, Volume 179, Issue 2, pp 495–507 | Cite as

Effects of non-native Melilotus albus on pollination and reproduction in two boreal shrubs

  • Katie V. Spellman
  • Laura C. Schneller
  • Christa P. H. Mulder
  • Matthew L. Carlson
Plant-microbe-animal interactions – original research


The establishment of abundantly flowered, highly rewarding non-native plant species is expected to have strong consequences for native plants through altered pollination services, particularly in boreal forest where the flowering season is short and the pollinator pool is small. In 18 boreal forest sites, we added flowering Melilotus albus to some sites and left some sites as controls in 2 different years to test if the invasive plant influences the pollination and reproductive success of two co-flowering ericaceous species: Vaccinium vitis-idaea and Rhododendron groenlandicum. We found that M. albus increased the pollinator diversity and tended to increase visitation rates to the focal native plant species compared to control sites. Melilotus albus facilitated greater seed production per berry in V. vitis-idaea when we added 120 plants compared to when we added 40 plants or in control sites. In R. groenlandicum, increasing numbers of M. albus inflorescences lowered conspecific pollen loads and percentage of flowers pollinated; however, no differences in fruit set were detected. The number of M. albus inflorescences had greater importance in explaining R. groenlandicum pollination compared to other environmental variables such as weather and number of native flowers, and had greater importance in lower quality black spruce sites than in mixed deciduous and white spruce sites for explaining the percentage of V. vitis-idaea flowers pollinated. Our data suggest that the identity of new pollinators attracted to the invaded sites, degree of shared pollinators between invasive and native species, and variation in resource limitation among sites are likely determining factors in the reproductive responses of boreal native plants in the presence of an invasive.


Fruit set Invasive species Ledum palustre ssp. groenlandicum Seed set Rhododendron groenlandicum Vaccinium vitis-idaea 



Funding for this project was provided by grants from the US Department of Agriculture NIFA (ALKR-2009-04931) and National Science Foundation IGERT (grant no. 0654441). We thank our technicians (S. Decina, P. Hurtt, M. Kain, J. Malthot, L. Medinger, K. Moeller, L. Ponchione, T. Saunders) and volunteers (J. Conn, J. Martin, B. Spellman, D. Uliassi, E. Uliassi, L. Uliassi, K. Schnaars Uvino, J. Villano, and T. Villano) for assistance in field and lab work, M. Wright for greenhouse support, and the Bonanza Creek Long-Term Ecological Research Program for providing access to sites. Thoughtful comments from L. Conner, A. D. McGuire, and D. Wagner greatly helped us improve this manuscript.

Supplementary material

442_2015_3364_MOESM1_ESM.docx (863 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 863 kb)


  1. AKEPIC—Alaska Exotic Plant Information Clearing House (2014) AKEPIC mapping project inventory field data. University of Alaska Anchorage Alaska Natural Heritage Program and USDA Forest Service, Anchorage, Alaska. Retrieved 9 September 2014 from
  2. Albrecht M, Padrón B, Bartomeus I, Traveset A (2014) Consequences of plant invasions on compartmentalization and species roles in plant–pollinator networks. Proc R Soc B 281:20140773. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0773 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnold TW (2010) Uninformative parameters and model selection using Akaike’s information criterion. J Wildl Manage 74:1175–1178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartomeus I, Bosch J, Vila M (2008a) High invasive pollen transfer, yet low deposition on native stigmas in a Carpobrotus-invaded community. Ann Bot 102:417–424PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartomeus I, Vila M, Santamaria L (2008b) Contrasting effects of invasive plants in plant–pollinator networks. Oecologia 155:761–770CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bartomeus I, Vila M, Steffan-Dewenter I (2010) Combined effects of Impatiens glandulifera invasion and landscape structure on native plant pollination. J Ecol 98:440–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brower JE, Zar JH (1984) Field and laboratory methods for general ecology, 2nd edn. Brown, DubuqueGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown BJ, Mitchell RJ, Graham SA (2002) Competition for pollination between an invasive species (purple loosestrife) and a native congener. Ecology 83:2328–2336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, NewyorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Campbell DR (1985) Pollinator sharing and seed set of Stellaria pubera: competition for pollination. Ecology 66:544–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carlson ML, Shephard M (2007) Is the spread of non-native plants in Alaska accelerating? In: Harrington TB, Reichard SH (ed) Meeting the challenge: invasive plants in Pacific Northwest ecosystems. Gen Tech Rep PNW-GTR-694. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR, pp 111–127Google Scholar
  12. Carlson ML, Lapina IV, Shephard M, Conn JS, Densmore R, Spencer P, Heys J, Riley J, Nielsen J (2008) Invasiveness ranking system for non-native plants of Alaska. Technical paper R10-TP-143. USDA Forest Service, Alaska Region, AnchorageGoogle Scholar
  13. Chittka L, Schürkens S (2001) Successful invasion of a floral market. Nature 411:653CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Coe HS, Martin JN (1920) Sweet clover seed. Bulletin 844. US Department of Agriculture, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  15. Conn JS, Stockdale CA, Morgan JC (2008a) Characterizing pathways of invasive plant spread to Alaska: propagules from container-grown ornamentals. Inv Plant Sci Mgmt 1:331–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Conn JS, Beattie KL, Shephard ML, Carlson ML, Lapina I, Hebert M, Gronquist R, Densmore R, Rasy M (2008b) Alaska Melilotus invasions: distribution, origin, and susceptibility of plant communities. Arct Antarct Alp Res 40:298–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Corbet SA, Fussell M, Ake R, Fraser A, Gunson C, Savage A, Smith K (1993) Temperature and the pollinating activity of social bees. Ecol Entomol 18:17–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Da Silva EM, King VM, Russell-Mercier JL, Sargent RD (2013) Evidence for pollen limitation of a native plant in invaded communities. Oecologia 172:469–476CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Davis AN (2002) Pollination biology of the lingonberry, Vaccinium vitis-idaea subsp. minus L. Master’s thesis. University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AlaskaGoogle Scholar
  20. Davis AN, Holloway PS, Kruse JJ (2003) Insect visitors and potential pollinators of lingonberries, Vaccinium vitis-idaea subsp. minus, in sub-arctic Alaska. Acta Hortic 626:441–446Google Scholar
  21. Dlusski GM, Glazunova KP, Perfilieva KS (2005) Mechanisms that limit pollinator range in Ericaceae. Z Obshch Biol 66:224–238Google Scholar
  22. Eckardt N (1987) Element stewardship abstract for Melilotus alba—sweetclover or white sweetclover, Melilotus officinalis—yellow sweetclover. The Nature Conservancy, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  23. Flanagan RJ, Mitchell RJ, Karron JD (2010) Increased relative abundance of an invasive competitor for pollination, Lythrum salicaria, reduces seed number in Mimulus ringens. Oecologia 164:445–454CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Fröborg H (1996) Pollination and seed production in five boreal species of Vaccinium and Andromeda (Ericaceae). Can J Bot 74:1363–1368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Garibaldi A (1999) Medicinal flora of the Alaska natives. University of Alaska Anchorage Press, AnchorageGoogle Scholar
  26. Gathmann A, Tscharntke T (2002) Foraging ranges of solitary bees. J Anim Ecol 71:757–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ghazoul J (2004) Alien abduction: disruption of native plant pollinator interactions by invasive species. Biotropica 36:156–164Google Scholar
  28. Hall IV, Beil CE (1970) Seed germination, pollination, and growth of Vaccinium vitis-idaea var. minus Lodd. Can J Plant Sci 50:731–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Holloway PS (2006) Managing wild bog blueberry, lingonberry, cloudberry, and crowberry stands in Alaska. Report for University of Alaska Fairbanks and Natural Resource Conservation Service, FairbanksGoogle Scholar
  30. Hultén E (1968) Flora of Alaska and neighboring territories. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  31. Irwin DL (1945) Forty-seven years of experimental work with grasses and legumes in Alaska. Univ Alaska Agric Exp Stn Bull 12:47Google Scholar
  32. Jacquemart AL (1997) Pollen limitation of three sympatric species of Vaccinium (Ericaceae) in the Upper Ardennes, Belgium. Plant Syst Evol 207:159–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jacquemart AL, Thompson JD (1996) Floral and pollination biology of three sympatric Vaccinium (Ericaceae) species in the upper Ardennes, Belgium. Can J Bot 74:210–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jakobsson A, Padrón B, Traveset A (2009) Competition for pollinators between invasive and native plants: effects of spatial scale of investigation (note). Ecoscience 16:138–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kandori I, Hirao T, Matsunaga S, Kurosaki T (2009) An invasive dandelion unilaterally reduces the reproduction of a native congener through competition for pollination. Oecologia 159:559–569CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Kearns CA, Inouye DW (1993) Techniques for pollination biologists. University Press of Colorado, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  37. Kevan PG, Tikhmenev EA, Usui M (1993) Insects and plants in the pollination ecology of the boreal zone. Ecol Res 8:247–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Krebs CJ, Boonstra R, Cowcill K, Kenney AJ (2009) Climatic determinants of berry crops in the boreal forest of the southwestern Yukon. Botany 87:401–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kuchko AA (1988) Bilberry and cranberry yields and the factors controlling them in the forests of Karelia USSR. Acta Bot Fenn 136:23–25Google Scholar
  40. Malacalza NH, Caccavari MA, Fagúndez G, Lupano CE (2005) Unifloral honeys of the province of Buenos Aires, Argentine. J Sci Food Agric 85:1389–1396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Molina-Montenegro MA, Badano EI, Cavieres LA (2008) Positive interactions among plant species for pollinator service: assessing the magnet species concept with invasive species. Oikos 117:1833–1839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Moragues E, Traveset A (2005) Effect of Carpobrotus spp. on the pollination success of native plant species of the Balearic Islands. Biol Conserv 122:611–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Morales CL, Traveset A (2008) Interspecific pollen transfer: magnitude, prevalence and consequences for plant fitness. Crit Rev Plant Sci 27:221–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Muñoz AA, Cavieres LA (2008) The presence of a showy invasive plant disrupts pollinator service and reproductive output in native alpine species only at high densities. J Ecol 96:459–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Myneni RB, Keeling CD, Tucker CJ, Asrar G, Nemani RR (1997) Increased plant growth in the northern high latitudes from 1981 to 1991. Nature 386:698–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nelson JL, Zavaleta E, Chapin FS III (2008) Boreal fire effects on subsistence resources: landscape diversity as a critical component of rural livelihoods in Alaska and adjacent Canada. Ecosystems 11:156–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nielsen C, Heimes C, Kollmann J (2008) Little evidence for negative effects of an invasive alien plant on pollinator services. Biol Invasions 10:1353–1363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Peterson SF (1989) Beekeeping under the northern lights. Am Bee J 129:33–35Google Scholar
  49. Proctor M, Yeo P, Lack A (1996) The natural history of pollination. Timber Press, PortlandGoogle Scholar
  50. Quiner M (2005) Ranchers get the blues: area citizens consider branching out into berries. Peninsula Clarion, 11 October 2005,
  51. R Development Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. ISBN. 3-900051-07-0,
  52. Royer F, Dickinson R (1999) Weeds of the Northern US and Canada. The University of Alberta Press, EdmontonGoogle Scholar
  53. Sanderson LA, McLaughlin JA, Antunes PM (2012) The last great forest: a review of the status of invasive species in the North American boreal forest. Forestry 85:329–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Serreze MC, Walsh JE, Chapin FS III, Osterkamp T, Dyurgerov M, Oechel WC, Romanovsky V, Morison J, Zhang T, Barry RG (2000) Observational evidence of recent change in the northern high latitude environment. Clim Change 46:159–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Shugart HH, Leemans R, Bonan GB (1992) A systems analysis of the boreal forest. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Spellman BT, Wurtz T (2011) Invasive white sweetclover (Melilotus officinalis) impacts native recruitment along rivers in interior Alaska. Biol Invasions 13:1779–1790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Spellman KV, Mulder CPH, Hollingsworth TN (2014) Susceptibility of burned black spruce (Picea mariana) forests to non-native plant invasions in Interior Alaska. Biol Invasions 16:1879–1895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tepedino VJ, Bradley BA, Griswold TL (2008) Might flowers of invasive plants increase native bee carrying capacity? Intimations from Capitol Reef National Park, Utah. Nat Area J 28:44–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Totland Ø, Nielsen A, Bjerknes AL, Ohlson M (2006) Effects of an exotic plant and habitat disturbance on pollinator visitation and reproduction in a boreal forest herb. Am J Bot 93:868–873CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Tuell JK, Isaacs R (2010) Weather during bloom affects pollination and yield of highbush blueberry. J Econ Entomol 103:557–562CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Turkington RA, Cavers PB, Rempel E (1978) The biology of Canadian weeds. 29. Melilotus alba Desr. and M. officinalis (L.) Lam. Can J Plant Sci 58:523–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. US Census 2010 (2010) Census 2010 data for the state of Alaska. US Census Bureau.
  63. Viereck LA, Dyrness CT, Batten AR, Wenzlick KJ (1992) The Alaska vegetation classification. Gen Tech Rep PNW-GTR-286. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. Portland, ORGoogle Scholar
  64. Villano KL, Mulder CPH (2008) Invasive plant spread in burned lands of interior Alaska. Technical report for National Park Service-Alaska Region and National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Fairbanks, AlaskaGoogle Scholar
  65. Walker DA, Walker MD (1991) History and pattern of disturbance in Alaskan arctic terrestrial ecosystems: a hierarchical approach to analysing landscape change. J Appl Ecol 28:244–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Waser NM (1978) Competition for pollination and sequential flowering in two Colorado wildflowers. Ecology 59:934–944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Waser NM (1983) Competition for pollination and floral character differences among sympatric plant species: a review of evidence. In: Jones CE, Little RJ (eds) Handbook of experimental pollination biology. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp 277–293Google Scholar
  68. Westphal C, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2003) Mass-flowering crops enhance pollinator densities at a landscape scale. Ecol Lett 6:961–965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Westrich P (1996) Habitat requirements of central European bees and the problems of partial habitats. In: Matheson A, Buchmann SL, O’Toole C, Westrich P, Williams H (eds) The Conservation of bees. Linnaean Society of London and the International Bee Research Association. Academic Press, London, pp 1–16Google Scholar
  70. Wheelwright NT, Dukeshire EE, Fontaine JB, Gutow SH, Moeller DA, Schuetz JG, Smith TM, Rodgers SL, Zink AG (2006) Pollinator limitation, autogamy and minimal inbreeding depression in insect-pollinated plants on a boreal island. Am Midl Nat 155:19–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katie V. Spellman
    • 1
  • Laura C. Schneller
    • 2
  • Christa P. H. Mulder
    • 1
  • Matthew L. Carlson
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Biology and Wildlife, Institute of Arctic BiologyUniversity of Alaska FairbanksFairbanksUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of Alaska AnchorageAnchorageUSA
  3. 3.Alaska Natural Heritage ProgramUniversity of Alaska AnchorageAnchorageUSA

Personalised recommendations