Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 179, Issue 4, pp 1067–1078 | Cite as

Contrasting environments shape thermal physiology across the spatial range of the sandhopper Talorchestia capensis

  • Simone Baldanzi
  • Nicolas F. Weidberg
  • Marco Fusi
  • Stefano Cannicci
  • Christopher D. McQuaid
  • Francesca Porri
Population ecology - Original research

Abstract

Integrating thermal physiology and species range extent can contribute to a better understanding of the likely effects of climate change on natural populations. Generally, broadly distributed species show variation in thermal physiology between populations. Within their distributional ranges, populations at the edges are assumed to experience more challenging environments than central populations (fundamental niche breadth hypothesis). We have investigated differences in thermal tolerance and thermal sensitivity under increasing/decreasing temperatures among geographically separated populations of the sandhopper Talorchestia capensis along the South African coasts. We tested whether the thermal tolerance and thermal sensitivity of T. capensis differ between central and marginal populations using a non-parametric constraint space analysis. We linked thermal sensitivity to environmental history by using historical climatic data to evaluate whether individual responses to temperature could be related to natural long-term fluctuations in air temperatures. Our results demonstrate that there were significant differences in the thermal response of T. capensis populations to both increasing/decreasing temperatures. Thermal sensitivity (for increasing temperatures only) was negatively related to temperature variability and positively related to temperature predictability. Two different models fitted the geographical distribution of thermal sensitivity and thermal tolerance. Our results confirm that widespread species show differences in physiology among populations by providing evidence of contrasting thermal responses in individuals subject to different environmental conditions at the limits of the species’ spatial range. When considering the complex interactions between individual physiology and species ranges, it is not sufficient to consider mean environmental temperatures, or even temperature variability; the predictability of that variability may be critical.

Keywords

Macrophysiology ACH Thermal sensitivity Climatic variability Climate change Temperature predictability 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript. We are grateful to Dr. M. Tagliarolo for her contribution to the experiments and Dr. Irene Ortolani for her help composing the first draft of the paper. The authors also thank the South African Weather Service (http://www.weathersa.co.za ) for the release of historical climatic dataset. This paper was written under the framework of the project ‘‘CREC’’ [EU IRSES#247514]. The work is based upon research supported by the South African Research Chairs Initiative of the Department of Science and Technology and National Research Foundation of South Africa (NRF).

Author contribution statement

SB, FP and MF conceived the ideas. SB and MF designed and performed the experiments. SB, NFW, MF, SC analysed the data. SB, NFW, CDM and FP wrote the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing financial interests or any other form of conflict of interest

Supplementary material

442_2015_3404_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (622 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 621 kb)
442_2015_3404_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (127 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 127 kb)
442_2015_3404_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (124 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (PDF 124 kb)

References

  1. Anderson MJ, Gorley RN, Clarke KR (2008) PERMANOVA+ for PRIMER: guide to software and statistical methods. PRIMER-E, PlymouthGoogle Scholar
  2. Angilletta MJ Jr (2009) Thermal adaptation: a theoretical and empirical synthesis. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Angilletta MJ, Huey RB, Frazier MR (2010) Thermodynamic effects on organismal performance: is hotter better? Physiol Biochem Zool 83:197–206. doi: 10.1086/648567 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Baldanzi S, McQuaid CD, Cannicci S, Porri F (2013) Environmental domains and range-limiting mechanisms: testing the Abundant Centre Hypothesis using Southern African sandhoppers. PLoS One 8(1):e54598CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bozinovic F, Calosi P, Spicer JI (2011) Physiological correlates of geographic range in animals. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Systt 42:155–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown JH (1984) On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. Am Nat 124:255–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown JH (1995) Macroecology. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  8. Calosi P, Morritt D, Chelazzi G, Ugolini A (2007) Physiological capacity and environmental tolerance in two sandhopper species with contrasting geographical ranges: Talitrus saltator and Talorchestia ugolinii. Mar Biol 151:1647–1655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Calosi P, Bilton DT, Spicer JI (2008) Thermal tolerance, acclimatory capacity and vulnerability to global climate change. Biol Lett 4:99–102CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Chown SL, Gaston KJ (2008) Macrophysiology for a changing world. Proc R Soc B 275:1469–1478CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Clarke A (2004) Is there a universal temperature dependence of metabolism? Funct Ecol 18:252–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Colwell RK (1974) Predictability, constancy and contingency of periodic phenomena. Ecology 55:1148–1153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DeWitt TJ, Scheiner SM (2004) Phenotypic plasticity: functional and conceptual approaches. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. Doney SC, Ruckelshaus M, Duffy JE, Barry JP, Chan F, English CA, Galindo HM, Grebmeier JM, Hollowed AB, Knowlton N, Polovina J, Rabalais NN, Sydeman WJ, Talley LD (2012) Climate change impacts on marine ecosystems. Annu Rev Mar Sci 4:11–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Enquist BJ, Jordan MA, Brown JH (1995) Connections between ecology, biogeography, and paleobiology: relationship between local abundance and geographic distribution in fossil and recent molluscs. Evol Ecol 9:586–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fenberg PB, Rivadeneira MM (2011) Range limits and geographic patterns of abundance of the rocky intertidal owl limpet, Lottia gigantea. J Biogeog 38:2286–2298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fischer K, Karl I (2010) Exploring plastic and genetic responses to temperature variation using copper butterflies. Clim Res 43:17–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Folguera G, Bastıas DA, Bozinovic F (2009) Impact of experimental thermal amplitude on ectotherm performance: adaptation to climate change variability? Comp Biochem Physiol A 154:389–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fusi M, Giomi F, Babbini S, Daffonchio D, McQuaid CD, Porri F, Cannicci S (2015) Thermal specialization across large geographical scales predicts the resilience of mangrove crab populations to global warming. Oikos 124:784–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gaitán-Espitia JD, Belén Arias M, Lardies MA, Nespolo RF (2013) Variation in thermal sensitivity and thermal tolerances in an invasive species across a climatic gradient: lessons from the land snail Cornu aspersum. PLoS ONE 8(8):e70662CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Gaston KJ (2003) The structure and dynamics of geographic ranges. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  22. Ghalambor CK, McKay JK, Carroll SP, Reznick DN (2007) Adaptive versus non-adaptive phenotypic plasticity and the potential for contemporary adaptation in new environments. Funct Ecol 21:394–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gianoli E, Valladares F (2012) Studying phenotypic plasticity: the advantages of a broad approach. Biol J Lin Soc 105:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gilchrist GW (1996) A quantitative genetic analysis of thermal sensitivity in the locomotor performance curve of Aphidius ervi. Evolution 50:1560–1572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gilman SE (2006) The northern geographic range limit of the intertidal limpet Collisella scabra: a test of performance, recruitment, and temperature hypotheses. Ecography 29:709–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Griffiths CL (1976) Guide to the benthic marine amphipods of Southern Africa. Trustees of the South African Museum, Rustica Press, Cape TownGoogle Scholar
  27. Hasanean HM (2004) Wintertime surface temperature in Egypt in relation to the associated atmospheric circulation. Int J Climatol 24:985–999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Helmuth B, Mieszkowska N, Moore P, Hawkins SJ (2006) Living on the edge of two changing worlds: forecasting the responses of rocky intertidal ecosystems to climate change. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37:373–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Holt RD (2003) On the evolutionary ecology of species’ ranges. Evol Ecol Res 5:159–178Google Scholar
  30. Huey RB, Berrigan D, Gilchrist GW, Herron JC (1999) Testing the adaptive significance of acclimation: a strong inference approach. Am Zool 39:323–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hutchinson GE (1959) Homage to Santa Rosalia or why are there so many kinds of animals? Am Nat 93:145–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kassahn KS, Crozier RH, Pörtner HO, Caley MJ (2009) Animal performance and stress: responses and tolerance limits at different levels of biological organisation. Biol Rev 84:277–292CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kearney M (2006) Habitat, environment and niche: what are we modelling? Oikos 115:186–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kelly MW, Sanford E, Grosberg RK (2012) Limited potential for adaptation to climate change in a broadly distributed marine crustacean. Proc R Soc B 279:349–356CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Khaliq I, Hof C, Prinzinger R, Böhning-Gaese K, Pfenninger M (2014) Global variation in thermal tolerances and vulnerability of endotherms to climate change. Proc R Soc B 281:20141097CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Lester SE, Gaines SD, Kinlan BP (2007) Reproduction on the edge: large-scale patterns of individual performance in a marine invertebrate. Ecology 88:2229–2239CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Lombard AT (2004) Marine component of the National Spatial Biodiversity Assessment for the development of South Africa’s National Biodiversity Strategic and Action Plan. National Botanical Institute, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  38. Mermillod-Blondin F, Lefour C, Lalouette L, Renault D, Malard F, Simon L, Douady CJ (2013) Thermal tolerance breadths among groundwater crustaceans living in a thermally constant environment. J Exp Biol 216:1683–1694CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Morritt D (1988) Osmoregulation in littoral terrestrial talitroidean amphipods (Crustacea) from Britain. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 123:77–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Morritt D (1998) Hygrokinetic responses of talitrid amphipods. J Crust Biol 18:25–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Morritt D, Ingolfsson A (2000) Upper thermal tolerances of the beachflea Orchestia gammarellus (Pallas) (Crustacea: amphipoda: Talitridae) associated with hot springs in Iceland. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 255:215–227CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Paaijmans KP, Heinig RL, Seliga RA, Blanford JI, Blanford S, Murdock CC, Thomas MB (2013) Temperature variation makes ectotherms more sensitive to climate change. Glob Change Biol 19(8):2373–2380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Parmesan C, Gaines S, Gonzalez S, Kaufman DM, Kingsolver J, Peterson AT, Sagarin R (2005) Empirical perspectives on species borders: from traditional biogeography to global change. Oikos 108:58–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pavesi L, Tiedemann R, DeMatthaeis E, Ketmaier V (2013) Genetic connectivity between land and sea: the case of the beachflea Orchestia montagui (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Talitridae) in the Mediterranean Sea. Front Zool 10:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pigliucci M (2001) Phenotypic plasticity: beyond nature and nurture. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  46. Pigliucci M (2005) Evolution of phenotypic plasticity: where are we going now? Trends Ecol Evol 20:481–486CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Pither J (2003) Climate tolerance and interspecific variation in geographic range size. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:475–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Podrabsky JE, Somero GN (2004) Changes in gene expression associated with acclimation to constant temperatures and fluctuating daily temperatures in an annual killifish, Austrofundulus limnaeus. J Exp Biol 207:2237–2254CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Pörtner H-O, Knust R (2007) Climate change affects marine fishes through the oxygen limitation of thermal tolerance. Science 315:95–97CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. R Development Core Team (2007) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  51. Ribeiro PL, Camacho A, Navas CA (2012) Considerations for assessing maximum critical temperatures in small ectothermic animals: insights from Leaf-Cutting Ants. PLoS ONE 7(2):e32083CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Rivadeneira MM, Hernáez P, Baeza JA, Boltaña S, Cifuentes M, Correa C, Cuevas A, del Valle E, Hinojosa I, Ulrich N, Valdivia N, Vásquez N, Zander A, Thiel M (2010) Testing the abundant-centre hypothesis using intertidal porcelain crabs along the Chilean coast: linking abundance and life-history variation. J Biogeog 37:486–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ruel JJ, Ayres MP (1999) Jensen’s inequality predicts effects of environmental variation. Trends Ecol Evol 14:361–366CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Sagarin RD, Gaines SD (2002) The ‘abundant centre’ distribution: to what extent is the biogeographical rule? Ecol Lett 5:137–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sagarin RD, Gaines SD, Gaylord B (2006) Moving beyond assumptions to understand abundance distributions across the ranges of species. Trends Ecol Evol 21:524–530CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Samis KE, Eckert CRG (2007) Testing the abundant center model using range-wide demographic surveys of two coastal dune plants. Ecology 88:1747–1758CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Sanford E, Kelly MW (2011) Local Adaptation in Marine Invertebrates. Annu Rev Mar Sci 3:509–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schuler MS, Cooper BS, Storm JJ, Sears MW, Angilletta MJ Jr (2011) Isopods failed to acclimate their thermal sensitivity of locomotor performance during predictable or stochastic cooling. PLoS One 6(6):e20905CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Schulte PM, Timothy MH, Fangue NA (2011) Thermal performance curves, phenotypic plasticity, and the time scales of temperature exposure. Integ Comp Biol 51:691–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schurmann H, Steffensen JF (1997) Effects of temperature, hypoxia and activity on the metabolism of juvenile Atlantic cod. J Fish Biol 50:1166–1180Google Scholar
  61. Somero GN (2010) The physiology of climate change: how potentials for acclimatization and genetic adaptation will determine ‘winners’ and ‘losers’. J Exp Biol 213:912–920CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Spicer JI, Gaston KJ (1999) Physiological diversity and its ecological implications. Blackwell Science, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  63. Stevens GC (1989) The latitudinal gradients in geographical range: how so many species co-exist in the tropics. Am Nat 133:240–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stillman JH, Somero GN (2000) A comparative analysis of the upper thermal tolerance limits of Eastern Pacific porcelain crabs, Genus Petrolisthes: influences of latitude, vertical zonation, acclimation, and phylogeny. Physiol Biochem Zool 73:200–208CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Sunday JM, Bates AE, Dulvy NK (2011) Global analysis of thermal tolerance and latitude in ectotherms. Proc R Soc Lond B 278(1713):1823–1830. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1295 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Terblanche JS, Deere JA, Clusella-Trullas S, Janion C, Chown SL (2007) Critical thermal limits depend on methodological context. Proc R Soc Lond B 274:2935–2942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Terblanche JS, Hoffmann AA, Mitchell KA, Rako L, le Roux PC, Chown SL (2011) Ecologically relevant measures of tolerance to potentially lethal temperatures. J Exp Biol 214:3713–3725CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Tsubokura T, Goshima S, Nakao S (1997) Seasonal horizontal and vertical distribution patterns of the supralittoral amphipod Trinorchestia trinitatis in relation to environmental variables. J Crustacean Biol 17:674–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tuya F, Wernberg T, Thomsen MS (2008) Testing the ‘abundant centre’ hypothesis on endemic reef fishes in south-western Australia. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 372:225–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Van Senus P (1988) Reproduction of the sandhoppers Talorchestia capensis (Dana) (Amphipoda, Talitridae). Crustaceana 55:93–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Virgós E, Kowalczyk R, Trua A, de Marinis A, Mangas JG, Barea-Azcón JM, Geffen E (2011) Body size clines in the European badger and the abundant centre hypothesis. J Biogeog 38:1546–1556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Willhite C, Cupp PV (1982) Daily rhythms of thermal tolerance in Rana clamitans (anura, ranidae) tadpoles. Comp Biochem Physiol 72:255–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Williams JA (1995) Burrow-zone distribution of the supra-littoral amphipod Talitrus saltator on Derby haven Beach, Isle of Man—a possible mechanism for regulating desiccation stress? J Crustacean Biol 15:466–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Williams CM, Marshall KE, MacMillan HA, Dzurisin JDK, Hellmann JJ, Sinclair BJ (2012) Thermal variability increases the impact of autumnal warming and drives metabolic depression in an overwintering butterfly. PLoS One 7:e34470CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simone Baldanzi
    • 1
    • 2
    • 6
  • Nicolas F. Weidberg
    • 1
    • 6
  • Marco Fusi
    • 3
  • Stefano Cannicci
    • 4
    • 5
  • Christopher D. McQuaid
    • 1
  • Francesca Porri
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Coastal Research Group, Department of Zoology and EntomologyRhodes UniversityGrahamstownSouth Africa
  2. 2.South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity (SAIAB)GrahamstownSouth Africa
  3. 3.Department of Food Environmental and Nutritionals Sciences (DeFENS)University of MilanMilanItaly
  4. 4.The Swire Institute of Marine Science and The School of Biological SciencesThe University of Hong KongHong KongPeople’s Republic of China
  5. 5.Department of BiologyUniversità degli Studi di FirenzeFlorenceItaly
  6. 6.Estación Costera de Investigaciones Marinas (ECIM)Pontificia Universidad Catolica de ChileLas CrucesChile

Personalised recommendations