert lizards. Austral Ecol 39:214–224. doi: 10.1111/aec.12061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pita R, Mira A, Beja P (2011) Assessing habitat differentiation between coexisting species: the role of spatial scale. Acta Oecol 37:124–132. doi: 10.1016/j.actao.2011.01.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Poisot T, Bever JD, Nemri A, Thrall PH, Hochberg ME (2011) A conceptual framework for the evolution of ecological specialisation. Ecol Lett 14:841–851. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01645.x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Rosenzweig ML (1981) A theory of habitat selection. Ecology 62:327–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Russell AJM, Storch I (2004) Summer food of sympatric red fox and pine marten in the German Alps. Eur J Wildl Res 50:53–58. doi: 10.1007/s10344-004-0037-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. R Development Core Team (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org
  52. Sanson G (1989) Morphological adaptations of teeth to diets and feeding in the Macropodoidea. In: Grigg GC, Jarman P, Hume ID (eds) Kangaroos, wallabies and rat-kangaroos. Surrey Beatty, Sydney, pp 151–168Google Scholar
  53. Schleuter D, Eckmann R (2008) Generalist versus specialist: the performances of perch and ruffe in a lake of low productivity. Ecol Freshw Fish 17:86–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0633.2007.00262.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schoener TW (1971) Theory of feeding strategies. Ann Rev Ecol Sys 3:369–404. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.02.110171.002101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sinclair ARE, Krebs CJ (2002) Complex numerical responses to top-down and bottom-up processes in vertebrate populations. Phil Trans Roy Soc Lond B 357:1221–1231. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1123 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Smith E (1982) Niche breadth, resource availability, and inference. Ecology 63:1675–1681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. South A, Kenward R, Walls S (2008) Ranges7: for the analysis of tracking and location data. Online manual. Anatrack Ltd., Wareham, UKGoogle Scholar
  58. Southwell C (1987) Activity pattern of the eastern grey kangaroo, Macropus giganteus. Mammalia 51:211–224. doi: 10.1515/mamm.1987.51.2.211 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Specht RL (1969) A comparison of the sclerophyllous vegetation characteristic of Mediterranean type climates in France, California, and Southern Australia. I. Structure, morphology, and succession. Aust J Bot 17:277–292. doi: 10.1071/BT9690277 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Swan M, Di Stefano J, Greenfield A, Coulson G (2008) Fine-scale habitat selection by adult female swamp wallabies (Wallabia bicolor). Aust J Zool 56:305–309. doi: 10.1071/ZO07051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wilson DS, Yoshimura J (1994) On the coexistence of specialists and generalists. Am Nat 144:692–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarah Garnick
    • 1
    Email author
  • Julian Di Stefano
    • 2
  • Mark A. Elgar
    • 1
  • Graeme Coulson
    • 1
  1. 1.School of BioSciencesUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.School of Ecosystem and Forest ScienceUniversity of MelbourneCreswickAustralia

Personalised recommendations