, Volume 180, Issue 1, pp 67–76 | Cite as

Brain size-related breeding strategies in a seabird

  • Kim Jaatinen
  • Markus Öst
Behavioral ecology - Original research


The optimal compromise between decision speed and accuracy may depend on cognitive ability, associated with the degree of encephalization: larger brain size may select for accurate but slow decision-making, beneficial under challenging conditions but costly under benign ones. How this brain size-dependent selection pressure shapes avian breeding phenology and reproductive performance remains largely unexplored. We predicted that (1) large-brained individuals have a delayed breeding schedule due to thorough nest-site selection and/or prolonged resource acquisition, (2) good condition facilitates early breeding independent of relative brain size, and (3) large brain size accrues benefits mainly to individuals challenged by environmental or intrinsic constraints. To test these predictions, we examined how the relative head volume of female eiders (Somateria mollissima) of variable body condition correlated with their breeding schedule, hatching success and offspring quality. The results were consistent with our predictions. First, large head size was associated with a progressively later onset of breeding with increasing breeding dispersal distance. Second, increasing body condition advanced the timing of breeding, but this effect was significantly weaker in large-brained females. Third, larger head volume was associated with increased hatching success mainly among late breeders and those in poor body condition, and duckling body condition was positively related to maternal head volume, but only in poor-condition mothers. Our study is, to our knowledge, the first to demonstrate the presence of brain size-related differences in reproductive strategies within a single natural population.


Breeding phenology Breeding success Cognition Animal personality Speed–accuracy trade-off 



We thank Petteri Lehikoinen, Heikki Eriksson, James Montanari, Martin Seltmann, Sara Neggazi and Ben Steele for their assistance in the field. We thank Anders Møller for discussion and constructive comments, and two anonymous reviewers for their comments. Tvärminne Zoological Station provided excellent facilities. This study was funded by the Academy of Finland (grants no. 266208 to KJ and 128039 to MÖ), the Finnish Cultural Foundation (to KJ) and the Swedish Cultural Foundation in Finland (to MÖ).

Author contribution statement

KJ and MÖ conceived and designed the study and both authors collected the field data together. KJ analysed the data. KJ and MÖ wrote the manuscript.

Supplementary material

442_2015_3468_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (6 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 6 kb)
442_2015_3468_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (20 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 20 kb)
442_2015_3468_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (20 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (PDF 20 kb)
442_2015_3468_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (22 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (PDF 21 kb)


  1. Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  2. Allander K, Bennett GF (1995) Retardation of breeding onset in great tits (Parus major) by blood parasites. Funct Ecol 9:677–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blums P, Clark RG, Mednis A (2002) Patterns of reproductive effort and success in birds: path analyses of long-term data from European ducks. J Anim Ecol 71:280–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bolduc F, Guillemette M (2003) Human disturbance and nesting success of common eiders: interaction between visitors and gulls. Biol Conserv 110:77–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burns JG, Rodd FH (2008) Hastiness, brain size and predation regime affect the performance of wild guppies in a spatial memory task. Anim Behav 76:911–922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cauchard L, Boogert NJ, Lefebvre L, Dubois F, Doligez B (2013) Problem-solving performance is correlated with reproductive success in a wild bird population. Anim Behav 85:19–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chittka L, Skorupski P, Raine NE (2009) Speed–accuracy tradeoffs in animal decision making. Trends Ecol Evol 24:400–407PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Christensen TK (1999) Effects of cohort and individual variation in duckling body condition on survival and recruitment in the Eider Somateria mollissima. J Avian Biol 30:302–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark RG, Shutler D (1999) Avian habitat selection: pattern from process in nest-site use by ducks? Ecology 80:272–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cole EF, Quinn JL (2012) Personality and problem-solving performance explain competitive ability in the wild. Proc R Soc Lond B 279:1168–1175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cole EF, Morand-Ferron J, Hinks A, Quinn JL (2012) Cognitive ability influences reproductive life history variation in the wild. Curr Biol 22:1808–1812PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cooke F, Findlay CS, Rockwell RF (1984) Recruitment and the timing of reproduction in lesser snow geese (Chen caerulescens caerulescens). Auk 101:451–458Google Scholar
  13. Deaner RO, Barton RA, van Schaik CP (2003) Primate brains and life histories: renewing the connection. In: Kappeler PM, Pereira ME (eds) Primate life histories and socioecology. University of Chicago, Chicago, pp 233–265Google Scholar
  14. Descamps S, Bêty J, Love OP, Gilchrist HG (2011) Individual optimization of reproduction in a long-lived migratory bird: a test of the condition-dependent model of laying date and clutch size. Funct Ecol 25:671–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Development Core Team R (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  16. Gonda A, Herczeg G, Merilä J (2013) Evolutionary ecology of intraspecific brain size variation: a review. Ecol Evol 3:2751–2764PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goudie RI, Roberston GJ, Reed A (2000) Common Eider (Somateria mollissima). In: Poole A, Gill F (eds.) The Birds of North America, No. 546. Birds of North America, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  18. Healy SD, Rowe C (2007) A critique of comparative studies of brain size. Proc R Soc Lond B 274:453–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoover JP (2003) Decision rules for site fidelity in a migratory bird, the prothonotary warbler. Ecology 84:416–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ings TC, Chittka L (2008) Speed-accuracy tradeoffs and false alarms in bee responses to cryptic predators. Curr Biol 18:1520–1524PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Isler K, van Schaik CP (2009) The expensive brain: a framework for explaining evolutionary changes in brain size. J Hum Evol 57:392–400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jaatinen K, Öst M (2011) Experience attracts: the role of age in the formation of cooperative brood-rearing coalitions in eiders. Anim Behav 81:1289–1294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jaatinen K, Öst M (2013) Brood size matching: a novel perspective on predator dilution. Am Nat 181:171–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jaatinen K, Seltmann MW, Hollmén T, Atkinson S, Mashburn K, Öst M (2013) Context dependency of baseline glucocorticoids as indicators of individual quality in a capital breeder. Gen Comp Endocrin 191:231–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kilpi M, Lindström K (1997) Habitat-specific clutch size and cost of incubation in common eiders, Somateria mollissima. Oecologia 111:297–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Koolhaas JM, de Boer SF, Coppens CM, Buwalda B (2010) Neuroendocrinology of coping styles: towards understanding the biology of individual variation. Front Neuroendocrin 31:307–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kotrschal A, Rogell B, Bundsen A, Svensson B, Zajitschek S, Brännström I, Immler S, Maklakov AA, Kolm N (2013) Artificial selection on relative brain size in the guppy reveals costs and benefits of evolving a larger brain. Curr Biol 23:168–171PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kotrschal A, Lievens EJ, Dahlbom J, Bundsen A, Semenova S, Sundvik M, Maklakov AA, Winberg S, Panula P, Kolm N (2014) Artificial selection on relative brain size reveals a positive genetic correlation between brain size and proactive personality in the guppy. Evolution 68:1139–1149PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kotrschal A, Corral-Lopez A, Amcoff M, Kolm N (2015) A larger brain confers a benefit in a spatial mate search learning task in male guppies. Behav Ecol 26:527–532PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Logan CJ, Palmstrom CR (2015) Can endocranial volume be estimated accurately from external skull measurements in great-tailed grackles (Quiscalus mexicanus)? PeerJ 3:e1000PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mery F, Kawecki TJ (2003) A fitness cost of learning ability in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:2465–2469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Møller AP (2010) Brain size, head size and behaviour of a passerine bird. J Evol Biol 23:625–635PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Møller AP, Erritzøe J (2014) Predator–prey interactions, flight initiation distance and brain size. J Evol Biol 24:34–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Opplinger A, Richner H, Christe P (1994) Effect of an ectoparasite on lay date, nest-site choice, desertion, and hatching success in the great tit (Parus major). Behav Ecol 5:130–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Öst M, Steele BB (2010) Age-specific nest-site preference and success in eiders. Oecologia 162:59–69PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Öst M, Jaatinen K (2015) Smart and safe? Antipredator behavior and breeding success are related to head size in a wild bird. Behav Ecol 26:1371–1378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Öst M, Wickman M, Matulionis E, Steele B (2008a) Habitat-specific clutch size and cost of incubation in eiders reconsidered. Oecologia 158:5–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Öst M, Smith BD, Kilpi M (2008b) Social and maternal factors affecting duckling survival in eiders Somateria mollissima. J Anim Ecol 77:315–325PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Öst M, Lehikoinen A, Jaatinen K, Kilpi M (2011) Causes and consequences of fine-scale breeding dispersal in a female-philopatric species. Oecologia 166:327–336PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Parker H, Holm H (1990) Patterns of nutrient and energy expenditure in female common eiders nesting in the high arctic. Auk 107:660–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Perrins CM (1970) The timing of birds’ breeding seasons. Ibis 112:242–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sih A, Del Guidice M (2012) Linking behavioural syndromes and cognition: a behavioural ecology perspective. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 367:2762–2772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sinnott RW (1984) Virtues of the haversine. Sky Telesc 68:159Google Scholar
  44. Sol D (2009) Revisiting the cognitive buffer hypothesis for the evolution of large brains. Biol Lett 5:130–133PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Trimmer PC, Houston AI, Marshall JAR, Bogacz R, Paul ES, Mendl MT, McNamara JM (2008) Mammalian choices: combining fast-but- inaccurate and slow-but-accurate decision-making systems. Proc R Soc Lond B 275:2353–2361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. van Woerden JT, Willems EP, van Schaik CP, Isler K (2012) Large brains buffer energetic effects of seasonal habitats in catarrhine primates. Evolution 66:191–199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Verhulst S, Nilsson JA (2008) The timing of birds’ breeding seasons: a review of experiments that manipulated timing of breeding. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 363:399–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wolak ME, Fairbairn DJ, Paulsen YR (2012) Guidelines for estimating repeatability. Methods Ecol Evol 3:129–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yokoi T, Fujisaki K (2009) Hesitation behaviour of hoverflies Sphaerophoria spp. to avoid ambush by crab spiders. Naturwissenschaften 96:195–200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aronia Coastal Zone Research TeamÅbo Akademi University and Novia University of Applied SciencesEkenäsFinland
  2. 2.Department of BiosciencesÅbo Akademi UniversityTurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations