, Volume 180, Issue 2, pp 439–451 | Cite as

Floral traits and pollination ecology of European Arum hybrids

  • Marion ChartierEmail author
  • Suzanne Liagre
  • Hanna Weiss-Schneeweiss
  • Bozena Kolano
  • Jean-Marie Bessière
  • Jürg Schönenberger
  • Marc Gibernau
Population ecology - Original research


Hybridisation is common in plants and can affect the genetic diversity and ecology of sympatric parental populations. Hybrids may resemble the parental species in their ecology, leading to competition and/or gene introgression; alternatively, they may diverge from the parental phenotypes, possibly leading to the colonisation of new ecological niches and to speciation. Here, we describe inflorescence morphology, ploidy levels, pollinator attractive scents, and pollinator guilds of natural hybrids of Arum italicum and A. maculatum (Araceae) from a site with sympatric parental populations in southern France to determine how these traits affect the hybrid pollination ecology. Hybrids were characterised by inflorescences with a size and a number of flowers more similar to A. italicum than to A. maculatum. In most cases, hybrid stamens were purple, as in A. maculatum, and spadix appendices yellow, as in A. italicum. Hybrid floral scent was closer to that of A. italicum, but shared some compounds with A. maculatum and comprised unique compounds. Also, the pollinator guild of the hybrids was similar to that of A. italicum. Nevertheless, the hybrids attracted a high proportion of individuals of the main pollinator of A. maculatum. We discuss the effects of hybridisation in sympatric parental zones in which hybrids exhibit low levels of reproductive success, the establishment of reproductive barriers between parental species, the role of the composition of floral attractive scents in the differential attraction of pollinators and in the competition between hybrids and their parental species, and the potential of hybridisation to give rise to new independent lineages.


Floral odour Morphospace Psychodidae Sapromyiophily Wallace effect 



Volatile organic compounds


Non-metric multidimensional scaling


Non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance



Bruno Buatois is thanked for helping with the GC–MS analyses and providing laboratory facilities; David Prehsler for cultivation of Arum tubers in the greenhouses of the Botanical Garden of the University of Vienna. We also acknowledge the support of the owner of the study site in Bagnère-de-Bigorre, France, for allowing us to regularly observe and collect Arum inflorescences. The manuscript was improved as a result of discussion with Yannick Staedler and proof-read by Ursula Schachner. This work received funding from the CNRS-GDREC (French National Research Group in Chemical Ecology) and FWF (Austrian Science Fund; number P25077-B16). The experiments conducted comply with the current laws of the country (France) in which the experiments were performed.

Author contribution statement

MC and MG conceived and designed the experiments. MC and SL performed the field and laboratory work; BK and HWS performed the chromosome analyses; JMB identified the chemical compounds. MC analysed the data. MC, MG, JS and HWS wrote the manuscript; other authors provided editorial advice.

Supplementary material

442_2015_3498_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (440 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 439 kb)


  1. Adams RP (2007) Identification of essential oil components by gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy, 4th edn. Allured, Carol StreamGoogle Scholar
  2. Albert NW, Lewis DH, Zhang H, Schwinn KE, Jameson PE, Davies KM (2011) Members of an R2R3-MYB transcription factor family in Petunia are developmentally and environmentally regulated to control complex floral and vegetative pigmentation patterning. Plant J 65:771–784CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Albre J, Quilichini A, Gibernau M (2003) Pollination ecology of Arum italicum (Araceae). Bot J Linn Soc 141:205–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol 26:32–46Google Scholar
  5. Baack EJ, Rieseberg LH (2007) A genomic view of introgression and hybrid speciation. Curr Opin Genet Dev 17:513–518PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Barton NH (2001) The role of hybridization in evolution. Mol Ecol 10:551–568CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Beuret E (1977) Contribution à l’étude de la distribution géographique et de la physiologie des taxons affines di- et polyploïdes. Bibl Bot 133:1–80Google Scholar
  8. Bischoff M, Jürgens A, Campbell DR (2014) Floral scent in natural hybrids of Ipomopsis (Polemoniaceae) and their parental species. Ann Bot 113:533–544PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bischoff M, Raguso RA, Jürgens A, Campbell DR (2015) Context-dependent reproductive isolation mediated by floral scent and color. Evolution 69:1–13CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Boyce P (1993) The genus Arum. Royal Botanic Gardens, KewGoogle Scholar
  11. Boyce P (2006) Arum: a decade of change. Aroideana 29:132–137Google Scholar
  12. Bringhurst R, Khan DA (1963) Natural pentaploid Fragaria chiloensis-F. vesca hybrids in coastal California and their significance in polyploid Fragaria evolution. Am J Bot 50:658–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Campbell DR, Aldridge G (2006) Floral biology of hybrid zones. In: Harder L, Barrett SCH (eds) Ecology and evolution of flowers. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 326–345Google Scholar
  14. Chappell J (1995) Biochemistry and molecular biology of the isoprenoid biosynthetic pathway in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 46:521–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chartier M, Gibernau M (2009) Size variations of flowering characters in Arum maculatum (Araceae). Aroideana 32:153–158Google Scholar
  16. Chartier M, Pélozuelo L, Gibernau M (2011) Do floral odor profiles geographically vary with the degree of specificity for pollinators? Investigation in two sapromyophilous Arum species (Araceae). Ann Soc Entomol Fr 47:71–77Google Scholar
  17. Chartier M, Pélozuelo L, Buatois B, Bessière J-M, Gibernau M (2013) Geographical variations of odour and pollinators, and test for local adaptation by reciprocal transplant of two European Arum species. Funct Ecol 27:1367–1381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chase MW, Paun O, Fay MF (2010) Hybridization and speciation in angiosperms: a role for pollinator shifts? BMC Biol 8:45PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Clarke KR (1993) Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust J Ecol 18:117–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cooley AM, Modliszewski JL, Rommel ML, Willis JH (2011) Gene duplication in Mimulus underlies parallel floral evolution via independent trans-regulatory changes. Curr Biol 21:700–704CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Cortis P, Vereecken N, Schiestl F, Lumaga MB, Scrugli A, Cozzolino S (2009) Pollinator convergence and the nature of species’ boundaries in sympatric Sardinian Ophrys (Orchidaceae). Ann Bot 104:497–506PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Davies KM, Albert NW, Schwinn KE (2012) From landing lights to mimicry: the molecular regulation of flower colouration and mechanisms for pigmentation patterning. Funct Plant Biol 39:619–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Delle-Vedove R, Juillet N, Bessière J-M, Grison C, Barthes N, Pailler T, Dormont L, Schatz B (2011) Colour-scent associations in a tropical orchid: three colours but two odours. Phytochemistry 72:735–742CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Diaz A, Kite GC (2002) A comparison of the pollination ecology of Arum maculatum and A. italicum in England. Watsonia 24:171–181Google Scholar
  25. Diaz A, Kite G (2006) Why be a rewarding trap? The evolution of floral rewards in Arum (Araceae), a genus characterized by saprophilous pollination systems. Biol J Linn Soc 88:257–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dormont L, Jay-Robert P, Bessière J-M, Rapior S, Lumaret J-P (2010) Innate olfactory preferences in dung beetles. J Exp Biol 213:3177–3185CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Dormont L, Delle-Vedove R, Bessière J-M, Schatz B (2014) Floral scent emitted by white and coloured morphs in orchids. Phytochemistry 100:51–59CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. El-Sayed AM (2014). The pherobase: database of pheromones and semiochemicals. © 2003–2014 The Pherobase
  29. Emms SK, Arnold ML (2000) Site-to-site differences in pollinator visitation patterns in a Louisiana iris hybrid zone. Oikos 91:568–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Espíndola A, Buerki S, Bedalov M, Küpfer P, Alvarez N (2010) New insights into the phylogenetics and biogeography of Arum (Araceae): unravelling its evolutionary history. Bot J Linn Soc 163:14–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Espíndola A, Pellissier L, Alvarez N (2011) Variation in the proportion of flower visitors of Arum maculatum along its distributional range in relation with community-based climatic niche analyses. Oikos 120:728–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gibernau M, Macquart D, Przetak G (2004) Pollination in the genus Arum: a review. Aroideana 27:148–166Google Scholar
  33. Grant V (1966) The selective origin of incompatibility barriers in the plant genus Gilia. Am Nat 100:99–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gröning J, Hochkirch A (2008) Reproductive interference between animal species. Q Rev Biol 83:257–282CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Grotewold E (2006) The genetics and biochemistry of floral pigments. Annu Rev Plant Biol 57:761–780CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Heslop-Harrison J (1990) Gene expression and parental dominance in hybrid plants. Development 108:21–28Google Scholar
  37. Hirota SK, Nitta K, Kim Y, Kato A, Kawakubo N, Yasumoto AA, Yahara T (2012) Relative role of flower colour and scent on pollinator attraction: experimental tests using F1 and F2 hybrids of daylily and nightlily. PLoS ONE 7:e39010PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Hopkins R (2013) Reinforcement in plants. New Phytol 197:1095–1103CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Hopkins R, Rausher MD (2012) Pollinator-mediated selection on flower color allele drives reinforcement. Science 335:1090–1092CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Ježek J (1990) Redescriptions of nine common palaeartic and holartic species of Psychodini End. (Diptera: psychodidae). Acta Entomol Mus Nat Pragae 43:33–83Google Scholar
  41. Johnson SD, Jürgens A (2010) Convergent evolution of carrion and faecal scent mimicry in fly-pollinated angiosperm flowers and a stinkhorn fungus. S Afr J Bot 76:796–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jürgens A, Dötterl S, Meve U (2006) The chemical nature of fetid floral odours in stapeliads (Apocynaceae-Asclepiadoideae-Ceropegieae). New Phytol 172:452–468CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Kimball S, Campbell DR, Lessin C (2008) Differential performance of reciprocal hybrids in multiple environments. J Ecol 96:1306–1318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kite GC (1995) The floral odor of Arum maculatum. Biochem Syst Ecol 23:343–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kite GC, Hetterscheid WL, Lewis MJ, Boyce PC, Ollerton J, Cocklin E, Diaz A, Simmonds M (1998) Inflorescence odours and pollinators of Arum and Amorphophallus (Araceae). In: Owens SJ, Rudall PJ (eds) Reproductive biology. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, pp 295–315Google Scholar
  46. Koes R, Verweij W, Quattrocchio F (2005) Flavonoids: a colorful model for the regulation and evolution of biochemical pathways. Trends Plant Sci 10:236–242CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Krejcíková J, Sudová R, Lucanová M, Trávnícek P, Urfus T, Vít P, Weiss-Schneeweiss H, Kolano B, Oberlander K, Dreyer LL, Suda J (2013) High ploidy diversity and distinct patterns of cytotype distribution in a widespread species of Oxalis in the Greater Cape Floristic Region. Ann Bot 111:641–649PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Lack AJ, Diaz A (1991) The pollination of Arum maculatum L.: a historical review and new observations. Watsonia 18:333–342Google Scholar
  49. Levin DA, Kerster HW (1967) Natural selection for reproductive isolation in Phlox. Evolution 21:679–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Linz J, Stökl J, Urru I, Krügel T, Stensmyr MC, Hansson BS (2010) Molecular phylogeny of the genus Arum (Araceae) inferred from multi-locus sequence data and AFLPs. Taxon 59:405–415Google Scholar
  51. Mallet J (2007) Hybrid speciation. Nature 446:279–283CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Mant J, Peakall R, Schiestl FP (2005) Does selection on floral odor promote differentiation among populations and species of the sexually deceptive orchid genus Ophrys? Evolution 59:1449–1463CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Martin NH, Willis JH (2007) Ecological divergence associated with mating system causes nearly complete reproductive isolation between sympatric Mimulus species. Evolution 61:68–82CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Ortiz-Barrientos D, Grealy A, Nosil P (2009) The genetics and ecology of reinforcement. Ann NY Acad Sci 1168:156–182CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Pfennig KS, Pfennig DW (2009) Character displacement: ecological and reproductive responses to a common evolutionary problem. Q Rev Biol 84:253PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
  57. Rabinowitz GB (1975) An introduction to nonmetric multidimensional scaling. Am J Polit Sci 19:343–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Raguso RA (2008) Wake up and smell the roses: the ecology and evolution of floral scent. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 39:549–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ramsey J, Schemske DW (1998) Pathways, mechanisms, and rates of polyploid formation in flowering plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29:467–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rieseberg LH (1997) Hybrid origins of plant species. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:359–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rieseberg LH, Willis JH (2007) Plant speciation. Science 317:910–914PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Rieseberg LH, Ellstrand NC, Arnold M (1993) What can molecular and morphological markers tell us about plant hybridization? CR Rev Plant Sci 12:213–241Google Scholar
  63. Rieseberg LH, Archer MA, Wayne RK (1999) Transgressive segregation, adaptation and speciation. Heredity 83:363–372CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Salzmann CC, Schiestl F (2007) Odour and colour polymorphism in the food-deceptive orchid Dactylorhiza romana. Plant Syst Evol 267:37–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Salzmann C, Cozzolino S, Schiestl F (2007) Floral scent in food-deceptive orchids: species specificity and sources of variability. Plant Biol 9:720–729CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Schaefer HM, Ruxton GD (2011) Plant–animal communication. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Schemske DW, Bradshaw H (1999) Pollinator preference and the evolution of floral traits in monkeyflowers (Mimulus). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:11910–11915PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Schiestl FP, Ayasse M (2002) Do changes in floral odor cause speciation in sexually deceptive orchids? Plant Syst Evol 234:111–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schwinn K, Venail J, Shang Y, Mackay S, Alm V, Butelli E, Oyama R, Bailey P, Davies K, Martin C (2006) A small family of MYB-regulatory genes controls floral pigmentation intensity and patterning in the genus Antirrhinum. Plant Cell Online 18:831–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Schwinn KE, Boase MR, Bradley JM, Lewis DH, Deroles SC, Martin CR, Davies KM (2014) MYB and bHLH transcription factor transgenes increase anthocyanin pigmentation in petunia and lisianthus plants, and the petunia phenotypes are strongly enhanced under field conditions. Front Plant Sci 5:603. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00603 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Shuttleworth A, Johnson SD (2010) The missing stink: sulphur compounds can mediate a shift between fly and wasp pollination systems. Proc R Soc Lond B 277:2811–2819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Silvertown J, Servaes C, Biss P, Macleod D (2005) Reinforcement of reproductive isolation between adjacent populations in the Park Grass Experiment. Heredity 95:198–205CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Sonnleitner M, Weis B, Flatscher R, García PE, Suda J, Krejčíková J, Schneeweiss GM, Winkler M, Schönswetter P, Hülber K (2013) Parental ploidy strongly affects offspring fitness in heteroploid crosses among three cytotypes of autopolyploid Jacobaea carniolica (Asteraceae). PLoS ONE 8:e78959PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Stensmyr MC, Urru I, Collu I, Celander M, Hansson BS, Angioy A-M (2002) Pollination: rotting smell of dead-horse arum florets. Nature 420:625–626CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Stökl J, Schlüter PM, Stuessy TF, Paulus HF, Assum G, Ayasse M (2008) Scent variation and hybridization cause the displacement of a sexually deceptive orchid species. Am J Bot 95:472–481CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Urru I, Stensmyr MC, Hansson BS (2011) Pollination by brood-site deception. Phytochemistry 72:1655–1666CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Vereecken NJ, Cozzolino S, Schiestl FP (2010) Hybrid floral scent novelty drives pollinator shift in sexually deceptive orchids. BMC Evol Biol 10:103PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Waelti MO, Muhlemann JK, Widmer A, Schiestl FP (2008) Floral odour and reproductive isolation in two species of Silene. J Evol Biol 21:111–121PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Wang L, Albert NW, Zhang H, Arathoon S, Boase MR, Ngo H, Schwinn KE, Davies KM, Lewis DH (2014) Temporal and spatial regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis provide diverse flower colour intensities and patterning in Cymbidium orchid. Planta 240:983–1002CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Williams CA, Harborne JB, Mayo SJ (1981) Anthocyanin pigments and leaf flavonoids in the family Araceae. Phytochemistry 20:217–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wilson P, Jordan EA (2009) Hybrid intermediacy between pollination syndromes in Penstemon, and the role of nectar in affecting hummingbird visitation. Botany 87:272–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Yao H, Gray AD, Auger DL, Birchler JA (2013) Genomic dosage effects on heterosis in triploid maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:2665–2669PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Zuker A, Tzfira T, Ben-Meir H, Ovadis M, Shklarman E, Itzhaki H, Forkmann G, Martens S, Neta-Sharir I, Weiss D (2002) Modification of flower color and fragrance by antisense suppression of the flavanone 3-hydroxylase gene. Mol Breed 9:33–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marion Chartier
    • 1
    Email author
  • Suzanne Liagre
    • 2
  • Hanna Weiss-Schneeweiss
    • 1
  • Bozena Kolano
    • 3
  • Jean-Marie Bessière
    • 4
  • Jürg Schönenberger
    • 1
  • Marc Gibernau
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Botany and Biodiversity ResearchUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria
  2. 2.Lille UniversityVilleneuve d’Ascq CedexFrance
  3. 3.Department of Plant Anatomy and CytologyUniversity of SilesiaKatowicePoland
  4. 4.Center for Functional and Evolutive EcologyMontpellier 2 UniversityMontpellier 5France
  5. 5.CNRS - Université de Corse, SPE UMR 6134, Natural Resources Project – VignolaAjaccioFrance

Personalised recommendations